nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.04.2007 | Original Research

Risk Perception, Worry and Satisfaction Related to Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Cancer

verfasst von: Cathrine Bjorvatn, Geir Egil Eide, Berit Rokne Hanestad, Nina Øyen, Odd E. Havik, Anniken Carlsson, Gunilla Berglund

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In this multi center study, genetic counseling for hereditary cancer was evaluated by assessing patients’ worry, perceived risk of developing cancer and satisfaction with genetic counseling. An overall aim was to identify characteristics of vulnerable patients in order to customize genetic counseling. In addition, agreement between patients’ and counselors’ scores was measured. A total of 275 Norwegian patients were consecutively recruited, and 213 completed questionnaires before and after genetic counseling. Patients’ perceived risk decreased after the genetic counseling session. There was incongruence between risk perception expressed as a percentage and in words. Patients were significantly less worried after counseling. Higher levels of worry were predicted by low instrumental satisfaction with counseling, high degree of perceived risk of developing cancer and younger age. In conclusion, counselors met the patients’ psychological needs to a satisfactory degree during counseling. However, patients did not fully understand their risk of developing cancer.

Act. (2003-12-05). Act regarding human medical use of biotechnology. Norwegian legislation.

Brain, K., Norman, P., Gray, J., Rogers, C., Mansel, R., & Harper, P. (2002). A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer, 86(2), 233–238.PubMedCrossRef

Braithwaite, D., Emery, J., Walter, F., Prevost, A. T., & Sutton, S. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96(2), 122–133.PubMed

Bresser, P. J., Seynaeve, C., Van Gool, A. R., Brekelmans, C. T., Meijers-Heijboer, H., van Geel, A. N., et al. (2006). Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women. Plast Reconstr Surg, 117(6), 1675–1682; discussion 1683–1674.

Brun, W., Wright, G., & Ayton, P. (1994). Risk Perception:Main Issues, Approaches and Findings in Subjective Probability (pp. 295–320). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Charles, S., Kessler, L., Stopfer, J. E., Domchek, S., & Halbert, C. H. (2006). Satisfaction with genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among African American women. Patient Educ Couns.

Claus, E. B., Risch, N. J., & Thompson, W. D. (1990). Age at onset as an indicator of familial risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol, 131(6), 961–972.PubMed

Collins, V., Halliday, J., Warren, R., & Williamson, R. (2000). Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic. Clin Genet, 58(6), 460–468.PubMedCrossRef

Cull, A., Anderson, E. D., Campbell, S., Mackay, J., Smyth, E., & Steel, M. (1999). The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women+s risk perceptions and levels of distress. Br J Cancer, 79(3–4), 501–508.PubMedCrossRef

Ervin, N. E. (2006). Does patient satisfaction contribute to nursing care quality? J Nurs Adm, 36(3), 126–130.PubMedCrossRef

Evans, D. G., Blair, V., Greenhalgh, R., Hopwood, P., & Howell, A. (1994). The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 70(5), 934–938.PubMed

Fayers, M., & Machin, D. (2000). Quality of Life. Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. West Sussex, England: Wiley.

Garber, J. E., & Offit, K. (2005). Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. J Clin Oncol, 23(2), 276–292.PubMedCrossRef

Gold, D. T., & McClung, B. (2006). Approaches to patient education: emphasizing the long-term value of compliance and persistence. Am J Med, 119(4 Suppl 1), S32–37.PubMedCrossRef

Holloway, S., Porteous, M., Cetnarskyj, R., Anderson, E., Rush, R., Fry, A. et al. (2004). Patient satisfaction with two different models of cancer genetic services in south-east Scotland. Br J Cancer, 90(3), 582–589.PubMedCrossRef

Hopwood, P. Wonderling, D., Watson, M., Cull, A., Douglas, F., Cole, T., et al. (2004). A randomised comparison of UK genetic risk counselling services for familial cancer: psychosocial outcomes. Br J Cancer, 91(5), 884–892.PubMed

Hunfeld, J. A., Leurs, A., De Jong, M., Oberstein, M. L., Tibben, A., Wladimiroff, J. W, et al. (1999). Prenatal consultation after a fetal anomaly scan: Videotaped exploration of physician+s attitude and patient+s satisfaction. Prenat Diagn, 19(11), 1043–1047.PubMedCrossRef

Kinney, A. Y., Choi, Y. A., DeVellis, B., Kobetz, E., Millikan, R. C., & Sandler, R. S. (2000). Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Am J Prev Med, 18(3), 249–252.PubMedCrossRef

Lampic, C., & Sjoden, P. O. (2000). Patient and staff perceptions of cancer patients+ psychological concerns and needs. Acta Oncol, 39(1), 9–22.PubMedCrossRef

Lerman, C., Lustbader, E., Rimer, B., Daly, M., Miller, S., Sands, C., et al. (1995). Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst, 87(4), 286–292.PubMedCrossRef

Liden, A., Berglund, G., Hansson, M. G., Rosenquist, R., Sjoden, P. O., & Nordin, K. (2003). Genetic counselling for cancer and risk perception. Acta Oncol, 42(7), 726–734.PubMedCrossRef

Michie, S., McDonald, V., & Marteau, T. M. (1997). Genetic counselling: Information given, recall and satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns, 32(1–2), 101–106.PubMedCrossRef

Miki, Y., Swensen, J., Shattuck-Eidens, D., Futreal, P. A., Harshman, K., Tavtigian, S., et al. (1994). A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science, 266(5182), 66–71.PubMedCrossRef

Moller, P., Borg, A., Evans, D. G., Haites, N., Reis, M. M., Vasen, H, et al. (2002). Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomy. Int J Cancer, 101(6), 555–559.PubMedCrossRef

Moller, P., Evans, G., Haites, N., Vasen, H., Reis, M. M., Anderson, E. et al. (1999). Guidelines for follow-up of women at high risk for inherited breast cancer: consensus statement from the Biomed 2 Demonstration Programme on Inherited Breast Cancer. Dis Markers, 15(1–3), 207–211.PubMed

Moller, P., Reis, M. M., Evans, G., Vasen, H., Haites, N., Anderson, E. et al. (1999). Efficacy of early diagnosis and treatment in women with a family history of breast cancer. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Dis Markers, 15(1–3), 179–186.PubMed

Mulvihill, J. J., & Stadler, M. P. (1996). Breast cancer risk analysis and counseling. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 39(4), 851–859.PubMedCrossRef

NBCG, N. B. C. G. (2003). Brystkreft -- Diagnostikk og Behandling. Oslo:The Norwegian Cancer Society.

