Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 3/2009

Open Access 01.03.2009 | Reports of Original Investigations

A simple method to adjust clinical prediction models to local circumstances

verfasst von: Kristel J. M. Janssen, PhD, Yvonne Vergouwe, PhD, Cor J. Kalkman, PhD, MD, Diederick E. Grobbee, PhD, MD, Karel G. M. Moons, PhD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 3/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical prediction models estimate the risk of having or developing a particular outcome or disease. Researchers often develop a new model when a previously developed model is validated and the performance is poor. However, the model can be adjusted (updated) using the new data. The updated model is then based on both the development and validation data. We show how a simple updating method may suffice to update a clinical prediction model.

Methods

A prediction model that preoperatively predicts the risk of severe postoperative pain was developed with multivariable logistic regression from the data of 1944 surgical patients in the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We studied the predictive performance of the model in 1,035 new patients, scheduled for surgery at a later time in the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. We assessed the calibration (agreement between predicted risks and the observed frequencies of an outcome) and discrimination (ability of the model to distinguish between patients with and without postoperative pain). When the incidence of the outcome is different, all predicted risks may be systematically over- or underestimated. Hence, the intercept of the model can be adjusted (updating).

Results

The predicted risks were systematically higher than the observed frequencies, corresponding to a difference in the incidence of postoperative pain between the development (62%) and validation set (36%). The updated model resulted in better calibration.

Discussion

When a clinical prediction model in new patients does not show adequate performance, an alternative to developing a new model is to update the prediction model with new data. The updated model will be based on more patient data, and may yield better risk estimates.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Randolph AG, Guyatt GH, Calvin JE, Doig DVM, Richardson WS. Understanding articles describing clinical prediction tools. Evidence Based Medicine in Critical Care Group. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1603–12.PubMedCrossRef Randolph AG, Guyatt GH, Calvin JE, Doig DVM, Richardson WS. Understanding articles describing clinical prediction tools. Evidence Based Medicine in Critical Care Group. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1603–12.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997; 277: 488–94.PubMedCrossRef Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997; 277: 488–94.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reilly BM, Evans AT. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 201–9.PubMed Reilly BM, Evans AT. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 201–9.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 1953; 32: 260–7.PubMed Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 1953; 32: 260–7.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619–36.PubMedCrossRef Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619–36.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993; 270: 2957–63.PubMedCrossRef Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993; 270: 2957–63.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kannel WB, McGee D, Gordon T. A general cardiovascular risk profile: the Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 46–51.PubMedCrossRef Kannel WB, McGee D, Gordon T. A general cardiovascular risk profile: the Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 46–51.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 384–90.PubMedCrossRef Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 384–90.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 693–700.PubMedCrossRef Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 693–700.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalkman CJ, Visser K, Moen J, Bonsel GJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain. Pain 2003; 105: 415–23.PubMedCrossRef Kalkman CJ, Visser K, Moen J, Bonsel GJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain. Pain 2003; 105: 415–23.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingui BJ, Rogers MA. Searching for clinical prediction rules in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 391–7.PubMed Ingui BJ, Rogers MA. Searching for clinical prediction rules in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 391–7.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobin K, Stomel R, Harber D, Karavite D, Sievers J, Eagle K. Validation in a community hospital setting of a clinical rule to predict preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in patients after myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 353–7.PubMedCrossRef Tobin K, Stomel R, Harber D, Karavite D, Sievers J, Eagle K. Validation in a community hospital setting of a clinical rule to predict preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in patients after myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 353–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanson B, Lijmer JG, Mac Gillavry MR, Turkstra F, Prins MH, Buller HR. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. ANTELOPE-Study Group. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 199–203.PubMed Sanson B, Lijmer JG, Mac Gillavry MR, Turkstra F, Prins MH, Buller HR. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. ANTELOPE-Study Group. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 199–203.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortescue EB, Kahn K, Bates DW. Prediction rules for complications in coronary bypass surgery: a comparison and methodological critique. Med Care 2000; 38: 820–35.PubMedCrossRef Fortescue EB, Kahn K, Bates DW. Prediction rules for complications in coronary bypass surgery: a comparison and methodological critique. Med Care 2000; 38: 820–35.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Orford JL, Sesso HD, Stedman M, Gagnon D, Vokonas P, Gaziano JM. A comparison of the Framingham and European Society of Cardiology coronary heart disease risk prediction models in the normative aging study. Am Heart J 2002; 144: 95–100.PubMedCrossRef Orford JL, Sesso HD, Stedman M, Gagnon D, Vokonas P, Gaziano JM. A comparison of the Framingham and European Society of Cardiology coronary heart disease risk prediction models in the normative aging study. Am Heart J 2002; 144: 95–100.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Suistomaa M, Niskanen M, Kari A, Hynynen M, Takala J. Customized prediction models based on APACHE II and SAPS II scores in patients with prolonged length of stay in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 479–85.PubMedCrossRef Suistomaa M, Niskanen M, Kari A, Hynynen M, Takala J. Customized prediction models based on APACHE II and SAPS II scores in patients with prolonged length of stay in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 479–85.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck DH, Smith GB, Pappachan JV, Millar B. External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 249–56.PubMed Beck DH, Smith GB, Pappachan JV, Millar B. External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 249–56.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Steyerberg EW, et al. External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 826–32.PubMedCrossRef Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Steyerberg EW, et al. External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 826–32.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Oudega R, Hoes AW, Moons KG. The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 100–7.PubMed Oudega R, Hoes AW, Moons KG. The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 100–7.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Berlin JA. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 515–24.PubMed Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Berlin JA. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 515–24.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 2000; 19: 453–73.PubMedCrossRef Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 2000; 19: 453–73.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG. Prognostic models: a methodological framework and review of models for breast cancer. In: Lyman GH, Burstein HJ, editors. Breast cancer. Translational therapeutic strategies. New York: Informa Healtcare; 2007. p. 11–25. Altman DG. Prognostic models: a methodological framework and review of models for breast cancer. In: Lyman GH, Burstein HJ, editors. Breast cancer. Translational therapeutic strategies. New York: Informa Healtcare; 2007. p. 11–25.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Perel P, Edwards P, Wentz R, Roberts I. Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 6: 38.PubMedCrossRef Perel P, Edwards P, Wentz R, Roberts I. Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 6: 38.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Steyerberg EW, Borsboom GJ, van Houwelingen HC, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med 2004; 23: 2567–86.PubMedCrossRef Steyerberg EW, Borsboom GJ, van Houwelingen HC, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med 2004; 23: 2567–86.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen KJ, Moons KG, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Vergouwe Y. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 76–86.PubMedCrossRef Janssen KJ, Moons KG, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Vergouwe Y. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 76–86.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330: 765.PubMedCrossRef Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330: 765.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hippisley Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, et al. The electronic patient record in primary care-regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ 2003; 326: 1439–43. Hippisley Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, et al. The electronic patient record in primary care-regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ 2003; 326: 1439–43.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauvin M. State of the art of pain treatment following ambulatory surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 2003; 28: 3–6.PubMed Chauvin M. State of the art of pain treatment following ambulatory surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 2003; 28: 3–6.PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang N, Cunningham F, Laurito CE, Chen C. Can we do better with postoperative pain management? Am J Surg 2001; 182: 440–8.PubMedCrossRef Huang N, Cunningham F, Laurito CE, Chen C. Can we do better with postoperative pain management? Am J Surg 2001; 182: 440–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaikh S, Chung F, Imarengiaye C, Yung D, Bernstein M. Pain, nausea, vomiting and ocular complications delay discharge following ambulatory microdiscectomy. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 514–8.PubMedCrossRef Shaikh S, Chung F, Imarengiaye C, Yung D, Bernstein M. Pain, nausea, vomiting and ocular complications delay discharge following ambulatory microdiscectomy. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 514–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen KJ, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Bonsel GJ, Moons KG, Vergouwe Y. The risk of severe postoperative pain: modification and validation of a clinical prediction rule. Anest Analg 2008; 107: 1330–9; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.CrossRef Janssen KJ, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Bonsel GJ, Moons KG, Vergouwe Y. The risk of severe postoperative pain: modification and validation of a clinical prediction rule. Anest Analg 2008; 107: 1330–9; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergouwe Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 475–83.PubMedCrossRef Vergouwe Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 475–83.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Poses RM, Cebul RD, Collins M, Fager SS. The importance of disease prevalence in transporting clinical prediction rules. The case of streptococcal pharyngitis. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 586–91.PubMed Poses RM, Cebul RD, Collins M, Fager SS. The importance of disease prevalence in transporting clinical prediction rules. The case of streptococcal pharyngitis. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 586–91.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA 1982; 247: 2543–6.PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA 1982; 247: 2543–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36.PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36.PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996; 15: 361–87.PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996; 15: 361–87.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ivanov J, Tu JV, Naylor CD. Ready-made, recalibrated, or remodeled? Issues in the use of risk indexes for assessing mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1999; 99: 2098–104.PubMed Ivanov J, Tu JV, Naylor CD. Ready-made, recalibrated, or remodeled? Issues in the use of risk indexes for assessing mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1999; 99: 2098–104.PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat van Houwelingen HC. Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Stat Med 2000; 19: 3401–15.PubMedCrossRef van Houwelingen HC. Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Stat Med 2000; 19: 3401–15.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A simple method to adjust clinical prediction models to local circumstances
verfasst von
Kristel J. M. Janssen, PhD
Yvonne Vergouwe, PhD
Cor J. Kalkman, PhD, MD
Diederick E. Grobbee, PhD, MD
Karel G. M. Moons, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9041-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2009

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 3/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.