Erschienen in:
01.04.2004 | Original Article
Effects of two-levels, four-levels, and four-levels plus offset-hook posterior fixation techniques on protecting the surgical correction of unstable thoracolumbar vertebral fractures: a clinical study
verfasst von:
Erhan Serin, Lokman Karakurt, Erhan Yilmaz, Oktay Belhan, Tahir Varol
Erschienen in:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
|
Ausgabe 1/2004
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Following fracture reduction and initial reconstitution of spinal alignment, loss of correction over time is frequently observed after posterior instrumentation. The degree of stability to provide a favorable environment for protection of initial correction is not known. A total of 36 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were divided into three groups. Group 1 included 12 patients treated by two-levels fixation, group 2 included ten patients treated by four-levels fixation, and group 3 included 14 patients treated by four-levels plus offset-hook fixation. Preoperative, early postoperative, and 1-year follow-up lateral spinal radiographs were evaluated by measuring the local kyphosis angle (LKA), the percentage of anterior body-height compression (%ABC), and the sagittal index (SI). For protecting the initial correction of LKA, group 3 was superior to the other groups (P<0.05). For protecting the initial correction of %ABC, groups 2 and 3 were the same (P>0.05), and these two groups were superior to group 1 (P<0.05). For protecting the initial correction of SI, group 3 was superior to group 1 (P<0.05), and the other groups were the same (P>0.05). Group 1 had a significant failure rate compared to the other groups (P<0.05). Two-levels fixation was the least stable system, and four-levels fixation plus offset hook was the most stable.