Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology 2/2014

01.06.2014 | Review

Market access of cancer drugs in European countries: improving resource allocation

verfasst von: Kim Pauwels, Isabelle Huys, Minne Casteels, Katelijne De Nys, Steven Simoens

Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Public health systems need to make well-founded choices in order to distribute their scarce resources in the most efficient way. Given the number of cancer patients, public/private investments in oncology research, the growing number of new anti-cancer agents and consequent budget impact of cancer care, market access of cancer drugs has become delicate over the last decade. Furthermore, decision makers are challenged by ethical objections and endeavour to provide fair and equal access to treatments for cancer patients. The aim of this study is to generate an overview of market access procedures for cancer drugs in eight European countries and formulate advice for improvement of resource allocation. Results are obtained through a literature review and a qualitative questionnaire and validated by experts with proven knowledge about procedures for price setting and reimbursement of drugs. Diverse measures are applied in the studied countries to optimize reimbursement of cancer drugs such as adjusted cost-effectiveness threshold, regulations for off-label use and new market access agreements. Additionally, innovative cancer drugs are excluded from explicit cost control measures such as payback of budget excess by pharmaceutical companies and lump-sum payments per diagnostic related groups (DRG) in the hospital. The results suggest that cancer is prioritized above other disease areas. Further research is necessary to address the question if society attaches higher value to cancer drugs than to treatments for other diseases.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat European Partnership For Action Against Cancer — EPAAC (2008) National cancer control programmes : analysis of primary data from questionnaires. European Partnership For Action Against Cancer — EPAAC. http://www.epaac.eu/national-cancer-plans. Accessed 20 March 2013 European Partnership For Action Against Cancer — EPAAC (2008) National cancer control programmes : analysis of primary data from questionnaires. European Partnership For Action Against Cancer — EPAAC. http://​www.​epaac.​eu/​national-cancer-plans. Accessed 20 March 2013
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan R, Peppercorn J, Sikora K, Zalcberg J, Meropol NJ, Amir E et al (2011) Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries. Lancet Oncol 12:933–980PubMedCrossRef Sullivan R, Peppercorn J, Sikora K, Zalcberg J, Meropol NJ, Amir E et al (2011) Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries. Lancet Oncol 12:933–980PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe C, Bergmann L, Bosanquet N, Ellis M, Enzmann H, von Euler M et al (2009) Market and patient access to new oncology products in Europe: a current, multidisciplinary perspective. Ann Oncol 20:403–412. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn603 PubMedCrossRef McCabe C, Bergmann L, Bosanquet N, Ellis M, Enzmann H, von Euler M et al (2009) Market and patient access to new oncology products in Europe: a current, multidisciplinary perspective. Ann Oncol 20:403–412. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdn603 PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Neumann PJ, Bliss SK, Chambers JD (2012) Therapies for advanced cancers pose a special challenge for health technology assessment organizations in many countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 31:700–708CrossRef Neumann PJ, Bliss SK, Chambers JD (2012) Therapies for advanced cancers pose a special challenge for health technology assessment organizations in many countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 31:700–708CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Simoens S, Dooms M (2011) How much is the life of a cancer patient worth? A pharmaco-economic perspective. J Clin Pharm Ther 36:249–256PubMedCrossRef Simoens S, Dooms M (2011) How much is the life of a cancer patient worth? A pharmaco-economic perspective. J Clin Pharm Ther 36:249–256PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogler S, Habl C, Bogut M, Voncina L (2011) Comparing pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies in Croatia to the European Union Member States. Croat Med J 52:183–197PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Vogler S, Habl C, Bogut M, Voncina L (2011) Comparing pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies in Croatia to the European Union Member States. Croat Med J 52:183–197PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Garau M, Mestre-Ferrandiz J (2009) Access mechanisms for orphan drugs: a comparative study of selected European countries. OHE briefing 52 Garau M, Mestre-Ferrandiz J (2009) Access mechanisms for orphan drugs: a comparative study of selected European countries. OHE briefing 52
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gress S, Niebuhr D, May U, Wasem J (2007) Reform of prescription drug reimbursement and pricing in the German social health insurance market: a comparison of three scenarios. Pharmacoeconomics 25:443–454PubMed Gress S, Niebuhr D, May U, Wasem J (2007) Reform of prescription drug reimbursement and pricing in the German social health insurance market: a comparison of three scenarios. Pharmacoeconomics 25:443–454PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Schäfer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M (2010) The Netherlands Health System Review. Health Syst Transit 12 Schäfer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M (2010) The Netherlands Health System Review. Health Syst Transit 12
