Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6/2018

27.09.2018 | Research Article

Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear

verfasst von: Tom Francart, Konstantin Wiebe, Thomas Wesarg

Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Currently there is a growing population of cochlear-implant (CI) users with (near) normal hearing in the non-implanted ear. This configuration is often called SSD (single-sided deafness) CI. The goal of the CI is often to improve spatial perception, so the question raises to what extent SSD CI listeners are sensitive to interaural time differences (ITDs). In a controlled lab setup, sensitivity to ITDs was investigated in 11 SSD CI listeners. The stimuli were 100-pps pulse trains on the CI side and band-limited click trains on the acoustic side. After determining level balance and the delay needed to achieve synchronous stimulation of the two ears, the just noticeable difference in ITD was measured using an adaptive procedure. Seven out of 11 listeners were sensitive to ITDs, with a median just noticeable difference of 438 μs. Out of the four listeners who were not sensitive to ITD, one listener reported binaural fusion, and three listeners reported no binaural fusion. To enable ITD sensitivity, a frequency-dependent delay of the electrical stimulus was required to synchronize the electric and acoustic signals at the level of the auditory nerve. Using subjective fusion measures and refined by ITD sensitivity, it was possible to match a CI electrode to an acoustic frequency range. This shows the feasibility of these measures for the allocation of acoustic frequency ranges to electrodes when fitting a CI to a subject with (near) normal hearing in the contralateral ear.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47CrossRefPubMed Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgärtel RM, Hu H, Kollmeier B, Dietz M (2017) Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 141(4):2338–2352CrossRefPubMed Baumgärtel RM, Hu H, Kollmeier B, Dietz M (2017) Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 141(4):2338–2352CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C (2002) Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli”. J Acoust Soc Am 112(3 Pt 1):1026–1036CrossRefPubMed Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C (2002) Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli”. J Acoust Soc Am 112(3 Pt 1):1026–1036CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C (2015) Converging measures of binaural detection yield estimates of precision of coding of interaural temporal disparities. J Acoust Soc Am 138(5):EL474–EL479CrossRefPubMed Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C (2015) Converging measures of binaural detection yield estimates of precision of coding of interaural temporal disparities. J Acoust Soc Am 138(5):EL474–EL479CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C (2016) Behavioral manifestations of audiometrically-defined “slight” or “hidden” hearing loss revealed by measures of binaural detection. J Acoust Soc Am 140(5):3540–3548CrossRefPubMed Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C (2016) Behavioral manifestations of audiometrically-defined “slight” or “hidden” hearing loss revealed by measures of binaural detection. J Acoust Soc Am 140(5):3540–3548CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bernstein JGW, Stakhovskaya OA, Schuchman GI, Jensen KK, Goupell MJ (2018) Interaural time-difference discrimination as a measure of place of stimulation for cochlear-implant users with single-sided deafness. Trends Hear 22:2331216518765514 Bernstein JGW, Stakhovskaya OA, Schuchman GI, Jensen KK, Goupell MJ (2018) Interaural time-difference discrimination as a measure of place of stimulation for cochlear-implant users with single-sided deafness. Trends Hear 22:2331216518765514
Zurück zum Zitat Buechner A, Brendel M, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Wenzel G, Frohne-Buechner C, Jaeger B, Lenarz T (2010) Cochlear implantation in unilateral deaf subjects associated with ipsilateral tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 31(9):1381–1385PubMed Buechner A, Brendel M, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Wenzel G, Frohne-Buechner C, Jaeger B, Lenarz T (2010) Cochlear implantation in unilateral deaf subjects associated with ipsilateral tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 31(9):1381–1385PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Buss E, Dillon MT, Rooth MA, King ER, Deres EJ, Buchman CA, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD (2018) Effects of cochlear implantation on binaural hearing in adults with unilateral hearing loss. Trends Hear 22:2331216518771173 Buss E, Dillon MT, Rooth MA, King ER, Deres EJ, Buchman CA, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD (2018) Effects of cochlear implantation on binaural hearing in adults with unilateral hearing loss. Trends Hear 22:2331216518771173
Zurück zum Zitat Domnitz R (1973) The interaural time JND as a simultaneous function of interaural time and interaural amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 53(6):1549–1552CrossRefPubMed Domnitz R (1973) The interaural time JND as a simultaneous function of interaural time and interaural amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 53(6):1549–1552CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Don M, Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B (1998) The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies. J Acoust Soc Am 104(4):2280–2289CrossRefPubMed Don M, Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B (1998) The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies. J Acoust Soc Am 104(4):2280–2289CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Egger K, Majdak P, Laback B (2016) Channel interaction and current level affect across-electrode integration of interaural time