Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2013

01.04.2013 | Reports of Original Investigations

The epidural electric stimulation test does not predict local anesthetic spread or consumption in labour epidural analgesia

verfasst von: Clarita B. Margarido, MD, PhD, Aleksandra Dlacic, MD, Mrinalini Balki, MD, Louis Furtado, MD, Jose C. A. Carvalho, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The epidural electrical stimulation test (EEST) is a highly specific and sensitive test for confirming placement of the epidural catheter in the epidural space. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the EEST could predict the spread and consumption of local anesthetic solutions during labour epidural analgesia.

Methods

This observational study was conducted in labouring parturients requesting epidural analgesia. The EEST was performed after the epidural catheter placement (T0) and repeated five minutes after a test dose with 2% lidocaine 3 mL (T1). The minimum current required to elicit the motor response at each time point was recorded. A loading dose of 0.125% bupivacaine 10 mL and fentanyl 50 μg was administered and followed by patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.0625% bupivacaine and fentanyl 2 μg·mL−1 (baseline infusion 10 mL·hr−1, bolus dose 5 mL, lockout interval ten minutes, maximum dose 20 mL·hr−1). The primary outcome was the correlation between the current required to elicit motor responses at T0 and T1 and the consumption of bupivacaine in the first two hours of epidural administration. The secondary outcomes included the muscle contraction patterns determined by the EEST and the incidence of failed, inadequate, or asymmetric blocks.

Results

The study was conducted in 102 parturients. The mean electric current required to elicit muscle response was 4.43 mA (range 1-10 mA) at T0, 5.97 mA (range 1-14 mA) at T1, and the mean Δ (T1-T0) current was 1.54 mA (range 0-8 mA). There was no correlation between either the mean baseline current required or the Δ (T1-T0) current and the total bupivacaine consumption at two hours. The incidence of inadequate blocks at two hours was 18%; however, none of the catheters required replacement. Unilateral left (34%) or right (31%) leg contraction was the most frequent pattern elicited by the EEST.

Conclusions

The EEST shows a wide range of electrical current requirements and elicits a variety of muscle twitch patterns on the lower limbs. Although it confirms the epidural placement of the catheter, the EEST cannot be used to predict the spread or consumption of the local anesthetic solution during labour epidural analgesia.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 144-54.PubMedCrossRef Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 144-54.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ready LB. Acute pain: lessons learned from 25,000 patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24: 499-505.PubMed Ready LB. Acute pain: lessons learned from 25,000 patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24: 499-505.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 227-33.PubMedCrossRef Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 227-33.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Eappen S, Blinn A, Segal S. Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review. Int J Obstet Anesth 1998; 7: 220-5.PubMedCrossRef Eappen S, Blinn A, Segal S. Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review. Int J Obstet Anesth 1998; 7: 220-5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui BC, Gupta S, Finucane B. Confirmation of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 640-4.PubMedCrossRef Tsui BC, Gupta S, Finucane B. Confirmation of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 640-4.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Goobie SM, Montgomery CJ, Basu R, et al. Confirmation of direct epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 984-8.PubMedCrossRef Goobie SM, Montgomery CJ, Basu R, et al. Confirmation of direct epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 984-8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui BC, Guenther C, Emery D, Finucane B. Determining epidural catheter location using nerve stimulation with radiological confirmation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 306-9.PubMed Tsui BC, Guenther C, Emery D, Finucane B. Determining epidural catheter location using nerve stimulation with radiological confirmation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 306-9.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui BC. Predicting caudal epidural analgesia using nerve stimulation. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 816-7.PubMedCrossRef Tsui BC. Predicting caudal epidural analgesia using nerve stimulation. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 816-7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui BC, Wagner A, Cave D, Kearney R. Thoracic and lumbar epidural analgesia via the caudal approach using electrical stimulation guidance in pediatric patients: a review of 289 patients. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 683-9.PubMedCrossRef Tsui BC, Wagner A, Cave D, Kearney R. Thoracic and lumbar epidural analgesia via the caudal approach using electrical stimulation guidance in pediatric patients: a review of 289 patients. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 683-9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat de Medicis E, Tetrault JP, Martin R, Robichaud R, Laroche L. A prospective comparative study of two indirect methods for confirming the localization of an epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1830-3.PubMedCrossRef de Medicis E, Tetrault JP, Martin R, Robichaud R, Laroche L. A prospective comparative study of two indirect methods for confirming the localization of an epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1830-3.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui BC, Gupta S, Finucane B. Determination of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation in obstetric patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24: 17-23.PubMed Tsui BC, Gupta S, Finucane B. Determination of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation in obstetric patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24: 17-23.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gielen MJ, Slappendel R, Merx JL. Asymmetric onset of sympathetic blockade in epidural anaesthesia shows no relation to epidural catheter position. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35: 81-4.PubMedCrossRef Gielen MJ, Slappendel R, Merx JL. Asymmetric onset of sympathetic blockade in epidural anaesthesia shows no relation to epidural catheter position. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35: 81-4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The epidural electric stimulation test does not predict local anesthetic spread or consumption in labour epidural analgesia
verfasst von
Clarita B. Margarido, MD, PhD
Aleksandra Dlacic, MD
Mrinalini Balki, MD
Louis Furtado, MD
Jose C. A. Carvalho, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-9887-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.