Nordin, K., Liden, A., Hansson, M., Rosenquist, R., & Berglund, G. (2002). Coping style, psychological distress, risk perception, and satisfaction in subjects attending genetic counselling for hereditary cancer. J Med Genet, 39(9), 689–694.PubMedCrossRef

Ollikainen, M., Abdel-Rahman, W. M., Moisio, A. L., Lindroos, A., Kariola, R., Jarvela, I, et al. (2005). Molecular analysis of familial endometrial carcinoma: A manifestation of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or a separate syndrome? J Clin Oncol, 23(21), 4609–4616.PubMedCrossRef

Pasacreta, J. V. (2003). Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review. Cancer Invest, 21(4), 588–623.PubMedCrossRef

Pearn, J. H. (1973). Patients+ subjective interpretation of risks offered in genetic counselling. J Med Genet, 10(2), 129–134.PubMedCrossRef

Pullman, D., & Hodgkinson, K. (2006). Genetic knowledge and moral responsibility: ambiguity at the interface of genetic research and clinical practice. Clin Genet, 69(3), 199–203.PubMedCrossRef

Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M. N., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic counselors+ task force report. J Genet Couns, 15(2), 77–83. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-9014-3

Rodriguez-Bigas, M. A., Boland, C. R., Hamilton, S. R., Henson, D. E., Jass, J. R., Khan, P. M., et al. (1997). A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines. J Natl Cancer Inst, 89(23), 1758–1762.PubMedCrossRef

Shiloh, S., Avdor, O., & Goodman, R. M. (1990). Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement. Am J Med Genet, 37(4), 522–529.PubMedCrossRef

Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

SPSS13.0. (2004). Users manual. Chicago.

StatXact. (2004). Users manual, Cytel Statistica Software.

Stormorken, A. T., Bowitz-Lothe, I. M., Noren, T., Kure, E., Aase, S., Wijnen, J., et al. (2005). Immunohistochemistry identifies carriers of mismatch repair gene defects causing hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol, 23(21), 4705–4712.PubMedCrossRef

Tercyak, K. P., Demarco, T. A., Mars, B. D., & Peshkin, B. N. (2004). Women+s satisfaction with genetic counseling for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: psychological aspects. Am J Med Genet A, 131(1), 36–41.PubMedCrossRef

Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., Grumet, S. C., et al. (2004). Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. J Genet Couns, 13(2), 83–114.PubMedCrossRef

Umar, A., Boland, C. R., Terdiman, J. P., Syngal, S., de la Chapelle, A., Ruschoff, J., et al. (2004). Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96(4), 261–268.PubMedCrossRef

van Dooren, S., Rijnsburger, A. J., Seynaeve, C., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Essink-Bot, M. L., Tilanus-Linthorst, M. M., et al. (2004). Psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer: the role of risk perception. Eur J Cancer, 40(14), 2056–2063.PubMedCrossRef

Vasen, H. F., Watson, P., Mecklin, J. P., & Lynch, H. T. (1999). New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology, 116(6), 1453–1456.PubMedCrossRef

Vernon, S. W. (1997). Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst, 89(19), 1406–1422.PubMedCrossRef

Vernon, S. W., Gritz, E. R., Peterson, S. K., Amos, C. I., Perz, C. A., Baile, W. F., et al. (1997). Correlates of psychologic distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer. Health Psychol, 16(1), 73–86.PubMedCrossRef

Wagner, A., van Kessel, I., Kriege, M. G., Tops, C. M., Wijnen, J. T., Vasen, H. F., et al. (2005). Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures. Fam Cancer, 4(4), 295–300.PubMedCrossRef

Watson, M., Kash, K. M., Homewood, J., Ebbs, S., Murday, V., & Eeles, R. (2005). Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk? Genet Test, 9(2), 167–174.PubMedCrossRef

Watson, M., Lloyd, S., Davidson, J., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S., et al. (1999). The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 79(5–6), 868–874.PubMedCrossRef

Wooster, R., Bignell, G., Lancaster, J., Swift, S., Seal, S., Mangion, J., et al. (1995). Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature, 378(6559), 789–792.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Risk Perception, Worry and Satisfaction Related to Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Cancer
verfasst von: Cathrine Bjorvatn
Geir Egil Eide
Berit Rokne Hanestad
Nina Øyen
Odd E. Havik
Anniken Carlsson
Gunilla Berglund
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2007
Verlag: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9061-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Risk Perception, Worry and Satisfaction Related to Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Cancer

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

Knowledge About Genetics Among African Americans

2006 National Society of Genetic Counselors Presidential Address: Join Me on the NSGC Journey

Report from the UK and Eire Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (AGNC) Supervision Working Group on Genetic Counselling Supervision

The Effect of Disruptions During Counseling on Recall of Genetic Risk Information: The Case of Cystic Fibrosis

Editorial on Supervision

Assessing the Informational Needs of Adolescents with a Genetic Condition: What Do They Want to Know?

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie