Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2012

01.05.2012 | Epidemiology

Assessing the added value of breast tumor markers in genetic risk prediction model BRCAPRO

verfasst von: Swati Biswas, Neelam Tankhiwale, Amanda Blackford, Angelica M. Gutierrez Barrera, Kaylene Ready, Karen Lu, Christopher I. Amos, Giovanni Parmigiani, Banu Arun

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The BRCAPRO model estimates carrier probabilities for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, and was recently enhanced to use estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of breast cancer. No independent assessment of the added value of these markers exists. Moreover, earlier versions of BRCAPRO did not use human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2/neu) status of breast cancer. Here, we incorporate Her-2/neu in BRCAPRO and validate all the markers. We trained the enhanced model on 406 germline tested individuals, and validated on a separate clinical cohort of 796 individuals for whom test results and family history are available. For model-building, we estimated joint probabilities of ER, PR, and Her-2/neu status for carriers and non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. For validation, we obtained BRCAPRO predictions with and without markers. We calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and correct reclassification rates. The AUC for predicting BRCA1 status among individuals who are carriers of at least one mutation improved when ER and PR were used. The AUC for predicting the presence of either mutation improved when Her-2/neu was added. Use of markers also produced highly significant correct reclassification improvements in both cases. Breast tumor markers are useful for prediction of BRCA1/2 mutation status. ER and PR improve discrimination between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers while Her-2/neu helps discriminate between carriers and non-carriers, particularly among women who are ER positive and Her-2/neu negative. These results support the use of the enhanced version of BRCAPRO in clinical settings.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72:1117–1130PubMedCrossRef Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72:1117–1130PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302:643–646PubMedCrossRef King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302:643–646PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Wang W, Broman KW et al (2004) BayesMendel: an R environment for Mendelian risk prediction. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:21 Chen S, Wang W, Broman KW et al (2004) BayesMendel: an R environment for Mendelian risk prediction. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:21
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O (1998) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 62:145–158PubMedCrossRef Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O (1998) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 62:145–158PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat James PA, Doherty R, Harris M et al (2006) Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing: a comparison of available methods. J Clin Oncol 24:707–715PubMedCrossRef James PA, Doherty R, Harris M et al (2006) Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing: a comparison of available methods. J Clin Oncol 24:707–715PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Parmigiani G, Chen S, Iversen ES et al (2007) Validity of models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Ann Intern Med 147:441–450PubMed Parmigiani G, Chen S, Iversen ES et al (2007) Validity of models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Ann Intern Med 147:441–450PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Barcenas CH, Hosain GM, Arun B et al (2006) Assessing BRCA carrier probabilities in extended families. J Clin Oncol 24:354–360PubMedCrossRef Barcenas CH, Hosain GM, Arun B et al (2006) Assessing BRCA carrier probabilities in extended families. J Clin Oncol 24:354–360PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marroni F, Aretini P, D’Andrea E et al (2004) Evaluation of widely used models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Med Genet 41:278–285PubMedCrossRef Marroni F, Aretini P, D’Andrea E et al (2004) Evaluation of widely used models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Med Genet 41:278–285PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindor NM, Lindor RA, Apicella C et al (2007) Predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: comparison of LAMBDA, BRCAPRO, Myriad II, and modified Couch models. Fam Cancer 6:473–482PubMedCrossRef Lindor NM, Lindor RA, Apicella C et al (2007) Predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: comparison of LAMBDA, BRCAPRO, Myriad II, and modified Couch models. Fam Cancer 6:473–482PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Euhus DM, Smith KC, Robinson L et al (2002) Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:844–851PubMedCrossRef Euhus DM, Smith KC, Robinson L et al (2002) Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:844–851PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang HH, Williams R, Leary J et al (2006) Evaluation of models to predict BRCA germline mutations. Br J Cancer 95:914–920PubMedCrossRef Kang HH, Williams R, Leary J et al (2006) Evaluation of models to predict BRCA germline mutations. Br J Cancer 95:914–920PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tai YC, Chen S, Parmigiani G et al (2008) Incorporating tumor immunohistochemical markers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier prediction. Breast Cancer Res 10:401PubMedCrossRef Tai YC, Chen S, Parmigiani G et al (2008) Incorporating tumor immunohistochemical markers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier prediction. Breast Cancer Res 10:401PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Katki HA, Blackford A, Chen S et al (2008) Multiple diseases in carrier probability estimation: accounting for surviving all cancers other than breast and ovary in BRCAPRO. Stat Med 27:4532–4548PubMedCrossRef Katki HA, Blackford A, Chen S et al (2008) Multiple diseases in carrier probability estimation: accounting for surviving all cancers other than breast and ovary in BRCAPRO. Stat Med 27:4532–4548PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Katki HA (2007) Incorporating medical interventions into Mendelian mutation prediction models. BMC Med Genet 8:13PubMedCrossRef Katki HA (2007) Incorporating medical interventions into Mendelian mutation prediction models. BMC Med Genet 8:13PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Blackford AL, Parmigiani G (2009) Tailoring BRCAPRO to Asian-Americans. J Clin Oncol 27:642–643PubMedCrossRef Chen S, Blackford AL, Parmigiani G (2009) Tailoring BRCAPRO to Asian-Americans. J Clin Oncol 27:642–643PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakhani SR, Van De Vijver MJ, Jacquemier J et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20:2310–2318PubMedCrossRef Lakhani SR, Van De Vijver MJ, Jacquemier J et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20:2310–2318PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L et al (2005) Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 11:5175–5180PubMedCrossRef Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L et al (2005) Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 11:5175–5180PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Atchley DP, Albarracin CT, Lopez A et al (2008) Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:4282–4288PubMedCrossRef Atchley DP, Albarracin CT, Lopez A et al (2008) Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:4282–4288PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Parmigiani G (2002) Modeling in medical decision making. Wiley, Chichester Parmigiani G (2002) Modeling in medical decision making. Wiley, Chichester
20.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188PubMedCrossRef DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Efron B, Tibshirani R (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall/CRC Monographs Efron B, Tibshirani R (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall/CRC Monographs
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook NR, Buring JE, Ridker PM (2006) The effect of including C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women. Ann Intern Med 145:21–29PubMed Cook NR, Buring JE, Ridker PM (2006) The effect of including C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women. Ann Intern Med 145:21–29PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, D’Agostino RB (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172PubMedCrossRef Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, D’Agostino RB (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Steyerberg EW (2011) Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 30:11–21PubMedCrossRef Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Steyerberg EW (2011) Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 30:11–21PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavaddat N, Rebbeck TR, Lakhani SR et al (2010) Incorporating tumour pathology information into breast cancer risk prediction algorithms. Breast Cancer Res 12:R28PubMedCrossRef Mavaddat N, Rebbeck TR, Lakhani SR et al (2010) Incorporating tumour pathology information into breast cancer risk prediction algorithms. Breast Cancer Res 12:R28PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing the added value of breast tumor markers in genetic risk prediction model BRCAPRO
verfasst von
Swati Biswas
Neelam Tankhiwale
Amanda Blackford
Angelica M. Gutierrez Barrera
Kaylene Ready
Karen Lu
Christopher I. Amos
Giovanni Parmigiani
Banu Arun
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-1958-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Bessere Prognose mit links- statt rechtsseitigem Kolon-Ca.

06.05.2024 Kolonkarzinom Nachrichten

Menschen mit linksseitigem Kolonkarzinom leben im Mittel zweieinhalb Jahre länger als solche mit rechtsseitigem Tumor. Auch aktuell ist das Sterberisiko bei linksseitigen Tumoren US-Daten zufolge etwa um 11% geringer als bei rechtsseitigen.

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

03.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Wenn bei Mammakarzinomen durch eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie ein Downstaging von nodal-positiv zu nodal-negativ gelingt, scheint es auch ohne Axilladissektion nur selten zu axillären Rezidiven zu kommen.

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

02.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Eine adjuvante Radiotherapie nach radikaler Prostata-Op. bringt den Betroffenen wahrscheinlich keinen Vorteil. Im Gegenteil: Durch die Bestrahlung steigt offenbar das Risiko für Harn- und Stuhlinkontinenz.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.