Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics 1/2007

01.09.2007 | Original paper

Methods for determining cost-benefit ratios for pharmaceuticals in Germany

verfasst von: J.- Matthias Graf v. d. Schulenburg, Christoph Vauth, Thomas Mittendorf, Wolfgang Greiner

Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Sonderheft 1/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this methodological paper is to summarize evidence on how to implement cost-benefit assessment according to the new German legislative framework (Competition Enhancement Act). Given the complexity of existing health policy frameworks within industrialised countries in adapting health economics in their respective regulatory scheme, no clear international scientific consensus on which health economic methods should be chosen for assessment can be determined. Nevertheless, a broad consensus on the internal properties of methods itself can be found. Based on these common international standards in methodology, this work provides a minimum catalogue of methods and criteria that meet legal and local German requirements with regard to specific factors of its health care system. Aside from categorising clearly defined standards (e.g., study forms, cost and benefit categories) the suggested catalogue specifies some intensively debated areas in Germany (e.g., the QALY, modelling, the perspective used in the assessment). After the proposition of certain methods the paper leads to a first recommendation of a detailed assessment-process itself specific for the German way in implementing cost-benefit ratios within regulatory decision making in Germany.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Akehurst, R., Anderson, P., Brazier, J.E.: Decision analytic modelling in the economic evaluation of health technologies. A consensus statement. Pharmacoeconomics 17, 443–444 (2000)CrossRef Akehurst, R., Anderson, P., Brazier, J.E.: Decision analytic modelling in the economic evaluation of health technologies. A consensus statement. Pharmacoeconomics 17, 443–444 (2000)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Akobundu, E., Ju, J., Blatt, L., Mullins, C.D.: Cost-of-illness studies: a review of current methods. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 869–890 (2006)CrossRef Akobundu, E., Ju, J., Blatt, L., Mullins, C.D.: Cost-of-illness studies: a review of current methods. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 869–890 (2006)CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Anand, S., Hanson, K.: Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review. J. Health Econ. 16, 685–702 (1997)CrossRef Anand, S., Hanson, K.: Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review. J. Health Econ. 16, 685–702 (1997)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnesen, T., Nord, E.: The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability adjusted life years. Lepr. Rev. 71, 123–127 (2000) Arnesen, T., Nord, E.: The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability adjusted life years. Lepr. Rev. 71, 123–127 (2000)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Barker, C., Green, A.: Opening the debate on DALYs (disability-adjusted life years). Health Policy Plan. 11, 179–183 (1996)CrossRef Barker, C., Green, A.: Opening the debate on DALYs (disability-adjusted life years). Health Policy Plan. 11, 179–183 (1996)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Barton, P., Bryan, S., Robinson, S.: Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 9, 110–118 (2004)CrossRef Barton, P., Bryan, S., Robinson, S.: Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 9, 110–118 (2004)CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier, J.E., Kolotkin, R.L., Crosby, R.D., Williams, G.R.: Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D. Value Health 7, 490–498 (2004)CrossRef Brazier, J.E., Kolotkin, R.L., Crosby, R.D., Williams, G.R.: Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D. Value Health 7, 490–498 (2004)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bren, L.: The importance of patient-reported outcomes...it’s all about the patients. FDA Consum. 40, 26–32 (2006) Bren, L.: The importance of patient-reported outcomes...it’s all about the patients. FDA Consum. 40, 26–32 (2006)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs, A.: Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: statistical representation of parameter uncertainty. Value Health 8, 1–2 (2005)CrossRef Briggs, A.: Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: statistical representation of parameter uncertainty. Value Health 8, 1–2 (2005)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs, A., Sculpher, M.: An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 13, 397–409 (1998)CrossRef Briggs, A., Sculpher, M.: An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 13, 397–409 (1998)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs, A., Sculpher, M., Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., Malchau, H.: The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment: the case of total hip replacement. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 3, 79–89 (2004)CrossRef Briggs, A., Sculpher, M., Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., Malchau, H.: The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment: the case of total hip replacement. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 3, 79–89 (2004)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs, A.H.: Statistical approaches to handling uncertainty in health economic evaluation. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 551–561 (2004)CrossRef Briggs, A.H.: Statistical approaches to handling uncertainty in health economic evaluation. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 551–561 (2004)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs, A.H., Gray, A.M.: Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions. BMJ 319, 635–638 (1999) Briggs, A.H., Gray, A.M.: Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions. BMJ 319, 635–638 (1999)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs, A.H., O’Brien B.J.: The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ. 10, 179–184 (2001)CrossRef Briggs, A.H., O’Brien B.J.: The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ. 10, 179–184 (2001)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooks, R., Rabin, R., de Charro, F.: The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Evidence from the EuroQol BIO MED Research Programme. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003) Brooks, R., Rabin, R., de Charro, F.: The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Evidence from the EuroQol BIO MED Research Programme. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer, W.B., Koopmanschap, M.: The friction-cost method: replacement for nothing and leisure for free? Pharmacoeconomics 23, 105–111 (2005)CrossRef Brouwer, W.B., Koopmanschap, M.: The friction-cost method: replacement for nothing and leisure for free? Pharmacoeconomics 23, 105–111 (2005)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer, W.B., Niessen, L.W., Postma, M.J., Rutten, F.F.: Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ 331, 446–448 (2005)CrossRef Brouwer, W.B., Niessen, L.W., Postma, M.J., Rutten, F.F.: Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ 331, 446–448 (2005)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer, W.B., Rutten, F., Koopmanschap, M.: Costing in economic evaluations. In: Drummond, M.F., McGuire, T. (eds.) Economic Evaluation In Health Care: Merging Theory And Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001) Brouwer, W.B., Rutten, F., Koopmanschap, M.: Costing in economic evaluations. In: Drummond, M.F., McGuire, T. (eds.) Economic Evaluation In Health Care: Merging Theory And Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer, W.B., van Exel, N.J., Baltussen, R.M., Rutten, F.F.: A dollar is a dollar is a dollar—or is it? Value Health 9, 341–347 (2006)CrossRef Brouwer, W.B., van Exel, N.J., Baltussen, R.M., Rutten, F.F.: A dollar is a dollar is a dollar—or is it? Value Health 9, 341–347 (2006)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Buxton, M.J., Drummond, M.F., Van Hout, B.A., Prince, R.L., Sheldon, T.A., Szucs, T., Vray, M.: Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ. 6, 217–227 (1997)CrossRef Buxton, M.J., Drummond, M.F., Van Hout, B.A., Prince, R.L., Sheldon, T.A., Szucs, T., Vray, M.: Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ. 6, 217–227 (1997)CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Byford, S., Torgerson, D.J., Raftery, J.: Economic note: cost of illness studies. BMJ 320, 1335 (2000)CrossRef Byford, S., Torgerson, D.J., Raftery, J.: Economic note: cost of illness studies. BMJ 320, 1335 (2000)CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Caro, J.J.: Pharmacoeconomic analyses using discrete event simulation. Pharmacoeconomics 23, 323–332 (2005)CrossRef Caro, J.J.: Pharmacoeconomic analyses using discrete event simulation. Pharmacoeconomics 23, 323–332 (2005)CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.: Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm (2001) Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.: Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. http://​www.​york.​ac.​uk/​inst/​crd/​report4.​htm (2001)
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Claxton, K.: The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J. Health Econ. 18, 341–364 (1999)CrossRef Claxton, K.: The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J. Health Econ. 18, 341–364 (1999)CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Claxton, K., Sculpher, M., Drummond, M.: A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE). Lancet 360, 711–715 (2002)CrossRef Claxton, K., Sculpher, M., Drummond, M.: A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE). Lancet 360, 711–715 (2002)CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman, M.S., Washington, M.L., Orenstein, W.A., Gazmararian, J.A., Prill, M.M.: Interdisciplinary epidemiologic and economic research needed to support a universal childhood influenza vaccination policy. Epidemiol. Rev. 28, 41–46 (2006)CrossRef Coleman, M.S., Washington, M.L., Orenstein, W.A., Gazmararian, J.A., Prill, M.M.: Interdisciplinary epidemiologic and economic research needed to support a universal childhood influenza vaccination policy. Epidemiol. Rev. 28, 41–46 (2006)CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., O’Brien, B.J., Stoddart, G.L.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programms, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005) Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., O’Brien, B.J., Stoddart, G.L.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programms, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
28.
Zurück zum Zitat EURONHEED.: Methodological Guide. http://infodoc.inserm.fr/euronheed/edition.nsf/0/3A567E73F448E8C0C12570D40032AC53/$FILE/Methodological_Guide_V3.pdf? openelement 3rd edn (2004) EURONHEED.: Methodological Guide. http://​infodoc.​inserm.​fr/​euronheed/​edition.​nsf/​0/​3A567E73F448E8C0​C12570D40032AC53​/​$FILE/​Methodological_​Guide_​V3.​pdf?​ openelement 3rd edn (2004)
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Greiner, W.: Die Berechnung von Kosten und Nutzen im Gesundheitswesen. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002) Greiner, W.: Die Berechnung von Kosten und Nutzen im Gesundheitswesen. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002)
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Greiner, W., Schöffski, O.: Grundprinzipien einer Wirtschaftlichkeitsuntersuchung. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002) Greiner, W., Schöffski, O.: Grundprinzipien einer Wirtschaftlichkeitsuntersuchung. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002)
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hannoveraner Konsensus Gruppe.: Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation—Revidierte Fassung des Hanoveraner Konsens. Gesundh. Ökon. Qual. Manag. 4, A62–A65 (1999) Hannoveraner Konsensus Gruppe.: Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation—Revidierte Fassung des Hanoveraner Konsens. Gesundh. Ökon. Qual. Manag. 4, A62–A65 (1999)
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hjelmgren, J., Berggren, F., Andersson, F.: Health economic guidelines—similarities, differences and some implications. Value Health 4, 225–250 (2001)CrossRef Hjelmgren, J., Berggren, F., Andersson, F.: Health economic guidelines—similarities, differences and some implications. Value Health 4, 225–250 (2001)CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffmann, C., von der Schulenburg, J.M.: Review of European guidelines for economic evaluation of medical technologies and pharmaceuticals. Eur. J. Health Econ. 1, 2–8 (2000)CrossRef Hoffmann, C., von der Schulenburg, J.M.: Review of European guidelines for economic evaluation of medical technologies and pharmaceuticals. Eur. J. Health Econ. 1, 2–8 (2000)CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs, P., Fassbender, K.: The measurement of indirect costs in the health economics evaluation literature. A review. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 14, 799–808 (1998) Jacobs, P., Fassbender, K.: The measurement of indirect costs in the health economics evaluation literature. A review. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 14, 799–808 (1998)
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, K., Buxton, M.J., Jones, D.R., Fitzpatrick, R.: Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. Health Technol. Assess. 3, 1–76 (1999) Johnston, K., Buxton, M.J., Jones, D.R., Fitzpatrick, R.: Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. Health Technol. Assess. 3, 1–76 (1999)
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsson, B., Weinstein, M.C.: Economic evaluation alongside multinational clinical trials. Study considerations for GUSTO IIb. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 13, 49–58 (1997) Jonsson, B., Weinstein, M.C.: Economic evaluation alongside multinational clinical trials. Study considerations for GUSTO IIb. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 13, 49–58 (1997)
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsson, G., Johannesson, M.: The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 9, 113–120 (1996) Karlsson, G., Johannesson, M.: The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 9, 113–120 (1996)
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Karnon, J.: Alternative decision modelling techniques for the evaluation of health care technologies: Markov processes versus discrete event simulation. Health Econ. 12, 837–848 (2003)CrossRef Karnon, J.: Alternative decision modelling techniques for the evaluation of health care technologies: Markov processes versus discrete event simulation. Health Econ. 12, 837–848 (2003)CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobelt, G.: Modelle als Intrument der Gesunheitsökonomie. Gesund. Ökon. Qual. Manag. 10, 37–44 (2005)CrossRef Kobelt, G.: Modelle als Intrument der Gesunheitsökonomie. Gesund. Ökon. Qual. Manag. 10, 37–44 (2005)CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassere, M.N., Johnson, K.R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Brooks, P., Simon, L., Strand, V., Conaghan, P.G., Ostergaard, M., Maksymowych, W.P., Landewe, R., Bresnihan, B., Tak, P.P., Wakefield, R., Mease, P., Bingham C.O. III, Hughes, M., Altman, D., Buyse, M., Galbraith, S., Wells, G.: Definitions and validation criteria for biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: development and testing of a quantitative hierarchical levels of evidence schema. J. Rheumatol. 34, 607–615 (2007) Lassere, M.N., Johnson, K.R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Brooks, P., Simon, L., Strand, V., Conaghan, P.G., Ostergaard, M., Maksymowych, W.P., Landewe, R., Bresnihan, B., Tak, P.P., Wakefield, R., Mease, P., Bingham C.O. III, Hughes, M., Altman, D., Buyse, M., Galbraith, S., Wells, G.: Definitions and validation criteria for biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: development and testing of a quantitative hierarchical levels of evidence schema. J. Rheumatol. 34, 607–615 (2007)
41.
Zurück zum Zitat McGuire, T., Wells, K.B., Bruce, M.L., Miranda, J., Scheffler, R., Durham, M., Ford, D.E., Lewis, L.: burden of illness. Ment. Health Serv. Res. 4, 179–185 (2002)CrossRef McGuire, T., Wells, K.B., Bruce, M.L., Miranda, J., Scheffler, R., Durham, M., Ford, D.E., Lewis, L.: burden of illness. Ment. Health Serv. Res. 4, 179–185 (2002)CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Meltzer, D.: Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to set priorities for medical research. J. Health Econ. 20, 109–129 (2001)CrossRef Meltzer, D.: Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to set priorities for medical research. J. Health Econ. 20, 109–129 (2001)CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray, C.J.: Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull. World Health Organ. 72, 429–445 (1994) Murray, C.J.: Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull. World Health Organ. 72, 429–445 (1994)
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray, C.J., Acharya, A.K.: Understanding DALYs (disability-adjusted life years). J. Health Econ. 16, 703–730 (1997)CrossRef Murray, C.J., Acharya, A.K.: Understanding DALYs (disability-adjusted life years). J. Health Econ. 16, 703–730 (1997)CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Clinical Excellence.: Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/TAP_Methods.pdf (2004) National Institute for Clinical Excellence.: Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​pdf/​TAP_​Methods.​pdf (2004)
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Nord, E.: An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE). BMJ 305, 875–877 (1992)CrossRef Nord, E.: An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE). BMJ 305, 875–877 (1992)CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Nord, E.: Quality adjustment of life years—possibilities, limitations, alternatives. Tidsskr. Nor Laegeforen. 112, 2668–2670 (1992) Nord, E.: Quality adjustment of life years—possibilities, limitations, alternatives. Tidsskr. Nor Laegeforen. 112, 2668–2670 (1992)
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Philips, Z., Bojke, L., Sculpher, M., Claxton, K., Golder, S.: Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review and consolidation of quality assessment. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 355–371 (2006)CrossRef Philips, Z., Bojke, L., Sculpher, M., Claxton, K., Golder, S.: Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review and consolidation of quality assessment. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 355–371 (2006)CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Philips, Z., Ginnelly, L., Sculpher, M., Claxton, K., Golder, S., Riemsma, R., Woolacoot, N., Glanville, J.: Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol. Assess. 8, iii–xi, 1 (2004) Philips, Z., Ginnelly, L., Sculpher, M., Claxton, K., Golder, S., Riemsma, R., Woolacoot, N., Glanville, J.: Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol. Assess. 8, iii–xi, 1 (2004)
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasanen, P., Roine, E., Sintonen, H., Semberg-Konttinen, V., Ryynanen, O.P., Roine, R.: Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 22, 235–241 (2006)CrossRef Rasanen, P., Roine, E., Sintonen, H., Semberg-Konttinen, V., Ryynanen, O.P., Roine, R.: Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 22, 235–241 (2006)CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravens-Sieberer, U., Cieza, A.: Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie in der Medizin. Konzepte, Methoden, Anwendung (2000) Ravens-Sieberer, U., Cieza, A.: Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie in der Medizin. Konzepte, Methoden, Anwendung (2000)
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrbacher, R.: Modellierungen als Grundlage für die Erstattung medizinischer Leistungen—eine internationale Perspektive. Gesund. Ökon. Qual. Manag. 10, 45–51 (2005)CrossRef Rohrbacher, R.: Modellierungen als Grundlage für die Erstattung medizinischer Leistungen—eine internationale Perspektive. Gesund. Ökon. Qual. Manag. 10, 45–51 (2005)CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Roviera, J.: Vorläufige Ergebnisse präsentiert auf dem Global Pricing and Reimbursement Congress 2007, Prague, Czech Republic. Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information (PPRI) (2007) Roviera, J.: Vorläufige Ergebnisse präsentiert auf dem Global Pricing and Reimbursement Congress 2007, Prague, Czech Republic. Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information (PPRI) (2007)
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Schöffski, O., Claes, C.: Die Datenherkunft als Hauptdeterminante des Studiendesigns. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002) Schöffski, O., Claes, C.: Die Datenherkunft als Hauptdeterminante des Studiendesigns. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002)
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Schöffski, O., Greiner, W.: Das QALY-Konzept zur Verknüpfung von Lebensqualitätseffekten mit ökonomischen Daten. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002) Schöffski, O., Greiner, W.: Das QALY-Konzept zur Verknüpfung von Lebensqualitätseffekten mit ökonomischen Daten. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002)
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M.: Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002) Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M.: Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002)
