nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.09.2015

Development and preliminary testing of PROGRESS: a Web-based education program for prostate cancer survivors transitioning from active treatment

verfasst von: Suzanne M. Miller, Shawna V. Hudson, Siu-kuen Azor Hui, Michael A. Diefenbach, Linda Fleisher, Stephanie Raivitch, Tanisha Belton, Gem Roy, Anuli Njoku, John Scarpato, Rosalia Viterbo, Mark Buyyounouski, Crystal Denlinger, Curtis Miyamoto, Adam Reese, Jayson Baman

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This formative research study describes the development and preliminary evaluation of a theory-guided, online multimedia psycho-educational program (PROGRESS) designed to facilitate adaptive coping among prostate cancer patients transitioning from treatment into long-term survivorship.

Methods

Guided by the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing Model (C-SHIP) and using health communications best practices, we conducted a two-phase, qualitative formative research study with early stage prostate cancer patients (n = 29) to inform the Web program development. Phase 1 included individual (n = 5) and group (n = 12) interviews to help determine intervention content and interface. Phase 2 employed iterative user/usability testing (n = 12) to finalize the intervention. Interview data were independently coded and collectively analyzed to achieve consensus.

Results

Survivors expressed interest in action-oriented content on (1) managing treatment side effects, (2) handling body image and comorbidities related to overweight/obesity, (3) coping with emotional and communication issues, (4) tips to reduce disruptions of daily living activities, and (5) health skills training tools. Patients also desired the use of realistic and diverse survivor images.

Conclusions

Incorporation of an established theoretical framework, application of multimedia intervention development best practices, and an evidence-based approach to content and format resulted in a psycho-educational tool that comprehensively addresses survivors’ needs in a tailored fashion.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

The results suggest that an interactive Web-based multimedia program is useful for survivors if it covers the key topics of symptom control, emotional well-being, and coping skills training; this tool has the potential to be disseminated and implemented as an adjunct to routine clinical care.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society; 2014.

Jemal A et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(4):225–49.CrossRefPubMed

Siegel R et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):220–41.CrossRefPubMed

American Cancer Society. Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts & Figures 2014–2015. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society; 2014.

Anandadas CN et al. Early prostate cancer—which treatment do men prefer and why? BJU Int. 2011;107(11):1762–8.CrossRefPubMed

Singer EA et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: past, present and future. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012;24(3):243–50.CrossRefPubMed

Skolarus TA et al. American cancer society prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):225–49.CrossRefPubMed

Bacon CG et al. The association of treatment-related symptoms with quality-of-life outcomes for localized prostate carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2002;94(3):862–71.CrossRefPubMed

Lintz K et al. Prostate cancer patients’ support and psychological care needs: survey from a non-surgical oncology clinic. Psychooncology. 2003;12(8):769–83.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Wootten AC et al. Psychological adjustment of survivors of localised prostate cancer: investigating the role of dyadic adjustment, cognitive appraisal and coping style. Psychooncology. 2007;16(11):994–1002.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Bennett G, Badger TA. Depression in men with prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32(3):545–56.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Chipperfield K et al. Factors associated with adherence to physical activity guidelines in patients with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22(11):2478–86.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Badger TA et al. Who benefits from a psychosocial counselling versus educational intervention to improve psychological quality of life in prostate cancer survivors? Psychol Health. 2013;28(3):336–54.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

14.

Cegala DJ, Post DM. The impact of patients‘ participation on physicians’ patient-centered communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(2):202–8.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Grunfeld E, Earle CC. The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):25–30.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

16.

Grant M et al. Educating health care professionals to provide institutional changes in cancer survivorship care. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27(2):226–32.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

17.

Bradley CJ et al. Employment and cancer: findings from a longitudinal study of breast and prostate cancer survivors. Cancer Invest. 2007;25(1):47–54.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Grunfeld EA et al. “The only way I know how to live is to work”: a qualitative study of work following treatment for prostate cancer. Health Psychol. 2013;32(1):75–82.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Boberg EW et al. Assessing the unmet information, support and care delivery needs of men with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;49(3):233–42.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Smith DP et al. Age, health, and education determine supportive care needs of men younger than 70 years with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18):2560–6.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Stanton AL. What happens now? psychosocial care for cancer survivors after medical treatment completion. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(11):1215–20.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Miller SM, Diefenbach MA. The Cognitive-Social Health Information-Processing (C-SHIP model: A theoretical Framework for Research in Behavioral Oncology. In: Krantz DS, Baum A, editors. Technology and Methods in Behavioral Medicine. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1998. p. 219–44.

23.

Miller SM et al. Tailoring psychosocial interventions to the individual’s health information-processing style: The influence of monitoring versus blunting in cancer risk and disease. In: Baum A, Andersen B, editors. Psychosocial interventions for cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001. p. 343–62.

24.

Project, P.R.I. Internet User Demographics, As of January 2014, 87 % of American adults use the internet. Internet and Tech 2014 [cited 2014 April]; Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats

25.

Sanchez MA et al. A systematic review of eHealth cancer prevention and control interventions: new technology, same methods and designs? Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(4):392–401.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

26.

