Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 8/2011

01.08.2011 | Clinical Research

Utility of Routine Versus Selective Upper Gastrointestinal Series to Detect Anastomotic Leaks After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

verfasst von: Marc Schiesser, Josef Guber, Stefan Wildi, Ivo Guber, Markus Weber, Markus K. Muller

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In up to 4% of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures, anastomotic leaks occur. Early detection of gastrointestinal leakage is important for successful treatment. Consequently, many centers advocate routine postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of this practice after LRYGB.

Methods

Eight hundred four consecutive patients undergoing LRYGB from June 2000 to April 2010 were analyzed prospectively. The first 382 patients received routine UGI series between the third and fifth postoperative days (group A). Thereafter, the test was only performed when clinical findings (tachycardia, fever, and drainage content) were suspicious for a leak of the gastrointestinal anastomosis (group B; n = 422).

Results

Overall, nine of 804 (1.1%) patients suffered from leaks at the gastroenterostomy. In group A, four of 382 (1%) patients had a leak, but only two were detected by the routine UGI series. This corresponds to a sensitivity of 50%. In group B, the sensitivity was higher with 80%. Specificities were comparable with 97% and 91%, respectively. Routine UGI series cost only 1.6% of the overall costs of a non-complicated gastric bypass procedure. With this leak rate and sensitivity, US $86,800 would have to be spent on 200 routine UGI series to find one leak which is not justified.

Conclusions

This study shows that routine UGI series have a low sensitivity for the detection of anastomotic leaks after LRYGB. In most cases, the diagnosis is initiated by clinical findings. Therefore, routine upper gastrointestinal series are of limited value for the diagnosis of a leak.
Literatur
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2004;292(14):1724–37.PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2004;292(14):1724–37.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, et al. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(7):547–59.PubMed Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, et al. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(7):547–59.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.PubMedCrossRef Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4(4):353–7.PubMedCrossRef Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4(4):353–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lujan JA, Frutos MD, Hernandez Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):433–7.PubMedCrossRef Lujan JA, Frutos MD, Hernandez Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):433–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT. Open vs. laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(4):393–5.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT. Open vs. laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(4):393–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279–89. discussion 289–291.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279–89. discussion 289–291.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Westling A, Gustavsson S. Laparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):284–92.PubMedCrossRef Westling A, Gustavsson S. Laparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):284–92.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515–29.PubMedCrossRef Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515–29.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y-500 patients: technique and results, with 3–60 month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2000;10(3):233–9.PubMedCrossRef Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y-500 patients: technique and results, with 3–60 month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2000;10(3):233–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrne TK. Complications of surgery for obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1181–93. vii–viii.PubMedCrossRef Byrne TK. Complications of surgery for obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1181–93. vii–viii.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ovnat A, Peiser J, Solomon H, et al. Early detection and treatment of a leaking gastrojejunostomy following gastric bypass. Isr J Med Sci. 1986;22(7–8):556–8.PubMed Ovnat A, Peiser J, Solomon H, et al. Early detection and treatment of a leaking gastrojejunostomy following gastric bypass. Isr J Med Sci. 1986;22(7–8):556–8.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton EC, Sims TL, Hamilton TT, et al. Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):679–84.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton EC, Sims TL, Hamilton TT, et al. Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):679–84.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Toppino M, Cesarani F, Comba A, et al. The role of early radiological studies after gastric bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2001;11(4):447–54.PubMedCrossRef Toppino M, Cesarani F, Comba A, et al. The role of early radiological studies after gastric bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2001;11(4):447–54.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Serafini F, Anderson W, Ghassemi P, et al. The utility of contrast studies and drains in the management of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):34–8.PubMedCrossRef Serafini F, Anderson W, Ghassemi P, et al. The utility of contrast studies and drains in the management of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):34–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller MK, Guber J, Wildi S, et al. Three-year follow-up study of retrocolic versus antecolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):889–93.PubMedCrossRef Muller MK, Guber J, Wildi S, et al. Three-year follow-up study of retrocolic versus antecolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):889–93.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason EE, Printen KJ, Barron P, et al. Risk reduction in gastric operations for obesity. Ann Surg. 1979;190(2):158–65.PubMedCrossRef Mason EE, Printen KJ, Barron P, et al. Risk reduction in gastric operations for obesity. Ann Surg. 1979;190(2):158–65.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Carucci LR, Turner MA, Conklin RC, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity: evaluation of postoperative extraluminal leaks with upper gastrointestinal series. Radiology. 2006;238(1):119–27.PubMedCrossRef Carucci LR, Turner MA, Conklin RC, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity: evaluation of postoperative extraluminal leaks with upper gastrointestinal series. Radiology. 2006;238(1):119–27.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith C, Gardiner R, Kubicka RA, et al. Gastric restrictive surgery for obesity: early radiologic evaluation. Radiology. 1984;153(2):321–7.PubMed Smith C, Gardiner R, Kubicka RA, et al. Gastric restrictive surgery for obesity: early radiologic evaluation. Radiology. 1984;153(2):321–7.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Doraiswamy A, Rasmussen JJ, Pierce J, et al. The utility of routine postoperative upper GI series following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2159–62.PubMedCrossRef Doraiswamy A, Rasmussen JJ, Pierce J, et al. The utility of routine postoperative upper GI series following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2159–62.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertucci W, White S, Yadegar J, et al. Routine postoperative upper gastroesophageal imaging is unnecessary after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2006;72(10):862–4.PubMed Bertucci W, White S, Yadegar J, et al. Routine postoperative upper gastroesophageal imaging is unnecessary after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2006;72(10):862–4.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SD, Khouzam MN, Kellum JM, et al. Selective, versus routine, upper gastrointestinal series leads to equal morbidity and reduced hospital stay in laparoscopic gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(4):413–6.PubMedCrossRef Lee SD, Khouzam MN, Kellum JM, et al. Selective, versus routine, upper gastrointestinal series leads to equal morbidity and reduced hospital stay in laparoscopic gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(4):413–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Utility of Routine Versus Selective Upper Gastrointestinal Series to Detect Anastomotic Leaks After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
verfasst von
Marc Schiesser
Josef Guber
Stefan Wildi
Ivo Guber
Markus Weber
Markus K. Muller
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0284-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2011

Obesity Surgery 8/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.