Skip to main content
Erschienen in: La radiologia medica 9/2015

01.09.2015 | ETHICS AND FORENSIC RADIOLOGY

Errors and malpractice lawsuits in radiology: what the radiologist needs to know

verfasst von: Francesco Paolo Busardò, Paola Frati, Alessandro Santurro, Simona Zaami, Vittorio Fineschi

Erschienen in: La radiologia medica | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

All medical specialties dealing with patients include an intrinsic risk in exposing them to issues resulting from human errors. Radiology is not spared from this risk since it includes “decision-making under conditions of uncertainty.” In medical imaging, the line between the word “error” and misdiagnosis or discrepancy is very difficult to demarcate, mainly because the diagnostic process is not a binary relation and it is not always possible to establish if a pathological condition is present or not. The error in radiology is strongly related to the diagnostic process; hence, it can be defined as a “diagnostic error” which represents the most common cause of medical malpractice suits against radiologists. In this paper, the authors described the features of errors occurring in radiology, trying to establish their impact and prevalence. Secondly, some data coming from different countries were compared in order to highlight the most frequent causes leading to malpractice lawsuits in radiology and how the phenomenon of malpractice in this field is represented worldwide.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brady A, Laoide RÓ, McCarthy P, McDermott R (2012) Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J 81(1):3–9PubMedCentralPubMed Brady A, Laoide RÓ, McCarthy P, McDermott R (2012) Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J 81(1):3–9PubMedCentralPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker SR, Whang JS, Luk L, Clarkin KS, Castro A 3rd, Patel R (2013) The demography of medical malpractice suits against radiologists. Radiology 266(2):539–547CrossRefPubMed Baker SR, Whang JS, Luk L, Clarkin KS, Castro A 3rd, Patel R (2013) The demography of medical malpractice suits against radiologists. Radiology 266(2):539–547CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazzocchi M (2012) Doctor-patient communication in radiology: a great opportunity for future radiology. Radiol Med 117(3):339–353CrossRefPubMed Bazzocchi M (2012) Doctor-patient communication in radiology: a great opportunity for future radiology. Radiol Med 117(3):339–353CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Merry A, McCall Smith A (2001) Errors, medicine, and the law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Merry A, McCall Smith A (2001) Errors, medicine, and the law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Graber M (2005) Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31(2):106–113PubMed Graber M (2005) Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31(2):106–113PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Garland LH (1949) On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology 52(3):309–328CrossRefPubMed Garland LH (1949) On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology 52(3):309–328CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat McCreadie G, Oliver TB (2009) Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT. Clin Radiol 64:491–499CrossRefPubMed McCreadie G, Oliver TB (2009) Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT. Clin Radiol 64:491–499CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Renfrew DL, Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM (1992) Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology 183(1):145–150CrossRefPubMed Renfrew DL, Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM (1992) Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology 183(1):145–150CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Whang JS, Baker SR, Patel R, Luk L, Castro A III (2013) The causes of medical malpractice suits against radiologists in the United States. Radiology 266(2):548–554CrossRefPubMed Whang JS, Baker SR, Patel R, Luk L, Castro A III (2013) The causes of medical malpractice suits against radiologists in the United States. Radiology 266(2):548–554CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fileni A, Magnavita N (2006) A 12-year follow-up study of malpractice claims against radiologists in Italy. Radiol Med 111(7):1009–1022CrossRefPubMed Fileni A, Magnavita N (2006) A 12-year follow-up study of malpractice claims against radiologists in Italy. Radiol Med 111(7):1009–1022CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Magnavita N, Fileni A, Mirk P, Magnavita G, Ricci S, Cotroneo AR (2012) Malpractice claims in interventional radiology: frequency, characteristics and protective measures. Radiol Med. 118(3):504–517CrossRefPubMed Magnavita N, Fileni A, Mirk P, Magnavita G, Ricci S, Cotroneo AR (2012) Malpractice claims in interventional radiology: frequency, characteristics and protective measures. Radiol Med. 118(3):504–517CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Breest Smallenburg V, Setz-Pels W, Groenewoud JH, Voogd AC, Jansen FH, Louwman MW, Tielbeek AV, Duijm LE (2012) Malpractice claims following screening mammography in The Netherlands. Int J Cancer 131(6):1360–1366CrossRef Van Breest Smallenburg V, Setz-Pels W, Groenewoud JH, Voogd AC, Jansen FH, Louwman MW, Tielbeek AV, Duijm LE (2012) Malpractice claims following screening mammography in The Netherlands. Int J Cancer 131(6):1360–1366CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlin L (1977) Does the “missed” radiographic diagnosis constitute malpractice? Radiology 123:523–527CrossRefPubMed Berlin L (1977) Does the “missed” radiographic diagnosis constitute malpractice? Radiology 123:523–527CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cannavale A, Santoni M, Mancarella P, Passariello R, Arbarello P (2013) Malpractice in radiology: what should you worry about? Radiol Res Practi 2013:219259CrossRef Cannavale A, Santoni M, Mancarella P, Passariello R, Arbarello P (2013) Malpractice in radiology: what should you worry about? Radiol Res Practi 2013:219259CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Caldwell C, Seamone ER (2007) Excusable neglect in malpractice suits against radiologists: a proposed jury instruction to recognize the human condition. Ann Health Law 16(1):43–77PubMed Caldwell C, Seamone ER (2007) Excusable neglect in malpractice suits against radiologists: a proposed jury instruction to recognize the human condition. Ann Health Law 16(1):43–77PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner DA (1978) Teaching editorial: observer variability—what to do until perfect diagnostic tests are invented. J Nucl Med 19:435–437PubMed Turner DA (1978) Teaching editorial: observer variability—what to do until perfect diagnostic tests are invented. J Nucl Med 19:435–437PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlin L (2007) Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past five decades? AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1173–1178CrossRefPubMed Berlin L (2007) Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past five decades? AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1173–1178CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlin L (2007) Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):517–522CrossRefPubMed Berlin L (2007) Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):517–522CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE (2013) Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(3):611–617CrossRefPubMed Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE (2013) Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(3):611–617CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Errico S, Pennelli S, Colasurdo AP, Frati P, Sicuro L, Fineschi V (2015) The right to be informed and fear of disclosure. Sustainability of a full error disclosure policy at an Italian cancer centre/clinic. BMC Health Serv Res 15(1):130PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed D’Errico S, Pennelli S, Colasurdo AP, Frati P, Sicuro L, Fineschi V (2015) The right to be informed and fear of disclosure. Sustainability of a full error disclosure policy at an Italian cancer centre/clinic. BMC Health Serv Res 15(1):130PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu AW, Boyle DJ, Wallace G, Mazor KM (2013) Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement. J Public Health Res 2(3):e32PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Wu AW, Boyle DJ, Wallace G, Mazor KM (2013) Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement. J Public Health Res 2(3):e32PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlin L (2013) To disclose or not to disclose radiologic errors: should “patient-first” supersede radiologist self-interest? Radiology 268(1):4–7CrossRefPubMed Berlin L (2013) To disclose or not to disclose radiologic errors: should “patient-first” supersede radiologist self-interest? Radiology 268(1):4–7CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy JF (2008) Root cause analysis of medical errors. Ir Med J 101(2):36PubMed Murphy JF (2008) Root cause analysis of medical errors. Ir Med J 101(2):36PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Chief Medical Officer (2000) An organisation with a memory: report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. Stationery Office, London, pp viii–ix Chief Medical Officer (2000) An organisation with a memory: report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. Stationery Office, London, pp viii–ix
Metadaten
Titel
Errors and malpractice lawsuits in radiology: what the radiologist needs to know
verfasst von
Francesco Paolo Busardò
Paola Frati
Alessandro Santurro
Simona Zaami
Vittorio Fineschi
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
La radiologia medica / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0033-8362
Elektronische ISSN: 1826-6983
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0561-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

La radiologia medica 9/2015 Zur Ausgabe

ETHICS AND FORENSIC RADIOLOGY

Errors in neuroradiology

ETHICS AND FORENSIC RADIOLOGY

Imaging for homicide investigations

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.