Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2010

01.12.2010 | Original Article

Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM)

verfasst von: Felix Roeder, Dan Brüllmann, Bernd d’Hoedt, Ralf Schulze

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 6/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A reference-based radiographic “reference sphere method” (RSM) for accurate length measurements in (dental) projection radiographs for the assessment of tooth length in dry human mandible sections is evaluated. RSM determines the depth coordinates of reference spheres placed in the object plane from the elliptical distortion of their shadows. Two segments (one canine and one molar) of dry human mandibles were exposed 95 times at different angulations (0–40°) on a dental charge-coupled device receptor. Three steel spheres (diameters d 1 = 2.00 mm, d 2 = 3.00 mm) were attached roughly coplanar with the tooth’s main axis. Radiographs were assessed once by visual inspection plus manual landmark identification with a mouse-driven cursor. The results were compared to the true tooth length assessed after extraction and to a conventional method (C), i.e., the rule of proportion based on magnification of the sphere shadows. Mean relative length error was 2.28% (d 1) and 0.46% (d 2) for RSM and −13.58% (d 1) and −9.90% (d 2) for C. For both methods, length errors were significantly (p < 0.0001) correlated with the inclination relative to the receptor. RSM allows for complete a posteriori determination of the imaging geometry under the assumption of a known source-to-receptor distance. One specific application is foreshortening correction of objects coplanar with the reference spheres. Remaining errors are mainly due to incorrect landmark definition. In our setup, these were exaggerated by the visual/manual image-evaluation process. Automated image analysis has been shown for similar tasks to minimize these errors considerably.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Aken J (1969) Optimum conditions for intraoral roentgenograms. Oral Surg 27:475–491CrossRef Van Aken J (1969) Optimum conditions for intraoral roentgenograms. Oral Surg 27:475–491CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2002) A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in “paralleling technique”. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:32–38CrossRefPubMed Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2002) A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in “paralleling technique”. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:32–38CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim TS, Obst C, Zehaczek S, Geenen C (2008) Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients. J Periodontol 79:1141–1149CrossRefPubMed Kim TS, Obst C, Zehaczek S, Geenen C (2008) Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients. J Periodontol 79:1141–1149CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Steffensen B, Suzuki H, Caffesse RG, Ash MM (1987) Repair of periodontal angular bony defects evaluated by one- and two-dimensional radiographic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 63:109–114 Steffensen B, Suzuki H, Caffesse RG, Ash MM (1987) Repair of periodontal angular bony defects evaluated by one- and two-dimensional radiographic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 63:109–114
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Benn DK (1990) A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes. J Clin Periodontol 17:14–21CrossRefPubMed Benn DK (1990) A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes. J Clin Periodontol 17:14–21CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Eickholz P, Riess T, Lenhard M, Haßfeld S, Staehle HJ (1999) Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss. J Clin Periodontol 26:294–300CrossRefPubMed Eickholz P, Riess T, Lenhard M, Haßfeld S, Staehle HJ (1999) Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss. J Clin Periodontol 26:294–300CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S (2006) A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 32:624–627CrossRefPubMed Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S (2006) A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 32:624–627CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2001) Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:364–371CrossRefPubMed Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2001) Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:364–371CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne AGT, Solomons YF, Lowine JF (1999) Standardization of radiographs for mandibular implant-supported overdentures: review and innovation. Clin Oral Implants Res 10:307–319CrossRefPubMed Payne AGT, Solomons YF, Lowine JF (1999) Standardization of radiographs for mandibular implant-supported overdentures: review and innovation. Clin Oral Implants Res 10:307–319CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon CA, Hildebolt CF (2005) An overview of radiographic film holders. Dentmaxillofac Radiol 34:67–73CrossRef Dixon CA, Hildebolt CF (2005) An overview of radiographic film holders. Dentmaxillofac Radiol 34:67–73CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubrez B, Jacot-Dsecombes S, Cimasoni G (1995) Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:358–364CrossRefPubMed Dubrez B, Jacot-Dsecombes S, Cimasoni G (1995) Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:358–364CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J (1991) In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 62:674–683PubMed Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J (1991) In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 62:674–683PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Eickholz P, Hausmann E (2000) Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 108:70–73CrossRefPubMed Eickholz P, Hausmann E (2000) Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 108:70–73CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Behneke N, Tetsch P (1985) Diagnostik und Planung von Implantaten im zahnlosen Unterkiefer. Fortsch Zahnärztl Implantol 1:266–271 Behneke N, Tetsch P (1985) Diagnostik und Planung von Implantaten im zahnlosen Unterkiefer. Fortsch Zahnärztl Implantol 1:266–271
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze R, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d’Hoedt B (2004) Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography. Med Phys 31:2849–2854CrossRefPubMed Schulze R, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d’Hoedt B (2004) Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography. Med Phys 31:2849–2854CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilbert D, Cohn-Vossen S (1999) The cylinder, the cone, the conic sections and their surfaces of revolution. In: Geometry and the imagination, 2nd edn. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, pp 7–9 Hilbert D, Cohn-Vossen S (1999) The cylinder, the cone, the conic sections and their surfaces of revolution. In: Geometry and the imagination, 2nd edn. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, pp 7–9
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bronstein IN, Semendjajew KA, Musiol G, Mühlig H (2000) Analytische Geometrie des Raumes. In: Taschenbuch der Mathematik, 5th edn. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun und Frankfurt am Main, pp 220–226 Bronstein IN, Semendjajew KA, Musiol G, Mühlig H (2000) Analytische Geometrie des Raumes. In: Taschenbuch der Mathematik, 5th edn. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun und Frankfurt am Main, pp 220–226
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzal A (2009) Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Invest (in press) Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzal A (2009) Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Invest (in press)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyndall AA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637CrossRefPubMed Tyndall AA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D (2002) Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 4:156–172CrossRefPubMed BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D (2002) Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 4:156–172CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Volchansky A, Cleaton-Jones P, Drummond S, Bönecker M (2006) Technique for linear measurement on panoramic and periapical radiographs: a pilot study. Quintessence Int 37:191–197PubMed Volchansky A, Cleaton-Jones P, Drummond S, Bönecker M (2006) Technique for linear measurement on panoramic and periapical radiographs: a pilot study. Quintessence Int 37:191–197PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze R, Heil U, Weinheimer O, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Thomas E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E (2008) Accurate registration of random radiographic projections based on three spherical references for the purpose of few-view 3D reconstruction. Med Phys 35:546–555CrossRefPubMed Schulze R, Heil U, Weinheimer O, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Thomas E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E (2008) Accurate registration of random radiographic projections based on three spherical references for the purpose of few-view 3D reconstruction. Med Phys 35:546–555CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze R, Weinheimer O, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d’Hoedt B, Schoemer E (2005) Software for automated application of a reference-based method for a posteriori determination of the effective radiographic image geometry. Dentmaxillofac Radiol 34:205–211CrossRef Schulze R, Weinheimer O, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d’Hoedt B, Schoemer E (2005) Software for automated application of a reference-based method for a posteriori determination of the effective radiographic image geometry. Dentmaxillofac Radiol 34:205–211CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Weijers RE, Kessels AG, Walenkamp GH, van Mameren H, Kemerink GJ (2005) Effect of tube angulation on the measurement of intermetatarsal angles. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95:370–375PubMed Weijers RE, Kessels AG, Walenkamp GH, van Mameren H, Kemerink GJ (2005) Effect of tube angulation on the measurement of intermetatarsal angles. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95:370–375PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Weijers R, Kemerink G, van Mameren H, Walenkamp G, Kessels AG (2005) The intermetatarsal and metatarsal declination angles: geometry as a source of error. Foot Ankle Int 26:387–393PubMed Weijers R, Kemerink G, van Mameren H, Walenkamp G, Kessels AG (2005) The intermetatarsal and metatarsal declination angles: geometry as a source of error. Foot Ankle Int 26:387–393PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Camasta CA, Pontious J, Boyd RB (1991) Quantifying magnification in pedal radiographs. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 81:545–548PubMed Camasta CA, Pontious J, Boyd RB (1991) Quantifying magnification in pedal radiographs. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 81:545–548PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng AC, Lew KK, Bhole S (1997) Head positioning and projection errors in submentovertex radiographic analysis. Singapore Dent J 22:13–17PubMed Cheng AC, Lew KK, Bhole S (1997) Head positioning and projection errors in submentovertex radiographic analysis. Singapore Dent J 22:13–17PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Malkoc S, Sari Z, Usumez S, Koyuturk AE (2005) The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 27:315–321CrossRefPubMed Malkoc S, Sari Z, Usumez S, Koyuturk AE (2005) The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 27:315–321CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon YJ, Kim KS, Hwang MS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW (2001) Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 71:396–403PubMed Yoon YJ, Kim KS, Hwang MS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW (2001) Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 71:396–403PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon YJ, Kim DH, Yu PS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW (2002) Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 72:36–42PubMed Yoon YJ, Kim DH, Yu PS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW (2002) Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 72:36–42PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Reikeras O (1996) Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion–extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 11:457–465CrossRef Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Reikeras O (1996) Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion–extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 11:457–465CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Leivseth G, Kolstad F, Nygaard OP, Zoega B, Frobin W, Brinckmann P (2006) Comparing precision of distortion-compensated and stereophotogrammetric roentgen analysis when monitoring fusion in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 15:774–779CrossRefPubMed Leivseth G, Kolstad F, Nygaard OP, Zoega B, Frobin W, Brinckmann P (2006) Comparing precision of distortion-compensated and stereophotogrammetric roentgen analysis when monitoring fusion in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 15:774–779CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Owens EF Jr (1992) Line drawing analysis of static cervical X ray used in chiropractic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 15:442–449PubMed Owens EF Jr (1992) Line drawing analysis of static cervical X ray used in chiropractic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 15:442–449PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM)
verfasst von
Felix Roeder
Dan Brüllmann
Bernd d’Hoedt
Ralf Schulze
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0350-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2010

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.