nach oben

Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Erschienen in:

24.03.2017

Achieving value in mobile health applications for cancer survivors

verfasst von: Sharon Watkins Davis, Ingrid Oakley-Girvan

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to identify appropriate development and testing strategies for mobile health applications for cancer survivors.

Methods

In January of 2016, we conducted a PubMed search for mobile applications for cancer survivors. A total of 32 articles were selected for inclusion, including 13 review articles, and 19 articles describing an mHealth application or intervention. We assessed mobile app development and testing strategies and standards as described in these articles.

Results

We identified seven elements of patient empowerment applications for cancer survivors, strategies for application development that take advantage of smartphone capabilities, issues for consideration in developing new applications, and steps for creating user-centered mobile health applications that provide meaningful value for cancer survivors. However, few mobile health apps implemented empowerment elements, underwent rigorous design approaches, or included assessment of use in the cancer survivor population.

Conclusions

There is tremendous potential for mobile health apps to benefit cancer survivors. However, there are specific issues for consideration in developing new applications and steps for creating user-centered applications which are not routinely used. This diminishes the value for the cancer survivor population but could be easily addressed through standardized development and testing procedures.

Implications for cancer survivors

Smartphone applications have the potential to improve the cancer survivorship experience, but users should look for evidence that the application was appropriately developed and tested.

Institute of Medicine. Delivering high quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis: Institute of Medicine. 2013.

ACS. Cancer facts and figures 2015. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2015.

Dowling EC, Chawla N, Forsythe LP, de Moor J, McNeel T, Rozjabek HM, et al. Lost productivity and burden of illness in cancer survivors with and without other chronic conditions. Cancer. 2013;119(18):3393–401. doi:10.1002/cncr.28214.CrossRefPubMed

Weaver KE, Foraker RE, Alfano CM, Rowland JH, Arora NK, Bellizzi KM, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors among long-term survivors of breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancers: a gap in survivorship care? J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(2):253–61. doi:10.1007/s11764-013-0267-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kent EE, Mitchell SA, Oakley-Girvan I, Arora NK. The importance of symptom surveillance during follow-up care of leukemia, bladder, and colorectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(1):163–72. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1961-x.CrossRefPubMed

Bloom JR, Stewart SL, Oakley-Girvan I, Banks PJ, Shema S. Quality of life of younger breast cancer survivors: persistence of problems and sense of well-being. Psychooncology. 2011; doi:10.1002/pon.1965.PubMedCentral

Bellizzi KM, Aziz NM, Rowland JH, Weaver K, Arora NK, Hamilton AS, et al. Double jeopardy? Age, race, and HRQOL in older adults with cancer. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:478642. doi:10.1155/2012/478642.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stoval E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington: National Academies Press; 2006.

Hoerger M, Epstein RM, Winters PC, Fiscella K, Duberstein PR, Gramling R, et al. Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:188. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Kent EE, Arora NK, Rowland JH, Bellizzi KM, Forsythe LP, Hamilton AS, et al. Health information needs and health-related quality of life in a diverse population of long-term cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89(2):345–52. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W, Oakley-Girvan I, Hamilton AS, Hesse BW. Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2(3):179–89. doi:10.1007/s11764-008-0055-0.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Arora NK, Jensen RE, Sulayman N, Hamilton AS, Potosky AL. Patient-physician communication about health-related quality-of-life problems: are non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors willing to talk? J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3964–70. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.47.6705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Walsh J, Young JM, Harrison JD, Butow PN, Solomon MJ, Masya L, et al. What is important in cancer care coordination? A qualitative investigation. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011;20(2):220–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01187.x.CrossRef

14.

Klabunde CN, Han PK, Earle CC, Smith T, Ayanian JZ, Lee R, et al. Physician roles in the cancer-related follow-up care of cancer survivors. Fam Med. 2013;45(7):463–74.PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Arora NK, Reeve BB, Hays RD, Clauser SB, Oakley-Girvan I. Assessment of quality of cancer-related follow-up care from the cancer survivor’s perspective. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(10):1280–9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.1554.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Haggstrom DA, Arora NK, Helft P, Clayman ML, Oakley-Girvan I. Follow-up care delivery among colorectal cancer survivors most often seen by primary and subspecialty care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(Suppl 2):S472–9. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1017-6.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Street Jr RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Arora NK, Weaver KE, Clayman ML, Oakley-Girvan I, Potosky AL. Physicians’ decision-making style and psychosocial outcomes among cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(3):404–12. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Anderson M. Technology device ownership: 2015: pew research center. 2015.

20.

Duggan M, Smith A. Cell internet use 2013: pew research center. 2013.

21.

Fox Sa, Maeve D. The diagnosis difference: pew research center. 2013.

22.

Smith A, McGeeney K, Duggan M, Rainie L, Keeter S. US Smart Phone Use in 2015 Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. 2015.

23.

Smith A. A portrait of smart phone ownership: Pew Research Center. 2015.

24.

Birur PN, Sunny SP, Jena S, Kandasarma U, Raghavan S, Ramaswamy B, et al. Mobile health application for remote oral cancer surveillance. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146(12):886–94. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2015.05.020.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Cook SE, Palmer LC, Shuler FD. Smartphone mobile applications to enhance diagnosis of skin cancer: a guide for the rural practitioner. W V Med J. 2015;111(5):22–8.PubMed

26.

Mancuso M, Cesarman E, Erickson D. Detection of Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus nucleic acids using a smartphone accessory. Lab Chip. 2014;14(19):3809–16. doi:10.1039/c4lc00517a.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Oakley-Girvan I, Londono C, Canchola A, Watkins Davis S. Text messaging may improve abnormal mammogram follow-up in Latinas. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016;43(1):36–43. doi:10.1188/16.ONF.36-43.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Davis SW, Oakley-Girvan I. mHealth education applications along the cancer continuum. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(2):388–94. doi:10.1007/s13187-014-0761-4.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Brier MJ, Schwartz LA, Kazak AE. Psychosocial, health-promotion, and neurocognitive interventions for survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review. Health Psychol. 2015;34(2):130–48. doi:10.1037/hea0000119.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Wesley KM, Fizur PJ. A review of mobile applications to help adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2015;6:141–8. doi:10.2147/AHMT.S69209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Maguire R, Ream E, Richardson A, Connaghan J, Johnston B, Kotronoulas G, et al. Development of a novel remote patient monitoring system: the advanced symptom management system for radiotherapy to improve the symptom experience of patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(2):E37–47. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000150.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Larsen ME, Rowntree J, Young AM, Pearson S, Smith J, Gibson OJ, et al. Chemotherapy side-effect management using mobile phones. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5152–5. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650374.PubMed

33.

McCann L, Maguire R, Miller M, Kearney N. Patients’ perceptions and experiences of using a mobile phone-based advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) to monitor and manage chemotherapy related toxicity. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2009;18(2):156–64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.00938.x.CrossRef

34.

Kearney N, McCann L, Norrie J, Taylor L, Gray P, McGee-Lennon M, et al. Evaluation of a mobile phone-based, advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) in the management of chemotherapy-related toxicity. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(4):437–44. doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0515-0.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Weaver A, Young AM, Rowntree J, Townsend N, Pearson S, Smith J, et al. Application of mobile phone technology for managing chemotherapy-associated side-effects. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(11):1887–92. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm354.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Min YH, Lee JW, Shin YW, Jo MW, Sohn G, Lee JH, et al. Daily collection of self-reporting sleep disturbance data via a smartphone app in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a feasibility study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(5):e135. doi:10.2196/jmir.3421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Breen S, Ritchie D, Schofield P, Hsueh YS, Gough K, Santamaria N, et al. The patient remote intervention and symptom management system (PRISMS)–a telehealth- mediated intervention enabling real-time monitoring of chemotherapy side-effects in patients with haematological malignancies: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:472. doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0970-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

de Bruin JS, Schuh C, Seeling W, Luger E, Gall M, Hutterer E, et al. Assessing the feasibility of a mobile health-supported clinical decision support system for nutritional triage in oncology outpatients using Arden Syntax. Artif Intell Med. 2015; doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2015.10.001.

39.

