Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports 3/2015

01.03.2015 | Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (S Malik, Section Editor)

Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes: PCI or CABG or None at All

verfasst von: Kreton Mavromatis, Habib Samady, Spencer B. King III

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Patients with diabetes have a high incidence of coronary artery disease, with particularly high rates of acute coronary syndromes and mortality. Revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting was found to be effective in reducing angina and mortality in patients with extensive coronary artery disease over 30 years ago. Percutaneous coronary intervention, particularly with drug-eluting stents, has more recently been demonstrated to reduce recurrent angina and improve quality of life in diabetic patients with less extensive coronary artery disease. Most recently, coronary artery bypass grafting has been shown to be superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in improving mortality in patients with diabetes and three-vessel coronary artery disease who are not at high surgical risk. The role of coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients who have less extensive coronary artery disease and/or higher surgical risk has not been fully elucidated. Newer treatment strategies, such as percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents, use of fractional flow reserve guidance, or hybrid revascularization combining minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous coronary intervention, may result in further improvements in outcomes in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.
Literatur
1.•
Zurück zum Zitat Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):e44–164. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.013. This is the most current guideline for management of stable ischemic heart disease.CrossRefPubMed Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):e44–164. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2012.​07.​013. This is the most current guideline for management of stable ischemic heart disease.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat The Veterans Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. Eleven-year survival in the veterans administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1333–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM198411223112102. The Veterans Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. Eleven-year survival in the veterans administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1333–9. doi:10.​1056/​NEJM198411223112​102.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yusuf S, Zucker D, Passamani E, Peduzzi P, Takaro T, Fisher LD, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 1994;344(8922):563–70. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91963-1.CrossRefPubMed Yusuf S, Zucker D, Passamani E, Peduzzi P, Takaro T, Fisher LD, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 1994;344(8922):563–70. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(94)91963-1.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Kalidindi S, Wolski K, Moon K-W, Sipahi I, et al. Effect of diabetes on progression of coronary atherosclerosis and arterial remodeling: a pooled analysis of 5 intravascular ultrasound trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(4):255–62. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.051.CrossRefPubMed Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Kalidindi S, Wolski K, Moon K-W, Sipahi I, et al. Effect of diabetes on progression of coronary atherosclerosis and arterial remodeling: a pooled analysis of 5 intravascular ultrasound trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(4):255–62. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2008.​03.​051.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Malmberg K, Yusuf S, Gerstein HC, Brown J, Zhao F, Hunt D, et al. Impact of diabetes on long-term prognosis in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: results of the OASIS (Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes) Registry. Circulation. 2000;102(9):1014–9. doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.9.1014.CrossRefPubMed Malmberg K, Yusuf S, Gerstein HC, Brown J, Zhao F, Hunt D, et al. Impact of diabetes on long-term prognosis in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: results of the OASIS (Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes) Registry. Circulation. 2000;102(9):1014–9. doi:10.​1161/​01.​cir.​102.​9.​1014.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat BARI 2D Study Group, Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, Hardison RM, Kelsey SF et al. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2503–15. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0805796. BARI 2D Study Group, Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, Hardison RM, Kelsey SF et al. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2503–15. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa0805796.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbert J, Raboud J, Zinman B. Meta-analysis of the effect of diabetes on restenosis rates among patients receiving coronary angioplasty stenting. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(4):990–4. Gilbert J, Raboud J, Zinman B. Meta-analysis of the effect of diabetes on restenosis rates among patients receiving coronary angioplasty stenting. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(4):990–4.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg P, Normand S-LT, Silbaugh TS, Wolf RE, Zelevinsky K, Lovett A, et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center Registry. Circulation. 2008;118(22):2277–85. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.820159.CrossRefPubMed Garg P, Normand S-LT, Silbaugh TS, Wolf RE, Zelevinsky K, Lovett A, et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center Registry. Circulation. 2008;118(22):2277–85. doi:10.​1161/​circulationaha.​108.​820159.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Stenestrand U, James SK, Lindbäck J, Fröbert O, Carlsson J, Scherstén F, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: long-term follow-up in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). Eur Heart J. 2010;31(2):177–86. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp424.CrossRefPubMed Stenestrand U, James SK, Lindbäck J, Fröbert O, Carlsson J, Scherstén F, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: long-term follow-up in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). Eur Heart J. 2010;31(2):177–86. doi:10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehp424.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bangalore S, Kumar S, Fusaro M, Amoroso N, Kirtane AJ, Byrne RA et al. Outcomes with various drug eluting or bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: mixed treatment comparison analysis of 22 844 patient years of follow-up from randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5170. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5170. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Fusaro M, Amoroso N, Kirtane AJ, Byrne RA et al. Outcomes with various drug eluting or bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: mixed treatment comparison analysis of 22 844 patient years of follow-up from randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5170. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​e5170.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dangas GD, Serruys PW, Kereiakes DJ, Hermiller J, Rizvi A, Newman W, et al. Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT Clinical Trials Program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6(9):914–22. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.005.CrossRef Dangas GD, Serruys PW, Kereiakes DJ, Hermiller J, Rizvi A, Newman W, et al. Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT Clinical Trials Program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6(9):914–22. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcin.​2013.​05.​005.CrossRef
17.•
Zurück zum Zitat Kedhi E, Gomes ME, Lagerqvist B, Smith JG, Omerovic E, James S, et al. Clinical impact of second-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with first-generation drug-eluting stents in diabetes mellitus patients: insights from a nationwide coronary intervention register. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(11):1141–9. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.020. Two studies showing improved outcomes with second generation stents compared to first generation stents.CrossRef Kedhi E, Gomes ME, Lagerqvist B, Smith JG, Omerovic E, James S, et al. Clinical impact of second-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with first-generation drug-eluting stents in diabetes mellitus patients: insights from a nationwide coronary intervention register. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(11):1141–9. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcin.​2012.​06.​020. Two studies showing improved outcomes with second generation stents compared to first generation stents.CrossRef
18.•
Zurück zum Zitat Silber S, Serruys PW, Leon MB, Meredith IT, Windecker S, Neumann F-J, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with and without diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention with the resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from the prospectively pooled analysis of the international global RESOLUTE program. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6(4):357–68. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.006. Two studies showing improved outcomes with second generation stents compared to first generation stents.CrossRef Silber S, Serruys PW, Leon MB, Meredith IT, Windecker S, Neumann F-J, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with and without diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention with the resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from the prospectively pooled analysis of the international global RESOLUTE program. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6(4):357–68. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcin.​2012.​11.​006. Two studies showing improved outcomes with second generation stents compared to first generation stents.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503–16. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070829.CrossRefPubMed Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503–16. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa070829.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, Maron DJ, Zhang Z, Jurkovitz C, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(7):677–87. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa072771.CrossRefPubMed Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, Maron DJ, Zhang Z, Jurkovitz C, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(7):677–87. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa072771.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GBJ, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117(10):1283–91. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.743963.CrossRefPubMed Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GBJ, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117(10):1283–91. doi:10.​1161/​circulationaha.​107.​743963.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mancini GBJ, Hartigan PM, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Bates ER, et al. Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation): coronary anatomy versus ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2014;7(2):195–201. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.10.017.CrossRef Mancini GBJ, Hartigan PM, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Bates ER, et al. Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation): coronary anatomy versus ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2014;7(2):195–201. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcin.​2013.​10.​017.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991–1001. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1205361.CrossRefPubMed De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991–1001. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1205361.CrossRefPubMed
25.•
Zurück zum Zitat De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NHJ, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1208–17. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408758. This study is the most contemporary comparison of PCI plus OMT to OMT alone in patients with CAD, demonstrating a significant urgent revascularization and angina benefit in the PCI arm.CrossRefPubMed De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NHJ, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1208–17. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1408758. This study is the most contemporary comparison of PCI plus OMT to OMT alone in patients with CAD, demonstrating a significant urgent revascularization and angina benefit in the PCI arm.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Donahoe SM, Stewart GC, McCabe CH, Mohanavelu S, Murphy SA, Cannon CP et al. Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2007;298(7):765–75. doi:10.1001/jama.298.7.765. Donahoe SM, Stewart GC, McCabe CH, Mohanavelu S, Murphy SA, Cannon CP et al. Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2007;298(7):765–75. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​298.​7.​765.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Norhammar A, Malmberg K, Diderholm E, Lagerqvist B, Lindahl B, Rydén L, et al. Diabetes mellitus: the major risk factor in unstable coronary artery disease even after consideration of the extent of coronary artery disease and benefits of revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(4):585–91. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.050.CrossRefPubMed Norhammar A, Malmberg K, Diderholm E, Lagerqvist B, Lindahl B, Rydén L, et al. Diabetes mellitus: the major risk factor in unstable coronary artery disease even after consideration of the extent of coronary artery disease and benefits of revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(4):585–91. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2003.​08.​050.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, Vicari R, Frey MJ, Lakkis N, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(25):1879–87. doi:10.1056/NEJM200106213442501.CrossRefPubMed Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, Vicari R, Frey MJ, Lakkis N, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(25):1879–87. doi:10.​1056/​NEJM200106213442​501.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, Ståhle E, Swahn E, Wallentin L. 5-year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):998–1004. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69416-6.CrossRefPubMed Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, Ståhle E, Swahn E, Wallentin L. 5-year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):998–1004. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(06)69416-6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox KAA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, Clayton TC, Chamberlain DA, Shaw TRD, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9335):743–51. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09894-X.CrossRefPubMed Fox KAA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, Clayton TC, Chamberlain DA, Shaw TRD, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9335):743–51. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(02)09894-X.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Donoghue ML, Vaidya A, Afsal R, Alfredsson J, Boden WE, Braunwald E, et al. An invasive or conservative strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(2):106–11. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.059.CrossRefPubMed O'Donoghue ML, Vaidya A, Afsal R, Alfredsson J, Boden WE, Braunwald E, et al. An invasive or conservative strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(2):106–11. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2012.​02.​059.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey Jr DE, Ettinger SM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(19):e215–367. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.011.CrossRefPubMed Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey Jr DE, Ettinger SM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(19):e215–367. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2011.​02.​011.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamm CW, Bassand J-P, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(23):2999–3054. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236.CrossRefPubMed Hamm CW, Bassand J-P, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(23):2999–3054. doi:10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehr236.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, Boersma E, Booth J, Brooks MM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373(9670):1190–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60552-3.CrossRefPubMed Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, Boersma E, Booth J, Brooks MM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373(9670):1190–7. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(09)60552-3.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Morice M-C, Banning AP, Serruys PW, Mohr F-W, et al. Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(5):1006–13. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezt017.CrossRefPubMed Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Morice M-C, Banning AP, Serruys PW, Mohr F-W, et al. Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(5):1006–13. doi:10.​1093/​ejcts/​ezt017.CrossRefPubMed
37.•
Zurück zum Zitat Mohr FW, Morice M-C, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):629–38. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5. This study is a contemporary comparison of CABG to DES PCI in patients with complex CAD with 5 year outcomes. Mohr FW, Morice M-C, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):629–38. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(13)60141-5. This study is a contemporary comparison of CABG to DES PCI in patients with complex CAD with 5 year outcomes.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapur A, Hall RJ, Malik IS, Qureshi AC, Butts J, de Belder M, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(5):432–40. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.014.CrossRefPubMed Kapur A, Hall RJ, Malik IS, Qureshi AC, Butts J, de Belder M, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(5):432–40. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2009.​10.​014.CrossRefPubMed
41.••
Zurück zum Zitat Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, Siami FS, Dangas G, Mack M, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(25):2375–84. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1211585. This comparison of CABG to PCI in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease is large, contemporary and has substantial follow-up (∼7 years) showing a mortality benefit from CABG.CrossRefPubMed Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, Siami FS, Dangas G, Mack M, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(25):2375–84. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1211585. This comparison of CABG to PCI in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease is large, contemporary and has substantial follow-up (∼7 years) showing a mortality benefit from CABG.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakeem A, Garg N, Bhatti S, Rajpurohit N, Ahmed Z, Uretsky BF. Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluting stents compared with bypass surgery in diabetics with multivessel coronary disease: comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical data. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(4):e000354. doi:10.1161/jaha.113.000354.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hakeem A, Garg N, Bhatti S, Rajpurohit N, Ahmed Z, Uretsky BF. Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluting stents compared with bypass surgery in diabetics with multivessel coronary disease: comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical data. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(4):e000354. doi:10.​1161/​jaha.​113.​000354.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–24. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.CrossRefPubMed Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–24. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa0807611.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Harskamp RE, Brennan JM, Xian Y, Halkos ME, Puskas JD, Thourani VH, et al. Practice patterns and clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization in the United States: an analysis from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. Circulation. 2014;130(11):872–9. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.114.009479.CrossRefPubMed Harskamp RE, Brennan JM, Xian Y, Halkos ME, Puskas JD, Thourani VH, et al. Practice patterns and clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization in the United States: an analysis from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. Circulation. 2014;130(11):872–9. doi:10.​1161/​circulationaha.​114.​009479.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:217–25. doi:10.1056/NEJM199607253350401. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:217–25. doi:10.​1056/​NEJM199607253350​401.
Metadaten
Titel
Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes: PCI or CABG or None at All
verfasst von
Kreton Mavromatis
Habib Samady
Spencer B. King III
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0565-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Current Cardiology Reports 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Echocardiography (JM Gardin, Section Editor)

Focused Cardiac Ultrasound: Where Do We Stand?

Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (SE Petersen, Section Editor)

Challenges of Cardiac Image Analysis in Large-Scale Population-Based Studies

Cardio-Oncology (SA Francis, Section Editor)

Cardiotoxicity Due to Chemotherapy: Role of Cardiac Imaging

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Strenge Blutdruckeinstellung lohnt auch im Alter noch

30.04.2024 Arterielle Hypertonie Nachrichten

Ältere Frauen, die von chronischen Erkrankungen weitgehend verschont sind, haben offenbar die besten Chancen, ihren 90. Geburtstag zu erleben, wenn ihr systolischer Blutdruck < 130 mmHg liegt. Das scheint selbst für 80-Jährige noch zu gelten.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Dihydropyridin-Kalziumantagonisten können auf die Nieren gehen

30.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Im Vergleich zu anderen Blutdrucksenkern sind Kalziumantagonisten vom Diyhdropyridin-Typ mit einem erhöhten Risiko für eine Mikroalbuminurie und in Abwesenheit eines RAS-Blockers auch für ein terminales Nierenversagen verbunden.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.