Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2020

28.08.2020 | Epidemiology

Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on DCIS on core biopsy is associated with higher risk of upgrade than conventional atypical ductal hyperplasia

verfasst von: Kate R. Pawloski, Nicole Christian, Andrea Knezevic, Hannah Y. Wen, Kimberly J. Van Zee, Monica Morrow, Audree B. Tadros

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Upgrade rates of conventional ADH are reported at 10–30%; however, rates for ADH bordering on DCIS (ADH-BD) are largely unknown. We examined the upgrade rate of ADH-BD and core needle biopsy (CNB) features associated with upgrade. Surgical management in patients with concurrent ipsilateral breast cancer (BC) was also examined.

Methods

From 2000 to 2018, women with CNB diagnosis of ADH-BD were prospectively identified. Women with pure ADH-BD and concurrent ipsilateral ADH-BD/BC were analyzed separately, and upgrade rates were calculated. CNB features associated with upgrade and type of surgery were examined in women with pure ADH-BD; CNB features and concurrent pathology associated with upgrade were examined in women with ipsilateral BC.

Results

108/236 (46%) patients with pure ADH-BD on CNB had DCIS (40%) or invasive carcinoma (6%) on surgical excision. DCIS or invasive carcinoma was more frequently found on excision of a mass that yielded ADH-BD on biopsy than excision of calcifications (65% vs 38%; p < 0.001). The breast conservation success rate was high (80%) in patients who upgraded, despite a high re-excision rate of 46%. The upgrade rate of ADH-BD in women with concurrent ipsilateral BC was 41%. Most women (94%) with ADH-BD in the same quadrant as the BC were candidates for breast conserving surgery, with a success rate of 89%.