Goode AD, Lawler SP, Brakenridge CL, Reeves MM, Eakin EG. Telephone, print, and web-based interventions for physical activity, diet, and weight control among cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(4):660–82. doi:10.1007/s11764-015-0442-2.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Payne HE, Lister C, West JH, Bernhardt JM. Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e20. doi:10.2196/mhealth.3335.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Aaronson NK, van Harten WH. A systematic review of web-based interventions for patient empowerment and physical activity in chronic diseases: relevance for cancer survivors. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e37. doi:10.2196/jmir.2281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Wang J, Wang Y, Wei C, Yao NA, Yuan A, Shan Y, et al. Smartphone interventions for long-term health management of chronic diseases: an integrative review. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(6):570–83. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0243.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Becker S, Kribben A, Meister S, Diamantidis CJ, Unger N, Mitchell A. User profiles of a smartphone application to support drug adherence—experiences from the iNephro project. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78547. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078547.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Spoelstra SL, Given CW, Sikorskii A, Coursaris CK, Majumder A, DeKoekkoek T, et al. Feasibility of a text messaging intervention to promote self-Management for Patients Prescribed Oral Anticancer Agents. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015;42(6):647–57. doi:10.1188/15.ONF.647-657.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Burhenn PS, Smudde J. Using tools and technology to promote education and adherence to oral agents for cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2015;19(3 Suppl):53–9. doi:10.1188/15.S1.CJON.53-59.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Galligioni E, Piras EM, Galvagni M, Eccher C, Caramatti S, Zanolli D, et al. Integrating mHealth in oncology: experience in the province of Trento. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(5):e114. doi:10.2196/jmir.3743.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Agboola S, Flanagan C, Searl M, Elfiky A, Kvedar J, Jethwani K. Improving outcomes in cancer patients on oral anti-cancer medications using a novel mobile phone-based intervention: study design of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014;3(4):e79. doi:10.2196/resprot.4041.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Klasnja P, Hartzler A, Powell C, Phan G, Pratt W. Health weaver mobile: designing a mobile tool for managing personal health information during cancer care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010;2010:392–6.PubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Okutsu A, Koiyabashi K. Effects of mobile phone usage in supporting leg lymphedema self-care. J Rural Med. 2014;9(2):74–85. doi:10.2185/jrm.2884.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Agboola S, Kamdar M, Flanagan C, Searl M, Traeger L, Kvedar J, et al. Pain management in cancer patients using a mobile app: study design of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014;3(4):e76. doi:10.2196/resprot.3957.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Girault A, Ferrua M, Lalloue B, Sicotte C, Fourcade A, Yatim F, et al. Internet-based technologies to improve cancer care coordination: current use and attitudes among cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(4):551–7. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.001.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Mirkovic J, Kaufman DR, Ruland CM. Supporting cancer patients in illness management: usability evaluation of a mobile app. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(3):e33. doi:10.2196/mhealth.3359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Groen WG, Kuijpers W, Oldenburg HS, Wouters MW, Aaronson NK, van Harten WH. Empowerment of cancer survivors through information technology: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):e270. doi:10.2196/jmir.4818.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Klasnja P, Pratt W. Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(1):184–98. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.017.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Bender JL, Yue RY, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR. A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(12):e287. doi:10.2196/jmir.2661.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD007459. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.PubMed

57.

Vollmer Dahlke D, Fair K, Hong YA, Beaudoin CE, Pulczinski J, Ory MG. Apps seeking theories: results of a study on the use of health behavior change theories in cancer survivorship mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e31. doi:10.2196/mhealth.3861.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Mohammadzadeh N, Safdari R, Rahimi A. Cancer care management through a mobile phone health approach: key considerations. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(9):4961–4.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Oldenburg HS, Wouters MW, Aaronson NK, van Harten WH. Development of MijnAVL, an interactive portal to empower breast and lung cancer survivors: an iterative. Multi-Stakeholder Approach JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(1):e14. doi:10.2196/resprot.3796.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Velicer WF, Rossi JS, Diclemente CC, Prochaska JO. A criterion measurement model for health behavior change. Addict Behav. 1996;21(5):555–84.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31(2):143–64. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Heimendinger J, O'Neill C, Marcus AC, Wolfe P, Julesburg K, Morra M, et al. Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the cancer information service. J Health Commun. 2005;10(Suppl 1):65–82. doi:10.1080/10810730500263646.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Marcus AC, Mason M, Wolfe P, Rimer BK, Lipkus I, Strecher V, et al. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute’s cancer information service. J Health Commun. 2005;10(Suppl 1):83–104. doi:10.1080/10810730500257754.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Strecher VJ, Marcus A, Bishop K, Fleisher L, Stengle W, Levinson A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multiple tailored messages for smoking cessation among callers to the cancer information service. J Health Commun. 2005;10(Suppl 1):105–18. doi:10.1080/10810730500263810.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Singh KBD, Drouin K, Newmark LP, Rozenblum R, Lee J, Landman A, et al. Developing a framework for evaluating the patient engagement, quality, and safety of mobile health applications: The Commonwealth Fund. Contract No.: 1863. 2016.

Titel: Achieving value in mobile health applications for cancer survivors
verfasst von: Sharon Watkins Davis
Ingrid Oakley-Girvan
Publikationsdatum: 24.03.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Elektronische ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0608-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Springer Medizin

Achieving value in mobile health applications for cancer survivors

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Implications for cancer survivors

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Implications for cancer survivors

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Unsupervised exercise in survivors of human papillomavirus related head and neck cancer: how many can go it alone?

Neuro emotional technique effects on brain physiology in cancer patients with traumatic stress symptoms: preliminary findings

The patients’ experience of a bladder cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence

Use of non-conventional medicine two years after cancer diagnosis in France: evidence from the VICAN survey

National estimates and correlates of secondhand smoke exposure in US cancer survivors

Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie