nach oben

Updates in Surgery

Erschienen in:

22.02.2021 | Review Article

Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

verfasst von: Federica Cipriani, Francesca Ratti, Guido Fiorentini, Raffaella Reineke, Luca Aldrighetti

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Most surgeons have traditionally been reluctant toward minimally-invasive surgery for bile duct tumors. This study aimed to perform a systematic literature review on perioperative and oncologic results of pure laparoscopic and robotic curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. According to the PRISMA statement, a systematic review was conducted into Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane. A critical appraisal of study was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Nineteen studies (12 on pure laparoscopy and 7 on robotics) were included: 7 case reports, 9 case series, 3 case–control (193 patients). The pooled conversion, morbidity, biliary leak and mortality rates were 5.5%, 43%, 16.4% and 4%. The weighted mean of operative time, blood loss and postoperative stay were 388 min, 446 mL and 14 days. For pure laparoscopy, the pooled R0 rate was 86%; overall survival and disease-free survival rates ranged from 85 to 100% and from 80 to 100% (median observation time 6–18 months). For robotic surgeries, the pooled R0 rate was 69% and overall survival rates ranged from 90 to 100% (median observation time 5–15 months). Case reports were overall of high quality, case series of moderate / high-quality, case–control studies ranged from low to high quality. In selected patients, minimally-invasive surgery for Klatskin tumors appears feasible, safe, satisfactory for perioperative outcomes and adequate for oncologic results. However, the results are based on few studies, limited in patient numbers and with allocation criteria more restrictive than open, reporting short follow-up and mainly with non-comparative design: evidence of higher quality is recommended.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aldrighetti L, Belli G, Boni L, Cillo U, Ettorre GM, De Carlis L et al (2015) Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: a national survey. Updates Surg 67:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0307-2CrossRefPubMed

Berardi G, Van Cleven S, Fretland ÅA, Barkhatov L, Halls M, Cipriani F et al (2017) Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery from innovation to implementation to mastery: perioperative and oncologic outcomes of 2,238 patients from 4 European Specialized Centers. J Am Coll Surg 225:639–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.006CrossRefPubMed

van der Poel MJ, Fichtinger RS, Bemelmans M, Bosscha K, Braat AE, de Boer MT et al (2019) Implementation and outcome of minor and major minimally invasive liver surgery in the Netherlands. HPB (Oxford) 21:1734–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.002CrossRef

Ban D, Tanabe M, Kumamaru H, Nitta H, Otsuka Y, Miyata H et al (2020) Safe Dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection in 27,146 cases between 2011 and 2017 from the National Clinical Database of Japan. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003799 (Online ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed

Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R et al (2018) The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 268:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524CrossRefPubMed

Lim C, Goumard C, Salloum C, Tudisco A, Napoli N, Boggi U et al (2020) Outcomes after 3D laparoscopic and robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter comparative study. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07762-7 (Online ahead of print)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim HJ, Choi GH, Yiengpruksawan A, Fong Y et al (2019) International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol 28(25):1432–1444. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1432CrossRef

Cipriani F, Ratti F, Paganelli M, Reineke R, Catena M, Aldrighetti L (2019) Laparoscopic or open approaches for posterosuperior and anterolateral liver resections? A Propensity Score based analysis of the degree of advantage. HPB (Oxford) 21:1676–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.006CrossRef

Patriti A, Cipriani F, Ratti F, Bartoli A, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L et al (2014) Robot-assisted versus open liver resection in the right posterior section. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00040CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Ratti F, Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2020) Reappraisal of the advantages of laparoscopic liver resection for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma within a stage migration perspective: Propensity score analysis of the differential benefit. J Hepatobili Pancreat Sci 27:510–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.736CrossRef

11.

Ratti F, Serenari M, Zanello M, Prosperi E, Cipriani F, Ercolani G et al (2019) Appraisal of disease-specific benefits of minimally invasiveness in surgery of breast cancer liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 120:1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25702CrossRefPubMed

12.

van der Poel MJ, Barkhatov L, Fuks D, Berardi G, Cipriani F, Aljaiuossi A et al (2019) Multicentre propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 106:783–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11096CrossRefPubMed

13.

Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, Stanton L, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Pearce NW et al (2016) Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 103:1504–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10211CrossRefPubMed

14.

Garbarino GM, Marchese U, Tobome R, Ward MA, Vibert E, Gayet B et al (2020) Laparoscopic versus open unisegmentectomy in two specialized centers. Feasibility and short-term results. HPB (Oxford). 22:750–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.017CrossRefPubMed

15.

Aghayan DL, Fretland ÅA, Kazaryan AM, Sahakyan MA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnbeth BA et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the posterosuperior segments: a sub-group analysis from the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. HPB (Oxford) 21:1485–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.358CrossRef

16.

Hasegawa S, Ikai I, Fujii H, Hatano E, Shimahara Y (2007) Surgical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of survival and postoperative complications. World J Surg 31:1256–1263CrossRef

17.

DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Kamangar F, Winter JM, Lillemoe KD et al (2007) Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 245:755–762CrossRef

18.

Yubin L, Chihua F, Zhixiang J, Jinrui O, Zixian L, Jianghua Z et al (2008) Surgical management and prognostic factors of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: experience with 115 cases in China. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2113–2119. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9932-zCrossRefPubMed

19.

Sakamoto Y, Kosuge T, Shimada K, Sano T, Ojima H, Yamamoto J et al (2005) Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer: an analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins. Surgery 137:396–402CrossRef

20.

Jo HS, Kim DS, Yu YD, Kang WH, Yoon KC (2020) Right-side versus left-side hepatectomy for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative study. World J Surg Oncol 4(18):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1779-1CrossRef

21.

Ratti F, Cipriani F, Piozzi G, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2015) Comparative analysis of left- versus right-sided resection in klatskin tumor surgery: can lesion side be considered a prognostic factor? J Gastrointest Surg 19:1324–1333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2840-1CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ramos E (2013) Principles of surgical resection in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 15(5):139–146. https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.139CrossRef

23.

Lin H, Wu YS, Li Z, Jiang Y (2018) Prognostic value of retrieved lymph node counts in patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. ANZ J Surg 88:E829–E834. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14775CrossRefPubMed

24.

Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Shionoya S (1990) Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J Surg. 14:535–543 (discussion 544)CrossRef

25.

Dinant S, Gerhards MF, Busch OR, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, Van Gulik TM (2005) The importance of complete excision of the caudate lobe in resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 7:263–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651820500372376CrossRef

26.

Kow AW, Wook CD, Song SC, Kim WS, Kim MJ, Park HJ et al (2012) Role of caudate lobectomy in type III A and III B hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a 15-year experience in a tertiary institution. World J Surg 36:1112–1121CrossRef

27.

Unno M, Katayose Y, Rikiyama T, Yoshida H, Yamamoto K, Morikawa T et al (2010) Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci 17:463–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0206-3CrossRef

28.

Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N et al (1999) Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 230:808–818 (discussion 819)CrossRef

29.

Ratti F, Fiorentini G, Cipriani F, Paganelli M, Catena M, Aldrighetti L (2019) Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lymphadenectomy for biliary tumors: a propensity-score-based. Case-Matched Anal Ann Surg Oncol 26:564–575. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6811-0CrossRef

30.

Fiorentini G, Ratti F, Cipriani F, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2019) Challenges and technical innovations for an effective laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in liver malignancies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29:72–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0568CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hamad A, Cloyd JM, Dillhoff M, Manilchuk A, Pawlik TM, Tsung A et al (2020) Comparison of lymph node evaluation and yield among patients undergoing open and minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07635-z (Online ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed

32.

Goja S, Singh MK, Saha S, Mahabaleshwar V, Soin AS (2017) Robotic Roux-en-Y bilioenteric reconstruction. Indian J Surg 79:475–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1676-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Zhang CW, Liu J, Hong DF, Wang ZF, Hu ZM, Huang DS et al (2018) Pure laparoscopic radical resection for type IIIa hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 32:1581–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5741-4CrossRefPubMed

34.

Liu Q, Zhang T, Hu M, Zhao Z, Zhao G, Li C et al (2020) Comparison of the learning curves for robotic left and right hemihepatectomy: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 30(81):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.022CrossRef

35.

Choi SH, Han DH, Lee JH, Choi Y, Lee JH, Choi GH (2020) Safety and feasibility of robotic major hepatectomy for novice surgeons in robotic liver surgery: A prospective multicenter pilot study. Surg Oncol 24(35):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2020.07.003CrossRef

36.

Cipriani F, Ratti F, Cardella A, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2019) Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in a high-volume centre. J Gastrointest Surg 23:2163–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04112-4CrossRefPubMed

37.

Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, Tranchart H, Fuks D, Soubrane O et al (2014) International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobili Pancreat Sci 21:732–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.140CrossRef

38.

Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B, Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Sarmiento JM et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient’s data. Surgery 163:985–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.020CrossRefPubMed

39.

Cipriani F, Alzoubi M, Fuks D, Ratti F, Kawai T, Berardi G et al (2020) Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a critical assessment and realistic expectations. A propensity score-based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from 9 European tertiary referral centers. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci. 27:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.662CrossRef

40.

Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Syed S, Primrose JN, Abu HM (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure. Am J Surg 202:e52–e58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.032CrossRefPubMed

41.

Fiorentini G, Ratti F, Cipriani F, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2018) Tips and tricks for a laparoscopic approach to paracaval liver segments. Ann Surg Oncol 25:1695–1698. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6432-7CrossRefPubMed

42.

Ding Z, Huang Y, Liu L, Xu B, Xiong H, Luo D et al (2020) Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 9:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01928-6 (Online ahead of print)CrossRef

43.

Zhao ZM, Yin ZZ, Pan LC, Hu MG, Tan XL, Liu R (2020) Robotic isolated partial and complete hepatic caudate lobectomy: A single institution experience. Hepatobili Pancreat Dis Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.05.003 (Online ahead of print)CrossRef

44.

Shirai Y, Sakata J, Wakai T, Hatakeyama K (2012) Intraoperative assessment of the resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 59:2436–2438. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge12240CrossRefPubMed

45.

Ribero D, Amisano M, Lo Tesoriere R, Rosso S, Ferrero A, Capussotti L (2011) Additional resection of an intraoperative margin-positive proximal bile duct improves survival in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 254:776–781. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182368f85 (discussion 781-3)CrossRefPubMed

46.

Endo I, House MG, Klimstra DS, Gonen M, D’Angelica M, Dematteo RP et al (2008) Clinical significance of intraoperative bile duct margin assessment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2104–2112. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0003-2CrossRefPubMed

47.

Aldrighetti L, Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Catena M, Paganelli M, Ratti F (2019) A stepwise learning curve to define the standard for technical improvement in laparoscopic liver resections: complexity-based analysis in 1032 procedures. Updates Surg 71:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00658-9CrossRefPubMed

48.

Berardi G, Aghayan D, Fretland A, Elberm H, Cipriani F, Spagnoli A et al (2019) Multicentre analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection of the posterosuperior segments. Br J Surg 106:1512–1522. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11286CrossRefPubMed

49.

van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, Armstrong T, Takhar AS, van Dieren SM et al (2016) Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg. 151:923–928. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1655CrossRefPubMed

50.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRef

51.

Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al (2017) In Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer’s manual, Aromataris E, Munn Z (eds) The Joanna Briggs Institute: Adelaide, 2017. The Joanna Briggs Institute. http://joannabriggs.org. Accessed 20 Jun 2017.

52.

Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Surjan RC, Mochizuki M (2012) Laparoscopic resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:954–956. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2012.0339CrossRefPubMed

53.

Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Surjan RC (2014) Totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for right-sided intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile duct. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1841–1843. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3517-9CrossRefPubMed

54.

Puntambekar S, Sharma V, Kumar S, Mitkare S, Joshi G, Parikh H (2016) Laparoscopic management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case report. Indian J Surg 78:57–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1345-1CrossRefPubMed

55.

Yu H, Wu SD, Chen DX, Zhu G (2011) Laparoscopic resection of Bismuth type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 14 cases from two institutions. Dig Surg 28:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1159/000322398CrossRefPubMed

56.

Gumbs AA, Jarufe N, Gayet B (2013) Minimally invasive approaches to extrapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 27:406–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2489-8CrossRefPubMed

57.

Lee W, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Choi YR, Shin HK et al (2015) Laparoscopic resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Treat Res 89:228–232. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2015.89.4.228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Li J, Zhao L, Zhang J, Li Z, Li A, Wei Y et al (2017) Application of the laparoscopic technique in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery. Int J Surg 44:104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.038CrossRefPubMed

59.

Elmoghazy W, Cowan J, Tabchouri N, Tinguely P, Bennamoun M, Tubbax C et al (2019) Liver resection for extra-pancreatic biliary cancer: what is the role of laparoscopic approach? Surg Endosc 33:3711–3717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06664-7CrossRefPubMed

60.

Feng F, Cao X, Liu X, Qin J, Zhang S, Li Q et al (2019) Laparoscopic resection for Bismuth type III and IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: how to improve the radicality without direct palpation. J Surg Oncol 120:1379–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25739CrossRefPubMed

61.

Liu S, Liu X, Li X, Li O, Yi W, Khan J et al (2020) Application of laparoscopic radical resection for type III and IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma treatment. Gastroenterol Res Pract. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1506275 (eCollection 2020)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Zhang Y, Dou C, Wu W, Liu J, Jin L, Hu Z et al (2019) Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07211-0 (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Ratti F, Fiorentini G, Cipriani F, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2020) Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: are we ready to step towards minimally invasiveness? Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00752-3 (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Addeo P (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:159–163. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2009.0383CrossRefPubMed

65.

Zhu Z, Liu Q, Chen J, Duan W, Dong M, Mu P et al (2014) Robotic surgery twice performed in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with deep jaundice: delayed right hemihepatectomy following the right-hepatic vascular control. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:e184–e190. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828f708bCrossRefPubMed

66.

Machado MA, Mattos BV, Lobo Filho MM, Makdissi F (2020) Robotic resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08514-6 (Online ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed

67.

Marino MV, Pellino G, Ahmad A (2020) The robotic-assisted approach for left-side predominance hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a video technique. Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00777-8 (Online ahead of print)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Liu QD, Chen JZ, Xu XY, Zhang T, Zhou NX (2012) Incidence of port-site metastasis after undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies. World J Gastroenterol 18:5695–5701. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i40.5695CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Li J, Tan X, Zhang X, Zhao G, Hu M, Zhao Z et al (2020) Robotic radical surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-centre case series. Int J Med Robot 16:e2076. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2076CrossRefPubMed

70.

Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, Tang M, Li H, Leng J et al (2016) Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 30:3060–3070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4925-7CrossRefPubMed

71.

Bismuth H (1975) Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:170–178PubMed

72.

Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T (1992) Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 215:31–38CrossRef

73.

Edge SBBD, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2020) American Joint Committee on cancer. Cancer staging manual. Springer, New York

74.

Ding G, Yang Y, Cao L, Chen W, Wu Z, Jiang G et al (2015) A modified Janargin-Blumgart classification better predicts survival for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 13:1–9CrossRef

75.

Halls MC, Cipriani F, Berardi G, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Alzoubi M et al (2018) Conversion for unfavorable intraoperative events results in significantly worse outcomes during laparoscopic liver resection: lessons learned from a multicenter review of 2861 cases. Ann Surg 268:1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002332CrossRefPubMed

76.

Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Manas D, Jiao LR, Hilal MA, White SA (2020) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic liver resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496920925637 (Online ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed

77.

Groot Koerkamp B, Wiggers JK, Allen PJ, Besselink MG, Blumgart LH, Busch OR et al (2016) Recurrence rate and pattern of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative intent resection. J Am Coll Surg 8:583–592

78.

Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ferla F, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti LA (2013) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: preoperative liver optimization with multidisciplinary approach. Toward a better outcome. World J Surg. 37:1388–1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1980-2CrossRefPubMed

79.

Bhardwaj N, Garcea G, Dennison AR, Maddern GJ (2015) The surgical management of klatskin tumours: has anything changed in the last decade? World J Surg 39:2748–2756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3125-2CrossRefPubMed

80.

Coelen RJS, Olthof PB, van Dieren S, Besselink MGH, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM (2016) External validation of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) risk model to predict operative risk in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 1(151):1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2305CrossRef

81.

Rassam F, Roos E, van Lienden KP, van Hooft JE, Klumpen HJ, van Tienhoven G et al (2018) Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1649-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

82.

Regimbeau JM, Fuks D, Pessaux P, Bachellier P, Chatelain D, Diouf M et al (2015) Tumour size over 3 cm predicts poor shortterm outcomes after major liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. By the HC-AFC-2009 group. HPB 17:79–86CrossRef

83.

Ratti F, Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Hidalgo Salinas C, Catena M, Paganelli M et al (2019) Management of hilum infiltrating tumors of the liver: the impact of experience and standardization on outcome. Dig Liver Dis 51:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2018.07.006CrossRefPubMed

84.

Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg. 246:385–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318146996c (discussion 392-4)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
verfasst von: Federica Cipriani
Francesca Ratti
Guido Fiorentini
Raffaella Reineke
Luca Aldrighetti
Publikationsdatum: 22.02.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01006-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Total upper transversal hepatectomy with outflow reconstruction for advanced mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma

Is there an indication left for gastric band? A single center experience on 178 patients with a follow-up of 10 years

Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of three-port vs four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (level 1 evidence)

Upper GI training of young surgeons: a reality full of hurdles. An international survey

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis-mini gastric bypass as a rescue procedure following failed restrictive bariatric surgery. A systematic review of literature with metanalysis

Outcome of bile leakage following liver resection with hepaticojejunostomy for liver cancer

Update Chirurgie