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorenson C (2010) Use of comparative effectiveness research in drug coverage and pricing decisions: a six-country comparison. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 91:1–14 Sorenson C (2010) Use of comparative effectiveness research in drug coverage and pricing decisions: a six-country comparison. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 91:1–14
39.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo Scalzo A, Donatini A (2009) Italy: health system review. Health Syst Transit 11:1–243 Lo Scalzo A, Donatini A (2009) Italy: health system review. Health Syst Transit 11:1–243
44.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Pen C, Priol G, Lilliu H (2003) What criteria for pharmaceuticals reimbursement? An empirical analysis of the evaluation of "medical service rendered" by reimbursable drugs in France. Eur J Health Econ 4:30–36. doi:10.1007/s10198-002-0145-2 PubMedCrossRef Le Pen C, Priol G, Lilliu H (2003) What criteria for pharmaceuticals reimbursement? An empirical analysis of the evaluation of "medical service rendered" by reimbursable drugs in France. Eur J Health Econ 4:30–36. doi:10.​1007/​s10198-002-0145-2 PubMedCrossRef
50.
52.
54.
60.
63.
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Anell A, Glenngard AH, Merkur S (2012) Sweden health system review. Health Syst Transit 14:1–159PubMed Anell A, Glenngard AH, Merkur S (2012) Sweden health system review. Health Syst Transit 14:1–159PubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Wettermark B, Godman B, Andersson K, Gustafsson LL, Haycox A, Bertele V (2008) Recent national and regional drug reforms in Sweden: implications for pharmaceutical companies in Europe. Pharmacoeconomics 26:537–550PubMedCrossRef Wettermark B, Godman B, Andersson K, Gustafsson LL, Haycox A, Bertele V (2008) Recent national and regional drug reforms in Sweden: implications for pharmaceutical companies in Europe. Pharmacoeconomics 26:537–550PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyle S (2011) United Kingdom (England): health system review. Health Syst Transit 13:1–xx Boyle S (2011) United Kingdom (England): health system review. Health Syst Transit 13:1–xx
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Trowman R, Chung H, Longson C, Littlejohns P, Clark P (2011) The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and its role in assessing the value of new cancer treatments in England and Wales. Clin Cancer Res 17:4930–4935. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2510 PubMedCrossRef Trowman R, Chung H, Longson C, Littlejohns P, Clark P (2011) The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and its role in assessing the value of new cancer treatments in England and Wales. Clin Cancer Res 17:4930–4935. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-10-2510 PubMedCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat National institute for Health and Clinical Excellence—NICE (2013) NICE and cancer drugs — the facts. National institute for Health and Clinical Excellence — NICE. Accessed 10 April 2013 National institute for Health and Clinical Excellence—NICE (2013) NICE and cancer drugs — the facts. National institute for Health and Clinical Excellence — NICE. Accessed 10 April 2013
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Maynard A, Bloor K (2011) The economics of the NHS cancer drugs fund. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9:137–138PubMedCrossRef Maynard A, Bloor K (2011) The economics of the NHS cancer drugs fund. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9:137–138PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerkens S, Merkur S (2010) Belgium: health system review. Health Syst Transit 12:1–266, xxv Gerkens S, Merkur S (2010) Belgium: health system review. Health Syst Transit 12:1–266, xxv
83.
87.
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins M, Latimer N (2013) NICE's end of life decision making scheme: impact on population health. BMJ 346:f1363PubMedCrossRef Collins M, Latimer N (2013) NICE's end of life decision making scheme: impact on population health. BMJ 346:f1363PubMedCrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlson JJ, Garrison LP, Sullivan SD (2009) Paying for outcomes: innovative coverage and reimbursement schemes for pharmaceuticals. J Manag Care Pharm 15:683–687PubMed Carlson JJ, Garrison LP, Sullivan SD (2009) Paying for outcomes: innovative coverage and reimbursement schemes for pharmaceuticals. J Manag Care Pharm 15:683–687PubMed
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Linley WG, Hughes DA (2012) Societal views on NICE, cancer drug fund, and value-based pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: a cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great-Britain. Health Econ. doi:10.1002/hec.2872 PubMed Linley WG, Hughes DA (2012) Societal views on NICE, cancer drug fund, and value-based pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: a cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great-Britain. Health Econ. doi:10.​1002/​hec.​2872 PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Market access of cancer drugs in European countries: improving resource allocation
verfasst von
Kim Pauwels
Isabelle Huys
Minne Casteels
Katelijne De Nys
Steven Simoens
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Targeted Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Elektronische ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-013-0301-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Targeted Oncology 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.