Erschienen in:
03.02.2017 | Review
Hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy in breast conservation for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
verfasst von:
Luca F. Valle, Surbhi Agarwal, Kathleen E. Bickel, Haley A. Herchek, David C. Nalepinski, Nirav S. Kapadia
Erschienen in:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
|
Ausgabe 3/2017
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
Breast conservation therapy (BCT) for early-stage breast cancer involves lumpectomy followed by whole breast radiotherapy, which can involve either standard fractionation (SRT) or accelerated fractionation (ART). This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine whether any benefit exists for ART or SRT.
Materials and methods
We searched MEDLINE (1966–2014), all seven databases of the Cochrane Library (1968–2014), EMBASE (1974–2014), clinicaltrials.gov, ISRCTN, WHO ICTRP, and meeting abstracts in the Web of Science Core Collection (1900–2014). RCTs comparing SRT to ART among women undergoing BCT with stage T1–T2 and/or N1 breast cancer or carcinoma in situ were included. Follow-up was 30 days for acute toxicity, or three years for disease control and late toxicity.
Results
13 trials with 8189 participants were included. No differences were observed in local failure (n = 7 trials; RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78–1.19, I
2 = 0%), locoregional failure, (n = 8 trials; RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.63–1.16, I
2 = 0%), or survival (n = 4 trials; RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.85–1.17, I
2 = 0%). ART was associated with significantly less acute toxicity (n = 5 trials; RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.21–0.62, I
2 = 20%), but no difference in late cosmesis (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.81–1.12, I
2 = 54%).
Conclusions
ART use does not reduce disease control or worsen long-term cosmetic outcome, and may decrease the risk of acute radiation toxicity as compared to SRT.