Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2019

23.05.2018

Predicting Return to Work in a Heterogeneous Sample of Recently Injured Workers Using the Brief ÖMPSQ-SF

verfasst von: M. K. Nicholas, D. S. J. Costa, S. J. Linton, C. J. Main, W. S. Shaw, R. Pearce, M. Gleeson, R. Z. Pinto, F. M. Blyth, J. H. McCauley, C. G. Maher, R. J. E. M. Smeets, A. McGarity

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose (1) to examine the ability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire-short version (ÖMPSQ-SF) to predict time to return to pre-injury work duties (PID) following a work-related soft tissue injury (regardless of body location); and (2) to examine the appropriateness of 50/100 as a suitable cut-off score for case identification. Methods Injured workers (IW) from six public hospitals in Sydney, Australia, who had taken medically-sanctioned time off work due to their injury, were recruited by insurance case managers within 5–15 days of their injury. Eligible participants (N = 213 in total) were administered the ÖMPSQ-SF over the telephone by the case manager. For objective (1) Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to predict days to return to PID using the ÖMPSQ-SF. For objective (2) receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the ÖMPSQ-SF total score that optimises sensitivity and specificity in detecting whether or not participants had returned to PID within 2–7 weeks. Results The total ÖMPSQ-SF score significantly predicted number of days to return to PID, such that for every 1-point increase in the total ÖMPSQ-SF score the predicted chance of returning to work reduced by 4% (i.e., hazard ratio = 0.96), p < 0.001. Sensitivity and specificity for the ROC analysis comparing ÖMPSQ-SF total score to return to PID within 2–7 weeks suggested 48 as the optimal cut off (sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.79). Conclusion The results provide strong support for the use of the ÖMPSQ-SF in an applied setting for identifying those IW likely to have delayed RTW when administered within 15 days of the injury. While a score of 48/100 was the optimal cut point for sensitivity and specificity, pragmatically, 50/100 should be acceptable as a cut-off in future studies of this type.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(4):398–412.CrossRefPubMed Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(4):398–412.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson CL, Murphy G. Transition from the labor market: older workers and retirement. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(4):609–627.CrossRefPubMed Peterson CL, Murphy G. Transition from the labor market: older workers and retirement. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(4):609–627.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schofield DJ, Shrestha RN, Percival R, Callander EJ, Kelly SJ, Passey ME. Early retirement and the financial assets of individuals with back problems. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5):731–736.CrossRefPubMed Schofield DJ, Shrestha RN, Percival R, Callander EJ, Kelly SJ, Passey ME. Early retirement and the financial assets of individuals with back problems. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5):731–736.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson D, Fry T. Factors affecting return to work after injury: a study for the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research; 2002. Johnson D, Fry T. Factors affecting return to work after injury: a study for the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research; 2002.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Landstad BJ, Wendelborg C, Hedlund M. Factors explaining return to work for long-term sick workers in Norway. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(15):1215–1226.CrossRefPubMed Landstad BJ, Wendelborg C, Hedlund M. Factors explaining return to work for long-term sick workers in Norway. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(15):1215–1226.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Lordan JL, Uthman O, Main CJ, Glozier N, et al. Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(6):448–456.CrossRefPubMed Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Lordan JL, Uthman O, Main CJ, Glozier N, et al. Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(6):448–456.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening of DWP clients for risk of long-term incapacity: a conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2003. Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening of DWP clients for risk of long-term incapacity: a conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2003.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Carragee EJ, Alamin TF, Miller JL, Carragee JM. Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain. Spine J. 2005;5(1):24–35.CrossRefPubMed Carragee EJ, Alamin TF, Miller JL, Carragee JM. Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain. Spine J. 2005;5(1):24–35.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Street TD, Lacey SJ. A systematic review of studies identifying predictors of poor return to work outcomes following workplace injury. Work 2015;51(2):373–381.CrossRefPubMed Street TD, Lacey SJ. A systematic review of studies identifying predictors of poor return to work outcomes following workplace injury. Work 2015;51(2):373–381.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(13):1295–1302.CrossRef Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(13):1295–1302.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallen CD, Peat G, Thomas E, Dunn KM, Croft PR. Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(541):655–661.PubMedPubMedCentral Mallen CD, Peat G, Thomas E, Dunn KM, Croft PR. Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(541):655–661.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. The early identification and management of psychological risk factors (Yellow Flags) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–753.CrossRefPubMed Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. The early identification and management of psychological risk factors (Yellow Flags) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–753.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill JC, Dunn K, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(5):632–641.CrossRef Hill JC, Dunn K, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(5):632–641.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(2):80–86.CrossRefPubMed Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(2):80–86.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hockings RL, McAuley JH, Maher CG. A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Spine. 2008;33(15):E494–E500.CrossRefPubMed Hockings RL, McAuley JH, Maher CG. A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Spine. 2008;33(15):E494–E500.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CG, Grotle M. Evaluation of the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(8):666–670.CrossRefPubMed Maher CG, Grotle M. Evaluation of the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(8):666–670.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Linton SJ, Nicholas MK, MacDonald S. Development of a Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine 2011;36(22):1891–1895.CrossRefPubMed Linton SJ, Nicholas MK, MacDonald S. Development of a Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine 2011;36(22):1891–1895.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hochberg Y. A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988;75(4):800–802.CrossRef Hochberg Y. A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988;75(4):800–802.CrossRef
21.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly GA, Blake C, Power CK, O’Keeffe D, Fullen BM. The association between chronic low back pain and sleep: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(2):169–181.CrossRefPubMed Kelly GA, Blake C, Power CK, O’Keeffe D, Fullen BM. The association between chronic low back pain and sleep: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(2):169–181.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotters F, Burdorf A. Prognostic factors for duration of sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(2):212–221.CrossRefPubMed Lotters F, Burdorf A. Prognostic factors for duration of sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(2):212–221.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fadyl J, McPherson K. Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):362–374.CrossRefPubMed Fadyl J, McPherson K. Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):362–374.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster NE, Thomas E, Bishop A, Dunn KM, Main CJ. Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care. Pain 2010;148(3):398–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foster NE, Thomas E, Bishop A, Dunn KM, Main CJ. Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care. Pain 2010;148(3):398–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB., Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: state of the scientific evidence. J Behav Med. 2007;30(1):77–94.CrossRefPubMed Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB., Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: state of the scientific evidence. J Behav Med. 2007;30(1):77–94.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wertli MM, Rasmussen-Barr E, Weiser S, Bachmann LM, Brunner F. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 2014;14(5):816–836.CrossRefPubMed Wertli MM, Rasmussen-Barr E, Weiser S, Bachmann LM, Brunner F. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 2014;14(5):816–836.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gauthier N, Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Stanish WD, Thibault P. Investigating risk factors for chronicity: the importance of distinguishing between return-to-work status and self-report measures of disability. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(3):312–318.CrossRefPubMed Gauthier N, Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Stanish WD, Thibault P. Investigating risk factors for chronicity: the importance of distinguishing between return-to-work status and self-report measures of disability. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(3):312–318.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Main CJ, Nicholas MK, Shaw WS, Tetrick LE, Ehrhart MG, Pransky G. Implementation science and employer disability practices: embedding implementation factors in research designs. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):448–464.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Main CJ, Nicholas MK, Shaw WS, Tetrick LE, Ehrhart MG, Pransky G. Implementation science and employer disability practices: embedding implementation factors in research designs. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):448–464.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Predicting Return to Work in a Heterogeneous Sample of Recently Injured Workers Using the Brief ÖMPSQ-SF
verfasst von
M. K. Nicholas
D. S. J. Costa
S. J. Linton
C. J. Main
W. S. Shaw
R. Pearce
M. Gleeson
R. Z. Pinto
F. M. Blyth
J. H. McCauley
C. G. Maher
R. J. E. M. Smeets
A. McGarity
Publikationsdatum
23.05.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9784-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe