Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2/2019

18.03.2019 | Original Research

Gene Editing, the Mystic Threat to Human Dignity

verfasst von: Vera Lúcia Raposo

Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Many arguments have been made against gene editing. This paper addresses the commonly invoked argument that gene editing violates human dignity and is ultimately a subversion of human nature. There are several drawbacks to this argument. Above all, the concept of what human dignity means is unclear. It is not possible to condemn a practice that violates human dignity if we do not know exactly what is being violated. The argument’s entire reasoning is thus undermined. Analyses of the arguments involved in this discussion have often led to the conclusion that gene editing contravenes the principle of genetic identity (genetic immutability) thereby subverting a requisite of human dignity and ultimately threatening human nature. This paper refutes these arguments and shows that any opposition to gene editing cannot rely on the human dignity argument.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Andorno, R. 2009. Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34(3): 223–240.CrossRefPubMed Andorno, R. 2009. Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34(3): 223–240.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Annas, G. 2005. Bioethics: Crossing human rights and health law boundaries. New York: Oxford University Press. Annas, G. 2005. Bioethics: Crossing human rights and health law boundaries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Annas, G., L. Andrews, and M. Isasit. 2002. Protecting the endangered human: Towards an international treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alternations. American Journal of Law & Medicine 28(2&3): 151–178. Annas, G., L. Andrews, and M. Isasit. 2002. Protecting the endangered human: Towards an international treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alternations. American Journal of Law & Medicine 28(2&3): 151–178.
Zurück zum Zitat Bachruch, S. 2004. In the name of public health—Nazi racial hygiene. New England Journal of Medicine 351(5): 417–420.CrossRef Bachruch, S. 2004. In the name of public health—Nazi racial hygiene. New England Journal of Medicine 351(5): 417–420.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baertschi, B. 2014. Human dignity as a component of a long-lasting and widespread conceptual construct. Bioethical Inquiry 11: 201–211.CrossRefPubMed Baertschi, B. 2014. Human dignity as a component of a long-lasting and widespread conceptual construct. Bioethical Inquiry 11: 201–211.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bayertz, K. 1996. Human dignity: Philosophical origin and scientific erosion of an idea. In Sanctity of life and human dignity, edited by K. Bayertz, 73–90. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Bayertz, K. 1996. Human dignity: Philosophical origin and scientific erosion of an idea. In Sanctity of life and human dignity, edited by K. Bayertz, 73–90. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benda, E. 2000. The Protection of Human Dignity (Article 1 of the Basic Law). Southern Methodist University Law Review 53: 443–454. Benda, E. 2000. The Protection of Human Dignity (Article 1 of the Basic Law). Southern Methodist University Law Review 53: 443–454.
Zurück zum Zitat Bifulco, R. 2008. Diritto e generazioni future: Problemi giuridici della responsabilità intergenerazionale. Milano: Franco Angeli. Bifulco, R. 2008. Diritto e generazioni future: Problemi giuridici della responsabilità intergenerazionale. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Zurück zum Zitat Birnbacher, D. 1996. Ambiguities in the concept of menschenwurde. In Sanctity of life and human dignity, edited by K. Bayertz, 107–121. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Birnbacher, D. 1996. Ambiguities in the concept of menschenwurde. In Sanctity of life and human dignity, edited by K. Bayertz, 107–121. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner, S.W. 2013. Humans and humans: Technological enhancement and criminal responsibility. Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law 19: 215–285. Brenner, S.W. 2013. Humans and humans: Technological enhancement and criminal responsibility. Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law 19: 215–285.
Zurück zum Zitat Brownsword, R. and D. Beyleveld. 2001. Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brownsword, R. and D. Beyleveld. 2001. Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, A. 2011. Better than human: The promise and perils of enhancing ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Buchanan, A. 2011. Better than human: The promise and perils of enhancing ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Calo, Z. 2012. Human dignity and health law: Personhood in recent bioethical debates. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 26: 473–499. Calo, Z. 2012. Human dignity and health law: Personhood in recent bioethical debates. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 26: 473–499.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke, A., J.K. Shim, L. Mamo, J.R. Fosket, and J.R. Fishman. 2003. Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review 68(2): 161–194.CrossRef Clarke, A., J.K. Shim, L. Mamo, J.R. Fosket, and J.R. Fishman. 2003. Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review 68(2): 161–194.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford, R. 1980. Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services 10(3): 365–88.CrossRefPubMed Crawford, R. 1980. Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services 10(3): 365–88.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Edited by S. Olson. International summit on human gene editing: A global discussion. Washington (DC): National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK343651/. Accessed January 20, 2018. Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Edited by S. Olson. International summit on human gene editing: A global discussion. Washington (DC): National Academies Press. https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK343651/​. Accessed January 20, 2018.
Zurück zum Zitat Council of Europe. 1997. Explanatory report to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaty Series— No. 164. https://rm.coe.int/16800ccde5. Accessed March 4, 2018. Council of Europe. 1997. Explanatory report to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaty Series— No. 164. https://​rm.​coe.​int/​16800ccde5. Accessed March 4, 2018.
Zurück zum Zitat De Miguel Beriain, I. 2017. Legal issues regarding gene editing at the beginning of life: An EU perspective. Regenerative Medicine 12(6): 669–679.CrossRefPubMed De Miguel Beriain, I. 2017. Legal issues regarding gene editing at the beginning of life: An EU perspective. Regenerative Medicine 12(6): 669–679.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Fabre-Magnan, M. 2005. Le sadisme n’est pas un droit de l’homme. Recueil Dalloz 2973–2981. Edited by W. Aiken and H. LaFollette, 124–153. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield. Fabre-Magnan, M. 2005. Le sadisme n’est pas un droit de l’homme. Recueil Dalloz 2973–2981. Edited by W. Aiken and H. LaFollette, 124–153. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zurück zum Zitat Falcón y Tella, F. (2007). Challenges for human rights. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRef Falcón y Tella, F. (2007). Challenges for human rights. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg, J. 1980. The child’s right to an open future. In Whose child?, edited by W. Aiken and H. LaFollette, 124–153. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield. Feinberg, J. 1980. The child’s right to an open future. In Whose child?, edited by W. Aiken and H. LaFollette, 124–153. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenton, E. 2006. Liberal eugenics and human nature. Against Habermas. Hastings Center Report 36(6): 35–42. Fenton, E. 2006. Liberal eugenics and human nature. Against Habermas. Hastings Center Report 36(6): 35–42.
Zurück zum Zitat Finkelstein, V., and O. Stuart. 1996. Developing new services. In Beyond disability: Towards an enabling society. Edited by G. Hales, 170–187. London: Sage. Finkelstein, V., and O. Stuart. 1996. Developing new services. In Beyond disability: Towards an enabling society. Edited by G. Hales, 170–187. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, J. 2006. O futuro da natureza humana. Coimbra: Almedina. Habermas, J. 2006. O futuro da natureza humana. Coimbra: Almedina.
Zurück zum Zitat Kant, I. 1996 [1785]. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, trans. Mary Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Kant, I. 1996 [1785]. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, trans. Mary Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kass, L. 2002. Life, liberty and the defence of dignity. San Francisco: Encounter Books. Kass, L. 2002. Life, liberty and the defence of dignity. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
Zurück zum Zitat McConnell, T. 2010. Genetic enhancement, human nature, and rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35(4): 415–428.CrossRefPubMed McConnell, T. 2010. Genetic enhancement, human nature, and rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35(4): 415–428.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McKibben, B. 2003. Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. New York: Henry Holt, Times Books. McKibben, B. 2003. Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. New York: Henry Holt, Times Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Melillo, T.R. 2017. Gene editing and the rise of designer babies. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 50: 757–790. Melillo, T.R. 2017. Gene editing and the rise of designer babies. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 50: 757–790.
Zurück zum Zitat Nabais, J.C. 2007. Por uma liberdade com responsabilidade (Estudos sobre direitos e deveres fundamentais). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora. Nabais, J.C. 2007. Por uma liberdade com responsabilidade (Estudos sobre direitos e deveres fundamentais). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Zurück zum Zitat Olszewski, W.L., B. Interewicz, M. Maksymowicz, and J. Stanislawska. 2005. Transplantation of organs is transplantations of donor DNA: Fate of DNA disseminated in recipient. Transplant International 18: 412–418.CrossRefPubMed Olszewski, W.L., B. Interewicz, M. Maksymowicz, and J. Stanislawska. 2005. Transplantation of organs is transplantations of donor DNA: Fate of DNA disseminated in recipient. Transplant International 18: 412–418.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Raposo, V.L. 2012. Biodireitos: The new kids on the juridical playground. In Estudos em homenagem ao Prof. Doutor José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho. edited by F.A. Correia, J. Machado, et al. Volume 3: 811–833. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora. Raposo, V.L. 2012. Biodireitos: The new kids on the juridical playground. In Estudos em homenagem ao Prof. Doutor José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho. edited by F.A. Correia, J. Machado, et al. Volume 3: 811–833. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Zurück zum Zitat Raposo, V.L. 2016. The convention of human rights and biomedicine revisited: Critical assessment. The International Journal of Human Rights 20(8): 1277–1294.CrossRef Raposo, V.L. 2016. The convention of human rights and biomedicine revisited: Critical assessment. The International Journal of Human Rights 20(8): 1277–1294.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raposo, V.L. 2017a. Are wrongful life actions threatening the value of human life? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(3): 339–345.CrossRefPubMed Raposo, V.L. 2017a. Are wrongful life actions threatening the value of human life? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(3): 339–345.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Raposo, V.L. 2017b. The usual suspects: Can parents be held accountable for their reproductive and genetic decisions? Law and the Human Genome Review 47: 109–137. Raposo, V.L. 2017b. The usual suspects: Can parents be held accountable for their reproductive and genetic decisions? Law and the Human Genome Review 47: 109–137.
Zurück zum Zitat Rolston, H. 2002. What do we mean by the intrinsic value and integrity of plants and animals? In Genetic engineering and the intrinsic value and integrity of animals and plants, edited by D. Heaf and J.Wirtz, 5–10. United Kingdom: Hafan. Rolston, H. 2002. What do we mean by the intrinsic value and integrity of plants and animals? In Genetic engineering and the intrinsic value and integrity of animals and plants, edited by D. Heaf and J.Wirtz, 5–10. United Kingdom: Hafan.
Zurück zum Zitat So, D., E. Kleiderman, S. Touré, and Y. Joly. 2017. Disease resistance and the definition of genetic enhancement. Frontiers in Genetics 8(40): 1–6. So, D., E. Kleiderman, S. Touré, and Y. Joly. 2017. Disease resistance and the definition of genetic enhancement. Frontiers in Genetics 8(40): 1–6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sykora, P. and A. Caplan. 2017. The Council of Europe should not reaffirm the ban on germline genome editing in humans. EMBO Reports 18(11): 1871–1872.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sykora, P. and A. Caplan. 2017. The Council of Europe should not reaffirm the ban on germline genome editing in humans. EMBO Reports 18(11): 1871–1872.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Gene Editing, the Mystic Threat to Human Dignity
verfasst von
Vera Lúcia Raposo
Publikationsdatum
18.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09906-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe