Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Tumor Biology 10/2014

01.10.2014 | Research Article

Tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9 correlate with radiological imaging in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy

verfasst von: M. Michl, J. Koch, R. P. Laubender, D. P. Modest, C. Giessen, Ch. Schulz, V. Heinemann

Erschienen in: Tumor Biology | Ausgabe 10/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), radiological imaging represents the current standard to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy. However, with growing knowledge about tumor biology, other diagnostic tools become of interest which can supplement radiology. The aim of the present study was to examine the correlation of tumor and serum markers with radiological imaging in patients with mCRC receiving first-line therapy. Patients were included if tumor (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9)) and serum marker (lactatdehydrogenase (LDH), γ-glutamyltransferase (γGT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), C-reactive protein (CRP), leucocyte count (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb)) levels were available at baseline and at least two times during treatment. The decline and increase of tumor and serum markers over time were approximated for each patient by estimating slopes depending on the radiological assessment. A linear mixed effects multiple regression model for each subject was used to evaluate the intra-class correlation of these slopes modeling tumor and serum marker changes with radiological imaging. Data of 124 patients (41 female, 83 male; median age 62.9 years, range 27–85) who received first-line chemotherapy for mCRC from 11/2007 to 04/2010 were analyzed retrospectively. CEA level slopes (n = 49; slopes = 102) differed between radiologically determined progressive disease (PD) and partial response (PR) (p = 0.005) and between PD and stable disease (SD) (p = 0.042). CA 19-9 level slopes (n = 57; slopes = 127) also showed a significant difference between PD and PR (p = 0.002) and PD and SD (p = 0.058). Furthermore, CRP slopes (n = 62; slopes = 134) differed significantly between PD and PR (p = 0.009). For LDH, ALP, γGT, Hb, and WBC, no correlations were observed. The results indicate the correlation of the tumor markers CEA, CA 19-9, and the serum marker CRP with radiological imaging in patients with mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy. Further data analyses would be helpful to develop a predictive model for tumor response based on an early tumor marker increase or decrease.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gehan EA, Schneiderman MA. Historical and methodological developments in clinical trials at the National Cancer Institute. Stat Med. 1990;9:871–80. discussion 903–876.CrossRefPubMed Gehan EA, Schneiderman MA. Historical and methodological developments in clinical trials at the National Cancer Institute. Stat Med. 1990;9:871–80. discussion 903–876.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981;47:207–14.CrossRefPubMed Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981;47:207–14.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwanicki-Caron I, Di Fiore F, Roque I, Astruc E, Stetiu M, Duclos A, et al. Usefulness of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen kinetic for chemotherapy monitoring in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3681–6.CrossRefPubMed Iwanicki-Caron I, Di Fiore F, Roque I, Astruc E, Stetiu M, Duclos A, et al. Usefulness of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen kinetic for chemotherapy monitoring in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3681–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kouri M, Pyrhonen S, Kuusela P. Elevated CA19-9 as the most significant prognostic factor in advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1992;49:78–85.CrossRefPubMed Kouri M, Pyrhonen S, Kuusela P. Elevated CA19-9 as the most significant prognostic factor in advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1992;49:78–85.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitsuyama Y, Shiba H, Haruki K, Fujiwara Y, Furukawa K, Iida T, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 are prognostic predictors of colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastasis. Oncol Lett. 2012;3:767–71.PubMedCentralPubMed Mitsuyama Y, Shiba H, Haruki K, Fujiwara Y, Furukawa K, Iida T, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 are prognostic predictors of colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastasis. Oncol Lett. 2012;3:767–71.PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5313–27.CrossRefPubMed Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5313–27.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chibaudel B, Bonnetain F, Tournigand C, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Teixeira L, Artru P, et al. Simplified prognostic model in patients with oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a GERCOR study. Oncologist. 2011;16:1228–38.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chibaudel B, Bonnetain F, Tournigand C, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Teixeira L, Artru P, et al. Simplified prognostic model in patients with oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a GERCOR study. Oncologist. 2011;16:1228–38.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Giessen C, Stintzing S, Laubender RP, Ankerst DP, Schulz C, Moosmann N, et al. Analysis for prognostic factors of 60-day mortality: evaluation of an irinotecan-based phase III trial performed in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011;10:317–24.CrossRefPubMed Giessen C, Stintzing S, Laubender RP, Ankerst DP, Schulz C, Moosmann N, et al. Analysis for prognostic factors of 60-day mortality: evaluation of an irinotecan-based phase III trial performed in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011;10:317–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stillwell AP, Ho YH, Veitch C. Systematic review of prognostic factors related to overall survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and unresectable metastases. World J Surg. 2011;35:684–92.CrossRefPubMed Stillwell AP, Ho YH, Veitch C. Systematic review of prognostic factors related to overall survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and unresectable metastases. World J Surg. 2011;35:684–92.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9 correlate with radiological imaging in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy
verfasst von
M. Michl
J. Koch
R. P. Laubender
D. P. Modest
C. Giessen
Ch. Schulz
V. Heinemann
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Tumor Biology / Ausgabe 10/2014
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Elektronische ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2280-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2014

Tumor Biology 10/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.