nach oben

Current Cardiology Reports

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.05.2017 | Lipid Abnormalities and Cardiovascular Prevention (G De Backer, Section Editor)

Genetic Architecture of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia

verfasst von: Mahtab Sharifi, Marta Futema, Devaki Nair, Steve E. Humphries

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 5/2017

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an inherited disorder of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) which is characterised by a raised cholesterol level from birth and a high risk of premature coronary heart disease. In this paper, we review the genetic basis of FH and its impact on the clinical presentation.

Recent Findings

Mutations in any of three genes (LDLR, APOB and PCSK9) are known to cause autosomal dominant FH, but a mutation can be found in only ∼40% of patients with a clinical diagnosis of FH. In the remainder, a polygenic aetiology is most likely, due to the co-inheritance of common LDL-C-raising variants. The cardiovascular presentation and management of FH will differ between patients based on their underlying genetic factors.

Summary

New genotyping methods such as next-generation sequencing will provide us with better understanding of the genetic architecture of FH.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Lipid Abnormalities and Cardiovascular Prevention

Introduction

There are three available criteria for clinical diagnosis of Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH): the Simon Broome criteria from the UK, the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria from the Netherlands and the MedPed criteria from the USA (Table 1) [2]. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline recommends use of the Simon Broome criteria. These criteria include raised cholesterol levels, physical stigmata e.g. tendon xanthomata or an evidence of these signs in first- or second-degree relatives, and having a family history of premature coronary artery disease [3]. A ‘definite’ diagnosis of FH is made if a patient has elevated cholesterol levels and tendon xanthomata or a mutation is found by sequencing a DNA sample from the patient. A ‘possible’ diagnosis of FH is made if the patient has only high levels of cholesterol levels and a family history of hypercholesterolaemia or premature coronary heart disease (CHD). The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria use a point system based on patient’s cholesterol levels, personal and family history of premature coronary artery disease, physical examination and detected mutations to give a possible, probable or definite diagnosis of FH [2]. The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria have been modified by clinicians in Wales to take into account that an elevated triglyceride level in a suspected FH patient makes it less likely that the patient has monogenic FH [1•]. Finally, the MedPed criteria are used for diagnosis of probable FH in the USA and are mainly based on the total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) cut offs stratified by age and family history. The cut offs are different in individuals with first-, second- and third-degree relatives with FH [4].

Table 1

Simon Broome and Dutch Lipid Clinic Network diagnostic criteria for FH diagnostic criteria for index FH individuals

Simon Broome criteria
Diagnosis of definite FH	Cholesterol concentration (adults >7.5 mmol/l LDL-C^a >4.9 mmol/l and children >6.7 mmol/l, LDL-C >4.0 mmol/l)
	And tendon xanthomata
	Or DNA-based evidence of a mutation in the LDLR, APOB or PCSK9 genes
Diagnosis of possible FH	Cholesterol concentration (adults >7.5 mmol/l LDL-C^a >4.9 mmol/l and children >6.7 mmol/l, LDL-C > 4.0 mmol/l)
	And at least one of the following below:
	Family history of myocardial infarction: aged younger than 50 years in second-degree relative or aged younger than 60 years in first-degree relative
	And/or
	Family history of raised total cholesterol greater than 7.5 mmol/l in adult first- or second-degree relative or greater than 6.7 mmol.l in child, brother or sister aged younger than 16 years
Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria		Points
Family history	First-degree relative with known premature (men <55 years and women <60 years) coronary and vascular disease or first-degree relative with known LDL-C above the 95th percentile	1
	First-degree relative with tendon xanthomata and/or arcus cornealis, or children aged less than 18 years with LDL-C above the 95th percentile	2
Clinical history	Patient with premature coronary artery disease	2
	Patient with premature cerebral or peripheral vascular disease	1
Physical examination	Tendon xanthomata	6
	Arcus cornealis prior to age 45 years	4
Cholesterol levels	LDL-C ≥ 8.5	8
	LDL-C 6.5–8.4	5
	LDL-C 5.0–6.4	3
	LDL-C 4.0–4.9	1
DNA analysis	Functional mutation in the LDLR gene	8
Diagnosis	A ‘definite’ diagnosis requires more than 8 points
	A ‘probable’ diagnosis requires 6–8 points
	A ‘possible’ diagnosis requires 3–5 points
Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria modified by clinicians in Wales		Points
	Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria plus fasting triglyceride levels	As above
	2.5–3.4 mmol/l	−2
	3.5–4.9 mmol/l	−3
	>5.0 mmol/l	−4
	Genetic testing offered when score—6 points