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Schöffski, O., Uber, A.: Grundformen gesundheitsökonomischer Evaluationen. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002) Schöffski, O., Uber, A.: Grundformen gesundheitsökonomischer Evaluationen. In: Schöffski, O., Schulenburg, J.M. (eds.) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin (2002)
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulenburg, J.M., Greiner, W.: Gesundheitsökonomik. 2. Auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tuebingen (2007) Schulenburg, J.M., Greiner, W.: Gesundheitsökonomik. 2. Auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tuebingen (2007)
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Sculpher, M.J., Claxton, K., Drummond, M., McCabe, C.: Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making? Health Econ. 15, 677–687 (2006)CrossRef Sculpher, M.J., Claxton, K., Drummond, M., McCabe, C.: Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making? Health Econ. 15, 677–687 (2006)CrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebert, U.: When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care? Eur. J. Health Econ.4, 143–150 (2003) Siebert, U.: When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care? Eur. J. Health Econ.4, 143–150 (2003)
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Simoens, S.: Using the Delphi technique in economic evaluation: time to revisit the oracle? J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 31, 519–522 (2006) Simoens, S.: Using the Delphi technique in economic evaluation: time to revisit the oracle? J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 31, 519–522 (2006)
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoykova, B., Drummond, M., Barbieri, M., Kleijnen, J.: The lag between effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence of new drugs. Implications for decision-making in health care. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4, 313–318 (2003)CrossRef Stoykova, B., Drummond, M., Barbieri, M., Kleijnen, J.: The lag between effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence of new drugs. Implications for decision-making in health care. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4, 313–318 (2003)CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarn, T., Dix Smith, M.: Pharmacoeconomic guidelines around the world. ISPOR Connections 10, 3–6 (2004) Tarn, T., Dix Smith, M.: Pharmacoeconomic guidelines around the world. ISPOR Connections 10, 3–6 (2004)
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Trueman, P., Drummond, M., Hutton, J.: Developing guidance for budget impact analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 19, 609–621 (2001)CrossRef Trueman, P., Drummond, M., Hutton, J.: Developing guidance for budget impact analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 19, 609–621 (2001)CrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat US Department of Health and Human Services.: Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 4, 79 (2006)CrossRef US Department of Health and Human Services.: Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 4, 79 (2006)CrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein, M.C., O’Brien, B., Hornberger, J., Jackson, J., Johannesson, M., McCabe, C., Luce, B.R.: Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—modeling studies. Value Health 6, 9–17 (2003)CrossRef Weinstein, M.C., O’Brien, B., Hornberger, J., Jackson, J., Johannesson, M., McCabe, C., Luce, B.R.: Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—modeling studies. Value Health 6, 9–17 (2003)CrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Weir, C.J., Walley, R.J.: Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review. Stat. Med. 25, 183–203 (2006)CrossRef Weir, C.J., Walley, R.J.: Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review. Stat. Med. 25, 183–203 (2006)CrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Welte, R., Feenstra, T., Jager, H., Leidl, R.: A decision chart for assessing and improving the transferability of economic evaluation results between countries. Pharmacoeconomics 22, 857–876 (2004)CrossRef Welte, R., Feenstra, T., Jager, H., Leidl, R.: A decision chart for assessing and improving the transferability of economic evaluation results between countries. Pharmacoeconomics 22, 857–876 (2004)CrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Zentner, A., Velasco-Garrido, M., Busse, R.: Methoden zur vergleichenden Bewertung pharmazeutischer Produkte. GMS Health Technol. Assess. Doc. 09, 1–158 (2005) Zentner, A., Velasco-Garrido, M., Busse, R.: Methoden zur vergleichenden Bewertung pharmazeutischer Produkte. GMS Health Technol. Assess. Doc. 09, 1–158 (2005)
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Zentner, A., Busse, R.: Internationale Standards der Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertung. Gesundh. Ökon. Qual. Manag. 11, 368–373 (2006)CrossRef Zentner, A., Busse, R.: Internationale Standards der Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertung. Gesundh. Ökon. Qual. Manag. 11, 368–373 (2006)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Methods for determining cost-benefit ratios for pharmaceuticals in Germany
verfasst von
J.- Matthias Graf v. d. Schulenburg
Christoph Vauth
Thomas Mittendorf
Wolfgang Greiner
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2007
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-007-0063-4