nach oben

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.04.2009 | Original Article

What Do Patients Choose to Tell Their Doctors? Qualitative Analysis of Potential Barriers to Reattributing Medically Unexplained Symptoms

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite both parties often expressing dissatisfaction with consultations, patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) prefer to consult their general practitioners (GPs) rather than any other health professional. Training GPs to explain how symptoms can relate to psychosocial problems (reattribution) improves the quality of doctor–patient communication, though not necessarily patient health.

OBJECTIVE

To examine patient experiences of GPs’ attempts to reattribute MUS in order to identify potential barriers to primary care management of MUS and improvement in outcome.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients consulting with MUS whose GPs had been trained in reattribution. A secondary sample of patients of control GPs was also interviewed to ascertain if barriers identified were specific to reattribution or common to consultations about MUS in general.

APPROACH

Thematic analysis of in-depth interviews.

RESULTS

Potential barriers include the complexity of patients’ problems and patients’ judgements about how to manage their presentation of this complexity. Many did not trust doctors with discussion of emotional aspects of their problems and chose not to present them. The same barriers were seen amongst patients whose GPs were not trained, suggesting the barriers are not particular to reattribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving GP explanation of unexplained symptoms is insufficient to reduce patients’ concerns. GPs need to (1) help patients to make sense of the complex nature of their presenting problems, (2) communicate that attention to psychosocial factors will not preclude vigilance to physical disease and (3) ensure a quality of doctor–patient relationship in which patients can perceive psychosocial enquiry as appropriate.

Salmon P, Peters S, Stanley I. Patients’ perceptions of medical explanations for somatisation disorders: qualitative analysis. BMJ. 1999;318:372–6.PubMed

Kirmayer LJ, Robbins JM. Patients who somatize in primary care: a longitudinal study of cognitive and social characteristics. Psychol Med. 1996;26:937–951.PubMedCrossRef

Arnold IA, Speckens AE, van Hemert AM. Medically unexplained physical symptoms: the feasibility of group cognitive–behavioural therapy in primary care. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:517–20.PubMedCrossRef

Goldberg D, Gask L, O’Dowd T. The treatment of somatisation: teaching techniques of reattribution. J Psychosom Res. 1989;33:689–95.PubMedCrossRef

Morriss R, Dowrick C, Salmon P, et al. Turning theory into practice: rationale, feasibility and external validity of an exploratory randomized controlled trial of training family practitioners in reattribution to manage patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUST). Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28:343–51.PubMedCrossRef

Morriss R, Gask L, Dowrick C, Salmon P, Peters S. Primary care: management of persistent medically unexplained symptoms. In: Lloyd GG, Guthrie E, eds. Handbook of Liaison Psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

Morriss RK, Gask L, Ronalds C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a new treatment for somatized mental disorder taught to GPs. Fam Pract. 1998;15:119–25.PubMedCrossRef

Morriss RK, Gask L, Ronalds C, Downes-Grainger E, Thompson H, Goldberg D. Clinical and patient satisfaction outcomes of a new treatment for somatized mental disorder taught to general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:263–7.PubMed

Blankenstein AH. Somatising patients in general practice reattribution, a promising approach. PhD thesis. Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit; 2001.

10.

Morriss RK, Gask L. Treatment of patients with somatized mental disorder: effects of reattribution training on outcomes under the direct control of the family doctor. Psychosomatics. 2002;43:394–9.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Larisch A, Schweickhardt A, Wirsching M, Fritzsche K. Psychosocial interventions for somatizing patients by the general practitioner: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:507–14.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Frostholm L, Fink P, Oernboel E, et al. The uncertain consultation and patient satisfaction: the impact of patients’ illness perceptions and a randomized controlled trial on the training of physicians’ communication skills. Psychosom Med. 2005;67:897–905.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Rosendal M, Bro F, Sokolowski I, Fink P, Toft T, Olesen F. A randomised controlled trial of brief training in assessment and treatment of somatisation: effects on GPs’ attitudes. Fam Pract. 2005;22:419–27.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Aiarzaguena JM, Grandes G, Gaminde I, Salazar A, Sánchez A, Ariño J. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a psychosocial and communication intervention carried out by GPs for patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Psychol Med. 2007;37:283–94.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Morriss R, Dowrick C, Salmon P, et al. Exploratory randomised controlled trial of training practices and general practitioners in reattribution to manage patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUST). Brit J Psychiatry. 2007;191:536–42.CrossRef

16.

Haynes B, Haines A. Getting research findings into practice: Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. BMJ. 1998;317:273–6.PubMed

17.

Bradley F, Wiles R, Kinmonth A-L, Mant D, Gantley M. Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). BMJ. 1999;318:711–5.PubMed

18.

Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321:694–6.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Medical Research Council. A frame work for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: MRC; 2000.

20.

Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.

21.

Henwood KL, Pidgeon NF. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol. 1992;83:97–111.PubMed

22.

Stiles WB. Quality-control in qualitative research. Clin Psychol Rev. 1993;13(6):593–618.CrossRef

23.

Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, et al. What patients want from primary care consultations: A discrete choice experiment to identify patients’ priorities. Annals of Family Medicine. 2008;6(2):107–15.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Hartz AJ, Noyes R, Bentler SE, Damiano PC, Willard JC, Momany ET. Unexplained symptoms in primary care: Perspectives of doctors and patients. Gen Hosp Psych. 2000;22(3):144–52.CrossRef

25.

Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, Stevenson FA, Barber N. Patients’ unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ. 2000;320:1246–50.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Nordin T, Hartz AJ, Noyes R, et al. Empirically identified goals for the management of unexplained symptoms. Fam Med. 2006;38(7):476–82.PubMed

27.

Thom DH, Campbell B. Patient–physician trust: an exploratory study. J Family Pract. 1997;44(2):169–76.

28.

Chew-Graham C, Cahill G, Dowrick C, Wearden A, Peters S. Using multiple sources of knowledge to reach clinical understanding of chronic fatigue syndrome. Annals of Family Medicine. 2008;6:340–8.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Werner A, Malterud K. It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(8):1409–19.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Dirkzwager AJE, Verhaak PFM. Patients with persistent medically unexplained symptoms in general practice: characteristics and quality of care. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;33(8).

31.

Buszewicz M, Pistrang N, Barker C, Cape J, Martin J. Patients’ experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:496–503.PubMed

32.

Salmon P, Ring A, Dowrick CF, et al. What do general practice patients want when they present medically unexplained symptoms, and why do their doctors feel pressurised? J Psychosom Res. 2005;59:255–60.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Salmon P, Humphris GM, Ring A, Davies JC, Dowrick CF. Primary care consultations about medically unexplained symptoms: patient presentations and doctor responses that influence the probability of somatic intervention. Psychosom Med. 2007;69:571–7.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Berry LL, Parish JT, Janakiraman R, et al. Patients’ commitment to their primary physician and why it matters. Annals of Family Medicine. 2008;6(1):6–13.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Epstein RM, Hadee T, Carroll J, Meldrum SC, Lardner LJ, Shields CG. “Could this be something serious?” — reassurance, uncertainty and empathy in response to patients’ expressions of worry. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(12):1731–9.PubMedCrossRef

36.

McKinstry B, Ashcroft AE, Car J, Freeman GK, Sheikh A. Interventions for improving patients’ trust in doctors and groups of doctors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD004134.PubMed

37.

Blakeman T, Macdonald W, Bower P, Gately C, Chew-Graham C. A qualitative study of GPs’ attitudes to self-management of chronic disease. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:407–14.PubMed

38.

Kroenke K, Spitzer R. Gender differences in the reporting of physical and somatoform symptoms. Psychosom Med. 1998;60(2):150–5.PubMed

39.

Salmon P, Peters S, Clifford R, Iredale W, Gask L, Rogers A, Dowrick C, Morriss R. Why do general practitioners decline training to improve management of medically unexplained symptoms? J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:565–71.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: What Do Patients Choose to Tell Their Doctors? Qualitative Analysis of Potential Barriers to Reattributing Medically Unexplained Symptoms
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2009
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0872-x

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVE

DESIGN

PARTICIPANTS

APPROACH

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

Trends in Primary Care Clinician Perceptions of a New Electronic Health Record

Physician Cultural Competence and Patient Ratings of the Patient-Physician Relationship

U.S. Physicians’ Views on Financing Options to Expand Health Insurance Coverage: A National Survey

BAIT

Medical Record Documentation of Patients’ Hearing Loss by Physicians