nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.07.2020 | Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (P Schoenhagen and P-H Chen, Section Editors)

Artificial Intelligence in Intracoronary Imaging

verfasst von: Russell Fedewa, Rishi Puri, Eitan Fleischman, Juhwan Lee, David Prabhu, David L. Wilson, D. Geoffrey Vince, Aaron Fleischman

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper investigates present uses and future potential of artificial intelligence (AI) applied to intracoronary imaging technologies.

Recent Findings

Advances in data analytics and digitized medical imaging have enabled clinical application of AI to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs through better diagnosis and enhanced workflow. Applications of AI to IVUS and IVOCT have produced improvements in image segmentation, plaque analysis, and stent evaluation. Machine learning algorithms are able to predict future coronary events through the use of imaging results, clinical evaluations, laboratory tests, and demographics.

Summary

The application of AI to intracoronary imaging holds significant promise for improved understanding and treatment of coronary heart disease. Even in these early stages, AI has demonstrated the ability to improve the prediction of cardiac events. Large curated data sets and databases are needed to speed the development of AI and enable testing and comparison among algorithms.

Hanekamp C, Koolen J, Pijls N, Michels H, Bonnier H. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation. 1999;99:1015–21.PubMed

Kim S-W, Mintz GS, Ohlmann P, Hassani S-E, Fernandez S, Lu L, et al. Frequency and severity of plaque prolapse within cypher and taxus stents as determined by sequential intravascular ultrasound analysis. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1206.PubMed

Cook S, Wenaweser P, Togni M, Billinger M, Morger C, Seiler C, et al. Incomplete stent apposition and very late stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2007;115:2426–34. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.658237.CrossRefPubMed

Mehta SK, McCrary JR, Frutkin AD, Dolla WJS, Marso SP. Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis of coronary atherosclerosis: an emerging technology for the assessment of vulnerable plaque. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1283–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm112.CrossRefPubMed

Siqueira DA, Abizaid AA, Costa Jd R, Feres F, Mattos LA, Staico R, et al. Late incomplete apposition after drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence and potential for adverse clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1304–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm114.CrossRefPubMed

Feres F, Costa JR, Abizaid A. Very late thrombosis after drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:83–8.PubMed

Bouma BE, Tearney GJ, Yabushita H, Shishkov M, Kauffman CR, DeJoseph Gauthier D, et al. Evaluation of intracoronary stenting by intravascular optical coherence tomography. Heart. 2003;89:317–20. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.3.317.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pinto TL, Waksman R. Clinical applications of optical coherence tomography. J Interv Cardiol. 2006;19:566.PubMed

Jeremias A, Sylvia B, Bridges J, Kirtane AJ, Bigelow B, Pinto DS, et al. Stent thrombosis after successful sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2004;109:1930–2. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000127105.99982.21.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Guagliumi G, Sirbu V. Optical coherence tomography: high resolution intravascular imaging to evaluate vascular healing after coronary stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:237–47.PubMed

11.

Hong SJ, Kim BK, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG, et al. Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2155–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15454.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kataoka Y, Puri R, Andrews J, Honda S, Nishihira K, Asaumi Y, et al. In vivo visualization of lipid coronary atheroma with intravascular near-infrared spectroscopy. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017;15:775–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2017.1367287.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Wu B, Abbott T, Fishman D, McMurray W, Mor G, Stone K, et al. Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2003;19:1636–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg210.CrossRef

15.

Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographsaccuracy of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathyaccuracy of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy. JAMA. 2016;316:2402–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17216.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Berner ES, Ozaydin B. Benefits and risks of machine learning decision support systems benefits and risks of machine learning decision support systems letters. JAMA. 2017;318:2353–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.16619.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Zhu L, Zheng WJ. Informatics, data science, and artificial intelligence informatics, data science, and artificial intelligence informatics, data science, and artificial intelligence. JAMA. 2018;320:1103–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.8211.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Naylor CD. On the prospects for a (deep) learning health care system prospects for a deep learning health care system prospects for a deep learning health care system. JAMA. 2018;320:1099–100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11103.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hinton G. Deep learning—a technology with the potential to transform health carethe potential of deep learning technology to transform health care the potential of deep learning technology to transform health care. JAMA. 2018;320:1101–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11100.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Carin L, Pencina MJ. On deep learning for medical image analysis on deep learning for medical image analysis on deep learning for medical image analysis. JAMA. 2018;320:1192–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13316.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Gianfrancesco MA, Tamang S, Yazdany J, Schmajuk G. Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1544–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Hatt M, Parmar C, Qi J, Naqa IE. Machine (deep) learning methods for image processing and radiomics. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences. 2019;3:104–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2019.2899538.CrossRef

24.

Yan J, Yang X, Sun X, Chen Z, Liu H. A lightweight ultrasound probe for wearable human–machine interfaces. IEEE Sensors J. 2019;19:5895–903. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2905243.CrossRef

25.

Tweedy L, Witzel P, Heinrich D, Insall RH, Endres RG. Screening by changes in stereotypical behavior during cell motility. Sci Rep. 2019;9:8784. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45305-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Lou B, Doken S, Zhuang T, Wingerter D, Gidwani M, Mistry N, et al. An image-based deep learning framework for individualising radiotherapy dose: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. The Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1:e136–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30058-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Eraslan G, Avsec Z, Gagneur J, Theis FJ. Deep learning: new computational modelling techniques for genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:389–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0122-6.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (ivus): a report of the american college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents developed in collaboration with the european society of cardiology endorsed by the society of cardiac angiography and interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1478–92.PubMed

29.

Nair A, Kuban BD, Obuchowski N, Vince DG. Assessing spectral algorithms to predict atherosclerotic plaque composition with normalized and raw intravascular ultrasound data. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:1319–31.PubMed

30.

• Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE, Vince DG. Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation. 2002;106:2200–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000035654.18341.5e. Successful clinical implementation of AI for intra-coronary imaging which added previously unavailable information and reduced subjectivity in image interpretation. CrossRefPubMed

31.

Nair A, Margolis MP, Kuban BD, Vince DG. Automated coronary plaque characterisation with intravascular ultrasound backscatter: ex vivo validation. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2007a;3:113.

32.

Nissen SE. Atherosclerosis in 2010: new therapeutic insights. Nat Rev Cardiol. 8:70–2.

33.

Nicholls SJ, Uno K, Tuzcu EM, Nissen SE. Lessons from coronary intravascular ultrasound on the importance of raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 12:301–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-010-0125-4.

34.

Lavoie AJ, Bayturan O, Uno K, Hsu A, Wolski K, Schoenhagen P, et al. Plaque progression in coronary arteries with minimal luminal obstruction in intravascular ultrasound atherosclerosis trials. Am J Cardiol. 105:1679–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.345.

35.

Nicholls SJ, Hsu A, Wolski K, Hu B, Bayturan O, Lavoie A, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-derived measures of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 55:2399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.026.

36.

Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Sipahi I, Libby P, Raichlen JS, Ballantyne CM, et al. Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA. 2006;295:1556–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.13.jpc60002.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Brown BG, Ganz P, Vogel RA, et al. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA. 2004;291:1071–80. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.9.1071.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Andrews J, Puri R, Kataoka Y, Nicholls SJ, Psaltis PJ. Therapeutic modulation of the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis: lessons learned from serial imaging studies. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016;6:282–303. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2015.10.02.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Ako J, Morino Y, Honda Y, Hassan A, Sonoda S, Yock PG, et al. Late incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1002–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.068.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Mintz GS, Shah VM, Weissman NJ. Regional remodeling as the cause of late stent malapposition. Circulation. 2003;107:2660–3. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000074778.46065.24.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Hong M-K, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Kim Y-H, Lee S-W, Song J-M, et al. Incidence, mechanism, predictors, and long-term prognosis of late stent malapposition after bare-metal stent implantation. Circulation. 2004;109:881–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000116751.88818.10.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Costa MA, Angiolillo DJ, Tannenbaum M, Driesman M, Chu A, Patterson J, et al. Impact of Stent Deployment Procedural Factors on Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents (Final Results of the Multicenter Prospective STLLR Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1704–11.PubMed

43.

Matsumoto D, Shite J, Shinke T, Otake H, Tanino Y, Ogasawara D, et al. Neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents at 6-month follow-up: evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:961–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl413.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Kawase Y, Hoshino K, Yoneyama R, McGregor J, Hajjar RJ, Jang I-K, et al. In vivo volumetric analysis of coronary stent using optical coherence tomography with a novel balloon occlusion-flushing catheter: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:1343.PubMed

45.

Kume T, Akasaka T, Kawamoto T, Watanabe N, Toyota E, Neishi Y, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial plaque by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1172.PubMed

46.

Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Litovsky S, Willerson JT, Casscells W. Finding vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques: is it worth the effort? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1775–82. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.0000142373.72662.20.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Stamper D, Weissman NJ, Brezinski M. Plaque characterization with optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:69–79.

48.

Puri R, Worthley MI, Nicholls SJ. Intravascular imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque: current and future concepts. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:131–9.PubMed

49.

Oemrawsingh RM, Garcia-Garcia HM, van Geuns RJ, Lenzen MJ, Simsek C, de Boer SP, et al. Integrated Biomarker and Imaging Study 3 (IBIS-3) to assess the ability of rosuvastatin to decrease necrotic core in coronary arteries. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2016;12:734–9. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv12i6a118.CrossRef

50.

Jaguszewski M, Klingenberg R, Landmesser U. Intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) imaging for detection of lipid content of coronary plaques: current experience and future perspectives. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2013;6:426–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-013-9224-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Michail M, Serruys PW, Stettler R, Crake T, Torii R, Tenekecioglu E, et al. Intravascular multimodality imaging: feasibility and role in the evaluation of coronary plaque pathology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:613–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew330.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Fard AM, Vacas-Jacques P, Hamidi E, Wang H, Carruth RW, Gardecki JA, et al. Optical coherence tomography--near infrared spectroscopy system and catheter for intravascular imaging. Opt Express. 2013;21:30849–58. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.21.030849.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Kanwar SS, Stone GW, Singh M, Virmani R, Olin J, Akasaka T, et al. Acute coronary syndromes without coronary plaque rupture. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:257–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2016.19.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Libby P, Pasterkamp G, Crea F, Jang I-K. Reassessing the mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes. Circ Res. 2019;124:150–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311098.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Ahmadi A, Stone GW, Leipsic J, Shaw LJ, Villines TC, Kern MJ, et al. Prognostic determinants of coronary atherosclerosis in stable ischemic heart disease: anatomy, physiology, or morphology? Circ Res. 2016;119:317–29. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308952.CrossRefPubMed

56.

• Partida RA, Libby P, Crea F, Jang IK. Plaque erosion: a new in vivo diagnosis and a potential major shift in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2070–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx786. Review of plaque rupture and plaque erosion suggesting that plaque erosion should be treated pharmacologically rather than mechanically, highlighting the need for IC imaging to determine rupture vs erosion. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Burke A, Virmani R. Pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:553–72.PubMed

58.

Burke A, Virmani R, Galis Z, Haudenschild C, Muller J. Task force #2--what is the pathologic basis for new atherosclerosis imaging techniques? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1874–86.PubMed

59.

Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C13–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Narula J, Nakano M, Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Petersen R, Newcomb R, et al. Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1041–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.054.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Otsuka F, Joner M, Prati F, Virmani R, Narula J. Clinical classification of plaque morphology in coronary disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:379–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.62.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Hellings WE, Peeters W, Moll FL, Piers SR, van Setten J, Van der Spek PJ, et al. Composition of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated with cardiovascular outcome: a prognostic study. Circulation. 2010;121:1941–50. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887497.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Ritman EL, Lerman A. The dynamic vasa vasorum. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;75:649–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.06.020.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2316–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa035655.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Moreno PR, Purushothaman KR, Fuster V, Echeverri D, Truszczynska H, Sharma SK, et al. Plaque neovascularization is increased in ruptured atherosclerotic lesions of human aorta: implications for plaque vulnerability. Circulation. 2004;110:2032–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000143233.87854.23.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Moreno PR, Purushothaman KR, Fuster V, O'Connor WN. Intimomedial interface damage and adventitial inflammation is increased beneath disrupted atherosclerosis in the aorta: implications for plaque vulnerability. Circulation. 2002;105:2504–11.PubMed

67.

Mulligan-Kehoe MJ, Simons M. Vasa vasorum in normal and diseased arteries. Circulation. 2014;129:2557–66. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007189.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Choi BJ, Matsuo Y, Aoki T, Kwon TG, Prasad A, Gulati R, et al. Coronary endothelial dysfunction is associated with inflammation and vasa vasorum proliferation in patients with early atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:2473–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

ten Kate GL, Sijbrands EJ, Valkema R, ten Cate FJ, Feinstein SB, van der Steen AF, et al. Molecular imaging of inflammation and intraplaque vasa vasorum: a step forward to identification of vulnerable plaques? J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:897–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9263-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang Y, Smialek JE, Virmani R. PLaque rupture and sudden death related to exertion in men with coronary artery disease. JAMA. 1999;281:921–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.10.921.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Fleiner M, Kummer M, Mirlacher M, Sauter G, Cathomas G, Krapf R, et al. Arterial neovascularization and inflammation in vulnerable patients: early and late signs of symptomatic atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004;110:2843–50. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000146787.16297.e8.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Finn AV, Gold HK, Tulenko TN, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2054–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.0000178991.71605.18.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Saia F, Komukai K, Capodanno D, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Boccuzzi G, et al. Eroded versus ruptured plaques at the culprit site of STEMI: in vivo pathophysiological features and response to primary PCI. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2015;8:566–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.018.CrossRef

74.

Arbustini E, Narula N, Kodama T. Clinical imaging of ACS with ruptured or intact fibrous caps. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2015;8:576–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.03.004.CrossRef

75.

Sugiyama T, Yamamoto E, Bryniarski K, Xing L, Lee H, Isobe M, et al. Nonculprit plaque characteristics in patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque erosion vs plaque rupture: a 3-vessel optical coherence tomography study. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:207–14. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.5234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

76.

Niccoli G, Montone RA, Di Vito L, Gramegna M, Refaat H, Scalone G, et al. Plaque rupture and intact fibrous cap assessed by optical coherence tomography portend different outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1377–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv029.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Hu S, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Dai J, Li L, Dauerman H, et al. Management and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque rupture versus plaque erosion: an intravascular optical coherence tomography study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.116.004730.

78.

Yonetsu T, Lee T, Murai T, Suzuki M, Matsumura A, Hashimoto Y, et al. Plaque morphologies and the clinical prognosis of acute coronary syndrome caused by lesions with intact fibrous cap diagnosed by optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2016;203:766–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.030.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, Neumann FJ, Rinaldi MJ, Metzger DC, et al. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study. Circulation. 2014;129:463–70. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003942.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Jang JS, Song YJ, Kang W, Jin HY, Seo JS, Yang TH, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents to improve outcome: a meta-analysis. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014;7:233–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.013.CrossRefPubMed

81.

Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Ali Z, Wijns W, Bezerra HG, Shite J, et al. Comparison of stent expansion guided by optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound: the ILUMIEN II study (observational study of optical coherence tomography [OCT] in patients undergoing fractional flow reserve [FFR] and percutaneous coronary intervention). JACC Cardiovascular interventions. 2015;8:1704–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.024.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Maehara A, Mintz GS, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, Neumann FJ, Rinaldi MJ, et al. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e006243. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.117.006243.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Shameer K, Johnson KW, Glicksberg BS, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP. Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet? Heart. 2018;104:1156–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311198.CrossRefPubMed

84.

Jordan MI, Mitchell TM. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science. 2015;349:255–60. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Zhang Z, Sejdic E. Radiological images and machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Comput Biol Med. 2019;108:354–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.02.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

86.

Kawasaki M, Bouma BE, Bressner J, Houser SL, Nadkarni SK, MacNeill BD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound images for tissue characterization of human coronary plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:81–8.PubMed

87.

Kawasaki M, Takatsu H, Noda T, Sano K, Ito Y, Hayakawa K, et al. In vivo quantitative tissue characterization of human coronary arterial plaques by use of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound and comparison with angioscopic findings. Circulation. 2002;105:2487–92.PubMed

88.

Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, Vince DG, Virmani R, Surmely J-F, et al. Accuracy of in vivo coronary plaque morphology assessment: a validation study of in vivo virtual histology compared with in vitro histopathology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2405–12.PubMed

89.

Okubo M, Kawasaki M, Ishihara Y, Takeyama U, Kubota T, Yamaki T, et al. Development of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound for tissue characterization of coronary plaques. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:655–63.PubMed

90.

Sathyanarayana S, Carlier S, Li W, Thomas L, et al. Characterisation of atherosclerotic plaque by spectral similarity of radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound signals. EuroIntervention : Journal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2009;5:133–9.

91.

Thim T, Hagensen MK, Wallace-Bradley D, Granada JF, Kaluza GL, Drouet L, et al. Unreliable assessment of necrotic core by VHTM IVUS in porcine coronary artery disease. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010:CIRCIMAGING-109.

92.

Van JH, De GM, Ennekens G, Van PH, Herman A, Vrints C. Validation of in vivo plaque characterisation by virtual histology in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention: Journal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2009;5:149–56.

93.

Athanasiou LS, Karvelis PS, Tsakanikas VD, Naka KK, Michalis LK, Bourantas CV, et al. A novel semiautomated atherosclerotic plaque characterization method using grayscale intravascular ultrasound images: comparison with virtual histology. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012;16:391–400.PubMed

94.

Brunenberg E, Pujol O, ter Haar Romeny B, Radeva P. Automatic IVUS segmentation of atherosclerotic plaque with stop & go snake,. 2006, pp. 9-16.

95.

Caballero KL, Barajas J, Pujol O, Salvatella N, Radeva P. In-vivo ivus tissue classification: a comparison between rf signal analysis and reconstructed images. 2006, pp. 137-146.

96.

V. G. Giannoglou, D. G. Stavrakoudis, and J. B. Theocharis, "IVUS-based characterization of atherosclerotic plaques using feature selection and SVM classification," 2012, pp. 715-720.

97.

Giannoglou VG, Stavrakoudis DG, Theocharis JB, Petridis V. Genetic fuzzy rule based classification systems for coronary plaque characterization based on intravascular ultrasound images. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2015;38:203–20.

98.

Hwang YN, Lee JH, Kim GY, Shin ES, Kim SM. Characterization of coronary plaque regions in intravascular ultrasound images using a hybrid ensemble classifier. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2018;153:83–92.

99.

Kim GY, Lee JH, Hwang YN, Kim SM. A novel intensity-based multi-level classification approach for coronary plaque characterization in intravascular ultrasound images. Biomed Eng Online, in Press. 2018.

100.

O. Pujol, P. Radeva, J. Vitria, and J. Mauri, "Adaboost to classify plaque appearance in IVUS images," 2004, pp. 629-636.

101.

O. Pujol, D. Rotger, P. Radeva, O. Rodriguez, and J. Mauri, "Near real-time plaque segmentation of IVUS," 2003, pp. 69-72.

102.

Selvathi D, Emimal N, Selvaraj H. Automated characterization of atheromatous plaque in intravascular ultrasound images using neuro fuzzy classifier. International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications. 2012;58:425–31.

103.

Taki A, Hetterich H, Roodaki A, Setarehdan SK, Unal G, Rieber J, et al. A new approach for improving coronary plaque component analysis based on intravascular ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1245–58.PubMed

104.

Taki A, Roodaki A, Setarehdan SK, Avansari S, Unal G, Navab N. An IVUS image-based approach for improvement of coronary plaque characterization. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43:268–80.PubMed

105.

Vince DG, Dixon KJ, Cothren RM, Cornhill JF. Comparison of texture analysis methods for the characterization of coronary plaques in intravascular ultrasound images. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2000a;24:221–9.PubMed

106.

Zhang X, McKay CR, Sonka M. Tissue characterization in intravascular ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:889–99.PubMed

107.

Escalera S, Pujol O, Mauri J, Radeva P. Intravascular ultrasound tissue characterization with sub-class error-correcting output codes. Journal of Signal Processing Systems. 2009;55:35–47.

108.

Granada JF, Wallace-Bradley D, Win HK, Alviar CL, Builes A, Lev EI, et al. In vivo plaque characterization using intravascular ultrasound–virtual histology in a porcine model of complex coronary lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:387–93.PubMed

109.

Brown AJ, Obaid DR, Costopoulos C, Parker RA, Calvert PA, Teng Z, et al. Direct comparison of virtual-histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography imaging for identification of thin-cap fibroatheroma clinical perspective. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;8:e003487.

110.

Maehara A, Mintz GS, Stone GW. OCT versus IVUS: accuracy versus clinical utility. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013.

111.

Murray SW, Stables RH, Hart G, Palmer ND. Defining the magnitude of measurement variability in the virtual histology analysis of acute coronary syndrome plaques. European Heart Journal–Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012;14:167–74.PubMed

112.

de Korte CL, Sierevogel MJ, Mastik F, Strijder C, Schaar JA, Velema E, et al. Identification of atherosclerotic plaque components with intravascular ultrasound elastography in vivo: a Yucatan pig study. Circulation. 2002;105:1627–30.PubMed

113.

Katouzian A, Sathyanarayana S, Baseri B, Konofagou EE, Carlier SG. Challenges in atherosclerotic plaque characterization with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS): from data collection to classification. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008;12:315–27.PubMed

114.

Diethrich EB, Pauliina Margolis M, Reid DB, Burke A, Ramaiah V, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, et al. Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of carotid artery disease: the carotid artery plaque virtual histology evaluation (CAPITAL) study. Journal of Endovascular Therapy : an Official Journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2007;14:676–86. https://doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14[676:VHIUAO]2.0.CO;2.CrossRef

115.

•• Zhang L, Wahle A, Chen Z, Lopez JJ, Kovarnik T, Sonka M. Predicting locations of high-risk plaques in coronary arteries in patients receiving statin therapy. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2018;37:151–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2017.2725443. Demonstration of combining data from multiple sources to greatly improve risk stratification for coronary artery disease. CrossRefPubMed

116.

Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2009.

117.

Nair A, Calvetti D, Kuban BD, Vince DG. Novel technique for normalization of intravascular ultrasound backscatter data: improvement in spatial accuracy of tissue maps. Am J Cardiol Suppl S. 2004a;94:123E.

118.

Nair A, Calvetti D, Vince DG. Regularized autoregressive analysis of intravascular ultrasound backscatter: improvement in spatial accuracy of tissue maps. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004b;51:420–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2004.1295427.CrossRefPubMed

119.

Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010933404324.CrossRef

120.

Campos CM, Fedewa RJ, Garcia-Garcia HM, Vince DG, Margolis MP, Lemos PA, et al. Ex vivo validation of 45 MHz intravascular ultrasound backscatter tissue characterization. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:1112–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev039.CrossRefPubMed

121.

Muramatsu T, Garcia-Garcia HM, Brugaletta S, Heo JH, Onuma Y, Fedewa RJ, et al. Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis (virtual histology) with a 45-MHz rotational imaging catheter in ex vivo human coronary arteries. J Cardiol. 2015;65:134–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.05.004.CrossRefPubMed

122.

Moradi M, Abolmaesumi P, Siemens DR, Sauerbrei EE, Boag AH, Mousavi P. Augmenting detection of prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound images using SVM and RF time series. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56:2214–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2008.2009766.CrossRefPubMed

123.

Caixinha M, Amaro J, Santos M, Perdigao F, Gomes M, Santos J. In-vivo automatic nuclear cataract detection and classification in an animal model by ultrasounds. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016;63:2326–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2016.2527787.CrossRefPubMed

124.

Karatzoglou A, Meyer D, Hornik K. Support vector machines in R. J Stat Softw. 2006;15.

125.

Meier DS, Cothren RM, Vince DG, Cornhill JF. Automated morphometry of coronary arteries with digital image analysis of intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J. 1997;133:681–90.PubMed

126.

Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis. 1988;1:321–s. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133570.CrossRef

127.

Mendizabal-Ruiz G, Kakadiaris IA. A physics-based intravascular ultrasound image reconstruction method for lumen segmentation. Comput Biol Med. 2016;75:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.05.007.CrossRefPubMed

128.

Klingensmith JD, Vince DG. B-spline methods for interactive segmentation and modeling of lumen and vessel surfaces in three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2002;26:429–38.PubMed

129.

Klingensmith VDJD, Nair A, Kuban BD. System and method for identifying a vascular border. USA Patent 8,630,492, January 14, 2014.

130.

Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Lect Notes Comput Sc. 2015;9351:234–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.CrossRef

131.

Yang J, Faraji M, Basu A. Robust segmentation of arterial walls in intravascular ultrasound images using Dual Path U-Net. Ultrasonics. 2019;96:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2019.03.014.CrossRefPubMed

132.

Su S, Hu Z, Lin Q, Hau WK, Gao Z, Zhang H. An artificial neural network method for lumen and media-adventitia border detection in IVUS. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017;57:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2016.11.003.CrossRefPubMed

133.

Qian CJ, Yang XP. An integrated method for atherosclerotic carotid plaque segmentation in ultrasound image. Comput Methods Program Biomed. 2018;153:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.10.002.CrossRef

134.

Attizzani GF, Bezerra HG. Contemporary assessment of stent strut coverage by OCT. Int J Card Imaging. 2013;29:23–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0046-0.CrossRef

135.

Wang A, Eggermont J, Dekker N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Pawar R, Reiber JHC, et al. Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs. Int J Card Imaging. 2013;29:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0064-y.CrossRef

136.

Bruining N, Sihan K, Ligthart J, Winter SD, Regar E. Automated three-dimensional detection of intracoronary stent struts in optical coherence tomography images. 2011 Computing in Cardiology. 2011:221–4.

137.

Gurmeric S, Isguder GG, Carlier S, Unal G. A new 3-D automated computational method to evaluate in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in in-vivo intravascular optical coherence tomography pullbacks. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2009;12:776–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04271-3_94.CrossRefPubMed

138.

Lu H, Gargesha M, Wang Z, Chamie D, Attizzani GF, Kanaya T, et al. Automatic stent detection in intravascular OCT images using bagged decision trees. Biomed Opt Express. 2012;3:2809–24. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

139.

Tsantis S, Kagadis GC, Katsanos K, Karnabatidis D, Bourantas G, Nikiforidis GC. Automatic vessel lumen segmentation and stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomography. Med Phys. 2012;39:503–13. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3673067.CrossRefPubMed

140.

Wang Z, Jenkins MW, Linderman GC, Bezerra HG, Fujino Y, Costa MA, et al. 3-D stent detection in intravascular OCT using a Bayesian network and graph search. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34:1549–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2015.2405341.CrossRefPubMedCentral

141.

Xu C, Schmitt JM, Akasaka T, Kubo T, Huang K. Automatic detection of stent struts with thick neointimal growth in intravascular optical coherence tomography image sequences. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:6665–75. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/20/010.CrossRefPubMed

142.

Ughi GJ, Van Dyck CJ, Adriaenssens T, Hoymans VY, Sinnaeve P, Timmermans J-P, et al. Automatic assessment of stent neointimal coverage by intravascular optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet134.CrossRefPubMed

143.

Adriaenssens T, Ughi GJ, Dubois C, Onsea K, De Cock D, Bennett J, et al. Automated detection and quantification of clusters of malapposed and uncovered intracoronary stent struts assessed with optical coherence tomography. Int J Card Imaging. 2014;30:839–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0406-z.CrossRef

144.

Nam HS, Kim C-S, Lee JJ, Song JW, Kim JW, Yoo H. Automated detection of vessel lumen and stent struts in intravascular optical coherence tomography to evaluate stent apposition and neointimal coverage. Med Phys. 2016;43:1662–75. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4943374.CrossRefPubMed

145.

Lu H, Lee J, Ray S, Tanaka K, Bezerra HG, Rollins AM, et al. Automated stent coverage analysis in intravascular OCT (IVOCT) image volumes using a support vector machine and mesh growing. Biomed Opt Express. 2019;10:2809–28. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.002809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

146.

Phipps JE, Vela D, Hoyt T, Halaney D, Mancuso JJ, Buja LM, et al. Macrophages and intravascular optical coherence tomography bright spots: a quantitative study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.07.027.CrossRefPubMed

147.

Tearney Guillermo J, Yabushita H, Houser Stuart L, Aretz HT, Jang I-K, Schlendorf Kelly H, et al. Quantification of macrophage content in atherosclerotic plaques by optical coherence tomography. Circulation. 2003;107:113–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000044384.41037.43.CrossRefPubMed

148.

Wang Z, Jia H, Tian J, Soeda T, Vergallo R, Minami Y, et al. Computer-aided image analysis algorithm to enhance in vivo diagnosis of plaque erosion by intravascular optical coherence tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:805–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002084.CrossRefPubMed

149.

Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, Adriaenssens T, Barlis P, Bezerra HG, et al. Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the international working group for intravascular optical coherence tomography standardization and validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1058–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079.CrossRefPubMed

150.

van Soest G, Goderie T, Regar E, Koljenović S, van Leenders GLJH, Gonzalo N, et al. Atherosclerotic tissue characterization in vivo by optical coherence tomography attenuation imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15:011105. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3280271.CrossRefPubMed

151.

Gargesha M, Shalev R, Prabhu D, Tanaka K, Rollins AM, Costa M, et al. Parameter estimation of atherosclerotic tissue optical properties from three-dimensional intravascular optical coherence tomography. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015;2. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.2.1.016001.

152.

Vermeer KA, Mo J, Weda JJA, Lemij HG, Boer JF d. Depth-resolved model-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2014;5:322–37. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.000322.CrossRef

153.

Liu S, Sotomi Y, Eggermont J, Nakazawa G, Torii S, Ijichi T, et al. Tissue characterization with depth-resolved attenuation coefficient and backscatter term in intravascular optical coherence tomography images. J Biomed Opt. 2017;22:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.9.096004.CrossRefPubMed

154.

Athanasiou LS, Exarchos TP, Naka KK, Michalis LK, Prati F, Fotiadis DI. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization in optical coherence tomography images. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2011, pp. 4485-4488.

155.

Ughi GJ, Adriaenssens T, Sinnaeve P, Desmet W, D’hooge J. Automated tissue characterization of in vivo atherosclerotic plaques by intravascular optical coherence tomography images. Biomed Optics Express. 2013;4:1014–30.

156.

Zhou P, Zhu T, He C, Li Z. Automatic classification of atherosclerotic tissue in intravascular optical coherence tomography images. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2017;34:1152–9. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.34.001152.CrossRefPubMed

157.

Rico-Jimenez JJ, Campos-Delgado DU, Villiger M, Otsuka K, Bouma BE, Jo JA. Automatic classification of atherosclerotic plaques imaged with intravascular OCT. Biomed Opt Express. 2016;7:4069–85. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.004069.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

158.

Xu C, Schmitt JM, Carlier SG, Virmani R. Characterization of atherosclerosis plaques by measuring both backscattering and attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2008;13:034003.PubMed

159.

Abdolmanafi A, Duong L, Dahdah N, Cheriet F. Deep feature learning for automatic tissue classification of coronary artery using optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8:1203–20. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.001203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

160.

Yong YL, Tan LK, McLaughlin RA, Chee KH, Liew YM. Linear-regression convolutional neural network for fully automated coronary lumen segmentation in intravascular optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2017;22:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.12.126005.CrossRefPubMed

161.

Abdolmanafi A, Duong L, Dahdah N, Adib IR, Cheriet F. Characterization of coronary artery pathological formations from OCT imaging using deep learning. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9:4936–60. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.004936.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

162.

Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM. 2017;60:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386.CrossRef

163.

He S, Zheng J, Maehara A, Mintz G, Tang D, Anastasio M, et al. Convolutional neural network based automatic plaque characterization from intracoronary optical coherence tomography images. Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing. 107:2018. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2293957.

164.

Gessert N, Lutz M, Heyder M, Latus S, Leistner DM, Abdelwahed YS, et al. Automatic plaque detection in IVOCT pullbacks using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38:426–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2865659.CrossRefPubMed

165.

He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770-778.

166.

Huang G, Liu Z, Maaten LVD, Weinberger KQ. Densely connected convolutional networks. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017, pp. 2261-2269.

167.

Prabhu D, Kolluru C, Gharaibeh Y, Mehanna E, Wen D, Wu H, et al. Automated A-line plaque classification of intravascular optical coherence tomography using 3D cryo-image/histology validation. J Biomed Opt. 2019a;24:1–15.PubMed

168.

Prabhu D, Bezerra HG, Chaitanya K, Gharaibeh Y, Emile M, Hao W, et al. Automated A-line coronary plaque classification of intravascular OCT images using hand-crafted features and large datasets. J Biomed Optics. 2019b;24(10):106002. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.10.106002.CrossRef

169.

Lee J, Prabhu D, Kolluru C, Gharaibeh Y, Zimin VN, Bezerra HG, Wilson DL. Automated plaque characterization using deep learning on coronary intravascular optical coherence tomographic images, Biomed Optics Express. 2019;10:6497–6515.

170.

Wang Z, Chamie D, Bezerra HG, Yamamoto H, Kanovsky J, Wilson DL, et al. Volumetric quantification of fibrous caps using intravascular optical coherence tomography. Biomed Optics Express. 2012;3:1413–26. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.001413.CrossRef

171.

Wang Z, Kyono H, Bezerra HG, Wang H, Gargesha M, Alraies C, et al. Semiautomatic segmentation and quantification of calcified plaques in intracoronary optical coherence tomography images. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15:061711. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3506212.CrossRefPubMed

172.

Kolluru C, Prabhu D, Gharaibeh Y, Bezerra H, Guagliumi G, Wilson D. Deep neural networks for A-line-based plaque classification in coronary intravascular optical coherence tomography images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018;5:044504. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044504.CrossRef

173.

Gharaibeh Y, Dong P, Prabhu D, Kolluru C, Lee J, Zimin V et al. Deep learning segmentation of coronary calcified plaque from intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) images with application to finite element modeling of stent deployment. In Medical Imaging 2019: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, 2019, p. 109511C.

174.

Le AS, Aoki H, Murase F, Ishida K. A novel method for classifying driver mental workload under naturalistic conditions with information from near-infrared spectroscopy. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:431–1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00431.

175.

Esperança PM, Blagborough AM, Da DF, Dowell FE, Churcher TS. Detection of Plasmodium berghei infected Anopheles stephensi using near-infrared spectroscopy. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:377–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2960-z.

Titel: Artificial Intelligence in Intracoronary Imaging
verfasst von: Russell Fedewa
Rishi Puri
Eitan Fleischman
Juhwan Lee
David Prabhu
David L. Wilson
D. Geoffrey Vince
Aaron Fleischman
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01299-w

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

24.04.2024 Adipositas Nachrichten

Der als Antidiabetikum sowie zum Gewichtsmanagement zugelassene Wirkstoff Tirzepatid hat in Studien bei adipösen Patienten auch schlafbezogene Atmungsstörungen deutlich reduziert, informiert der Hersteller in einer Vorab-Meldung zum Studienausgang.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Role of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus and in the Elderly

Walk with a Doc—a Call to Action for Physician-Led Walking Programs

Recent Advances in T1 and T2 Mapping in the Assessment of Fulminant Myocarditis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Burnout Among Women Physicians: a Call to Action