Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Urology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports 3/2010

01.05.2010

Factors Predicting Early Return of Continence After Radical Prostatectomy

verfasst von: Jaspreet S. Sandhu, James A. Eastham

Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Success of radical prostatectomy is measured by control of cancer and return of urinary and sexual function. Urinary incontinence is generally considered the greatest impairment in immediate postoperative urinary function. Multiple factors are associated with earlier return of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. These factors can be divided into those known prior to surgery, and therefore possibly not modifiable, and factors that can be controlled during surgery or surgical planning. In addition, various postoperative maneuvers can help hasten urinary continence. This article examines the effect of known factors related to early return of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.
Literatur
1.
Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA: Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology 2005, 66:83–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Krupski TL, Saigal CS, Litwin MS: Variation in continence and potency by definition. J Urol 2003, 170:1291–1294.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Litwin MS, Lubeck DP, Henning JM, Carroll PR: Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. J Urol 1998, 159:1988–1992.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI: Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. J Urol 1994, 152:1831–1836.PubMed
5.
Catalona WJ, Basler JW: Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1993, 150:905–907.PubMed
6.
Kielb SJ, Clemens JQ: Comprehensive urodynamic evaluation of 146 men with incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2005, 66:392–396.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC, et al: The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J Urol 2000, 163:1767–1770.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Saranchuk JW, Kattan MW, Elkin E, et al.: Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:4146.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E, et al.: Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1996, 156:1707–1713.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Touijer K, Eastham JA, Secin FP, et al: Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J Urol 2008, 179:1811–1817.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, et al.: Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2006, 97:1234–1241.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Wei JT, Dunn RL, Marcovich R, et al.: Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000, 164:744–748.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, et al.: Nerve Sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy-does it have an impact on urinary continence? J Urol 2006, 176:189–195.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Anast JW, Sadetshy N, Pasta DJ, et al.: The impact of obesity on health related quality of life before and after radical prostatectomy (data from CaPSURE). J Urol 2005, 173:1132–1138.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Konety BR, Sadetsky N, Carroll PR, et al.: Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume-analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database. J Urol 2007, 177:1423–1425.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Elder JS, Gibbons RP, Correa RJ Jr, Brannen GE: Morbidity of radical perineal prostatectomy following transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 1984, 132:55–57.PubMed
17.
Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Bianco FJ Jr, et al.: Morbidity and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. J Urol 2004, 172:2239–2243.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW, et al.: Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2002, 168:1032–1035.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP: Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1998, 51:67–72.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Braslis KG, Petsch M, Lim A, et al.: Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins. Eur Urol 1995, 28:202–208.PubMed
21.
Cambio AJ, Evans CP: Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol 2006, 50:903–913.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al.: Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol 2007, 52:376–383.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al.: Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1138–1144.CrossRefPubMed
24.
• Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al.: Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009, 302:1557–1564. This is an excellent analysis of the SEER-Medicare linked database to evaluate differences in efficacy between MIS and open RP, including urinary incontinence and stricture rates among the two groups.
25.
Licht MR, Klein EA, Tuason L, Levin H: Impact of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control. Urology 1994, 44:883–887.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Karakiewicz PI, Tanquay S, Kattan MW, et al.: Erectile and urinary dysfunction after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in Quebec: a population-based study of 2415 men. Eur Urol 2004, 46:188–194.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Anger JT, Saigal CS, Stothers L, et al.: The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling men: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey. J Urol 2006, 176:2103–2108.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Mulholland TL, Huynh PN, Huang RR, et al.: Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy is not related to patient body mass index. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2006, 9:153–159.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Elliott SP, Meng MV, Elkin EP, et al.: Incidence of urethral stricture after primary treatment for prostate cancer: data from CaPSURE. J Urol 2007, 178:529–534.CrossRefPubMed
30.
• Wolin KY, Luly J, Sutcliffe S, et al.: Risk of urinary incontinence following prostatectomy: the role of physical activity and obesity. J Urol 2010, 183:629–633. This is one of the few studies attempting to correlate physical activity and obesity to the risk of postoperative urinary incontinence after RP.
31.
Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards R, Skarecky DW: Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2005, 65:740–744.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Karakiewicz PI, Bhojani N, Neugut A, et al.: The effect of comorbidity and socioeconomic status on sexual and urinary function and on general health-related quality of life in men treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. J Sex Med 2008, 5:919–927.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Teber D, Sofikerim M, Ates M, et al.: Is Type 2 diabetes mellitus a predictive factor for incontinence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? A matched pair and multivariate analysis. J Urol 2010, 183:1087–1091.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Colombo R, Naspro R, Salonia A, et al.: Radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: clinical and functional outcomes. J Urol 2006, 176:2459–2463.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Palisaar JR, Wenske S, Sommerer F, et al.: Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 2009, 104:611–615.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Lepor H, Kaci L: The impact of open radical retropubic prostatectomy on continence and lower urinary tract symptoms: a prospective assessment using validated self-administered outcome instruments. J Urol 2004, 171:1216–1219.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Pettus JA, Masterson T, Sokol A, et al.: Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2009, 182:949–955.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Hammerer P, Huland H: Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1997, 157:233–236.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Masterson TA, Wedmid A, Sandhu JS, Eastham JA: Outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men receiving previous pelvic radiation for non-prostate malignancies. BJU Int 2009, 104:482–485.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Ward JF, Sebo TJ, Blute ML, Zincke H: Salvage surgery for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: contemporary outcomes. J Urol 2005, 173:1156–1160.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Lowe BA: Comparison of bladder neck preservation to bladder neck resection in maintaining postprostatectomy urinary continence. Urology 1996, 48:889–893.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Deliveliotis C, Protogerou V, Alargof E, Varkarakis J: Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing-effects on continence and positive margins. Urology 2002, 60:855–858.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Srougi M, Nesrallah LJ, Kauffmann JR, et al.: Urinary continence and pathological outcome after bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial. J Urol 2001, 165:815–818.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, et al.: Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007, 51:996–1003.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S, et al.: Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. BJU Int 2008, 101:871–877.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Neill MG, Louie-Johnsun M, Chabert C, Eden C: Does intrafascial dissection during nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compromise cancer control? BJU Int 2009, 104:1730–1733.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Jorion JL: Rectus fascial sling suspension of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1997, 157:926–928.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Jones JS, Vasavada SP, Abdelmalak JB, et al.: Sling may hasten return of continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2005, 65:1163–1167.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Van Kampen M, De Weerdt W, Van Poppel H, et al: Effect of pelvic-floor re-education on duration and degree of incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000, 355:98.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, et al.: Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 2005, 48:734.
51.
Burgio KL, Goode PS, Urban DA, et al.: Preoperative biofeedback assisted behavioral training to decrease post-prostatectomy incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2006, 175:196.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Wille S, Sobottka A, Heidenreich A, et al.: Pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation and biofeedback after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2003, 170:490.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Factors Predicting Early Return of Continence After Radical Prostatectomy
verfasst von
Jaspreet S. Sandhu
James A. Eastham
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2010
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Urology Reports / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0108-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Current Urology Reports 3/2010 Zur Ausgabe

ReviewPaper

Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Review

ReviewPaper

The Quality-of-Life Impact of Prostate Cancer Treatments

ReviewPaper

Imaging Prostate Cancer: An Update on Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ReviewPaper

Update: Immunological Strategies for Prostate Cancer

ReviewPaper

Emerging Therapies in Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer

ReviewPaper

A Review of Methods for Hemostasis and Renorrhaphy After Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

22.04.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Erst PSA-Test, dann Kallikrein-Score, schließlich MRT und Biopsie – ein vierstufiges Screening-Schema kann die Zahl der unnötigen Prostatabiopsien erheblich reduzieren: Die Hälfte der Männer, die in einer finnischen Studie eine Biopsie benötigten, hatte einen hochgradigen Tumor.

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

20.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Beim chronischen Harnwegsinfekt bei Frauen wird bisher meist eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe eingesetzt. Angesichts der zunehmenden Antibiotikaresistenz erweist sich das Antiseptikum Methenamin-Hippurat als vielversprechende Alternative, so die Auswertung einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise