Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Urology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports 5/2014

01.05.2014 | Minimally Invasive Surgery (V Bird and M Desai, Section Editors)

Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology

Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures for urological diseases in children have proven to be safe and effective, with outcomes comparable to open procedures. Technical advances, including improved instruments and high-definition cameras, have contributed to the expanded role of minimal invasive surgery (MIS) in children. The major drawback to laparoscopy has been the relatively steep learning curve due to the technical difficulties of suturing and the limitations of instrument dexterity and range of motion. Recently, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) has gained popularity in both adult and pediatric urology. RAS has several advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery, particularly in the improved exposure via magnified 3-dimensional view and simplification of suturing with the increased degree of freedom and movement of the robotic arm. This review discusses the role of RAS in pediatric urology and provides technical aspects of RAS in specific urologic procedures as well.
Literatur
1.
Tobias JD. Anaesthesia for minimally invasive surgery in children. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002;16:115.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Freud E. Minimally invasive surgery in childhood: current status. Isr Med Assoc J. 2000;2:377.PubMed
3.
Georgeson KE, Owings E. Advances in minimally invasive surgery in children. Am J Surg. 2000;180:362.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, Rodriguez E, Eichel L, Rajpoot D. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology. 2006;67:599–602.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Olsen H, Jorgensen, T. Robotic vs. standard retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty in children. Br J Urol. 2003; 91.
6.
Peters CA. Robotic assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Technol. 2003;7:403–14.CrossRef
7.
McCullough TC, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Galiano M, Vallancien G. Role of robotics for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19(1):65–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury Jr JK. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2004;188:2S–15.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Peters C. Laparoscopy in pediatric urology: adoption of innovative technology. BJU Int. 2003;92 Suppl 1:52–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Pedraza R, Weiser A, Franco I. (2004) Laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy (Mitrofanoff procedure) in a child using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol. 2004;171:1652–3.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Gundeti MS, Eng MK, Reynolds WS, Zagaja GP. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: complete intracorporeal–-initial case report. Urology. 2008;72:1144–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol. 2002;42:453–7. discussion 457–8, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
13.••
Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, et al. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol. 2006;175:683. One of the largest case-control series comparing robotic and open pyeloplasty. The authors found that robotic pyeloplasty led to decreased hospital stay and narcotic use, with similar operative times as the open technique.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Sakka SG, Huettemann E, Petrat G, et al. Transoesophageal echocardiographic assessment of haemodynamic changes during laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in small children. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(3):330–4.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Westgarth-Taylor C, de Lijster L, van Bogerijen G, et al. A prospective assessment of renal oxygenation in children undergoing laparoscopy using near-infrared spectroscopy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3696–704.PubMedCrossRef
16.•
Korets R, Mues AC, Graversen JA, et al. Validating the use of the Mimic dV-Trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents. Urology. 2011;78(6):1326–30. This randomized study of urologic residents found that curriculum-based training with the Mimic dV-Trainer and da Vinci Surgical System console significantly improves robotic surgery aptitude.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Larobina M, Nottle P. Complete evidence regarding major visceral injuries during laparoscopic access. Surg Laparosc Endosc Technol. 2005;5(3):119–23.CrossRef
18.
Catarci M, Carlini M, Santoro E. Major and minor injuries during creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study of 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:566–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Casale P. Laparoscopic and robotic approach to genitourinary anomalies in children. Urol Clin N Am. 2010;37(2):279–86.CrossRef
20.
21.
Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Heidari M, Moghaddam SM, Otookesh H. Laparoscopic v open donor nephrectomy for pediatric kidney recipients: preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. J Endourol. 2007;21:1033–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Koyle MA, Woo HH, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in the first year of life. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28(5):693–5.PubMedCrossRef
23.
El-Ghoneimi A, Valla JS, Steyaert H, Aigrain Y. Laparoscopic renal surgery via a retroperitoneal approach in children. J Urol. 1998;160:1138–41.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Gargollo P. Hidden incision endoscopic surgery: description of technique, parental satisfaction and applications. J Urol. 2011;185(4):1425–31.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Lee RS, Sethi AS, Passerotti CC, Retik AB, Borer JG, Nguyen HT, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a viable and safe option in children. J Urol. 2009;181:823–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
Tan H. Laparoscopic Anderson–Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 1999;162:1045–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.•
Mesrobian HG. Bypass pyeloplasty.: description of a procedure and initial results. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5:34–6. The first paper to describe the “bypass pyeloplasty” – a simple technique ideal for high inserting ureters that does not disrupt the UPJ and can be easily performed robotically.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Casale P, Grady RW, Joyner BD, et al. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient. J Endourol. 2004;18:875–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1440–2.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol. 2006;176(5):2237–9. discussion 2239–40.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Casale P, Mucksavage P, Resnick M, Kim SS. Robotic ureterocalicostomy in the pediatric population. J Urol. 2008;180:2643–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Yeung CK, Sihoe JD, Borzi PA. Endoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation under carbon dioxide bladder insufflation: a novel technique. J Endourol. 2005;19:295–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Hayn MH, Smaldone MC, Ost MC, Docimo SG. Minimally invasive treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. Urol Clin N Am. 2008;35:477–88.CrossRef
35.
36.••
Marchini GS, Hong YK, Minnillo BJ, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach. J Urol. 2011;185:1870–5. A case-matched series comparing robotic ureteral reimplantation (both intravesical and extravesical) to open surgery. While overall success rates were similar between both techniques, robotic surgery had statistically significant benefits of shorter time for catheter drainage, fewer bladder spasms, and shorter hospital stay.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Peters CA, Woo R. Intravesical robotically assisted bilateral ureteral reimplantation. J Endourol. 2005;19(6):618–21.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Kutikov A, Guzzo TJ, Canter DJ, Casale P. Initial experience with laparoscopic transvesical ureteral reimplantation at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. J Urol. 2006;176(5):2222–5.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kasturi S, Sehgal SS, Christman MS, Lambert SM, Casale P. Prospective long-term analysis of nerve-sparing extravesical robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation. Urology. 2012;79(3):680–3.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Carmignani G, Gallucci M, Puppo P, De Stefani S, Simonato A, Maffezzini M. Video laparoscopic excision of a seminal vesicle cyst associated with ipsilateral renal agenesis. J Urol. 1995;153(2):437–9.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Christman MS, Casale P. Robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy in the pediatric population. J Endourol. 2012;26(10):1296–300.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Erschienen in
Current Urology Reports / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0402-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Current Urology Reports 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio, Section Editor)

Lessons learned from the International Renal Cell Carcinoma-Venous Thrombus Consortium (IRCC-VTC)

New Imaging Techniques (A Atala and A Rastinehad, Section Editors)

Pelvic Ultrasound Evaluation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Prediction of Obstruction

New Imaging Techniques (A Atala and A Rastinehad, Section Editors)

Emerging Endoscopic Imaging Technologies for Bladder Cancer Detection

Minimally Invasive Surgery (V Bird and M Desai, Section Editors)

Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones in Children: Technical Considerations

Minimally Invasive Surgery (V Bird and M Desai, Section Editors)

Kidney Stone Risk Following Modern Bariatric Surgery

Men's Health (R Carrion and C Yang, Section Editors)

Alternative Sexualities: Implications for the Urologist

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Ambulantisierung: Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Hybrid-DRG

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Hybrid-DRG-Verordnung soll dazu führen, dass mehr chirurgische Eingriffe ambulant durchgeführt werden, wie es in anderen Ländern schon länger üblich ist. Die gleiche Vergütung im ambulanten und stationären Sektor hatten Niedergelassene schon lange gefordert. Aber die Umsetzung bereitet ihnen doch Kopfzerbrechen.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Harninkontinenz: Netz-Op. erfordert über lange Zeit intensive Nachsorge

30.04.2024 Harninkontinenz Nachrichten

Frauen mit Belastungsinkontinenz oder Organprolaps sind nach einer Netz-Operation keineswegs beschwerdefrei. Vielmehr scheint die Krankheitslast weiterhin hoch zu sein, sogar höher als von harninkontinenten Frauen, die sich nicht haben operieren lassen.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise