nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.12.2008

Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice

verfasst von: Molla Sloane Donaldson

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice poses challenges for health care teams and organizations to respond to individual patient needs in a timely fashion. Well-validated tools and feasibility studies are available, but successful spread will require knowledge of effective technology dissemination in complex health delivery systems. Given what has been learned about effective implementation, it is reasonable to ask whether the broad adoption of PROs can occur incrementally using current models of care to apply PRO technology. Another approach is to start with patient needs and focus on how to meet those needs most effectively using PROs in new ways of organizing health care.

Haldane, J. B. S. (1963). The truth about death. Journal of Genetics, 58, 463–464.

Osoba, D. (2007). Translating the science of patient-reported outcomes assessment into clinical practice. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monograph, 37, 5–11.CrossRef

Cleeland, C. S. (2007). Symptom burden: multiple symptoms and their impact as patient-reported outcomes. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monograph, 37, 16–21. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgm005.CrossRef

Nelson, E. C., Wasson, J. H., Johnson, D. J., & Hays, R. D. (1996). Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts: Brief measures for clinical practice. Available online at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~coopproj/more_charts.html.

Guyatt, G. H., Ferrans, C. E., Halyard, M. Y., Revicki, D. A., Symonds, T. L., Varricchio, C. G., et al.; Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. (2007). Exploration of the value of health-related quality-of-life information from clinical research and into clinical practice. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82(10), 1229–1239. Erratum in: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82(12), 1579. Alonso, Jordi L corrected to Alonso, Jordi.PubMedCrossRef

Bruner, D. W. (2007). Outcomes research in cancer symptom management trials: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) conceptual model. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 37, 12–15. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgm004.PubMedCrossRef

Lipscomb, J., Gotay, C. C., & Snyder, C. (Eds.). (2005). Outcomes assessment in cancer. Measures, methods, and applications. New York: Cambridge University.

Lipscomb, J., Donaldson, M. S., Arora, N. K., Brown, M. L., Clauser, S. B., Potosky, A. L., et al. (2004). Cancer outcomes research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monograph, 33, 178–197.CrossRef

Ganz, P. A. (1995). Impact of quality of life outcomes on clinical practice. Oncology (Williston Park), 9, 61–65.

10.

International Society for Quality of Life Research. (2007). ISOQOL Conference on Patient Reported Outcomes in Clinical Practice, Budapest, Hungary, 24–26 June 2007. Home page at: http://www.isoqol.org.

11.

Valderas, J. M., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., Guyatt, G., Ferrans, C. E., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2008). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17(2), 179–193. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9295-0.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Lipscomb, J., Gotay, C. C., & Snyder, C. F. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes in cancer: A review of recent research and policy initiatives. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 57(5), 278–300.CrossRef

13.

Fung, C. H., & Hays, R. D. (2008). Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9379-5.PubMed

14.

Donaldson, M. (2006). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical oncology practice: benefits, challenges and next steps. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 6(1), 87–95. doi:10.1586/14737167.6.1.87.CrossRef

15.

Donaldson, M. S. (2004). Taking stock of health-related quality-of-life measurement in oncology practice in the United States. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 33, 155–167. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh017.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Bjordal, K. (2004). Impact of quality of life measurement in daily clinical practice. Annals of Oncology, 15(Supplement 4), iv279–iv282. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh939.PubMed

17.

Jacobsen, P. B., Davis, K., & Cella, D. (2002). Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practice. Oncology (Williston Park), 16, 133–139.

18.

Espallargues, M., Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2000). Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: A systematic review of its impact. Medical Care, 38, 175–186. doi:10.1097/00005650-200002000-00007.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Buxton, J., White, M., & Osoba, D. (1998). Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 7, 513–519. doi:10.1023/A:1008826408328.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Cull, A., Gould, A., House, A., Smith, A., Strong, V., Velikova, G., et al. (2001). Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice. British Journal of Cancer, 85, 1842–1849. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2001.2182.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Fayers, P. M. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of using PROs in clinical practice: A role for cluster-randomised trials. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9391-9.

22.

Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5, 401–416. PubMedCrossRef

23.

Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(23), 3027–34. Erratum in: (2003). Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(8), 987.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Chang, C. H., Cella, D., Masters, G. A., Laliberte, N., O’Brien, P., Peterman, A., et al. (2002). Real-time clinical application of quality-of-life assessment in advanced lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer, 4(2), 104–109. doi:10.3816/CLC.2002.n.020.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Chumbler, N. R., Kobb, R., Harris, L., Richardson, L. C., Darkins, A., Sberna, M., et al. (2007). Healthcare utilization among veterans undergoing chemotherapy: The impact of a cancer care coordination/home-telehealth program. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 30, 308–317.PubMed

27.

Gravel, K., Légaré, F., & Graham, I. D. (2006). Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implementation Science, 1, 16. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-16.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Nelson, E. C., Godfrey, M. M., Batalden, P. B., Berry, S. A., Bothe, A. E., Jr, McKinley, K. E., et al. (2008). Clinical microsystems, part 1. The building blocks of health systems. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 34(7), 367–378.PubMed

29.

Institute of Medicine National Cancer Policy Forum. (2007). Implementing cancer survivorship care planning. A workshop summary. Maria Hewitt and Patricia A. Ganz, Rapporteurs. Washington, National Academy Press.

30.

Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006). Welcome to Implementation Science. 1(1). Available online at: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/1/1/1.

31.

Eccles, M., Grimshaw, J., Campbell, M., & Ramsay, C. (2003). Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 12(1), 47–52. doi:10.1136/qhc.12.1.47.CrossRef

32.

Shojania, K. G., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2005). Evidence-based quality improvement: The state of the science. Health Affairs, 24(1), 138–150. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.138.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Stetler, C. B., McQueen, L., Demakis, J., & Mittman, B. S. (2008). An organizational framework and strategic implementation for system-level change to enhance research-based practice: QUERI series. Implementation Science, 3, 30.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Goetz, M. B., Bowman, C., Hoang, T., Anaya, H., Osborn, T., Gifford, A. L., et al. (2008). Implementing and evaluating a regional strategy to improve testing rates in VA patients at risk for HIV, utilizing the QUERI process as a guiding framework: QUERI series. Implementation Science, 3, 16.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Krein, S. L., Bernstein, S. J., Fletcher, C. E., Makki, F., Goldzweig, C. L., Watts, B., et al. (2008). Improving eye care for veterans with diabetes: An example of using the QUERI steps to move from evidence to implementation—QUERI series. Implementation Science, 3, 18.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

37.

Shojania, K. G., McDonald, K. M., Wachter, R. M., & Owens, D. K. (2004). Closing the quality gap: A critical analysis of quality improvement strategies. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

38.

Schrijvers, G., Oudendijk, N., & de Vries, P. (2003). In search of the quickest way to disseminate health care innovations [Electronic version]. International Journal of Integrated Care, 3, e19.PubMed

39.

Fleuren, M., Wiefferink, K., & Paulussen, T. (2004). Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: Literature review and Delphi study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16(2), 107–123. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh030.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. doi:10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Lomas, J. (1993). Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: Who should do what? Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 703, 226–235.CrossRef

42.

Berwick, D. M. (2003). Disseminating innovations in health care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(15), 1969–1975. doi:10.1001/jama.289.15.1969.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Reisse, G. (2007). Appendix C. In The state of quality improvement and implementation research: Expert views, workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11986.html.

44.

Sederer, L. I., Dickey, B., & Eisen, S. V. (1997). Assessing outcomes in clinical practice. The Psychiatric Quarterly, 68(4), 311–325. doi:10.1023/A:1025490930088.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Institute of Medicine. Kaveh Shajania. (2007). Appendix C. In The state of quality improvement and implementation research: Expert views, workshop summary. Washington: National Academy Press. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11986.html.

46.

Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm. A new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academy Press.

47.

Bielli, E., Carminati, F., La Capra, S. L., Lina, M., Brunelli, C., & Tamburini, M. (2004). A wireless health outcomes monitoring system (WHOMS): Development and field testing with cancer patients using mobile phones. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 4, 7.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Chaudhry, B. (2008). Computerized clinical decision support: Will it transform healthcare? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(Suppl 1), 85–87. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0432-9.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Jones, J. B., Snyder, C. F., & Wu, A. W. (2007). Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 16(8), 1407–1417. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9235-z.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Garcia, S. F., Cella, D., Clauser, S. B., Flynn, K. E., Lad, T., Lai, J.-S., et al. (2007). Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: A patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(32), 5106–5112. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2005). Item response theory and the measurement of clinical change. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 228–238. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_02.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Whitney, S. N., McGuire, A. L., & McCullough, L. B. (2004). A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140(1), 54–59.PubMed

53.

Christensen, C.M., Bohmer, R. & Kenagy, J. (2000). Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 102–112, 119.PubMed

54.

Smith, M. D. (2007). Disruptive innovation: Can health care learn from other industries? A conversation with Clayton M. Christensen. Health Affairs, 26(3), w288–w295. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w288.CrossRef

55.

Gibson, W. (1999). Attribution, paraphrased in NPR Interview. Talk of the Nation, November 30.

56.

Podichetty, V. K., Weiss, L. T., Fanciullo, G. J., & Baird, J. C. (2007). Web-based health survey systems in outcome assessment and management of pain. Pain Medicine, 8(Suppl 3), S189–S198.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Editorial (no author). (2007). Patient-reported outcomes: the better to know you with. Executive Healthcare Magazine, 2(3).

58.

Personal Medical Records. (2008). National Library of Medicine. 2008. Available online at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/personalmedicalrecords.html.

59.

Jones, P. A., & Laird, P. W. (1999). Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nature Genetics, 21 February, pp 123–167. Available online at: http://www.chem.ucsb.edu/coursepages/archive/fall03/94-Reich/Laird2.pdf.

60.

Waters, M. D., Selkirk, J. K., & Olden, K. (2003). The impact of new technologies on human population studies. Mutation Research, 544(2–3), 349–360. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.06.022.PubMed

Titel: Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice
verfasst von: Molla Sloane Donaldson
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2008
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9414-6

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2008

Evaluating the effectiveness of using PROs in clinical practice: a role for cluster-randomised trials

Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a population-based sample of children and adolescents after 3 years of follow-up

Lower visual acuity predicts worse utility values among patients with type 2 diabetes

Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement

The Turkish version of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument: translation, validity and reliability

Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: Results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)