Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 6/2017

01.12.2017 | Original Research Article

Views of the UK General Public on Important Aspects of Health Not Captured by EQ-5D

verfasst von: Koonal Kirit Shah, Brendan Mulhern, Louise Longworth, M. F. Janssen

Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The EQ-5D is a standardised instrument designed for use as a generic measure of health outcome. It was (and is) intended to provide information about a ‘common core’ of dimensions known to be relevant across a range of conditions; however, the five dimensions may not fully capture the health-related impacts of certain conditions. This study analyses the views of the UK general public about important aspects of health considered to be missing from the instrument.

Methods

Survey respondents were asked whether there are any aspects of health they consider to be important but are not captured by the EQ-5D, and, if so, what these aspects are. The responses (text comments) were analysed using content analysis with analyst triangulation. Data were collected from a broadly representative sample of the general public via a paper questionnaire administered as part of face-to-face interviews.

Results

Data are available for 436 respondents, 179 of whom suggested aspects of health they considered important but not captured by the five EQ-5D dimensions. These were organised into 22 themes. Sensory deprivation and mental health were the health aspects most commonly mentioned by respondents.

Conclusions

Respondents identified several important aspects of health that are not covered by the EQ-5D descriptive system. This study can provide the basis for more detailed qualitative and quantitative research—in particular to examine the views of different patient groups—to inform further review of the EQ-5D descriptive system. The results also have implications for the sensitivity of other generic measures.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Grad FP. The preamble of the constitution of the World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(12):982. Grad FP. The preamble of the constitution of the World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(12):982.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, et al. How should we define health? BMJ. 2011;26:343. Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, et al. How should we define health? BMJ. 2011;26:343.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudex C. The descriptive system of the EuroQol Instrument. In: Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R, editors. EQ-5D concepts and methods: a developmental history. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. Gudex C. The descriptive system of the EuroQol Instrument. In: Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R, editors. EQ-5D concepts and methods: a developmental history. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams A. The EuroQol instrument. In: Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R, editors. EQ-5D concepts and methods: a developmental history. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. Williams A. The EuroQol instrument. In: Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R, editors. EQ-5D concepts and methods: a developmental history. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen MF, Birnie E, Haagsma JA, Bonsel GJ. Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version. Value Health. 2008;11:275–84.CrossRefPubMed Janssen MF, Birnie E, Haagsma JA, Bonsel GJ. Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version. Value Health. 2008;11:275–84.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:645–9.CrossRefPubMed Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:645–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooks R. Health status measurement: a perspective on change. Hampshire: Macmillan Press Ltd; 1995.CrossRef Brooks R. Health status measurement: a perspective on change. Hampshire: Macmillan Press Ltd; 1995.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dalen H, Williams A, Gudex C. Lay people’s evaluations of health: are there variations between different subgroups? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994;48:248–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Dalen H, Williams A, Gudex C. Lay people’s evaluations of health: are there variations between different subgroups? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994;48:248–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen MF, Lubetkin EI, Sekhobo JP, Pickard AS. The use of the EQ-5D preference-based health status measure in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2011;28(4):395–413.CrossRefPubMed Janssen MF, Lubetkin EI, Sekhobo JP, Pickard AS. The use of the EQ-5D preference-based health status measure in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2011;28(4):395–413.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulhern B, Meadows K. The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D, SF-6D and Diabetes Health Profile-18 in type 2 diabetes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2014;12:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mulhern B, Meadows K. The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D, SF-6D and Diabetes Health Profile-18 in type 2 diabetes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2014;12:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, Shojania K, Offer R, Brazier JE, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1571–82.CrossRefPubMed Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, Shojania K, Offer R, Brazier JE, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1571–82.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickard AS, Wilke CT, Lin HW, Lloyd A. Health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(5):365–84.CrossRefPubMed Pickard AS, Wilke CT, Lin HW, Lloyd A. Health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(5):365–84.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Longworth L, Yang Y, Young T, Mulhern B, Hernandez-Alava M, Mukuria C, et al. Use of generic and condition specific measures of health related quality of life in NICE decision making: systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(9):1–224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Longworth L, Yang Y, Young T, Mulhern B, Hernandez-Alava M, Mukuria C, et al. Use of generic and condition specific measures of health related quality of life in NICE decision making: systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(9):1–224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Espallargues M, Czoski-Murray CJ, Bansback NJ, Carlton J, Lewis GM, Hughes LA, et al. The impact of age-related macular degeneration on health status utility values. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(11):4016–23.CrossRefPubMed Espallargues M, Czoski-Murray CJ, Bansback NJ, Carlton J, Lewis GM, Hughes LA, et al. The impact of age-related macular degeneration on health status utility values. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(11):4016–23.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Krabbe PFM, Stouthard ME, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel G. The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(4):293–301.CrossRefPubMed Krabbe PFM, Stouthard ME, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel G. The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(4):293–301.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaarlola A, Pettilä V, Kekki P. Performance of two measures of general health-related quality of life, the EQ-5D and the RAND-36 among critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2014;30(12):2245–52.CrossRef Kaarlola A, Pettilä V, Kekki P. Performance of two measures of general health-related quality of life, the EQ-5D and the RAND-36 among critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2014;30(12):2245–52.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulhern B, Mukuria C, Barkham M, Knapp M, Byford S, Soeteman D, et al. Using preference based measures in mental health conditions: the psychometric validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205(3):236–43.CrossRefPubMed Mulhern B, Mukuria C, Barkham M, Knapp M, Byford S, Soeteman D, et al. Using preference based measures in mental health conditions: the psychometric validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205(3):236–43.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–27.CrossRefPubMed Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–27.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Swinburn P, Lloyd A, Boye KS, Edson-Heredia E, Bowman L, Janssen B. Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK. Value Health. 2013;16(8):1156–62.CrossRefPubMed Swinburn P, Lloyd A, Boye KS, Edson-Heredia E, Bowman L, Janssen B. Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK. Value Health. 2013;16(8):1156–62.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang Y, Rowen D, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Young T, Longworth L. An exploratory study to test the impact on three “bolt-on” items to the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2015;18(1):52–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang Y, Rowen D, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Young T, Longworth L. An exploratory study to test the impact on three “bolt-on” items to the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2015;18(1):52–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah K, Mulhern B, Longworth L, Janssen MF. An empirical study of two alternative comparators for use in time trade-off studies. Value Health. 2016;19:53–9.CrossRefPubMed Shah K, Mulhern B, Longworth L, Janssen MF. An empirical study of two alternative comparators for use in time trade-off studies. Value Health. 2016;19:53–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Oppe M, Devlin NJ, van Hout B, Krabbe PF, de Charro F. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value Health. 2014;17:445–53.CrossRefPubMed Oppe M, Devlin NJ, van Hout B, Krabbe PF, de Charro F. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value Health. 2014;17:445–53.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 1999;34(5 Part 2):1189–208. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 1999;34(5 Part 2):1189–208.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Office for National Statistics. Census: digitised boundary data (England and Wales) [computer file]. UK Data Service Census Support; 2011. Available at: http://edina.ac.uk/ukborders. Accessed 23 Oct 2014. Office for National Statistics. Census: digitised boundary data (England and Wales) [computer file]. UK Data Service Census Support; 2011. Available at: http://​edina.​ac.​uk/​ukborders. Accessed 23 Oct 2014.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Devlin NJ, Hansen P, Selai C. Understanding health state valuations: a qualitative analysis of respondents’ comments. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(7):1265–77.CrossRefPubMed Devlin NJ, Hansen P, Selai C. Understanding health state valuations: a qualitative analysis of respondents’ comments. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(7):1265–77.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Connell J, O’Cathain A, Brazier J. Measuring quality of life in mental health: are we asking the right questions? Soc Sci Med. 2014;120:12–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Connell J, O’Cathain A, Brazier J. Measuring quality of life in mental health: are we asking the right questions? Soc Sci Med. 2014;120:12–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen MF, Krabbe PFM, Lamers L, Oppe M, Stolk E, Vermeulen K, et al. The Cognition dimension revisited: a detailed study on its added value and interactions with EQ-5D core dimensions. In: Paper presented at the EuroQol plenary meeting: Montreal; 2013. Janssen MF, Krabbe PFM, Lamers L, Oppe M, Stolk E, Vermeulen K, et al. The Cognition dimension revisited: a detailed study on its added value and interactions with EQ-5D core dimensions. In: Paper presented at the EuroQol plenary meeting: Montreal; 2013.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowen D, Brazier J, Young T, Gaugris S, King M, Craig B, et al. Deriving a preference based measure for cancer using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Value Health. 2011;14(5):721–31.CrossRefPubMed Rowen D, Brazier J, Young T, Gaugris S, King M, Craig B, et al. Deriving a preference based measure for cancer using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Value Health. 2011;14(5):721–31.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulhern B, Rowen D, Brazier J, Smith S, Tait R, Watchurst C, et al. Development of DEMQOL-U and DEMQOL-Proxy-U: generation of preference based indices from DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy for use in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(5):1–140. doi:10.3310/hta17050.CrossRef Mulhern B, Rowen D, Brazier J, Smith S, Tait R, Watchurst C, et al. Development of DEMQOL-U and DEMQOL-Proxy-U: generation of preference based indices from DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy for use in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(5):1–140. doi:10.​3310/​hta17050.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavranezouli I, Brazier JE, Rowen D, Barkham M. Estimating a preference-based index from the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM): valuation of CORE-6D. Med Decis Mak. 2013;33(3):381–95.CrossRef Mavranezouli I, Brazier JE, Rowen D, Barkham M. Estimating a preference-based index from the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM): valuation of CORE-6D. Med Decis Mak. 2013;33(3):381–95.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271–92.CrossRefPubMed Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271–92.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier JE, Roberts J. Estimating a preference-based index from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42(9):851–9.CrossRefPubMed Brazier JE, Roberts J. Estimating a preference-based index from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42(9):851–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Brook RH, Davies AR, Lohr KN. Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. Am J Public Health. 1981;71(6):620–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ware JE, Brook RH, Davies AR, Lohr KN. Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. Am J Public Health. 1981;71(6):620–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Views of the UK General Public on Important Aspects of Health Not Captured by EQ-5D
verfasst von
Koonal Kirit Shah
Brendan Mulhern
Louise Longworth
M. F. Janssen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Elektronische ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0240-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Acknowledgement to Referees

Acknowledgement to Referees