^aIf untreated, LDL- C values are unobtainable, see the ‘Correction Factor Table’ in Haralambos et al. [1•] and calculate estimated value

Since FH is a disorder of LDL-C metabolism, it is important to understand the basic process of this pathway. LDL-C particles are comprised of an apoB molecule which envelopes a core of cholesteryl esters and triacylglycerols, together with smaller amounts of other lipid species. During normal lipid regulation, these particles bind to LDL-receptors expressed on the liver surface via their apoB molecule. The binding of LDL-C to its receptor induces a rapid internalisation of the LDL-C particle-receptor complex into the endosome compartment of the cell, where the lipoprotein is broken down into its constituent lipids and amino acids. The LDL-receptor then is either recycled back to the plasma membrane, or diverted to a lysosome and catabolised, so that the LDL-receptor is no longer available for recycling. Defects in any of these processes can therefore potentially cause FH.

FH-Causing Genes

The Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor

The LDLR gene was the first gene found where mutations cause FH. It spans 45 kb (kilobases) on the short arm of chromosome 19 and comprises 18 exons that are transcribed and translated into five distinct domains which form the cell surface LDL-receptor [5]. Any defect in the LDLR gene can cause loss of function of LDL-receptors resulting in reduced LDL-C uptake from blood and cause FH. In mutation carriers, blood cholesterol level is usually raised two fold above the normal level. In the homozygous form, where two identical mutations have been inherited, one from each parent (usually from a consanguineous marriage), or compound heterozygous FH, where two different mutations on both alleles have been inherited, the cholesterol levels are four or five times greater than those of the heterozygous cases [6].

FH-causing mutations in the LDLR gene are found along the entire length of the gene. There are more than 2900 different variants identified in the LDLR gene with majority of them being exonic substitutions and small (<100 bp) or large rearrangements (>100 bp) [7••]. More than 90% of the reported variants are likely to be disease causing [8]. Most FH cohort studies showed that among the variants found, a large proportion cluster in exon 4 [9]. This could be due to the large size of exon 4 or to the highly detrimental effect of variants in this exon which encodes the ligand-binding domain, on the gene function compared to variants in other exons. Patients with a mutation in exon 4 might present with more severe FH in the clinics. In contrast, the mutation frequency in exons 15 and 16 is extremely low. The spectrum of FH mutations varies between countries; from Greece, where a relatively small numbers of mutations account for the majority of FH cases, to the Netherlands where the mutation spectrum was found to be extensive [10]. The cause of FH in the UK is highly heterogeneous with over 200 different mutations reported [11, 12] The information regarding molecular diagnosis of FH in some parts of the world such as Latin America and South Asia are scant. In Brazil and Mexico, the countries with the largest cohorts in Latin America, only few LDLR mutations have been found that have been encountered in the European population previously [13].

Predicting whether novel variants in LDLR are pathogenic or not is not always straightforward, especially for synonymous and missense variants. In 2013, the Association for Clinical Genetic Science (ACGS) published guidelines for the classification of variants, with categories ranging from 1 and 2 (clearly not or unlikely to be pathogenic), to 3 (variants of unknown significance), to 4 and 5 (likely to be or clearly pathogenic). The recently updated LDLR variant database with variants classified according to these guidelines may be accessed via: http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/LDLR [7••]. All 128 nonsense substitutions, 336 small frame-shifting rearrangements and 116/117 large rearrangements were considered to be pathogenic (classes 4 and 5). Of the 795 missense variants analysed, 115were in classes 1 and 2, 605 in class 4 and 75 in class 3. One hundred eleven of the 180 intronic variants, 4 of 34 synonymous variants and 14 of 37 reported promoter variants were predicted to be likely or clearly pathogenic (classes 4 and 5). It is clearly of great importance to be able to assess whether variants identified in clinical settings or as incidental findings in genomics projects are pathogenic or not. Although 93% (1588) of LDLR variants in the current upgrade of the database have been assigned to an ACGS pathogenicity category, 7% (115) remain as variants of unknown significance. It is hoped that as more information becomes available from in vitro functional studies, the development of additional in silico tools and from the various genomics studies, it will be possible to determine the pathogenicity of these variants, and indeed the classification of some variants may also change as our knowledge increases. The ‘gold standard’ test for pathogenicity of a variant is to carry out co-segregation studies, where the co-inheritance of the variant with elevated LDL-C levels is seen in many relatives in a family, while the relatives without the inherited variant have normal levels of LDL-C. The interpretation of family data may be complicated by the overlay of environmental factors that influence lipid levels and by the presence in the family of other genetic variants that raise or lower LDL-C.

Apolipoprotein B

Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is the major apolipoprotein on lipoprotein molecules, especially LDL-C, and functions as a ligand to the LDL-receptor. The gene is located on chromosome 2p and spans more than 43 kb. The gene comprises 29 exons and is transcribed and translated into a protein of 4563 amino acids [14]. While truncation mutations in the APOB gene cause hypobetalipoproteinemia, mutations causing hypercholesterolaemia are due to missense mutations that result in ligand-defective apoB protein. The LDL-C particles made from this allele are therefore not able to bind to the LDL-receptor and thus accumulate in the blood [15]. A single mutation of the APOB gene (p.Arg3527Gln) accounts for approximately 6–10% of all FH cases in European population, and it is located in exon 26 of APOB gene [16]. Other APOB mutations in other regions of the gene such as p.Arg50Trp, p.Arg1164Thr and p.Gln4494del were also recently found to cause FH [17, 18•]. For other variants, for example for p.Arg3531Cys, which was detected in a patient with a clinical diagnosis of FH, while initial reports showed that LDL-C from the patient had reduced binding to the LDL-receptor, later co-segregation studies found that there was no clear co-segregation [19]. This variant is now considered to be a ‘susceptibility’ variant that raises the likelihood of hypercholesterolaemia in a carrier but does not itself cause frank FH.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9

The PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) gene encodes an enzyme that is involved in regulating the degradation of the LDL-receptor protein in the lysosome of the cell, preventing it from being recycled to the cell surface. The gene is found on chromosome 1p and comprises 12 exons, covering 39 kb [20]. The PCSK9 molecule is synthesised as an inactive proprotein and undergoes cleavage in the endoplasmic reticulum to produce an enzyme with the prodomain noncovalently bound to the catalytic site, preventing further enzyme action. PCSK9 is secreted mostly from the liver and its binding to the LDL-receptor directs the receptor to the lysosome for degradation [21].

Mutations in the PCSK9 gene that cause FH are gain-of-function mutations that increase LDL-receptor degradation and consequently reduce the number of receptors on the cell surface. Although more than 20 such variants have been reported world-wide, the only common PCSK9 variant in the UK is p.Asp374Tyr, which occurs in about 2% of the mutation-positive FH patients. This variant is associated with a raised cholesterol level and a high risk of developing premature coronary heart disease, compared with a mutation in the LDLR gene [22]. On the other hand, loss-of-function mutations that inactivate the PCSK9 protein lead to less degradation of the LDL-receptor [23]. The most common of these variants, p.Arg46Leu, enhances the clearance of LDL-C from the plasma and lowers cholesterol level in the plasma. In European populations, approximately 3% of individuals are carriers of this variant, and because of their lifelong lower LDL-C levels, they have ∼28% lower CHD risk [24].

Other Monogenic Causes of FH

A very rare autosomal recessive hypercholesterolaemia is caused by mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1 (LDLRAP1) gene which encodes a cytosolic protein that interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of the LDL-receptor. Mutations in this gene that usually cause premature truncations of the protein lead to LDL-receptor malfunction and hypercholesterolaemia. This gene is located on the short arm of chromosome 1 [25]. The LDL-C level in these cases is typically intermediate between homozygote and heterozygote autosomal dominant FH patients [2].

Several studies have reported that a specific mutation (p.Leu167del) in APOE gene causes autosomal dominant FH [26]. This mutation has been previously reported to be associated with sea-blue histiocytosis and familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH) but overlap between the FCH and FH phenotype has been shown before as hypertriglyceridemia can be seen due to many common genetic and environmental factors [27, 28].

Several studies have been conducted to identify new genes causing FH, using family studies and next-generation sequencing (NGS) and this has identified three genes STAP1 (signal transducing adaptor protein family 1), LIPA (lysosomal acid lipase) and PNPLA5 (patatin-like phospholipase-domain-containing family) where mutations may be causing significantly elevated LDL-C and possibly the clinical phenotype of FH [29•, 30, 31]. So far, for STAP1 and PNPLA5, these genes and variants in them have yet to be independently confirmed as FH-causing.

Frequency of FH

Next-generation sequencing has driven major advances in our understanding of monogenic cause of elevated LDL-C and premature CHD, focussing on the three proven FH-causing genes (LDLR, APOB and PCSK9). Although the prevalence of FH has historically been estimated at 1/500, the likely true prevalence of FH-causing mutation carriage now appears to be between 1/250 and 1/300 in many European populations. In Denmark, 98,098 participants from the Copenhagen General Population Study were genotyped for the three common LDLR mutations and commonest APOB mutation (p.Arg3527Gln). The prevalence of the four FH mutations was 1/565, accounting for ∼39% of pathogenic mutations in the country, and equating to a total prevalence of FH-mutation carriers of 1/217 [32••]. A similar prevalence was reported in subjects in the UK 10,000 genome project [33], and in a large sample of healthy subjects in the USA [34]. In support of this higher estimate, although historically the prevalence of homozygote FH is believed to be 1 per million [6], several population-based studies have now estimated the prevalence to be around 1/300 with a mean LDL-C levels prior to lipid-lowering treatment being 12.9 ± 5.1 mmol/l. [35] This higher figure would be expected if the true prevalence of FH mutation carriers is 1/250.

The frequency of heterozygous FH is also considerably higher in some populations due to founder effect. This occurs when immigration of a small number of subjects to a geographical area is followed by a population expansion from those individuals. If, by any chance, those individuals have FH, then genetic drift could lead to a high proportion of affected people in that population. Such founder effects have been reported in French Canadian, South African-Afrikaners, Jews and Indians and Finns [2].

Polygenic versus Monogenic FH

In diagnostic laboratories, a mutation in one of the three known FH-causing genes can be found in 60–80% of patients with a clinical diagnosis of definite FH and 30% of patients with possible FH [11]. As shown in Fig. 1, mutations that cause loss of function in LDLR or APOB or gain of function in PCSK9 result in an individual moving from a low point in the population cholesterol distribution to being over the diagnostic cut-off for FH (7.5 mmol/l). In those where a causative mutation cannot be found, there is a strong possibility that there may be a polygenic cause for FH. The Global Lipids Genetics Consortium meta-analysis identified over 100 loci where common variants influence LDL-C levels [36]. Thus, in patients where no mutation can be found, the LDL-C and total cholesterol level is raised above the FH diagnostic cut-off by having inherited a greater than average number of common cholesterol-raising variants with modest effect. Such key single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are located in LDLR, APOB, APOE, ABCG8 and SORT1. In more than 80% of those with a clinical diagnosis of FH but with no detectable mutation in LDLR/APOB/PCSK9, the polygenic explanation is most likely. In the remainder, mutation in a novel gene may be present [37••, 38•].

The additional polygenic contribution might explain the variation in the LDL-C concentrations among the family members of the FH patients. In these families, it might be possible that the FH phenotype is caused by the combination of a single mutation of large effect in LDLR/APOB/PCSK9 and several LDL-C alleles of modest effect which may differ in the family members [37••].

Cascade Testing

All recent European guidelines for the management of FH patients have recommended that healthcare professionals should offer a referral for cascade testing to every FH patient to identify affected first- and second- degree relatives of the index patient [3, 39]. DNA testing would thus confirm the diagnosis of FH and helps to identify affected relatives at an early age. Lipid-lowering therapy in these individuals results in reducing the morbidity and mortality from premature CHD and would be a highly cost-effective strategy in the health services [40, 41]. Such cascade testing of the relatives of affected individuals has been carried out effectively in several countries in Europe, including Holland, and shown to be feasible in the UK [40].

The ascertainment of index cases in the UK is currently relying on a case presenting with premature CHD or the incidental finding of an extreme total cholesterol (TC) or LDL-C level. One problem is that TC and LDL-C values in adults with FH overlap substantially with values observed among individuals from the general population, where a higher than average burden of common, small-effect cholesterol-raising alleles can mimic the biochemical features of FH [37••]. Thus, biochemical screening for FH in adulthood is prone to misclassification. For this reason, according to recent surveys and a national audit, the FH patients currently treated by lipid clinics in the UK represent <15% of an estimated 126,000 FH patients in the UK (if the incidence of 1/500) or <7.5% of the estimated 252,000 FH patients (if the true incidence is 1/250).

Reverse Cascade Testing

Wald and colleagues used the diagnostic criteria of either total cholesterol >5.31 mmol/l (95th percentile) plus one mutation, or two cholesterol values of ≥5.90 mmol/l (99th percentile), in 10,094 children in the UK at the time of routine immunisations (median age 12.7 months) to identify adults with FH by measuring cholesterol level [42••]. They identified 45 children with FH, including 37 with a detected mutation and 8 with a raised LDL-C but with no mutation. The prevalence of mutation carriers was estimated at 1/273 (37/10,940). We have previously demonstrated that such individuals (without a monogenic cause of FH) are likely to have a polygenic aetiology for their FH phenotype, with co-inheritance of a greater than average number of common LDL-C-raising variants of modest effect, and have proposed that only those patients with a detected mutation should be designated as monogenic FH. Testing parents of the confirmed FH children identified 40 parents who also met the criteria for FH diagnoses.

In the UK, in FH patients where a monogenic cause is found, roughly 93% have a mutation in the LDLR gene, 5% in APOB and 2% in PCSK9 [43]. In the Wald study, 40% of the detected FH-mutations were the APOB (p.Arg3527Gln) mutation which is known to cause a generally less severe FH than most LDLR mutations. Thus, while this screening approach has value in finding new families with FH, it will also identify individuals with less severe form of hypercholesterolaemia and at lower cardiovascular risk. In these patients, the genetic data may contribute to decision-making for intensive statin treatment, but the risk-benefit balance is not as clear as for relatives of clinically diagnosed FH index cases, whose personal or family history of premature CHD is a key diagnostic component.

Cardiovascular Disease in FH Patients with Different Genetic Cause of their Disease

The earlier studies of heterozygous FH patients, before statin therapy became a standard treatment, showed the risk of fatal or nonfatal coronary heart disease by the age of 60 years was about 50% for male and 30% for females compared with 10% in the relatives without FH [2]. The concept of a cumulative LDL-C burden since birth may play an important role in the aetiology of cardiovascular disease in monogenic FH patients. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as age, male gender, smoking and hypertension may play additional roles to the genetic defects in increased coronary risk in these patients [44, 45].

Severity of the clinical presentations is different among the FH patients [39]. The severity and clinical expression of CHD are even variable within a family, where all relatives carry the same LDLR gene defect [46‐48]. The LDLR mutations (null allele) that severely impair the function of LDL-receptor are shown to cause more advanced CHD with earlier onset [46, 48, 49]. In addition, the severity of atherosclerosis appears to be greater in monogenic FH than that of polygenic hypercholesterolaemia [50•, 51]. Aortic valve and supravalve calcification is common among the FH patients with LDLR-negative mutations and homozygous FH [52, 53].

This elevated risk for CHD in FH patients with a detected mutation has been convincingly confirmed by Khera et al. in a population-based analysis [54••]. Using NGS for the known FH genes among 20,485 CHD-free individuals, 1386 (6.7%) had LDL-C >4.9 mmol/l, and of these, 24 (1.7%) carried a known FH mutation. Compared with individuals with LDL-C <3.7 mmol/l and no mutation, those with LDL-C >4.9 mmol/l and no FH mutation had a six-fold higher risk for CHD, but those with both LDL-C >4.9 mmol/l and an FH mutation had a 22-fold higher risk. This risk is explained by the substantially higher accumulated ‘LDL-C burden’ since patients have had genetically determined lifelong high LDL-C.

Conclusion

Monogenic FH is mainly caused by mutations in common FH-causing genes. In patients with a clinical diagnosis of FH where no mutation found, it is most likely to be a polygenic cause for the clinical presentation. Using new genotyping methods such as NGS produces a large amount of sequence data which must be analysed using statistical and bioinformatics approaches and has increased the number of occasions where a variant of uncertain significance is identified. This creates a diagnostic conundrum which requires either in vitro molecular analysis to examine the impact on transcription or splicing, or co-segregation study of families to see if other relatives with the same variant have also high LDL-C levels. Better screening programmes for diagnosis of FH are needed in the community and for cascade testing of the relatives of the FH patients.

Acknowledgments

Steve E. Humphries and Marta Futema are supported by a grant from the British Heart Foundation (BHF grant PG 08/008) and by funding from the Department of Health’s NIHR Biomedical Research Centers funding scheme.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Mahtab Sharifi declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Marta Futema reports speakers’ fees from Sanofi.

Devaki Nair has received grants from Pfizer (Pfizer Foundation award 2008), Solvay, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Astra Zeneca. DN has advisory board membership with Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Amgen and Astra Zeneca.

Steve E. Humphries is the Medical director of a UCL spin-out company StoreGene that offers to clinicians genetic testing for patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ²

e.Med Radiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ³

• Haralambos K, Whatley SD, Edwards R, Gingell R, Townsend D, Ashfield-Watt P, et al. Clinical experience of scoring criteria for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) genetic testing in Wales. Atherosclerosis. 2015;240(1):190–6. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.03.003. Modification of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network scoring system by subtracting points for the degree of elevation of fasting triglycerides has shown to improve mutation detection rate.CrossRefPubMed

Austin MA, Hutter CM, Zimmern RL, Humphries SE. Genetic causes of monogenic heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a huge prevalence review. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(5):407–20. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh236.CrossRefPubMed

DeMott KNL, Shaw EJ, Minhas R, Humphries SE, Kathoria M, Ritchie G, et al. Clinical guidelines and evidence review for familial hypercholesterolaemia: the identification and management of adults and children with familial hypercholesterolaemia. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners; 2008.

Williams RR, Hunt SC, Schumacher MC, Hegele RA, Leppert MF, Ludwig EH, et al. Diagnosing heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia using new practical criteria validated by molecular genetics. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72(2):171–6.CrossRefPubMed

Hobbs HH, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Molecular genetics of the LDL receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat. 1992;1(6):445–66. doi:10.1002/humu.1380010602.CrossRefPubMed

Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, et al. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the consensus panel on familial hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(32):2146–57. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu274.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

•• Leigh S, Futema M, Whittall R, Taylor-Beadling A, Williams M, den Dunnen JT, et al. The UCL low-density lipoprotein receptor gene variant database: pathogenicity update. J Med Genet. 2016; doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104054. This study updates the LDLR variants database available for use by scientists and clinicians, giving clear pathogenic or non-pathogenic catagories to over 1000 published variants.PubMed

Usifo E, Leigh SE, Whittall RA, Lench N, Taylor A, Yeats C, et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor gene familial hypercholesterolemia variant database: update and pathological assessment. Ann Hum Genet. 2012;76(5):387–401. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.2012.00724.x.CrossRefPubMed

Grenkowitz T, Kassner U, Wuhle-Demuth M, Salewsky B, Rosada A, Zemojtel T, et al. Clinical characterization and mutation spectrum of German patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2016;253:88–93. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.037.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Kusters DM, Huijgen R, Defesche JC, Vissers MN, Kindt I, Hutten BA, et al. Founder mutations in the Netherlands: geographical distribution of the most prevalent mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor and apolipoprotein B genes. Neth Heart J. 2011;19(4):175–82. doi:10.1007/s12471-011-0076-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Taylor A, Wang D, Patel K, Whittall R, Wood G, Farrer M, et al. Mutation detection rate and spectrum in familial hypercholesterolaemia patients in the UK pilot cascade project. Clin Genet. 2010;77(6):572–80. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01356.x.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Futema M, Whittall RA, Kiley A, Steel LK, Cooper JA, Badmus E, et al. Analysis of the frequency and spectrum of mutations recognised to cause familial hypercholesterolaemia in routine clinical practice in a UK specialist hospital lipid clinic. Atherosclerosis. 2013;229(1):161–8. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Mehta R, Zubiran R, Martagon AJ, Vazquez-Cardenas A, Segura-Kato Y, Tusie-Luna MT, et al. The panorama of familial hypercholesterolemia in Latin America: a systematic review. J Lipid Res. 2016;57(12):2115–29. doi:10.1194/jlr.R072231.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Chen SH, Yang CY, Chen PF, Setzer D, Tanimura M, Li WH, et al. The complete cDNA and amino acid sequence of human apolipoprotein B-100. J Biol Chem. 1986;261(28):12918–21.PubMed

15.

Myant NB. Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100: a review, including some comparisons with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis. 1993;104(1–2):1–18.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Myant NB, Forbes SA, Day IN, Gallagher J. Estimation of the age of the ancestral arginine 3500--> glutamine mutation in human apoB-100. Genomics. 1997;45(1):78–87. doi:10.1006/geno.1997.4898.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Fernandez-Higuero JA, Etxebarria A, Benito-Vicente A, Alves AC, Arrondo JL, Ostolaza H, et al. Structural analysis of APOB variants, p.(Arg3527Gln), p.(Arg1164Thr) and p.(Gln4494del), causing familial hypercholesterolaemia provides novel insights into variant pathogenicity. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18184. doi:10.1038/srep18184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

