nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.09.2011 | Health Policy

Artificial Nutrition and Hydration: The Evolution of Ethics, Evidence, and Policy

verfasst von: Howard Brody, MD, PhD, Laura D. Hermer, JD, LLM, Larry D. Scott, MD, MA, L. Lee Grumbles, MD, Julie E. Kutac, MA, Susan D. McCammon, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 9/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The debate over use of artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in terminal illness, including advanced dementia, remains contentious despite extensive ethical and empirical investigation.

Methods

For this narrative review we undertook a focused, selective review of literature reflecting ethical analysis, empirical assessment of outcomes, legal responses, and thinking within the Roman Catholic religious tradition.

Results

The history of the debate over the past 60 years results from a complex interplay of ethical concerns, a growing empirical database, legal changes, public opinion, and financial as well as institutional concerns. Discussions of ANH today are often conducted without any understanding of this historical context.

Discussion

Patients’ interests could be better protected through remedial action at both the individual and the policy levels.

Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Roy J, et al. Clinical and organizational factors associated with feeding tube use among nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. JAMA. 2003;290:73–80.PubMedCrossRef

Mitchell SL, Kiely DK, Hamel MB. Dying with advanced dementia in the nursing home. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:321–26.PubMedCrossRef

Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Kiely DK, et al. The clinical course of advanced dementia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1529–38.PubMedCrossRef

Teno JM, Mitchell SL, Gozalo PL, et al. Hospital characteristics associated with feeding tube placement in nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. JAMA. 2010;303:544–550.PubMedCrossRef

Sampson EL, Candy B, Jones L. Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 Apr 15; (2):CD007209.

Howland JS. A defense of assisted nutrition and hydration in patients with dementia. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2009;9:697–710.

American Academy of Family Physicians. Ethics and advance planning for end-of-life care. 2008. http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/policy/policies/e/ethicsadvplan.html (accessed January 16, 2011).

American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Statement on artificial nutrition and hydration at the end of life. December 2006.

Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association. HPNA Position paper—artificial nutrition and hydration in end-of-life care. 2003. http://www.hpna.org/pdf/Artifical_Nutrition_and_Hydration_PDF.pdf (accessed January 16, 2011).

10.

American Medical Association. Opinion E-2.20; http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/about-ethics-group/ethics-resource-center/end-of-life-care/ama-policy-end-of-life-care.shtml (accessed January 16, 2011).

11.

Meisel A, Snyder L, Quill T. Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care. JAMA. 2000;284:2495–2401.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Annas GJ. “Culture of life” politics at the bedside: the case of Terri Schiavo. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1710–15.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Cassell EJ. The Schiavo case: a medical perspective. Hastings Cent Rep. 2005;35:22–23.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Pius XII. The prolongation of life: allocution to the international congress of anesthesiologists. Pope Speaks. 1958;4:393–97.

15.

Drane JF. Stopping nutrition and hydration technologies: a conflict between traditional Catholic ethics and church authority. Christian Bioethics. 2006;12:11–28.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Kelly G. The duty of using artificial means of preserving life. Theological Studies. 1950;11:203–20.

17.

President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forgo life-sustaining treatment. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1983.

18.

Lynn J, ed. By no extraordinary means: the choice to forgo life-sustaining food and water. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1986.

19.

Siegler M, Weisbard AJ. Against the emerging stream: should fluids and nutritional support be discontinued? Arch Intern Med. 1985;145:129–31.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Callahan D. On feeding the dying. Hastings Cent Rep. 1983;13:22.PubMed

21.

Hastings Center. Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. Briarcliff Manor: Hastings Center; 1987.

22.

Lo B, Dornbrand L. Understanding the benefits and burdens of tube feedings. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1925–26.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Baxter JD. Air versus water. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:616–17.PubMed

24.

Nat’l Conf. of Comm’rs of Unif. State Laws. Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act, § 6 (1989).

25.

Annas GJ. Nancy Cruzan and the right to die. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:670–73.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Nat’l Conf. of Comm’rs of Unif. State Laws. Unif. Health-Care Decisions Act. §§ 1, 2, 5, 6 (1993).

27.

Longenecker RL. Health care proxies, living wills, and durable powers of attorney. ABA-ALI Course of Study. 1991;C644:437–520.

28.

Finucane TE, Christmas C, Travis K. Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. JAMA. 1999;282:1365–70.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Gillick MR. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:206–10.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Sanders DS, Carter MJ, D’Silva J, et al. Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1472–75.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Garrow D, Pride P, William M, et al. Feeding alternatives in patients with dementia: examining the evidence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1372–78.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Ganzini L. Artificial nutrition and hydration at the end of life: ethics and evidence. Palliat Support Care. 2006;4:135–43.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Dy SM. Enteral and parenteral nutrition in terminally ill cancer patients: a review of the literature. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006;23:369–77.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Murphy LM, Lipman TO. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy does not prolong survival in patients with dementia. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1351–53.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Cervo FA, Bryan L, Farber S. To PEG or not to PEG: a review of evidence for placing feeding tubes in advanced dementia and the decision-making process. Geriatrics. 2006;61:30–35.PubMed

36.

McClave SA, Chang WK. Complications of enteral access. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:739–51.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Casarett D, Kapo J, Caplan A. Appropriate use of artificial nutrition and hydration—fundamental principles and recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2607–12.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Morrison RS, Meier DE. Palliative care. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2582–90.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Cinocco D. The difficulties of swallowing at the end of life. J Palliat Med. 2007;10:506–8.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Schmitz P. The process of dying with and without feeding and fluids by tube. Law Med Health Care. 1991;19:23–26.PubMed

41.

Printz LA. Is withdrawing hydration a valid comfort measure in the terminally ill? Geriatrics. 1988;43:84–88.PubMed

42.

Zerwekh JV. The dehydration question. Nursing. 1983;13:47–51.PubMed

43.

Smith SA, Andrews M. Artificial nutrition and hydration at the end of life. Medsurg Nurs. 2000;9:233–44.PubMed

44.

Printz LA. Terminal dehydration, a compassionate treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:697–700.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Yarborough M. Why physicians must not give food and water to every patient. J Fam Pract. 1989;29:683–84.PubMed

46.

Callahan CM, Haag KM, Buchanan NN, Nisi R. Decision-making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a community setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:1105–09.PubMed

47.

Monturo CA, Strumpf NE. Advance directives at end-of-life: nursing home resident preferences for artificial nutrition. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007;8:224–28.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Schrader SL, Nelson ML, Eidsness LM. “South Dakota’s dying to know”: a statewide survey about end of life. J Palliat Med. 2009;12:695–705.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Shega JW, Hougham GW, Stocking CB, Sachs GA. Barriers to limiting the practice of feeding tube placement in advanced dementia. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:885–93.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Vitale CA, Hiner T, Ury WA, et al. Tube feeding in advanced dementia: an exploratory survey of physician knowledge. Care Manag J. 2006;7:79–85.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Monteleoni C, Clark C. Using rapid-cycle quality improvement methodology to reduce feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia: before and after study. BMJ. 2004;239:491–94.CrossRef

52.

Smith WJ. Culture of death: the assault on medical ethics in America. San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2000.

53.

Ariz. Rev. Stat. 36–3231 (West 2009).

54.

N. Dakota Cen. Code § 23–06.5-09(6) (West 2009).

55.

NY Public Health Act § 2982(2) (West 2009).

56.

NY Surrogate Court Procedure Act § 1750b(b)(iii) (West 2009).

57.

OK St T. 63 § 3080.4.

58.

OK St T. 63 § 3101.4.

59.

OK St T. 63 § 3101.8.

60.

OK St T. 63 § 3101.14.

61.

20 Pa. C.S.A. § 5456(c)(5)(iii) (West 2009).

62.

SD Codified Laws § 59-7-2.7 (West 2009).

63.

Stolberg SG. The Schiavo case: the legacy; a collision of disparate forces may be reshaping American law. New York Times, April 1, 2005:A18.

64.

SB 2015. 2008 Leg. Reg. Sess. (MS 2008).

65.

SB 2096. 2008 Leg. Reg. Sess. (MS 2008).

66.

HB490, Alabama (2008).

67.

HB 2741, Hawaii (2008).

68.

SB 1255, Pennsylvania (2008).

69.

HB 7049, Rhode Island (2008).

70.

Swartz MS. “Conscience clauses” or “unconscionable clauses”: personal beliefs vs. professional responsibilities. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2006;6:269–350.PubMed

71.

Pope TM. Medical futility statutes: no safe harbor to unilaterally refuse life-sustaining treatment. Tenn L Rev. 2007;75:1–81.

72.

42 USC 300a-7(d) (West 2010); 45 CFR 88.4(d) (West 2010).

73.

42 USC § 2000e-2(a)(1) (West 2010).

74.

Miss. Code § 41-107-5(1) & (2) (West 2009).

75.

745 Ill. Comp. Stat. §§ 70/4, 70/5 70/7, 70/9, 70/14 (West 2009).

76.

Shannon TA, Walter JJ. Implications of the papal allocution on feeding tubes. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:18–20.PubMed

77.

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Responses to certain questions of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops concerning artifician nutrition and hydration; http://www.pcf.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070801_risposte-usa_en.html (accessed January 15, 2011).

78.

John Paul II. Address to the participants in the International Congress on ‘Life-Sustaining Treatments and the Vegetative State: Scientific Advancements and Ethical Dilemmas,’ March 20, 2004; http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/2004/march/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20040320_congress-fiamc_en.html (accessed January 15, 2011).

79.

Consortium of Jesuit Bioethics Programs. Undue burden? The Vatican and artificial nutrition and hydration. Commonweal. 2009;136:13–15.

80.

Bradley CT. Roman Catholic doctrine guiding end-of-life care: a summary of the recent discourse. J Palliat Med. 2009;12:373–77.PubMedCrossRef

81.

Meyer H. Catholic directive may thwart end-of-life wishes. Kaiser Health News, Feb. 27, 2010, http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2010/February/24/Catholic-directive-may-thwart-end-of-life-wishes.aspx (accessed January 15, 2011).

82.

Sanders A. The clinical reality of artificial nutrition and hydration for patients at the end of life. Natl Cathol Bioeth Quart. 2009;9:293–304.

83.

Graham RC. Decisions about CPR [letter]. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1273.

84.

Palecek EJ, Teno JM, Casarett DJ, et al. Comfort feeding only: a proposal to bring clarity to decision-making regarding difficulty with eating for persons with advanced dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:580–84.PubMedCrossRef

85.

American Medical Association. Opinion H-140.874. Opposition to legislation that presumes to prescribe patients’ preferences for artificial hydration and nutrition 2010, www.ama-assn.org/ad-com/polfind/Hlth-Ethics.pdf (accessed January 16, 2011).

86.

Menkin E. Artificial nutrition and the public guardian. J Palliat Med. 2004;7:723–26.PubMedCrossRef

87.

Menkin ES. Tell it to the judge. J Palliat Med. 2005;8:6–8.PubMedCrossRef

88.

Rhee F. Senators eliminate end of life provision. Boston Globe, August 14, 2009, http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/08/14/senators_eliminate_end_of_life_provision/ (accessed January 16, 2011).

Titel: Artificial Nutrition and Hydration: The Evolution of Ethics, Evidence, and Policy
verfasst von: Howard Brody, MD, PhD
Laura D. Hermer, JD, LLM
Larry D. Scott, MD, MA
L. Lee Grumbles, MD
Julie E. Kutac, MA
Susan D. McCammon, MD
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 9/2011
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1659-z

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2011

Attending Code Status Discussions at Admission

Excellent Hospital Care for All: Open and Operating 24/7

Osler-Weber-Rendu Syndrome: A Rare Cause of Iron Deficiency

Improvement Happens: an Interview with Furman McDonald, MD MPH

Effect of Problem-Solving-Based Diabetes Self-Management Training on Diabetes Control in a Low Income Patient Sample

Relationship Between Literacy, Knowledge, Self-Care Behaviors, and Heart Failure-Related Quality of Life Among Patients With Heart Failure