Skip to main content
Erschienen in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1/2020

25.05.2019 | Original Article

Early outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthesis in Japanese (MITRAL VIV study): a four-case series

verfasst von: Kizuku Yamashita, Satsuki Fukushima, Yusuke Shimahara, Atsushi Okada, Makoto Amaki, Hideaki Kanzaki, Chisato Izumi, Satoshi Yasuda, Junjiro Kobayashi, Tomoyuki Fujita

Erschienen in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The mitral valve-in-valve procedure has been performed in the world. However, the early clinical outcomes in Japan remain unclear. Hence, we investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy in high-risk Japanese patients.

Methods

In May 2017, we launched the present clinical study of the mitral valve-in-valve procedure (MITRAL VIV study). The study enrolled four patients (three women; age range 69–85 years) with severe mitral regurgitation due to a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis. The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 8.8 (range 8.4–9.8)%.

Results

In all patients, the mitral valve-in-valve procedure was successfully performed via a transapical approach at the initial attempt. The median grade of mitral insufficiency improved from grade 4 (range 3–4) to grade 1 (range 0–1) at days 7 and 30. The mean mitral pressure gradient of the median value changed from 7.0 (range 5.0–8.0) mmHg to 5.0 (range 5.0–9.5) mmHg at 7 days and 6.2 (range 4.0–11.0) mmHg at 30 days. The median New York Heart Association functional class improved from 2 (range 2–3) to 1 (range 1–3) at day 7 and to 1 (range 1–2) at day 30. We performed a bit deep implantation intentionally to avoid left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in one patient with a small aorto-mitral-annular angle. Neither mortality nor severe complications were observed at the last follow-up (range 207–513 days).

Conclusions

In our experience, the safe mitral valve-in-valve procedure was feasible with cautious procedures.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung A, Webb JG, Barbanti M, Freeman M, Binder RK, Thompson C, et al. 5-year experience with transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1759–66.CrossRef Cheung A, Webb JG, Barbanti M, Freeman M, Binder RK, Thompson C, et al. 5-year experience with transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1759–66.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon SH, Whisenant BK, Bleiziffer S, Delgado V, Dhoble A, Schofer N, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:441–51.CrossRef Yoon SH, Whisenant BK, Bleiziffer S, Delgado V, Dhoble A, Schofer N, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:441–51.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Adams DH, Abraham WT, Kappetein AP, Généreux P, Vranckx P, et al. Clinical trial design principles and endpoint definitions for transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement: part 2: endpoint definitions: a consensus document from the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1878–91.CrossRef Stone GW, Adams DH, Abraham WT, Kappetein AP, Généreux P, Vranckx P, et al. Clinical trial design principles and endpoint definitions for transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement: part 2: endpoint definitions: a consensus document from the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1878–91.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bapat V. Valve-in-valve apps: why and how they were developed and how to use them. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(Suppl U):U44–51.CrossRef Bapat V. Valve-in-valve apps: why and how they were developed and how to use them. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(Suppl U):U44–51.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadopoulos N, Ilioska P, Fichtlscherer S, Lehmann R, Beiras Fernandez A, Moritz A, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with previous cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:37–42.CrossRef Papadopoulos N, Ilioska P, Fichtlscherer S, Lehmann R, Beiras Fernandez A, Moritz A, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with previous cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:37–42.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dvir D, Webb J. Mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring: technical aspects and procedural outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(Y):Y93–6.CrossRef Dvir D, Webb J. Mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring: technical aspects and procedural outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(Y):Y93–6.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bapat V, Attia R, Redwood S, Hancock J, Wilson K, Young C, et al. Use of transcatheter heart valves for a valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic bioprosthesis: technical considerations and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1372–9.CrossRef Bapat V, Attia R, Redwood S, Hancock J, Wilson K, Young C, et al. Use of transcatheter heart valves for a valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic bioprosthesis: technical considerations and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1372–9.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerillo AG, Gasbarri T, Celi S, Murzi M, Trianni G, Ravani M, et al. Transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed mitral bioprostheses: gradient, symptoms, and functional status in 18 high-risk patients up to 5 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1289–95.CrossRef Cerillo AG, Gasbarri T, Celi S, Murzi M, Trianni G, Ravani M, et al. Transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed mitral bioprostheses: gradient, symptoms, and functional status in 18 high-risk patients up to 5 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1289–95.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bapat V, Pirone F, Kapetanakis S, Rajani R, Niederer S. Factors influencing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction following a mitral valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring procedure, part 1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:747–60.CrossRef Bapat V, Pirone F, Kapetanakis S, Rajani R, Niederer S. Factors influencing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction following a mitral valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring procedure, part 1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:747–60.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon SH, Bleiziffer S, Latib A, Eschenbach L, Ancona M, Vincent F, et al. Predictors of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:182–93.CrossRef Yoon SH, Bleiziffer S, Latib A, Eschenbach L, Ancona M, Vincent F, et al. Predictors of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:182–93.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Capretti G, Urena M, Himbert D, Brochet E, Goublaire C, Verdonk C, et al. Valve thrombosis after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1814–5.CrossRef Capretti G, Urena M, Himbert D, Brochet E, Goublaire C, Verdonk C, et al. Valve thrombosis after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1814–5.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Loardi C, Mirza A, Candolfi P, Marchand M, et al. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2004–11.CrossRef Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Loardi C, Mirza A, Candolfi P, Marchand M, et al. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2004–11.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sezai A, Osaka S, Yaoita H, Ishii Y, Arimoto M, Hata H, et al. Long-term outcome of prosthetic valve replacement in Japanese patients aged 65 years or older: are guidelines for prosthetic valve selection based on overseas data appropriate for Japanese patients? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21:254–60.CrossRef Sezai A, Osaka S, Yaoita H, Ishii Y, Arimoto M, Hata H, et al. Long-term outcome of prosthetic valve replacement in Japanese patients aged 65 years or older: are guidelines for prosthetic valve selection based on overseas data appropriate for Japanese patients? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21:254–60.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakazato T, Hata H, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Yoshikawa Y, Saito S, et al. Midterm clinical outcomes of the St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Circ J. 2018;83:110–6.CrossRef Nakazato T, Hata H, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Yoshikawa Y, Saito S, et al. Midterm clinical outcomes of the St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Circ J. 2018;83:110–6.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dvir D. Transseptal instead of transapical valve implantation: making mitral great again? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1175–7.CrossRef Dvir D. Transseptal instead of transapical valve implantation: making mitral great again? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1175–7.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Eleid MF, Cabalka AK, Williams MR, Whisenant BK, Alli OO, Fam N, et al. Percutaneous transvenous transseptal transcatheter valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic mitral valves, ring annuloplasty, and severe mitral annular calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1161–74.CrossRef Eleid MF, Cabalka AK, Williams MR, Whisenant BK, Alli OO, Fam N, et al. Percutaneous transvenous transseptal transcatheter valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic mitral valves, ring annuloplasty, and severe mitral annular calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1161–74.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Early outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthesis in Japanese (MITRAL VIV study): a four-case series
verfasst von
Kizuku Yamashita
Satsuki Fukushima
Yusuke Shimahara
Atsushi Okada
Makoto Amaki
Hideaki Kanzaki
Chisato Izumi
Satoshi Yasuda
Junjiro Kobayashi
Tomoyuki Fujita
Publikationsdatum
25.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-6705
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-6713
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01147-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.