Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Investigational New Drugs 6/2020

14.05.2020 | PHASE I STUDIES

A phase 1b study of the MET inhibitor capmatinib combined with cetuximab in patients with MET-positive colorectal cancer who had progressed following anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment

verfasst von: Jean-Pierre Delord, Guillem Argilés, Jerôme Fayette, Lori Wirth, Stefan Kasper, Salvatore Siena, Ricard Mesia, Rossana Berardi, Andrés Cervantes, Jeroen Dekervel, Sylvia Zhao, Yongjian Sun, Huai-Xiang Hao, Ralph Tiedt, Sergio Vicente, Andrea Myers, Lillian L. Siu

Erschienen in: Investigational New Drugs | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background Overcoming resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in patients with KRAS wildtype (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) could help meet the needs of patients with limited treatment options. Methods In this phase 1b study, patients with N/KRAS WT, MET-positive mCRC who had progressed following anti-EGFR mAb treatment received escalating oral doses of capmatinib (150, 300, and 400 mg) twice daily plus weekly intravenous cetuximab (at the approved dose). The primary objective was to establish a recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of capmatinib in combination with cetuximab. Safety, preliminary activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were also explored. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled. No patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity at investigated doses; the RDE was established as capmatinib 400 mg twice daily plus cetuximab. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs) suspected to be related to the study treatment. Five patients (38.5%) reported study-drug–related AEs of grade 3/4 in severity. No patients achieved a complete or partial response according to RECIST v1.1; however, tumor shrinkage of 29–44% was observed in 4 patients. Conclusions Capmatinib plus cetuximab was well tolerated. Preliminary signs of activity were observed. Further investigation is warranted to obtain efficacy data and refine predictive biomarkers of response. Clinical trial registration NCT02205398.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65(2):87–108CrossRef Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65(2):87–108CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R et al (2016) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 27(8):1386–1422CrossRef Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R et al (2016) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 27(8):1386–1422CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E et al (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360(14):1408–1417CrossRef Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E et al (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360(14):1408–1417CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I et al (2011) Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol 29(15):2011–2019CrossRef Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I et al (2011) Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol 29(15):2011–2019CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J et al (2010) Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol 28(31):4697–4705CrossRef Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J et al (2010) Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol 28(31):4697–4705CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Lenz HJ, Köhne CH et al (2015) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(7):692–700CrossRef Van Cutsem E, Lenz HJ, Köhne CH et al (2015) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(7):692–700CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W et al (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2335–2342CrossRef Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W et al (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2335–2342CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 26(12):2013–2019CrossRef Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 26(12):2013–2019CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorich MJ, Wiese MD, Rowland A, Kichenadasse G, McKinnon RA, Karapetis CS (2015) Extended RAS mutations and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Oncol 26(1):13–21CrossRef Sorich MJ, Wiese MD, Rowland A, Kichenadasse G, McKinnon RA, Karapetis CS (2015) Extended RAS mutations and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Oncol 26(1):13–21CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong CR, Jänne PA (2013) The quest to overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer. Nat Med 19(11):1389–1400CrossRef Chong CR, Jänne PA (2013) The quest to overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer. Nat Med 19(11):1389–1400CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T et al (2007) MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 316(5827):1039–1043CrossRef Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T et al (2007) MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 316(5827):1039–1043CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bean