Carpenter, K.M., et al., An online stress management workbook for breast cancer. J Behav Med, 2012

27.

Pauwels E et al. Design and process evaluation of an informative website tailored to breast cancer survivors ‘and intimate partners’ post-treatment care needs. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:548.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

28.

Wen KY et al. The development and preliminary testing of a multimedia patient-provider survivorship communication module for breast cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88(2):344–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

29.

Marcus AC et al. Cancer patient and survivor research from the cancer information service research consortium: a preview of three large randomized trials and initial lessons learned. J Health Commun. 2013;18(5):543–62.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

30.

Schover LR et al. A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer. 2012;118(2):500–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

31.

Van Bogaert D et al. The development of an eHealth tool suite for prostate cancer patients and their partners. J Support Oncol. 2012;10(5):202–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

32.

McPherson, D.A. and D.A. Herxheimer. healthtalk.org. [cited 2014; Available from: http://www.healthtalk.org/.

33.

Wootten A et al. Development, feasibility and usability of an online psychological intervention for men with prostate cancwer: My road ahead. Internet Interv. 2014;1.

34.

Burns SM, Mahalik JR. Understanding how masculine gender scripts may contribute to men’s adjustment following treatment for prostate cancer. Am J Mens Health. 2007;1(4):250–61.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Wall D, Kristjanson L. Men, culture and hegemonic masculinity: understanding the experience of prostate cancer. Nurs Inq. 2005;12(2):87–97.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Mankowski ES, Maton KI. A community psychology of men and masculinity: historical and conceptual review. Am J Community Psychol. 2010;45(1–2):73–86.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Mroz LW, Oliffe JL, Davison BJ. Masculinities and patient perspectives of communication about active surveillance for prostate cancer. Health Psychol. 2013;32(1):83–90.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Rudd, R.E. Guidelines for Creating Materials-Resources for Developing and Assessing Materials. 2014; Available from: www.hsph.harvard.edu/healthliteracy.edu.

39.

Osborne H. Health literacy from a to Z, second edition: practical ways to communicate your health message. Burlington: Jones&Bartlett Learning; 2011.

40.

Doak, C., L. Doak, and J. Root, Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 1985, Philadelphia: JB Lippincott.

41.

Venderbos, L.D., et al., A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels. Psychooncology, 2014

42.

Hudson SV et al. Cancer survivors and the patient-centered medical home. Transl Behav Med. 2012;2(3):322–31.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

43.

Hudson SV et al. Adult cancer survivors discuss follow-up in primary care: ‘not what i want, but maybe what i need’. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(5):418–27.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

44.

Diefenbach MA et al. Acceptability and preliminary feasibility of an internet/CD-ROM-based education and decision program for early-stage prostate cancer patients: randomized pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

45.

Fleisher L et al. Application of best practice approaches for designing decision support tools: the preparatory education about clinical trials (PRE-ACT) study. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(1):63–71.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

46.

Neilsen J. Usability engineering. Cambridge: Elsevier; 1994.

47.

Jaspers MW et al. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73(11–12):781–95.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Crabtree, B.F. and W.L. Miller, Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. 1999, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. xvii, 406 p.

49.

Miles, M.B., A.M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook. Third edition. ed. 2014, Thousand Oaks, Califorinia: SAGE Publications, Inc. xxiii, 381 pages.

50.

Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1675–83.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Connell RW. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1995.

52.

Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept gender. Society. 2005;19(6):829–59.

53.

Buzaglo JS et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and usability of NCI’s facing forward booklet in the cancer community setting. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(1):63–73.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

54.

Coleman MT, Newton KS. Supporting self-management in patients with chronic illness. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(8):1503–10.PubMed

55.

Weiss, D.S. and C.R. Marmar, The Impact of Event Scale-Revised, in Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD, J.P. Wilson and T.M. Keane, Editors. 1996, Guilford: New York.

56.

Perez M et al. A novel intervention using interactive technology and personal narratives to reduce cancer disparities: African American breast cancer survivor stories. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(1):21–30.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Development and preliminary testing of PROGRESS: a Web-based education program for prostate cancer survivors transitioning from active treatment
verfasst von: Suzanne M. Miller
Shawna V. Hudson
Siu-kuen Azor Hui
Michael A. Diefenbach
Linda Fleisher
Stephanie Raivitch
Tanisha Belton
Gem Roy
Anuli Njoku
John Scarpato
Rosalia Viterbo
Mark Buyyounouski
Crystal Denlinger
Curtis Miyamoto
Adam Reese
Jayson Baman
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Elektronische ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0431-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Springer Medizin

Development and preliminary testing of PROGRESS: a Web-based education program for prostate cancer survivors transitioning from active treatment

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Applying evidence from economic evaluations to translate cancer survivorship research into care

Psychological distress, quality of life, symptoms and unmet needs of colorectal cancer survivors near the end of treatment

A meta-analysis of body mass index of adolescent and adult survivors of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Erratum to: Psychological distress, quality of life, symptoms and unmet needs of colorectal cancer survivors near the end of treatment

The association between partner support and psychological distress among prostate cancer survivors in a nationwide study

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, physical activity and health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors from the PROFILES registry

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie