Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2011

01.06.2011 | Original Article

Ink-jet printout of radiographs on transparent film and glossy paper versus monitor display: an ROC analysis

verfasst von: Sebastian Kühl, Frank Krummenauer, Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt, Thomas J. Lambrecht, Bernd d’Hoedt, Ralf Kurt Willy Schulze

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the depiction ability of small grayscale contrasts in ink-jet printouts of digital radiographs on different print media with CRT monitor. A CCD-based digital cephalometric image of a stepless aluminum wedge containing 50 bur holes of different depth was cut into 100 isometric images. Each image was printed on glossy paper and on transparent film by means of a high-resolution desktop inkjet printer at specific settings. The printed images were viewed under standardized conditions, and the perceptibility of the bur holes was evaluated and compared to the perceptibility on a 17-in CRT monitor. Thirty observers stated their blinded decision on a five-point confidence scale. Areas (Az) under receiver operating characteristics curves were calculated and compared using the pair wise sign tests. Overall agreement was estimated using Cohen’s kappa device and observer bias using McNemar’s test. Glossy paper prints and monitor display revealed significantly higher (P < 0.001) average Az values (0.83) compared to prints on transparent film (0.79), which was caused by higher sensitivity. Specificity was similar for all modalities. The sensitivity was dependent on the mean gray scale values for the transparent film.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Geissler O, Rother U (2007) The film-based printout using tetenal printing solution II. Int J Comput Dent 10:285–291PubMed Geissler O, Rother U (2007) The film-based printout using tetenal printing solution II. Int J Comput Dent 10:285–291PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenzel A (1999) Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int J Comput Dent 2:269–290PubMed Wenzel A (1999) Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int J Comput Dent 2:269–290PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze RKW, Schulze D, Voss K, Rottner M, Keller H-P, Dollmann K, Maager B, Wedel M (2008) Quality of individually calibrated customary printers for assessment of typical dental diagnoses on glossy paper prints: a multicenter pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:578–586PubMedCrossRef Schulze RKW, Schulze D, Voss K, Rottner M, Keller H-P, Dollmann K, Maager B, Wedel M (2008) Quality of individually calibrated customary printers for assessment of typical dental diagnoses on glossy paper prints: a multicenter pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:578–586PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Combs MJ, Snell J, Cail WS, Maier T, Buck DA (1995) The gray-scale ink jet printer: value in making hard copies of digital images. Am J Roentgenol 164:225–227 Combs MJ, Snell J, Cail WS, Maier T, Buck DA (1995) The gray-scale ink jet printer: value in making hard copies of digital images. Am J Roentgenol 164:225–227
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkhorn T, Kehler M, Nilsson J, Lyttkens K, Andersson B, Holmer N-G (1994) Demonstration of digital radiographs by means of ink jet-printed paper copies: pilot study. J Digit Imaging 5:246–251CrossRef Kirkhorn T, Kehler M, Nilsson J, Lyttkens K, Andersson B, Holmer N-G (1994) Demonstration of digital radiographs by means of ink jet-printed paper copies: pilot study. J Digit Imaging 5:246–251CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyttkens K, Kirkhorn T, Kehler M, Andersson B, Ebbesen A, Hochbergs P, Jarlman O, Lindberg C-G, Holmer N-G (1994) Evaluation of the image quality of ink jet-printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study. J Digit Imaging 7:61–68PubMedCrossRef Lyttkens K, Kirkhorn T, Kehler M, Andersson B, Ebbesen A, Hochbergs P, Jarlman O, Lindberg C-G, Holmer N-G (1994) Evaluation of the image quality of ink jet-printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study. J Digit Imaging 7:61–68PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Pauwels H, Jacobs R (2004) Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media. Clin Oral Investig 8:25–29PubMedCrossRef Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Pauwels H, Jacobs R (2004) Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media. Clin Oral Investig 8:25–29PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Otis L, Sherman RG (2005) Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print. J Am Dent Assoc 136:323–300PubMed Otis L, Sherman RG (2005) Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print. J Am Dent Assoc 136:323–300PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman LR, Wilson CR, Foley WD (1988) Digital radiography of the chest: promises and problems. Am J Roentgenol 150:1241–1252 Goodman LR, Wilson CR, Foley WD (1988) Digital radiography of the chest: promises and problems. Am J Roentgenol 150:1241–1252
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein LM, Fitzer MS, Fitzer PM (1975) Detail enhancement in prints of radiographs. use of a linear radial transmission filter. Radiology 115:726–728PubMed Weinstein LM, Fitzer MS, Fitzer PM (1975) Detail enhancement in prints of radiographs. use of a linear radial transmission filter. Radiology 115:726–728PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bley TA, Kotter E, Saueressig U, Springer OS, Fisch D, Ghanem NA, Langer M (2003) Using receiver operating characteristic methodology to evaluate the diagnostic quality of radiography on paper print versus film. AJR Am Roentgenol 181:1487–1490 Bley TA, Kotter E, Saueressig U, Springer OS, Fisch D, Ghanem NA, Langer M (2003) Using receiver operating characteristic methodology to evaluate the diagnostic quality of radiography on paper print versus film. AJR Am Roentgenol 181:1487–1490
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bednarek DR, Rudin S (1991) Blurred-mask density compression for improved reproduction of radiographs. Invest Radiol 26:358–363PubMedCrossRef Bednarek DR, Rudin S (1991) Blurred-mask density compression for improved reproduction of radiographs. Invest Radiol 26:358–363PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Benediktsdottir I, Wenzel A (2004) Accuracy of digital panoramic images displayed on monitor, glossy paper, and film for assessment of mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:217–222PubMedCrossRef Benediktsdottir I, Wenzel A (2004) Accuracy of digital panoramic images displayed on monitor, glossy paper, and film for assessment of mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:217–222PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Agresti A (1989) An agreement model with kappa as parameter. Stat Probab Lett 7:271–273CrossRef Agresti A (1989) An agreement model with kappa as parameter. Stat Probab Lett 7:271–273CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubert L, Golledge RG (1983) Rater agreement for complex assessments. Brit J Math Stat Psychol 36:207–216 Hubert L, Golledge RG (1983) Rater agreement for complex assessments. Brit J Math Stat Psychol 36:207–216
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Ink-jet printout of radiographs on transparent film and glossy paper versus monitor display: an ROC analysis
verfasst von
Sebastian Kühl
Frank Krummenauer
Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt
Thomas J. Lambrecht
Bernd d’Hoedt
Ralf Kurt Willy Schulze
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0400-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.