Conclusion

The upgrade rate for pure ADH-BD is significantly higher than that reported for women with conventional ADH, especially in women with a mass on imaging. The upgrade rate of concurrent ipsilateral ADH-BD and BC is similarly high. Excision with a margin of normal tissue and specimen inking should be routine to minimize the need for re-excision.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Racz JM, Carter JM, Degnim AC (2017) Lobular neoplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: current surgical management recommendations. Ann Surg Oncol 24(10):2848–2854CrossRef Racz JM, Carter JM, Degnim AC (2017) Lobular neoplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: current surgical management recommendations. Ann Surg Oncol 24(10):2848–2854CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55(11):2698–2708CrossRef Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55(11):2698–2708CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tavassoli FA, Norris HJ (1990) A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. Cancer 65(3):518–529CrossRef Tavassoli FA, Norris HJ (1990) A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. Cancer 65(3):518–529CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosai J (1991) Borderline epithelial lesions of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 15(3):209–221CrossRef Rosai J (1991) Borderline epithelial lesions of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 15(3):209–221CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tozbikian G, Brogi E, Vallejo CE et al (2017) Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on ductal carcinoma in situ. Int J Surg Pathol 25(2):100–107CrossRef Tozbikian G, Brogi E, Vallejo CE et al (2017) Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on ductal carcinoma in situ. Int J Surg Pathol 25(2):100–107CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Burak WE Jr, Owens KE, Tighe MB et al (2000) Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 135(6):700–703CrossRef Burak WE Jr, Owens KE, Tighe MB et al (2000) Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 135(6):700–703CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Deshaies I, Provencher L, Jacob S et al (2011) Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy. Breast 20(1):50–55CrossRef Deshaies I, Provencher L, Jacob S et al (2011) Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy. Breast 20(1):50–55CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 224(2):548–554CrossRef Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 224(2):548–554CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G et al (2007) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2497–2501CrossRef Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G et al (2007) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2497–2501CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Winchester DJ, Bernstein JR, Jeske JM et al (2003) Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy. Arch Surg 138(6):619–622CrossRef Winchester DJ, Bernstein JR, Jeske JM et al (2003) Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy. Arch Surg 138(6):619–622CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandenbussche CJ, Khouri N, Sbaity E et al (2013) Borderline atypical ductal hyperplasia/low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ on breast needle core biopsy should be managed conservatively. Am J Surg Pathol 37(6):913–923CrossRef Vandenbussche CJ, Khouri N, Sbaity E et al (2013) Borderline atypical ductal hyperplasia/low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ on breast needle core biopsy should be managed conservatively. Am J Surg Pathol 37(6):913–923CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Keulers A, Strobel K, Schneider H, Gaisa N, Schrading S (2018) Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: on the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography/digital tomosynthesis screening. Breast Cancer Res 20(1):13CrossRef Kuhl CK, Keulers A, Strobel K, Schneider H, Gaisa N, Schrading S (2018) Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: on the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography/digital tomosynthesis screening. Breast Cancer Res 20(1):13CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, Bird R, Norton HJ, Greene F (2000) Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? Am J Surg 180(4):313–315CrossRef Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, Bird R, Norton HJ, Greene F (2000) Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? Am J Surg 180(4):313–315CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I (2000) Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(4):1047–1050CrossRef Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I (2000) Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(4):1047–1050CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Co M, Kwong A, Shek T (2018) Factors affecting the under-diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsies—a 10-year retrospective study and review of the literature. Int J Surg 49:27–31CrossRef Co M, Kwong A, Shek T (2018) Factors affecting the under-diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsies—a 10-year retrospective study and review of the literature. Int J Surg 49:27–31CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoury T, Chen X, Wang D et al (2015) Nomogram to predict the likelihood of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on a core needle biopsy in mammographically detected lesions. Histopathology 67(1):106–120CrossRef Khoury T, Chen X, Wang D et al (2015) Nomogram to predict the likelihood of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on a core needle biopsy in mammographically detected lesions. Histopathology 67(1):106–120CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko E, Han W, Lee JW et al (2008) Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112(1):189–195CrossRef Ko E, Han W, Lee JW et al (2008) Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112(1):189–195CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang M, Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Seong MH, Park IA (2008) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(5):1347–1351CrossRef Jang M, Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Seong MH, Park IA (2008) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(5):1347–1351CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mesurolle B, Perez JC, Azzumea F et al (2014) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle biopsy: frequency, final surgical outcome, and factors associated with underestimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(6):1389–1394CrossRef Mesurolle B, Perez JC, Azzumea F et al (2014) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle biopsy: frequency, final surgical outcome, and factors associated with underestimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(6):1389–1394CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ et al (2016) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 23(12):3801–3810CrossRef Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ et al (2016) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 23(12):3801–3810CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Havel L, Naik H, Ramirez L, Morrow M, Landercasper J (2019) Impact of the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline on rates of re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 26(5):1238–1244CrossRef Havel L, Naik H, Ramirez L, Morrow M, Landercasper J (2019) Impact of the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline on rates of re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 26(5):1238–1244CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberger LH, Mamtani A, Fuzesi S et al (2016) Early adoption of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: initial experience from memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol 23(10):3239–3246CrossRef Rosenberger LH, Mamtani A, Fuzesi S et al (2016) Early adoption of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: initial experience from memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol 23(10):3239–3246CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi DX, Eaton AA, Olcese C, Patil S, Morrow M, Van Zee KJ (2013) Blurry boundaries: do epithelial borderline lesions of the breast and ductal carcinoma in situ have similar rates of subsequent invasive cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1302–1310CrossRef Choi DX, Eaton AA, Olcese C, Patil S, Morrow M, Van Zee KJ (2013) Blurry boundaries: do epithelial borderline lesions of the breast and ductal carcinoma in situ have similar rates of subsequent invasive cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1302–1310CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Coopey SB, Mazzola E, Buckley JM et al (2012) The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136(3):627–633CrossRef Coopey SB, Mazzola E, Buckley JM et al (2012) The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136(3):627–633CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on DCIS on core biopsy is associated with higher risk of upgrade than conventional atypical ductal hyperplasia
verfasst von
Kate R. Pawloski
Nicole Christian
Andrea Knezevic
Hannah Y. Wen
Kimberly J. Van Zee
Monica Morrow
Audree B. Tadros
Publikationsdatum
28.08.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05890-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.