Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 4/2016

01.04.2016 | Original Research Article

Predicting the Effect of CYP3A Inducers on the Pharmacokinetics of Substrate Drugs Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling: An Analysis of PBPK Submissions to the US FDA

verfasst von: Christian Wagner, Yuzhuo Pan, Vicky Hsu, Vikram Sinha, Ping Zhao

Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Objective

We recently published analyses regarding the predictive performance of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for the effect of cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of substrate drugs. We now analyze and summarize the predictive performance of PBPK models for the effect of CYP3A inducers on a substrate’s pharmacokinetics.

Methods

This analysis was based on 11 substrate PBPK models, developed by six sponsors, using a commercial PBPK software, with 13 clinical interaction studies. Four CYP3A inducers were used: rifampicin, rifabutin, carbamazepine, and efavirenz. Sponsors either directly used the software-provided inducer models or verified these models’ induction magnitude prior to use. The metric for assessing predictive performance was the R predicted/observed value [R predicted/observed = (predicted mean exposure ratio)/(observed mean exposure ratio)], with the exposure ratio defined as maximum plasma concentration (C max) or area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) with and without an inducer.

Results

In 77 % (10/13; AUCR) and 83 % (10/12; C max R) of the cases, the R predicted/observed values were within 1.25-fold of the observed data. Cases with R predicted/observed values >1.25-fold (>twofold for all three AUCR) were under-predictions as a result of using the PBPK software’s default rifampicin model. Improved predictions were observed when the rifampicin model was modified by increasing the induction potency.

Conclusion

Based on submissions to the FDA, and similar to our previous findings for CYP inhibition, we observed good agreement between PBPK-predicted and observed effect of CYP3A inducers on substrate pharmacokinetics. Verification of the inducer model appears to be crucial for improved predictive performance.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner C, Pan Y, Hsu V, Grillo JA, Zhang L, Reynolds KS, et al. Predicting the effect of cytochrome P450 inhibitors on substrate drugs: analysis of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling submissions to the US Food and Drug Administration. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54:117–27.CrossRefPubMed Wagner C, Pan Y, Hsu V, Grillo JA, Zhang L, Reynolds KS, et al. Predicting the effect of cytochrome P450 inhibitors on substrate drugs: analysis of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling submissions to the US Food and Drug Administration. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54:117–27.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vieira MD, Kim MJ, Apparaju S, Sinha V, Zineh I, Huang SM, et al. PBPK Model describes the effects of comedication and genetic polymorphism on systemic exposure of drugs that undergo multiple clearance pathways. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:550–7.CrossRefPubMed Vieira MD, Kim MJ, Apparaju S, Sinha V, Zineh I, Huang SM, et al. PBPK Model describes the effects of comedication and genetic polymorphism on systemic exposure of drugs that undergo multiple clearance pathways. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:550–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Einolf HJ, Chen L, Fahmi OA, Gibson CR, Obach RS, Shebley M, et al. Evaluation of various static and dynamic modeling methods to predict clinical CYP3A induction using in vitro CYP3A4 mRNA induction data. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:179–88.CrossRefPubMed Einolf HJ, Chen L, Fahmi OA, Gibson CR, Obach RS, Shebley M, et al. Evaluation of various static and dynamic modeling methods to predict clinical CYP3A induction using in vitro CYP3A4 mRNA induction data. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:179–88.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guest EJ, Aarons L, Houston JB, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Galetin A. Critique of the twofold measure of prediction success for ratios: application for the assessment of drug–drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:170–3.CrossRefPubMed Guest EJ, Aarons L, Houston JB, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Galetin A. Critique of the twofold measure of prediction success for ratios: application for the assessment of drug–drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:170–3.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Y, Zhou Y, Hayashi M, Shou M, Skiles GL. Simulation of clinical drug-drug interactions from hepatocyte CYP3A4 induction data and its potential utility in trial designs. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:1139–48.CrossRefPubMed Xu Y, Zhou Y, Hayashi M, Shou M, Skiles GL. Simulation of clinical drug-drug interactions from hepatocyte CYP3A4 induction data and its potential utility in trial designs. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:1139–48.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baneyx G, Parrott N, Meille C, Iliadis A, Lave T. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of CYP3A4 induction by rifampicin in human: influence of time between substrate and inducer administration. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;56:1–15.CrossRefPubMed Baneyx G, Parrott N, Meille C, Iliadis A, Lave T. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of CYP3A4 induction by rifampicin in human: influence of time between substrate and inducer administration. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;56:1–15.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Predicting the Effect of CYP3A Inducers on the Pharmacokinetics of Substrate Drugs Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling: An Analysis of PBPK Submissions to the US FDA
verfasst von
Christian Wagner
Yuzhuo Pan
Vicky Hsu
Vikram Sinha
Ping Zhao
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0330-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe