Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2017

17.04.2017 | Brief Report

Assessment of the prognostic and discriminating value of the novel bioscore system for breast cancer; a SEER database analysis

verfasst von: Omar Abdel-Rahman

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

An updated bioscore has been proposed within the context of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for breast cancer. This study seeks to validate the discriminating value of this bioscore among non-metastatic breast cancer patients registered within the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database.

Methods

Through SEER*Stat program, SEER database (2010–2013) was accessed and bioscore was formulated for each patient. Overall and cancer-specific survival analyses according to both bioscore and AJCC pathological stages were conducted through Kaplan–Meier analysis/log-rank testing, and multivariate analysis was conducted through a Cox proportional model.

Results

A total of 181030 patients with non-metastatic, surgically treated breast cancer were identified in the period from 2010 to 2013. For overall and cancer-specific survival assessment according to the bioscore system, P values for pairwise comparisons among different score points were significant (P < 0.0001) except for the comparison between score 0 and score 1. For cancer-specific survival assessment according to the AJCC stages, P values for pairwise comparisons among different stages were significant (P < 0.0001) except for the comparison between stages IIIB and IIIC. For overall survival assessment according to the AJCC stages, P values for pairwise comparisons among different stages were significant (P < 0.001) except for the comparison between stages IA and IB. In a multivariate analysis, the following factors were associated with better cancer-specific survival (earlier stage disease, ER positivity, PR positivity, Her2 neu positivity, and nuclear grade) (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The current analysis confirms the prognostic utility of the bioscore system and suggests it may be incorporated into decision-making algorithms for non-metastatic breast cancer.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdoli G, Bottai M, Sandelin K, Moradi T (2017) Breast cancer diagnosis and mortality by tumor stage and migration background in a nationwide cohort study in Sweden. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 31:57–65CrossRef Abdoli G, Bottai M, Sandelin K, Moradi T (2017) Breast cancer diagnosis and mortality by tumor stage and migration background in a nationwide cohort study in Sweden. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 31:57–65CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackisch C, Lammers P, Jacobs I (2017) Evolving landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer treatment and the future of biosimilars. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 32:199–216CrossRef Jackisch C, Lammers P, Jacobs I (2017) Evolving landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer treatment and the future of biosimilars. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 32:199–216CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin MB, Greene FL, Greene FL, Edge SB, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK et al (2017) The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 67(2):93–99CrossRefPubMed Amin MB, Greene FL, Greene FL, Edge SB, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK et al (2017) The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 67(2):93–99CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagaria SP, Ray PS, Sim MS, Ye X, Shamonki JM, Cui X et al (2014) Personalizing breast cancer staging by the inclusion of ER, PR, and HER2. JAMA surgery 149(2):125–129CrossRefPubMed Bagaria SP, Ray PS, Sim MS, Ye X, Shamonki JM, Cui X et al (2014) Personalizing breast cancer staging by the inclusion of ER, PR, and HER2. JAMA surgery 149(2):125–129CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yi M, Mittendorf EA, Cormier JN, Buchholz TA, Bilimoria K, Sahin AA et al (2011) Novel staging system for predicting disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with surgery as the first intervention: time to modify the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Clin Oncol 29(35):4654–4661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yi M, Mittendorf EA, Cormier JN, Buchholz TA, Bilimoria K, Sahin AA et al (2011) Novel staging system for predicting disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with surgery as the first intervention: time to modify the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Clin Oncol 29(35):4654–4661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ, et al (2017) Breast cancer—major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. doi:10.3322/caac.21393 Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ, et al (2017) Breast cancer—major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. doi:10.​3322/​caac.​21393
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittendorf EA, Vila J, Tucker SL, Chavez-MacGregor M, Smith BD, Symmans WF et al (2016) The neo-bioscore update for staging breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: incorporation of prognostic biologic factors into staging after treatment. JAMA Oncol. 2(7):929–936CrossRefPubMed Mittendorf EA, Vila J, Tucker SL, Chavez-MacGregor M, Smith BD, Symmans WF et al (2016) The neo-bioscore update for staging breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: incorporation of prognostic biologic factors into staging after treatment. JAMA Oncol. 2(7):929–936CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marme F, Lederer B, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Denkert C, Eidtmann H et al (2016) Utility of the CPS + EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 53:65–74CrossRefPubMed Marme F, Lederer B, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Denkert C, Eidtmann H et al (2016) Utility of the CPS + EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 53:65–74CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vila J, Teshome M, Tucker SL, Woodward WA, Chavez-MacGregor M, Hunt KK et al (2017) Combining clinical and pathologic staging variables has prognostic value in predicting local-regional recurrence following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 265(3):574–580CrossRefPubMed Vila J, Teshome M, Tucker SL, Woodward WA, Chavez-MacGregor M, Hunt KK et al (2017) Combining clinical and pathologic staging variables has prognostic value in predicting local-regional recurrence following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 265(3):574–580CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittendorf EA, Jeruss JS, Tucker SL, Kolli A, Newman LA, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al (2011) Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29(15):1956–1962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mittendorf EA, Jeruss JS, Tucker SL, Kolli A, Newman LA, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al (2011) Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29(15):1956–1962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggemann H, Ignatov T, Burger E, Kantelhardt EJ, Fettke F, Thomssen C et al (2015) Moderate HER2 expression as a prognostic factor in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 22(5):725–733CrossRefPubMed Eggemann H, Ignatov T, Burger E, Kantelhardt EJ, Fettke F, Thomssen C et al (2015) Moderate HER2 expression as a prognostic factor in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 22(5):725–733CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98(19):10869–10874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98(19):10869–10874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF et al (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(21):2005–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF et al (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(21):2005–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gluz O, Nitz UA, Christgen M, Kates RE, Shak S, Clemens M et al (2016) West german study group phase III PlanB trial: first prospective outcome data for the 21-gene recurrence score assay and concordance of prognostic markers by central and local pathology assessment. J Clin Oncol 34(20):2341–2349CrossRefPubMed Gluz O, Nitz UA, Christgen M, Kates RE, Shak S, Clemens M et al (2016) West german study group phase III PlanB trial: first prospective outcome data for the 21-gene recurrence score assay and concordance of prognostic markers by central and local pathology assessment. J Clin Oncol 34(20):2341–2349CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of the prognostic and discriminating value of the novel bioscore system for breast cancer; a SEER database analysis
verfasst von
Omar Abdel-Rahman
Publikationsdatum
17.04.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4244-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.