differences in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17(1):55–67CrossRefPubMed Egger K, Majdak P, Laback B (2016) Channel interaction and current level affect across-electrode integration of interaural time differences in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17(1):55–67CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Feddersen WE (1957) Localization of high-frequency tones. J Acoust Soc Am 29(9):988–991CrossRef Feddersen WE (1957) Localization of high-frequency tones. J Acoust Soc Am 29(9):988–991CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Francart T, McDermott HJ (2013) Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation. Ear Hear 34(6):685–700CrossRefPubMed Francart T, McDermott HJ (2013) Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation. Ear Hear 34(6):685–700CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Francart T, Wouters J (2007) Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences. J Acoust Soc Am 122(5):2826–2831CrossRefPubMed Francart T, Wouters J (2007) Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences. J Acoust Soc Am 122(5):2826–2831CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J (2008) APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments. J Neurosci Methods 172(2):283–293 Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J (2008) APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments. J Neurosci Methods 172(2):283–293
Zurück zum Zitat Francart T, Brokx J, Wouters J (2009) Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10(1):131–141CrossRefPubMed Francart T, Brokx J, Wouters J (2009) Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10(1):131–141CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J (2011) Sensitivity of bimodal listeners to interaural time differences with modulated single- and multiple-channel stimuli. Audiol Neurootol 16(2):82–92CrossRefPubMed Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J (2011) Sensitivity of bimodal listeners to interaural time differences with modulated single- and multiple-channel stimuli. Audiol Neurootol 16(2):82–92CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J (2014) Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15(4):633–647CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J (2014) Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15(4):633–647CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Goupell MJ, Stoelb C, Kan A, Litovsky RY (2013) Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening. J Acoust Soc Am 133(4):2272–2287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goupell MJ, Stoelb C, Kan A, Litovsky RY (2013) Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening. J Acoust Soc Am 133(4):2272–2287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Hall JW (2007) New handbook of auditory evoked responses. Pearson Hall JW (2007) New handbook of auditory evoked responses. Pearson
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Dunn C (2013) Outcomes after cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness, including those with recalcitrant Ménière’s disease. Otol Neurotol 34(9):1681–1687CrossRefPubMed Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Dunn C (2013) Outcomes after cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness, including those with recalcitrant Ménière’s disease. Otol Neurotol 34(9):1681–1687CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hartmann WM, Raked B (1989) On the minimum audible angle–a decision theory approach. J Acoust Soc Am 85(5):2031–2041CrossRefPubMed Hartmann WM, Raked B (1989) On the minimum audible angle–a decision theory approach. J Acoust Soc Am 85(5):2031–2041CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel RJ (2007) Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 121(4):2192–2206CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJ (2007) Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 121(4):2192–2206CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM (1997) Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 102(1):495–507CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM (1997) Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 102(1):495–507CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel RJ, Tong YC, Hollow RD, Clark GM (1993) Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. J Acoust Soc Am 94(6):3178–3189CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJ, Tong YC, Hollow RD, Clark GM (1993) Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. J Acoust Soc Am 94(6):3178–3189CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel RJM, Jones GL, Litovsky RY (2009) Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10(4):557–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Hoesel RJM, Jones GL, Litovsky RY (2009) Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10(4):557–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Hu H, Dietz M (2015) Comparison of interaural electrode pairing methods for bilateral cochlear implants. Trends Hear 19:233121651561714CrossRef Hu H, Dietz M (2015) Comparison of interaural electrode pairing methods for bilateral cochlear implants. Trends Hear 19:233121651561714CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacob R, Stelzig Y, Nopp P, Schleich P (2011) Audiological results with cochlear implants for single-sided deafness. HNO 59(5):453–460CrossRefPubMed Jacob R, Stelzig Y, Nopp P, Schleich P (2011) Audiological results with cochlear implants for single-sided deafness. HNO 59(5):453–460CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kan A, Stoelb C, Litovsky RY, Goupell MJ (2013) Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 134(4):2923–2936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kan A, Stoelb C, Litovsky RY, Goupell MJ (2013) Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 134(4):2923–2936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Kitterick PT, Smith SN, Lucas L (2016) Hearing instruments for unilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear Hear 37(5):495–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kitterick PT, Smith SN, Lucas L (2016) Hearing instruments for unilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear Hear 37(5):495–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Kleine Punte A, Vermeire K, Hofkens A, De Bodt M, De Ridder D, de Heyning P (2011) Cochlear implantation as a durable tinnitus treatment in single-sided deafness. Cochlear Implant Int 12 Suppl 1:26–29 Kleine Punte A, Vermeire K, Hofkens A, De Bodt M, De Ridder D, de Heyning P (2011) Cochlear implantation as a durable tinnitus treatment in single-sided deafness. Cochlear Implant Int 12 Suppl 1:26–29
Zurück zum Zitat Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner WD (2007) Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 121(4):2182–2191CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner WD (2007) Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 121(4):2182–2191CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P (2015) Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 322:138–150CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P (2015) Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 322:138–150CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland JT, Svirsky M (2015) The relationship between insertion angles, default frequency allocations, and spiral ganglion place pitch in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 36(5):e207–e213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland JT, Svirsky M (2015) The relationship between insertion angles, default frequency allocations, and spiral ganglion place pitch in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 36(5):e207–e213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Lenssen A, Francart T, Brokx J, Wouters J (2011) Bimodal listeners are not sensitive to interaural time differences in unmodulated low-frequency stimuli (L). J Acoust Soc Am 129(6):3457–3460CrossRefPubMed Lenssen A, Francart T, Brokx J, Wouters J (2011) Bimodal listeners are not sensitive to interaural time differences in unmodulated low-frequency stimuli (L). J Acoust Soc Am 129(6):3457–3460CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Litovsky RY, Jones GL, Agrawal S, van Hoesel RJ (2010) Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 127(1):400–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Litovsky RY, Jones GL, Agrawal S, van Hoesel RJ (2010) Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 127(1):400–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Litovsky RY, Moua K, Godar S, Kan A, Misurelli SM, Lee DJ (2018) Restoration of spatial hearing in adult cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Hear Res Litovsky RY, Moua K, Godar S, Kan A, Misurelli SM, Lee DJ (2018) Restoration of spatial hearing in adult cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Hear Res
Zurück zum Zitat Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM (2003) Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am 114(3):1565–1574CrossRefPubMed Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM (2003) Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am 114(3):1565–1574CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ma N, Morris S, Kitterick PT (2016) Benefits to speech perception in noise from the binaural integration of electric and acoustic signals in simulated unilateral deafness. Ear Hear 37(3):248–259CrossRefPubMed Ma N, Morris S, Kitterick PT (2016) Benefits to speech perception in noise from the binaural integration of electric and acoustic signals in simulated unilateral deafness. Ear Hear 37(3):248–259CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Neely ST, Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Jesteadt W (1988) Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 83(2):652–656CrossRefPubMed Neely ST, Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Jesteadt W (1988) Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 83(2):652–656CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat NIDCD (2016) NIDCD fact sheet: who gets cochlear implants? Children and adults who are deaf or severely hard-of hearing can be fitted for cochlear implants NIDCD (2016) NIDCD fact sheet: who gets cochlear implants? Children and adults who are deaf or severely hard-of hearing can be fitted for cochlear implants
Zurück zum Zitat NIH (1995) NIH consensus conference. Cochlear implants in adults and children. JAMA 274(24):1955–1961CrossRef NIH (1995) NIH consensus conference. Cochlear implants in adults and children. JAMA 274(24):1955–1961CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nuetzel J, Hafter ER (1981) Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: spectral effects. J Acoust Soc Am 69(4):1112–1118CrossRef Nuetzel J, Hafter ER (1981) Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: spectral effects. J Acoust Soc Am 69(4):1112–1118CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oh Y, Reiss LAJ (2017) Binaural pitch fusion: pitch averaging and dominance in hearing-impaired listeners with broad fusion. J Acoust Soc Am 142(2):780–791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oh Y, Reiss LAJ (2017) Binaural pitch fusion: pitch averaging and dominance in hearing-impaired listeners with broad fusion. J Acoust Soc Am 142(2):780–791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Poon BB, Eddington DK, Noel V, Colburn HS (2009) Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing. J Acoust Soc Am 126(2):806–815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Poon BB, Eddington DK, Noel V, Colburn HS (2009) Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing. J Acoust Soc Am 126(2):806–815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Reiss LAJ, Eggleston JL, Walker EP, Oh Y (2016) Two ears are not always better than one: mandatory vowel fusion across spectrally mismatched ears in hearing-impaired listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17(4):341–356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reiss LAJ, Eggleston JL, Walker EP, Oh Y (2016) Two ears are not always better than one: mandatory vowel fusion across spectrally mismatched ears in hearing-impaired listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17(4):341–356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Reiss LAJ, Shayman CS, Walker EP, Bennett KO, Fowler JR, Hartling CL, Glickman B, Lasarev MR, Oh Y (2017) Binaural pitch fusion: comparison of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 141(3):1909–1920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reiss LAJ, Shayman CS, Walker EP, Bennett KO, Fowler JR, Hartling CL, Glickman B, Lasarev MR, Oh Y (2017) Binaural pitch fusion: comparison of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 141(3):1909–1920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Ruggero MA, Temchin AN (2007) Similarity of traveling-wave delays in the hearing organs of humans and other tetrapods. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8(2):153–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ruggero MA, Temchin AN (2007) Similarity of traveling-wave delays in the hearing organs of humans and other tetrapods. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8(2):153–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Shallop JK, Beiter AL, Goin DW, Mischke RE (1990) Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 11(1):5–15CrossRefPubMed Shallop JK, Beiter AL, Goin DW, Mischke RE (1990) Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 11(1):5–15CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shepard NT, Colburn HS (1976) Interaural time discrimination of clicks: dependence on interaural time and intensity differences. J Acoust Soc Am 59(S1):S23CrossRef Shepard NT, Colburn HS (1976) Interaural time discrimination of clicks: dependence on interaural time and intensity differences. J Acoust Soc Am 59(S1):S23CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steel MM, Papsin BC, Gordon KA (2015) Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study. PLoS One 10(2):e0117611CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Steel MM, Papsin BC, Gordon KA (2015) Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study. PLoS One 10(2):e0117611CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Strelcyk O, Dau T (2009) Estimation of cochlear response times using lateralization of frequency-mismatched tones. J Acoust Soc Am 126(3):1302–1311CrossRefPubMed Strelcyk O, Dau T (2009) Estimation of cochlear response times using lateralization of frequency-mismatched tones. J Acoust Soc Am 126(3):1302–1311CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Távora-Vieira D, Marino R, Acharya A, Rajan GP (2016) Cochlear implantation in adults with unilateral deafness: a review of the assessment/evaluation protocols. Cochlear Implants Int 17(4):184–189CrossRefPubMed Távora-Vieira D, Marino R, Acharya A, Rajan GP (2016) Cochlear implantation in adults with unilateral deafness: a review of the assessment/evaluation protocols. Cochlear Implants Int 17(4):184–189CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Trapeau R, Schönwiesner M (2015) Adaptation to shifted interaural time differences changes encoding of sound location in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 118:26–38CrossRefPubMed Trapeau R, Schönwiesner M (2015) Adaptation to shifted interaural time differences changes encoding of sound location in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 118:26–38CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D (2008) Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(9):645–652CrossRefPubMed Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D (2008) Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(9):645–652CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P (2009) Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 14(3):163–171CrossRefPubMed Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P (2009) Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 14(3):163–171CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wess JM, Brungart DS, Bernstein JGW (2017) The effect of interaural mismatches on contralateral unmasking with single-sided vocoders. Ear Hear 38(3):374–386CrossRefPubMed Wess JM, Brungart DS, Bernstein JGW (2017) The effect of interaural mismatches on contralateral unmasking with single-sided vocoders. Ear Hear 38(3):374–386CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Zirn S, Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Wesarg T (2015) Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users. Hear Res 328:148–156CrossRefPubMed Zirn S, Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Wesarg T (2015) Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users. Hear Res 328:148–156CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear
verfasst von
Tom Francart
Konstantin Wiebe
Thomas Wesarg
Publikationsdatum
27.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-018-00697-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Nur selten Nachblutungen nach Abszesstonsillektomie

03.05.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

In einer Metaanalyse von 18 Studien war die Rate von Nachblutungen nach einer Abszesstonsillektomie mit weniger als 7% recht niedrig. Nur rund 2% der Behandelten mussten nachoperiert werden. Die Therapie scheint damit recht sicher zu sein.

Rezidivierender Peritonsillarabszess nach Oralsex

02.05.2024 Peritonsillarabszess Kasuistik

Die erotischen Dimensionen von Peritonsillarabszessen scheinen eng begrenzt zu sein. Das heißt aber nicht, solche Abszesse und Erotik hätten nichts miteinander gemein, wie ein Fallbericht verdeutlicht.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.