J, Brennan C, Shih JY et al (2007) MET amplification occurs with or without T790M mutations in EGFR mutant lung tumors with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(52):20932–20937CrossRef Bean J, Brennan C, Shih JY et al (2007) MET amplification occurs with or without T790M mutations in EGFR mutant lung tumors with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(52):20932–20937CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bardelli A, Corso S, Bertotti A et al (2013) Amplification of the MET receptor drives resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov 3(6):658–673CrossRef Bardelli A, Corso S, Bertotti A et al (2013) Amplification of the MET receptor drives resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov 3(6):658–673CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Siravegna G, Mussolin B, Buscarino M et al (2015) Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients. Nat Med 21(7):795–801CrossRef Siravegna G, Mussolin B, Buscarino M et al (2015) Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients. Nat Med 21(7):795–801CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertotti A, Papp E, Jones S et al (2015) The genomic landscape of response to EGFR blockade in colorectal cancer. Nature 526(7572):263–267CrossRef Bertotti A, Papp E, Jones S et al (2015) The genomic landscape of response to EGFR blockade in colorectal cancer. Nature 526(7572):263–267CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Raghav K, Morris V, Tang C et al (2016) MET amplification in metastatic colorectal cancer: an acquired response to EGFR inhibition, not a de novo phenomenon. Oncotarget 7(34):54627–54631CrossRef Raghav K, Morris V, Tang C et al (2016) MET amplification in metastatic colorectal cancer: an acquired response to EGFR inhibition, not a de novo phenomenon. Oncotarget 7(34):54627–54631CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Luraghi P, Reato G, Cipriano E et al (2014) MET signaling in colon cancer stem-like cells blunts the therapeutic response to EGFR inhibitors. Cancer Res 74(6):1857–1869CrossRef Luraghi P, Reato G, Cipriano E et al (2014) MET signaling in colon cancer stem-like cells blunts the therapeutic response to EGFR inhibitors. Cancer Res 74(6):1857–1869CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Troiani T, Martinelli E, Napolitano S et al (2013) Increased TGF-α as a mechanism of acquired resistance to the anti-EGFR inhibitor cetuximab through EGFR-MET interaction and activation of MET signaling in colon cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 19(24):6751–6765CrossRef Troiani T, Martinelli E, Napolitano S et al (2013) Increased TGF-α as a mechanism of acquired resistance to the anti-EGFR inhibitor cetuximab through EGFR-MET interaction and activation of MET signaling in colon cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 19(24):6751–6765CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Wang Q, Yang G et al (2011) A novel kinase inhibitor, INCB28060, blocks c-MET-dependent signaling, neoplastic activities, and cross-talk with EGFR and HER-3. Clin Cancer Res 17(22):7127–7138CrossRef Liu X, Wang Q, Yang G et al (2011) A novel kinase inhibitor, INCB28060, blocks c-MET-dependent signaling, neoplastic activities, and cross-talk with EGFR and HER-3. Clin Cancer Res 17(22):7127–7138CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltschukat S, Engstler BS, Huang A et al (2019) Capmatinib (INC280) is active against models of non-small cell lung cancer and other cancer types with defined mechanisms of MET activation. Clin Cancer Res 25(10):3164–3175CrossRef Baltschukat S, Engstler BS, Huang A et al (2019) Capmatinib (INC280) is active against models of non-small cell lung cancer and other cancer types with defined mechanisms of MET activation. Clin Cancer Res 25(10):3164–3175CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuler MH, Berardi R, Lim W et al (2016) Phase (ph) I study of the safety and efficacy of the cMET inhibitor capmatinib (INC280) in patients (pts) with advanced cMET + non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 34(Suppl):9067 (Abstract 9067)CrossRef Schuler MH, Berardi R, Lim W et al (2016) Phase (ph) I study of the safety and efficacy of the cMET inhibitor capmatinib (INC280) in patients (pts) with advanced cMET + non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 34(Suppl):9067 (Abstract 9067)CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang Y, Su W, Nam D et al (2014) Phase I study of the safety and efficacy of INC280 in patients with advanced MET-dependent solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 32(5 Suppl):2520 (Abstract 2520)CrossRef Bang Y, Su W, Nam D et al (2014) Phase I study of the safety and efficacy of INC280 in patients with advanced MET-dependent solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 32(5 Suppl):2520 (Abstract 2520)CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Y, Kim D, Felip E et al (2016) Phase (ph) II safety and efficacy results of a single-arm ph ib/II study of capmatinib (INC280) + gefitinib in patients (pts) with EGFR-mutated (mut), cMET-positive (cMET+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 34(Suppl):9020 (Abstract 9020)CrossRef Wu Y, Kim D, Felip E et al (2016) Phase (ph) II safety and efficacy results of a single-arm ph ib/II study of capmatinib (INC280) + gefitinib in patients (pts) with EGFR-mutated (mut), cMET-positive (cMET+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 34(Suppl):9020 (Abstract 9020)CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S (1998) Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med 17(10):1103–1120CrossRef Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S (1998) Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med 17(10):1103–1120CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuenschwander B, Branson M, Gsponer T (2008) Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat Med 27(13):2420–2439CrossRef Neuenschwander B, Branson M, Gsponer T (2008) Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat Med 27(13):2420–2439CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuenschwander B, Capkun-Niggli G, Branson M, Spiegelhalter DJ (2010) Summarizing historical information on controls in clinical trials. Clin Trials 7(1):5–18CrossRef Neuenschwander B, Capkun-Niggli G, Branson M, Spiegelhalter DJ (2010) Summarizing historical information on controls in clinical trials. Clin Trials 7(1):5–18CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu YL, Zhang L, Kim DW et al (2018) Phase Ib/II study of capmatinib (INC280) plus gefitinib after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapy in patients with EGFR-mutated, MET factor-dysregulated non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 36(31):3101–3109CrossRef Wu YL, Zhang L, Kim DW et al (2018) Phase Ib/II study of capmatinib (INC280) plus gefitinib after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapy in patients with EGFR-mutated, MET factor-dysregulated non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 36(31):3101–3109CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauer TM, Schuler M, Berardi R et al (2016) MINI01.03: Phase (ph) I study of the safety and efficacy of the cMET inhibitor capmatinib (INC280) in patients with advanced cMET + NSCLC: topic: medical oncology. J Thorac Oncol 11(11 Suppl):S257–S258 (Abstract)CrossRef Bauer TM, Schuler M, Berardi R et al (2016) MINI01.03: Phase (ph) I study of the safety and efficacy of the cMET inhibitor capmatinib (INC280) in patients with advanced cMET + NSCLC: topic: medical oncology. J Thorac Oncol 11(11 Suppl):S257–S258 (Abstract)CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Engl N J Med 357(20):2040–2048CrossRef Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Engl N J Med 357(20):2040–2048CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson TB, Ranganathan A, Grothey A (2006) Randomized phase III trial results of panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 6(1):29–31CrossRef Gibson TB, Ranganathan A, Grothey A (2006) Randomized phase III trial results of panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 6(1):29–31CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasquini G, Giaccone G (2018) C-MET inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 27(4):363–375CrossRef Pasquini G, Giaccone G (2018) C-MET inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 27(4):363–375CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Iacopetta B (2003) TP53 mutation in colorectal cancer. Hum Mutat 21(3):271–276CrossRef Iacopetta B (2003) TP53 mutation in colorectal cancer. Hum Mutat 21(3):271–276CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Fodde R (2002) The APC gene in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 38(7):867–871CrossRef Fodde R (2002) The APC gene in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 38(7):867–871CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Modest DP, Jung A, Moosmann N et al (2012) The influence of KRAS and BRAF mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab-based first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: an analysis of the AIO KRK-0104-trial. Int J Cancer 131(4):980–986CrossRef Modest DP, Jung A, Moosmann N et al (2012) The influence of KRAS and BRAF mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab-based first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: an analysis of the AIO KRK-0104-trial. Int J Cancer 131(4):980–986CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A phase 1b study of the MET inhibitor capmatinib combined with cetuximab in patients with MET-positive colorectal cancer who had progressed following anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment
verfasst von
Jean-Pierre Delord
Guillem Argilés
Jerôme Fayette
Lori Wirth
Stefan Kasper
Salvatore Siena
Ricard Mesia
Rossana Berardi
Andrés Cervantes
Jeroen Dekervel
Sylvia Zhao
Yongjian Sun
Huai-Xiang Hao
Ralph Tiedt
Sergio Vicente
Andrea Myers
Lillian L. Siu
Publikationsdatum
14.05.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Investigational New Drugs / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-00928-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Investigational New Drugs 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.