Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 3/2012

01.05.2012 | Original article

Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas

Long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial

verfasst von: Yuji Nimura, Masato Nagino, Sonshin Takao, Tadahiro Takada, Koji Miyazaki, Yoshifumi Kawarada, Shuichi Miyagawa, Akihiro Yamaguchi, Shuichi Ishiyama, Yutaka Takeda, Kourou Sakoda, Taira Kinoshita, Kenzo Yasui, Hiroshi Shimada, Hiroyuki Katoh

Erschienen in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The value of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer has been evaluated by many retrospective studies and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, the protocols used and the results found in the 3 RCTs were diverse. Therefore, a multicenter RCT was proposed in 1998 to evaluate the primary end point of long-term survival and the secondary end points of morbidity, mortality and quality of life of patients undergoing standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical PD for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

From March 2000 to May 2003, 112 patients with potentially curable pancreatic head cancer were enrolled and intraoperatively randomized to a standard or extended lymphadenectomy group. No resected patients received any adjuvant treatments.

Results

A hundred and one eligible patients were analyzed. Demographic and histopathological characteristics of the two groups were similar. The mean operating time, intraoperative blood loss and number of retrieved lymph nodes were greater in the extended group, but the other operative results were comparable.

Conclusions

Although this multicenter RCT was conducted in a strict setting, extended lymphadenectomy in radical PD did not benefit long-term survival in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer and led to levels of morbidity, mortality and quality of life comparable to those found after standard lymphadenectomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortner JG. Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery. 1973;73:307–20.PubMed Fortner JG. Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery. 1973;73:307–20.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortner JG, Kim DK, Cubilla A, Turnbull A, Pahnke LD, Shils ME, et al. Regional pancreatectomy: en bloc pancreatic, portal vein and lymph node resection. Ann Surg. 1977;186:42–50.PubMedCrossRef Fortner JG, Kim DK, Cubilla A, Turnbull A, Pahnke LD, Shils ME, et al. Regional pancreatectomy: en bloc pancreatic, portal vein and lymph node resection. Ann Surg. 1977;186:42–50.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishikawa O, Ohhigashi H, Sasaki Y, Kabuto T, Fukuda I, Furukawa H, et al. Practical usefulness of lymphatic and connective tissue clearance for the carcinoma of the pancreas head. Ann Surg. 1988;208:215–20.PubMedCrossRef Ishikawa O, Ohhigashi H, Sasaki Y, Kabuto T, Fukuda I, Furukawa H, et al. Practical usefulness of lymphatic and connective tissue clearance for the carcinoma of the pancreas head. Ann Surg. 1988;208:215–20.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Manabe T, Ohshio G, Baba N, Miyashita T, Asano N, Tamura K, et al. Radical pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer. 1989;64:1132–7.PubMedCrossRef Manabe T, Ohshio G, Baba N, Miyashita T, Asano N, Tamura K, et al. Radical pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer. 1989;64:1132–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, Furukawa H, Sasaki Y, Fujita M, et al. Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein. Ann Surg. 1992;215:231–6.PubMedCrossRef Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, Furukawa H, Sasaki Y, Fujita M, et al. Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein. Ann Surg. 1992;215:231–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, Ohta T, Takeda T, Miyazaki I. An evaluation of radical resection for pancreatic cancer based on the mode of recurrence as determined by autopsy and diagnostic imaging. Cancer. 1993;72:2118–23.PubMedCrossRef Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, Ohta T, Takeda T, Miyazaki I. An evaluation of radical resection for pancreatic cancer based on the mode of recurrence as determined by autopsy and diagnostic imaging. Cancer. 1993;72:2118–23.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sindelar WF. Clinical experience with regional pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg. 1989;124:127–32.PubMedCrossRef Sindelar WF. Clinical experience with regional pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg. 1989;124:127–32.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Satake K, Nishiwaki H, Yokomatsu H, Kawazoe Y, Kim K, Haku A, et al. Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;175:259–65.PubMed Satake K, Nishiwaki H, Yokomatsu H, Kawazoe Y, Kim K, Haku A, et al. Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;175:259–65.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagakawa T, Nagamori M, Futakami F, Tsukioka Y, Kayahara M, Ohta T, et al. Results of extensive surgery for pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;77:640–5.PubMedCrossRef Nagakawa T, Nagamori M, Futakami F, Tsukioka Y, Kayahara M, Ohta T, et al. Results of extensive surgery for pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;77:640–5.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirata K, Sato T, Mukaiya M, Yamashiro K, Kimura M, Sasaki K, et al. Results of 1001 pancreatic resections for invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg. 1997;132:771–6.PubMedCrossRef Hirata K, Sato T, Mukaiya M, Yamashiro K, Kimura M, Sasaki K, et al. Results of 1001 pancreatic resections for invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg. 1997;132:771–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukaiya M, Hirata K, Satoh T, Kimura M, Yamashiro K, Ura H, et al. Lack of survival benefit of extended lymph node dissection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: retrospective multi-institutional analysis in Japan. World J Surg. 1998;22:248–53.PubMedCrossRef Mukaiya M, Hirata K, Satoh T, Kimura M, Yamashiro K, Ura H, et al. Lack of survival benefit of extended lymph node dissection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: retrospective multi-institutional analysis in Japan. World J Surg. 1998;22:248–53.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Henne-Bruns D, Vogel I, Lüttges J, Klöppel G, Kremer B. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head: survival after regional versus extended lymphadenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:855–66.PubMed Henne-Bruns D, Vogel I, Lüttges J, Klöppel G, Kremer B. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head: survival after regional versus extended lymphadenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:855–66.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gazzaniga GM, Cappato S, Papadia F, Mori L, Filauro M. D1 versus D2 pancreatoduodenectomy in surgical therapy of pancreatic head cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1471–8.PubMed Gazzaniga GM, Cappato S, Papadia F, Mori L, Filauro M. D1 versus D2 pancreatoduodenectomy in surgical therapy of pancreatic head cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1471–8.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Iacono C, Accordini S, Bortolasi L, Facci E, Zamboni G, Montresor E, et al. Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: extended versus standard procedure. World J Surg. 2002;26:1309–14.PubMedCrossRef Iacono C, Accordini S, Bortolasi L, Facci E, Zamboni G, Montresor E, et al. Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: extended versus standard procedure. World J Surg. 2002;26:1309–14.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg. 1998;228:508–17.PubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg. 1998;228:508–17.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Coleman J, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome. Ann Surg. 1999;229:613–24.PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Coleman J, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome. Ann Surg. 1999;229:613–24.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg. 2002;236:355–68.PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg. 2002;236:355–68.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma—part 3: update on 5-year survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1191–206.PubMedCrossRef Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma—part 3: update on 5-year survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1191–206.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, DiMagno EP, Burgart LJ, Dahl TR, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2005;138:618–30.PubMedCrossRef Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, DiMagno EP, Burgart LJ, Dahl TR, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2005;138:618–30.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd.; 1996. Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd.; 1996.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd.; 2003. Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd.; 2003.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985;120:899–903.PubMedCrossRef Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985;120:899–903.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Further evidence of effective adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 1987;59:2006–10.CrossRef Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Further evidence of effective adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 1987;59:2006–10.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, Almond J, Link K, Beger H, et al. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:1576–85.PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, Almond J, Link K, Beger H, et al. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:1576–85.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn JA, Hickey H, et al. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–10.PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn JA, Hickey H, et al. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–10.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Farnell MB, Aranha GV, Nimura Y, Michelassi F. The role of extended lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: strength of the evidence. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:651–6.PubMedCrossRef Farnell MB, Aranha GV, Nimura Y, Michelassi F. The role of extended lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: strength of the evidence. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:651–6.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen TC, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Campbell KA, Coleman J, et al. Standard vs. radical pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: a prospective, randomized trial evaluating quality of life in pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:1–11.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen TC, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Campbell KA, Coleman J, et al. Standard vs. radical pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: a prospective, randomized trial evaluating quality of life in pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:1–11.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt CM. Extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: less is more. Am J Oncol Rev. 2006;5:302–6. Schmidt CM. Extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: less is more. Am J Oncol Rev. 2006;5:302–6.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Friess H. Systemic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:265–73.PubMedCrossRef Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Friess H. Systemic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:265–73.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas
Long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial
verfasst von
Yuji Nimura
Masato Nagino
Sonshin Takao
Tadahiro Takada
Koji Miyazaki
Yoshifumi Kawarada
Shuichi Miyagawa
Akihiro Yamaguchi
Shuichi Ishiyama
Yutaka Takeda
Kourou Sakoda
Taira Kinoshita
Kenzo Yasui
Hiroshi Shimada
Hiroyuki Katoh
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1868-6974
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-6982
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0466-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.