• Thomas ER, Atanur SS, Norsworthy PJ, Encheva V, Snijders AP, Game L, et al. Identification and biochemical analysis of a novel APOB mutation that causes autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2013;1(3):155–61. doi:10.1002/mgg3.17. Identification of a novel FH-causing APOB mutation that is outside the LDL-binding region of the protein.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Rabes JP, Varret M, Devillers M, Aegerter P, Villeger L, Krempf M, et al. R3531C mutation in the apolipoprotein B gene is not sufficient to cause hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(10):E76–82.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Humphries SE, Neely RD, Whittall RA, Troutt JS, Konrad RJ, Scartezini M, et al. Healthy individuals carrying the PCSK9 p.R46L variant and familial hypercholesterolemia patients carrying PCSK9 p.D374Y exhibit lower plasma concentrations of PCSK9. Clin Chem. 2009;55(12):2153–61. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2009.129759.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Lagace TA, Curtis DE, Garuti R, McNutt MC, Park SW, Prather HB, et al. Secreted PCSK9 decreases the number of LDL receptors in hepatocytes and in livers of parabiotic mice. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(11):2995–3005. doi:10.1172/JCI29383.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Naoumova RP, Tosi I, Patel D, Neuwirth C, Horswell SD, Marais AD, et al. Severe hypercholesterolemia in four British families with the D374Y mutation in the PCSK9 gene: long-term follow-up and treatment response. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(12):2654–60. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000190668.94752.ab.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Zhao Z, Tuakli-Wosornu Y, Lagace TA, Kinch L, Grishin NV, Horton JD, et al. Molecular characterization of loss-of-function mutations in PCSK9 and identification of a compound heterozygote. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(3):514–23. doi:10.1086/507488.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Benn M, Nordestgaard BG, Grande P, Schnohr P, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. PCSK9 R46L, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and risk of ischemic heart disease: 3 independent studies and meta-analyses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2833–42. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.044.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Michaely P, Li WP, Anderson RG, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. The modular adaptor protein ARH is required for low density lipoprotein (LDL) binding and internalization but not for LDL receptor clustering in coated pits. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(32):34023–31. doi:10.1074/jbc.M405242200.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Marduel M, Ouguerram K, Serre V, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Marques-Pinheiro A, Erik Berge K, et al. Description of a large family with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia associated with the APOE p.Leu167del mutation. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(1):83–7. doi:10.1002/humu.22215.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Civeira F, Jarauta E, Cenarro A, Garcia-Otin AL, Tejedor D, Zambon D, et al. Frequency of low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations in patients with a clinical diagnosis of familial combined hyperlipidemia in a clinical setting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(19):1546–53. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.050.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Talmud PJ. Genetic determinants of plasma triglycerides: impact of rare and common mutations. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001;3(3):191–9.CrossRefPubMed

29.

• Fouchier SW, Dallinga-Thie GM, Meijers JC, Zelcer N, Kastelein JJ, Defesche JC, et al. Mutations in STAP1 are associated with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Circ Res. 2014;115(6):552–5. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.304660. Identification of a potential new FH-causing gene in patients in Holland but not yet confirmed elsewhere.

30.

Lange LA, Hu Y, Zhang H, Xue C, Schmidt EM, Tang ZZ, et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies rare and low-frequency coding variants associated with LDL cholesterol. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94(2):233–45. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.01.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Stitziel NO, Fouchier SW, Sjouke B, Peloso GM, Moscoso AM, Auer PL, et al. Exome sequencing and directed clinical phenotyping diagnose cholesterol ester storage disease presenting as autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(12):2909–14. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302426.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

•• Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Mutations causative of familial hypercholesterolaemia: screening of 98 098 individuals from the Copenhagen general population study estimated a prevalence of 1 in 217. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(17):1384–94. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw028. The first European population-based molecular screening to establish the prevelance of FH.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Consortium UK, Walter K, Min JL, Huang J, Crooks L, Memari Y, et al. The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease. Nature. 2015;526(7571):82–90. doi:10.1038/nature14962.CrossRef

34.

Do R, Stitziel NO, Won HH, Jorgensen AB, Duga S, Angelica Merlini P, et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarction. Nature. 2015;518(7537):102–6. doi:10.1038/nature13917.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Sjouke B, Kusters DM, Kindt I, Besseling J, Defesche JC, Sijbrands EJ, et al. Homozygous autosomal dominant hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands: prevalence, genotype-phenotype relationship, and clinical outcome. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(9):560–5. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu058.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Teslovich TM, Musunuru K, Smith AV, Edmondson AC, Stylianou IM, Koseki M, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010;466(7307):707–13. doi:10.1038/nature09270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

•• Talmud PJ, Shah S, Whittall R, Futema M, Howard P, Cooper JA, et al. Use of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol gene score to distinguish patients with polygenic and monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia: a case-control study. Lancet. 2013;381(9874):1293–301. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62127-8. This study explains the basis of polygenic hypercholesterolemia and the common LDL-C-raising variants causing it in a group of patients with a clinical diagnosis of FH where no mutation was found in the three common FH-causing genes.CrossRefPubMed

38.

• Futema M, Shah S, Cooper JA, Li K, Whittall RA, Sharifi M, et al. Refinement of variant selection for the LDL cholesterol genetic risk score in the diagnosis of the polygenic form of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia and replication in samples from 6 countries. Clin Chem. 2015;61(1):231–8. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2014.231365. This study confirms the polygenic contribution to non-mutation FH in 6 European countries and shows that the top 6 SNPs perform as well as the 12 SNPS used originally.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(45):3478–90a. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht273.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Hadfield SG, Horara S, Starr BJ, Yazdgerdi S, Marks D, Bhatnagar D, et al. Family tracing to identify patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: the second audit of the Department of Health Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cascade Testing Project. Ann Clin Biochem. 2009;46(Pt 1):24–32. doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008094.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Humphries SE, Norbury G, Leigh S, Hadfield SG, Nair D. What is the clinical utility of DNA testing in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia? Curr Opin Lipidol. 2008;19(4):362–8. doi:10.1097/MOL.0b013e32830636e5.CrossRefPubMed

42.

•• Wald DS, Bestwick JP, Morris JK, Whyte K, Jenkins L, Wald NJ. Child-parent familial hypercholesterolemia screening in primary care. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(17):1628–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1602777. Demonstration of the feasabilty of ‘reverse cascade testing’ by screening infants for high cholesterol and then testing their parents found a prevelance of FH-mutation carriers in the UK of ∼1/270.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Humphries SE, Whittall RA, Hubbart CS, Maplebeck S, Cooper JA, Soutar AK, et al. Genetic causes of familial hypercholesterolaemia in patients in the UK: relation to plasma lipid levels and coronary heart disease risk. J Med Genet. 2006;43(12):943–9. doi:10.1136/jmg.2006.038356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Hill JS, Hayden MR, Frohlich J, Pritchard PH. Genetic and environmental factors affecting the incidence of coronary artery disease in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11(2):290–7.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Neil HA, Seagroatt V, Betteridge DJ, Cooper MP, Durrington PN, Miller JP, et al. Established and emerging coronary risk factors in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Heart. 2004;90(12):1431–7. doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.022764.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Ferrieres J, Lambert J, Lussier-Cacan S, Davignon J. Coronary artery disease in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients with the same LDL receptor gene mutation. Circulation. 1995;92(3):290–5.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Jarauta E, Junyent M, Gilabert R, Plana N, Mateo-Gallego R, de Groot E, et al. Sonographic evaluation of Achilles tendons and carotid atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204(2):345–7. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.09.040.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Besseling J, Kindt I, Hof M, Kastelein JJ, Hutten BA, Hovingh GK. Severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and risk for cardiovascular disease: a study of a cohort of 14,000 mutation carriers. Atherosclerosis. 2014;233(1):219–23. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.12.020.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Vilades Medel D, Leta Petracca R, Carreras Costa F, Cardona Olle M, Barros Membrilla A, Hidalgo Perez JA, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiographic findings in asymptomatic patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and null allele low-density lipoprotein receptor mutations. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(7):955–61. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.012.CrossRefPubMed

50.

• Sharifi M, Gallivan A, Harvey D, Li KW, Cooper J, Futema M, Humphries SE, Nair D. Atherosclerosis in monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia versus polygenic hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2016b;252:e36–e7. Pilot study demonstrating the higher carotid thickening in monogenic FH patients compared to that of matched polygenic patients.CrossRef

51.

Sharifi M, Jain A, Resuad J, Humphries SE, Nair D. Cardiovascular biomarkers in monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia and polygenic hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis. 2016a;255:e4.CrossRef

52.

Santos RD, Miname MH, Martinez LR, Rochitte CE, Chacra AP, Nakandakare ER, et al. Non-invasive detection of aortic and coronary atherosclerosis in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia by 64 slice multi-detector row computed tomography angiography. Atherosclerosis. 2008;197(2):910–5. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.08.017.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Rafeiyian S, Mojtahedzadeh S, Hekmat M, Naderi N, Nobahar R, Hashemi MJ, et al. Supravalvular and valvular aortic stenosis in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Med Princ Pract. 2007;16(4):315–7. doi:10.1159/000102156.CrossRefPubMed

54.

•• Khera AV, Won HH, Peloso GM, Lawson KS, Bartz TM, Deng X, et al. Diagnostic yield and clinical utility of sequencing familial hypercholesterolemia genes in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(22):2578–89. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.520. This demonstrates the high CAD mortality rate in patients with an FH-causing mutation compared to patients with similarly elevated LDL-C but with no mutation.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Genetic Architecture of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia
verfasst von: Mahtab Sharifi
Marta Futema
Devaki Nair
Steve E. Humphries
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-017-0848-8

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Genetic Architecture of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia