nach oben

European Spine Journal

Erschienen in:

01.06.2011 | Review Article

Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

verfasst von: Nai-Feng Tian, Qi-Shan Huang, Ping Zhou, Yang Zhou, Rui-Kai Wu, Yi Lou, Hua-Zi Xu

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Studies revealed that navigation systems that provided intraoperative assistance might improve pedicle screw insertion accuracy, and also implied that different systems provided different pedicle screw insertion accuracy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to focus on the pedicle screw insertion accuracy with or without the assistance of image-guided system, and the variance among the different navigation systems. Comparative studies were searched on pedicle screw insertion accuracy between conventional and navigated method, and among different navigation systems. A total of 43 papers, including 28 clinical, 14 cadaveric and 1 model studies, were included in the current study. For clinical articles, there were 3 randomized clinical trials, 4 prospective comparative studies and 21 retrospective comparative studies. The incidence of pedicle violation among computer tomography-based navigation method group was statistically significantly less than that observed among the conventional group (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.32–0.60; in vitro: 0.24–0.75 P < 0.01). Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation system (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.27–0.48; in vitro: 0.43–0.88 P < 0.01) and three-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.09–0.38; in vitro: 0.09–0.36 P < 0.01) also obtained significant reduced screw deviation rate over traditional methods. Between navigated approaches, statistically insignificant individual and pooled RR values were observed for all in vivo subgroups. Pooled estimate of in vitro studies show that computer tomography-based and three-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system provided more accurate pedicle screw insertion over two-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system. Our review showed that navigation provided a higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws compared with conventional methods. The superiority of navigation systems was obvious when they were applied to abnormal spinal structure. Although no strong in vivo evidence has detected significantly different pedicle screw placement accuracy among the three major navigation systems, meta-analysis revealed the variance in pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different navigation methods.

Harrington PR, Tullos HS (1969) Reduction of severe spondylolisthesis in children. South Med J 62:1–7PubMedCrossRef

Xu R, Zhao L, Chai B et al (2009) Lateral radiological evaluation of transarticular screw placement in the lower cervical spine. Eur Spine J 18:392–397PubMedCrossRef

Bayley E, Zia Z, Kerslake R et al (2010) Lamina-guided lateral mass screw placement in the sub-axial cervical spine. Eur Spine J 19:660–664PubMedCrossRef

Husted DS, Yue JJ, Fairchild TA et al (2003) An extrapedicular approach to the placement of screws in the thoracic spine: an anatomic and radiographic assessment. Spine 28:2324–2330PubMedCrossRef

Tian NF, Xu HZ, Wang XY et al (2010) Morphometric comparisons between the pedicle and the pedicle rib unit in the immature Chinese thoracic spine: a computed tomographic assessment. Spine 35:1514–1519PubMedCrossRef

Lo YL, Dan YF, Teo A et al (2008) The value of bilateral ipsilateral and contralateral motor evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 17:S236–S238PubMedCrossRef

Sutter M, Eggspuehler A, Grob D et al (2007) The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients. Eur Spine J 16:S162–S170PubMedCrossRef

Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C (2007) Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 32:E111–E120PubMedCrossRef

Tian NF, Xu HZ (2009) Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 33:895–903PubMedCrossRef

10.

Nakanishi K, Tanaka M, Misawa H et al (2009) Usefulness of a navigation system in surgery for scoliosis: segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1211–1218PubMedCrossRef

11.

Arand M, Schempf M, Fleiter T et al (2006) Qualitative and quantitative accuracy of CAOS in a standardized in vitro spine model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 450:118–128PubMedCrossRef

12.

Fu TS, Wong CB, Tsai TT et al (2008) Pedicle screw insertion: computed tomography versus fluoroscopic image guidance. Int Orthop 32:517–521PubMedCrossRef

13.

Lee GY, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR (2007) Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the “open” lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:25–32PubMedCrossRef

14.

