Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2013

01.12.2013 | Original Article

Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group

verfasst von: Takafumi Oshita, Hiroaki Itamochi, Ryuichiro Nishimura, Fumitaka Numa, Kazuhiro Takehara, Masamichi Hiura, Hirotoshi Tanimoto, Jun Noma, Ryoji Hayase, Akihiro Murakami, Hideo Fujimoto, Yasunobu Kanamori, Fuminori Kitada, Keiji Shitsukawa, Makoto Nagaji, Yukihisa Minagawa, Michihisa Fujiwara, Junzo Kigawa

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The therapeutic value of systematic lymphadenectomy for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is controversial. This study evaluates the survival impact and adverse events of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with pT1 and pT2 EOC.

Methods

A retrospective investigation was performed using data from patients with pT1 and pT2 EOC at multi-institutions belonging to the Sankai Gynecologic Study Group (SGSG). We selected patients who had undergone systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Group LA) (n = 284) and patients who had not undergone lymph node resection (Group no-LA) (n = 138). Outcomes for patients and peri-operative adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results

The median operation time was significantly longer in Group LA (288 min) than in Group no-LA (128 min) (P < 0.0001). Total blood loss was significantly higher in Group LA, 43.7 % of patients receiving blood transfusions. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups for progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). However, for patients with pT2, PFS was significantly longer in Group LA than in Group no-LA (P = 0.0150). Lymph node metastases were detected in 23 cases (8.1 %) and these patients had significantly shorter PFS than those without metastasis (P = 0.0409). The outcome for patients who underwent chemotherapy after surgery was significantly improved in the Group no-LA, but no improvement was observed in Group LA.

Conclusions

Systematic lymphadenectomy may improve outcomes only in pT2 EOC patients with acceptable peri-operative events. Furthermore, accurate surgical staging may avoid unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy in selected early-stage cases.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90PubMedCrossRef
2.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cass I, Li AJ, Runowicz CD et al (2001) Pattern of lymph node metastases in clinically unilateral stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 80:56–61PubMedCrossRef Cass I, Li AJ, Runowicz CD et al (2001) Pattern of lymph node metastases in clinically unilateral stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 80:56–61PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Maggioni A, Benedetti Panici P, Dell’Anna T et al (2006) Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer 95:699–704PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Maggioni A, Benedetti Panici P, Dell’Anna T et al (2006) Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer 95:699–704PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsumura N, Sakuragi N, Hareyama H et al (1998) Distribution pattern and risk factors of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Cancer 79:526–530PubMedCrossRef Tsumura N, Sakuragi N, Hareyama H et al (1998) Distribution pattern and risk factors of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Cancer 79:526–530PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Panici PB, Angioli R (2002) Role of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16:529–551PubMedCrossRef Panici PB, Angioli R (2002) Role of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16:529–551PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK et al (2007) Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 109:12–19PubMedCrossRef Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK et al (2007) Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 109:12–19PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Re F, Baiocchi G (2000) Value of lymph node assessment in ovarian cancer: status of the art at the end of the second millennium. Int J Gynecol Cancer 10:435–442PubMedCrossRef Di Re F, Baiocchi G (2000) Value of lymph node assessment in ovarian cancer: status of the art at the end of the second millennium. Int J Gynecol Cancer 10:435–442PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Spirtos NM, Gross GM, Freddo JL et al (1995) Cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary: the impact of aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 56:345–352PubMedCrossRef Spirtos NM, Gross GM, Freddo JL et al (1995) Cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary: the impact of aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 56:345–352PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Panici PB, Maggioni A, Hacker N et al (2005) Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:560–566PubMedCrossRef Panici PB, Maggioni A, Hacker N et al (2005) Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:560–566PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M et al (1991) Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 40:103–106PubMedCrossRef Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M et al (1991) Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 40:103–106PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakuragi N, Yamada H, Oikawa M et al (2000) Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and clear cell histology in ovarian carcinoma limited to the pelvis (pT1M0 and pT2M0). Gynecol Oncol 79:251–255PubMedCrossRef Sakuragi N, Yamada H, Oikawa M et al (2000) Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and clear cell histology in ovarian carcinoma limited to the pelvis (pT1M0 and pT2M0). Gynecol Oncol 79:251–255PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Petru E, Lahousen M, Tamussino K et al (1994) Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:656–662PubMedCrossRef Petru E, Lahousen M, Tamussino K et al (1994) Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:656–662PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cliby WA, Aletti GD, Wilson TO et al (2006) Is it justified to classify patients to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only? Gynecol Oncol 103:797–801PubMedCrossRef Cliby WA, Aletti GD, Wilson TO et al (2006) Is it justified to classify patients to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only? Gynecol Oncol 103:797–801PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Harter P, Gnauert K, Hils R et al (2007) Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:1238–1244PubMedCrossRef Harter P, Gnauert K, Hils R et al (2007) Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:1238–1244PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki M, Ohwada M, Yamada T et al (2000) Lymph node metastasis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 79:305–308PubMedCrossRef Suzuki M, Ohwada M, Yamada T et al (2000) Lymph node metastasis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 79:305–308PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yokota H et al (1996) Assessment of metastases to aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A proposal for essential sites for lymph node biopsy. Cancer 78:803–808PubMedCrossRef Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yokota H et al (1996) Assessment of metastases to aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A proposal for essential sites for lymph node biopsy. Cancer 78:803–808PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter-Roach BA, Kitchener HC, Dickinson HO (2009) Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004706 Winter-Roach BA, Kitchener HC, Dickinson HO (2009) Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004706
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Trope C, Kaern J (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage ovarian cancer: review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 25:2909–2920PubMedCrossRef Trope C, Kaern J (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage ovarian cancer: review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 25:2909–2920PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Trimbos JB, Parmar M, Vergote I et al (2003) International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm trial 1 and Adjuvant ChemoTherapy In Ovarian Neoplasm trial: two parallel randomized phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:105–112PubMedCrossRef Trimbos JB, Parmar M, Vergote I et al (2003) International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm trial 1 and Adjuvant ChemoTherapy In Ovarian Neoplasm trial: two parallel randomized phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:105–112PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group
verfasst von
Takafumi Oshita
Hiroaki Itamochi
Ryuichiro Nishimura
Fumitaka Numa
Kazuhiro Takehara
Masamichi Hiura
Hirotoshi Tanimoto
Jun Noma
Ryoji Hayase
Akihiro Murakami
Hideo Fujimoto
Yasunobu Kanamori
Fuminori Kitada
Keiji Shitsukawa
Makoto Nagaji
Yukihisa Minagawa
Michihisa Fujiwara
Junzo Kigawa
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-012-0483-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.