Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 12/2007

01.12.2007 | Original Contributions

Is Internet Information Adequate to Facilitate Surgical Decision-Making in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis?

verfasst von: Heather B. Neuman, M.D., Cynthia Cabral, B.S., Mary E. Charlson, M.D., Larissa K. Temple, M.D.

Erschienen in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Ausgabe 12/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Prophylactic surgery decisions are difficult. Supplemental information improves patients’ knowledge, promoting active participation in decision-making. Our objective was to examine internet information regarding prophylactic surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis to determine its adequacy in facilitating patient participation in surgical decision-making.

Methods

We searched the internet for information on surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis, using an intentionally simple strategy to represent patients’ searches. We examined the first 50 sites from each search, assessing each for content by using predefined criteria. Every site was evaluated by two investigators (kappa 0.71) by using the DISCERN criteria, a tool for evaluating quality of health information. Search-efficiency was calculated.

Results

Searches revealed 307,138 “hits”; 20 sites met inclusion criteria. GOOGLE™ demonstrated the highest search-efficiency (28 percent). Sites were maintained by general health pages (35 percent), hospitals (30 percent), professional organizations (15 percent), familial adenomatous polyposis registries (10 percent), and government (10 percent). Only 40 percent had been developed and/or updated within two years. Most included basic information regarding risk, symptoms, diagnosis, as well as discussion of familial adenomatous polyposis-associated diseases and surveillance (80–100 percent). Although 90 percent of sites presented surgical treatment options, only 60 percent provided details. Few provided information regarding postoperative bowel function (40 percent), sexual function (20 percent), or fertility (5 percent). Seven (35 percent) were identified as being of “good/excellent” quality. Only four were patient-oriented; variable information was provided.

Conclusions

Internet information regarding surgical treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis is sparse, and insufficient to support active patient participation in decision-making. Despite the time and financial commitment required, development of high-quality internet resources may be justified given the lack of adequate patient-oriented information currently available.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillem JG, Wood WC, Moley JF, et al. ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4642–60.PubMedCrossRef Guillem JG, Wood WC, Moley JF, et al. ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4642–60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Davey HM, Butow PN, Armstrong BK. Cancer patients’ preferences for written prognostic information provided outside the clinical context. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1450–6.PubMedCrossRef Davey HM, Butow PN, Armstrong BK. Cancer patients’ preferences for written prognostic information provided outside the clinical context. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1450–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004;292:435–41.PubMedCrossRef Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004;292:435–41.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Davison BJ, Degner LF. Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 1997;20:187–96.PubMedCrossRef Davison BJ, Degner LF. Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 1997;20:187–96.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Butow P, Brindle E, McConnell D, Boakes R, Tattersall M. Information booklets about cancer: factors influencing patient satisfaction and utilization. Patient Educ Couns 1998;33:129–41PubMedCrossRef Butow P, Brindle E, McConnell D, Boakes R, Tattersall M. Information booklets about cancer: factors influencing patient satisfaction and utilization. Patient Educ Couns 1998;33:129–41PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Macklin C. Colorectal website review: hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1646–7.CrossRef Macklin C. Colorectal website review: hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1646–7.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Eysenbach G, Kohler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002;324:573–7PubMedCrossRef Eysenbach G, Kohler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002;324:573–7PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen DL, Derry HA, Resnick PJ, Richardson CR. Adolescents searching for health information on the Internet: an observational study. J Med Internet Res 2003;5:e25.PubMedCrossRef Hansen DL, Derry HA, Resnick PJ, Richardson CR. Adolescents searching for health information on the Internet: an observational study. J Med Internet Res 2003;5:e25.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:105–11.PubMedCrossRef Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:105–11.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X, Siu LL. Impact of the media and the internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:4291–7.PubMed Chen X, Siu LL. Impact of the media and the internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:4291–7.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 2001;84:48–51.PubMedCrossRef Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 2001;84:48–51.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001;285:2612–21PubMedCrossRef Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001;285:2612–21PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287:2691–700.PubMedCrossRef Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287:2691–700.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekman A, Hall P, Litton JE. Can we trust cancer information on the Internet? A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites. Cancer Causes Control 2005;16:765–72.PubMedCrossRef Ekman A, Hall P, Litton JE. Can we trust cancer information on the Internet? A comparison of interactive cancer risk sites. Cancer Causes Control 2005;16:765–72.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ilic D, Risbridger G, Green S. Searching the Internet for information on prostate cancer screening: an assessment of quality. Urology 2004;64:112–6.PubMedCrossRef Ilic D, Risbridger G, Green S. Searching the Internet for information on prostate cancer screening: an assessment of quality. Urology 2004;64:112–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Bahrani A, Plusa S. The quality of patient-orientated internet information on colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:323–6.PubMedCrossRef Al-Bahrani A, Plusa S. The quality of patient-orientated internet information on colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:323–6.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sacchetti P, Zvara P, Plante MK. The Internet and patient education–resources and their reliability: focus on a select urologic topic. Urology 1999;53:1117–20.PubMedCrossRef Sacchetti P, Zvara P, Plante MK. The Internet and patient education–resources and their reliability: focus on a select urologic topic. Urology 1999;53:1117–20.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Meric F, Bernstam EV, Mirza NQ, et al. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ 2002;324:577–81.PubMedCrossRef Meric F, Bernstam EV, Mirza NQ, et al. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ 2002;324:577–81.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 1998;279:611–4.PubMedCrossRef Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 1998;279:611–4.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ley P, Bradshaw PW, Eaves D, Walker CM. A method for increasing patients’ recall of information presented by doctors. Psychol Med 1973;3:217–20.PubMedCrossRef Ley P, Bradshaw PW, Eaves D, Walker CM. A method for increasing patients’ recall of information presented by doctors. Psychol Med 1973;3:217–20.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is Internet Information Adequate to Facilitate Surgical Decision-Making in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis?
verfasst von
Heather B. Neuman, M.D.
Cynthia Cabral, B.S.
Mary E. Charlson, M.D.
Larissa K. Temple, M.D.
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Ausgabe 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Elektronische ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9036-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2007

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 12/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.