Lekovic GP, Potts EA, Karahalios DG et al (2007) A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Spine 7:393–398PubMedCrossRef

15.

Gruetzner PA, Waelti H, Vock B et al (2004) Navigation using fluoro-CT technology, concept and clinical experience in a new method for intraoperative navigation. Eur J Trauma 30:161–170CrossRef

16.

Nottmeier EW, Seemer W, Young PM (2009) Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using three-dimensional image guidance: experience in a large patient cohort. J Neurosurg Spine 10:33–39PubMedCrossRef

17.

Merloz P, Troccaz J, Vouaillat H et al (2007) Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 221:813–820

18.

Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P et al (2007) Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 32:E56–E64PubMedCrossRef

19.

Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M et al (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 25:606–614PubMedCrossRef

20.

Ito H, Neo M, Yoshida M et al (2007) Efficacy of computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion for cervical instability in RA patients. Rheumatol Int 27:567–574PubMedCrossRef

21.

Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M et al (2007) Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique. Spine 32:1543–1550PubMedCrossRef

22.

Laine T, Schlenzka D, Mäkitalo K et al (1997) Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine 22:1254–1258PubMedCrossRef

23.

Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M et al (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240PubMedCrossRef

24.

Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L et al (1998) Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:39–48PubMedCrossRef

25.

Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R (2005) Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine 30:2280–2287PubMedCrossRef

26.

Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Nakamura H et al (2008) Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scoliosis using computer-assisted surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:181–186PubMedCrossRef

27.

Arand M, Hartwig E, Hebold D et al (2001) Precision analysis of navigation-assisted implanted thoracic and lumbar pedicled screws. A prospective clinical study. Unfallchirurg 104:1076–1081PubMedCrossRef

28.

Schnake KJ, König B, Berth U et al (2004) Accuracy of CT-based navigation of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine compared with conventional technique. Unfallchirurg 107:104–112PubMedCrossRef

29.

Seller K, Wild A, Urselmann L et al (2005) Prospective screw misplacement analysis after conventional and navigated pedicle screw implantation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 50:287–292CrossRef

30.

Huang Y, Kong R, Fang SY et al (2009) Comparison study between C-arm X-ray and 3D CT in guiding thoracolumbar pedicle screw fixation. Shandong Med J (Chin) 49:5–7

31.

Li Y (2007) The study of clinical anatomy of cervical pedicle with Iso-C arm and clinical application of Iso-C navigation system. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University (Chin) (5)

32.

Liu YJ, Tian W, Liu B et al (2005) Accuracy of CT-based navigation of pedicle screws implantation in the cervical spine compared with X-ray fluoroscopy technique. Chin J Surg (Chin) 43:1328–1330

33.

Yang YH, Ye H, Zheng J et al (2005) Application of orthopaedic guidance for pedicle screw fixation of spine. Orthop J Chin (Chin) 13:75–76

34.

Xu L, Yu X, Zheng DB et al (2004) Preliminary application of spinal navigation with the intra-operative 3D-imaging modality in pedicle screw fixation. Orthop J Chin (Chin) 12:1895–1897

35.

Yang LL, Chen HJ, Chen DY et al (2007) Clinical applications of computer assisted navigation technique in scoliosis surgery. Orthop J Chin (Chin) 15:1773–1776

36.

Zhang DS, Yuan JT, Zheng J et al (2008) Pedicle screw placement under the guidance of computer-assisted navigation system. Chin J Min Inv Surg (Chin) 8:544–546

37.

Li SG, Sheng L, Zhao H et al (2009) Computer-assisted navigation technique in the spinal pedicle screw internal fixation. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res (Chin) 13:3365–3369

38.

Tian W, Liu B, Li Q et al (2003) Experience of pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine using navigation system. J Spinal Surg (Chin) 1:15–18

39.

Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B et al (2002) Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine 27:2503–2508PubMedCrossRef

40.

Choi WW, Green BA, Levi AD (2000) Computer-assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion. Neurosurgery 47:872–878PubMedCrossRef

41.

Mirza SK, Wiggins GC, Kuntz C et al (2003) Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study. Spine 28:402–413PubMed

42.

Sagi HC, Manos R, Park SC et al (2003) Electromagnetic field-based image-guided spine surgery part two: results of a cadaveric study evaluating thoracic pedicle screw placement. Spine 28:E351–E354PubMedCrossRef

43.

Sagi HC, Manos R, Benz R et al (2003) Electromagnetic field-based image-guided spine surgery part one: results of a cadaveric study evaluating lumbar pedicle screw placement. Spine 28:2013–2018PubMedCrossRef

44.

Assaker R, Reyns N, Vinchon M et al (2001) Transpedicular screw placement: image-guided versus lateral-view fluoroscopy: in vitro simulation. Spine 26:2160–2164PubMedCrossRef

45.

Hart RA, Hansen BL, Shea M et al (2005) Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison of image-guided and manual techniques in cadavers. Spine 30:E326–E331PubMedCrossRef

46.

John PS, James C, Antony J et al (2007) A novel computer-assisted technique for pedicle screw insertion. Int J Med Robot 3:59–63PubMed

47.

Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA et al (2000) Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine 25:1655–1667PubMedCrossRef

48.

Ludwig SC, Kowalski JM, Edwards CC et al (2000) Cervical pedicle screws: comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine 25:2675–2681PubMedCrossRef

49.

Tian W, Liu YJ, Liu B et al (2006) Experimental study and clinical applications of computer assisted navigation technique in spinal surgery. Chin J Orthop (Chin) 26:671–675

50.

He XS, Yang HL, Zhu RF et al (2008) Study on pedicle screw fixation of cervical spine assisted CT-based navigation system compared with the individual cervical peddle screws placement technique. Suzhou Univ J Med Sci (Chin) 28:415–417

51.

Xia Q, Yan SJ, Chen TY et al (2007) Application of computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation based on the C-arm X-ray in pedicle screw fixation. Fudan Univ J Med Sci (Chin) 34:873–876

52.

Lim MR, Girardi FP, Yoon SC et al (2005) Accuracy of computerized frameless stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spines. Spine 30:1793–1798PubMedCrossRef

53.

Rampersaud YR, Lee KS (2007) Fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw placement through a mature fusion mass: an assessment of 24 consecutive cases with independent analysis of computed tomography and clinical data. Spine 32:217–222PubMedCrossRef

54.

von Jako RA, Carrino JA, Yonemura KS et al (2009) Electromagnetic navigation for percutaneous guide-wire insertion: accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional fluoroscopic guidance. Neuroimage 47:T127–T132CrossRef

55.

Nakashima H, Sato K, Ando T et al (2009) Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:468–472PubMedCrossRef

56.

Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K et al (2010) Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 19:370–375PubMedCrossRef

57.

Sugano N (2003) Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery. J Orthop Sci 8:442–448PubMedCrossRef

58.

Kendo D, Citak M, Hüfner T et al (2007) Current concepts and applications of computer navigation in orthopedic trauma surgery. Central Eur J Med 2:392–403CrossRef

59.

Slomczykowski M, Roberto M, Schneeberger P et al (1999) Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. Spine 24:975–982PubMedCrossRef

60.

Gebhard FT, Kraus MD, Schneider E et al (2006) Does computer-assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? Spine 31:2024–2027PubMedCrossRef

61.

Tjardes T, Shafizadeh S, Rixen D et al (2010) Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions. Eur Spine J 19:25–45PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
verfasst von: Nai-Feng Tian
Qi-Shan Huang
Ping Zhou
Yang Zhou
Rui-Kai Wu
Yi Lou
Hua-Zi Xu
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1577-5

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2011

Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement

Mayfield head clamp and intracranial epidural hematoma

Sensitivity to change of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale

Anterior lumbar discectomy and disc replacement

Quantification of the Trömner signs: a sensitive marker for cervical spondylotic myelopathy