Late Presentation and Loss to Follow-Up of Immigrants Newly Diagnosed with HIV in the HAART Era

To compare clinical characteristics and therapeutic management of newly HIV-diagnosed immigrants to natives. Patients with a first HIV diagnosis from 1996 to 2010 were included. Of 716 new diagnoses, 85 (12 %) were immigrants. Migrants were younger, more frequently females and sexually infected, less likely to voluntarily request testing, and less HCV-coinfected. Late presenters (CD4 <350 or AIDS) were 76 % among migrants versus 56 % in natives (p = 0.006) with an increasing trend over time. HAART was initiated in 76.5 % of natives and 72.4 % of immigrants; the number/type of adverse events and treatment discontinuation were similar. Immigrants received more NNRTIs-based regimens. A similar proportion of patients reached virological suppression at month 1–3–6 after HAART initiation, but 43 % of immigrants versus 27 % of natives resulted lost to follow-up (p < 0.001). Diagnosis of HIV was often delayed among migrants, who also presented a higher rate of lost to follow-up.