nach oben

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

Erschienen in:

01.08.2018 | Systematic Review

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of laser pulpotomy in vital primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: H. Nematollahi, A. Sarraf Shirazi, M. Mehrabkhani, S. Sabbagh

Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

This was to compare clinical and radiographic success rates of laser pulpotomy with those of other pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth.

Methods

PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Cochrane and ISI Web of Knowledge databases were searched electronically without time or language limitations. Clinical trials in which laser pulpotomy was compared with at least one other pulpotomy modality in primary teeth were selected. The bibliographic reference lists of eligible articles were also hand-searched. Odds ratios, risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the aid of Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Version 2.2.050, Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). The methodological quality of articles included in the meta-analysis was determined using the Jadad scale.

Results

Twelve pulpotomy studies were selected for systematic review and underwent data extraction. Of these studies, statistical analysis was conducted on 11. All clinical trials had low to moderate risks of methodological bias. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences in clinical and radiographic pulpotomy outcomes with laser compared with other techniques (p > 0.05). Likewise, no differences were found in the outcomes at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 or ≥ 18 months (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions

For primary molar pulpotomy, the laser technique showed comparable clinical and radiographic results to other conventional pulpotomy medicaments, including formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate.

American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(6):280–8.

Bagherian A, Sarraf Shirazi A. Preparation before acid etching in fissure sealant therapy: yes or no? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(12):943–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2016.08.003.CrossRefPubMed

Celik B, Atac AS, Cehreli ZC, Uysal S. A randomized trial of mineral trioxide aggregate cements in primary tooth pulpotomies. J Dent Child (Chic). 2013;80(3):126–32.

De Coster P, Rajasekharan S, Martens L. Laser-assisted pulpotomy in primary teeth: a systematic review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23(6):389–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12014.PubMed

DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A):139–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Durmus B, Tanboga I. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(5):289–95. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3628.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Elliott RD, Roberts MW, Burkes J, Phillips C. Evaluation of the carbon dioxide laser on vital human primary pulp tissue. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21(6):327–31.PubMed

Fernandes AP, Lourenco Neto N, Teixeira Marques NC, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of low-level laser therapy in vital pulp of primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015;25(2):144–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12115.CrossRefPubMed

Fuks AB. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3(3):115–20.PubMed

Fuks AB, Papagiannoulis L. Pulpotomy in primary teeth: review of the literature according to standardized criteria. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7(2):64–71.CrossRefPubMed

Furze HA, Furze ME. Pulpotomy with laser in primary and young permanent teeth. J Oral Laser Appl. 2006;6(1):53–8.

Golpayegani MV, Ansari G, Tadayon N, Shams S, Mir M. Low-level laser therapy for pulpotomy treatment of primary molars. J Dent Tehran Univ Med Sci. 2009;6(4):168–74.

Gupta G, Rana V, Srivastava N, Chandna P. Laser pulpotomy-an effective alternative to conventional techniques: a 12 months clinicoradiographic study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8(1):18–21. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Havale R, Anegundi RT, Indushekar K, Sudha P. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013;12(1):24–31.PubMed

Huth KC, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, Wolf P, et al. Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3-year randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(4):1243–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0602-3.CrossRefPubMed

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed

Jukic S, Anic I, Koba K, Najzar-Fleger D, Matsumoto K. The effect of pulpotomy using CO₂ and Nd:YAG lasers on dental pulp tissue. Int Endod J. 1997;30(3):175–80.CrossRefPubMed

Khorakian F, Mazhari F, Asgary S, et al. Two-year outcomes of electrosurgery and calcium-enriched mixture pulpotomy in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(4):223–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0102-z.CrossRefPubMed

Klingberg G, Ridell K, Brogardh-Roth S, Vall M, Berlin H. Local analgesia in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review of techniques and pharmacologic agents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-017-0302-z.PubMedCentral

Kuo HY, Lin JR, Huang WH, Chiang ML. Clinical outcomes for primary molars treated by different types of pulpotomy: a retrospective cohort study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2017.02.010.

Lin PY, Chen HS, Wang YH, Tu YK. Primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1060–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.001.CrossRefPubMed

Liu JF. Effects of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary molars. J Endod. 2006;32(5):404–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.01.005.CrossRefPubMed

Malekafzali B, Shekarchi F, Asgary S. Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomised clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2011;12(3):189–93.PubMed

Mareddy A, Mallikarjun SB, Shetty PV, Rao V, Chandru T. Histological evaluation of diode laser pulpotomy in dogs. J Oral Laser Appl. 2010;10(1):7–16.

Marques NC, Neto NL, Rodini Cde O, et al. Low-level laser therapy as an alternative for pulpotomy in human primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(7):1815–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1656-7.CrossRefPubMed

Martens L, De Smet S, Yusof MY, Rajasekharan S. Association between overweight/obesity and periodontal disease in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(2):69–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-017-0272-1.CrossRefPubMed

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.CrossRefPubMed

Nazemisalman B, Farsadeghi M, Sokhansanj M. Types of lasers and their applications in pediatric dentistry. J Lasers Med Sci. 2015;6(3):96–101. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2015.01.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nematollahi H, Sahebnasagh M, Parisay I. Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36(2):133–7.CrossRefPubMed

Niranjani K, Prasad MG, Vasa AA, et al. Clinical evaluation of success of primary teeth pulpotomy using mineral trioxide aggregate ^(R), laser and biodentine^(TM)—an in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):ZC35–7. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2015/13153.5823.PubMedPubMedCentral

Odabas ME, Bodur H, Baris E, Demir C. Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic evaluation of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth. J Endod. 2007;33(4):415–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.013.CrossRefPubMed

Parisay I, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):6–15.PubMed

Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X. Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102(6):e40–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.017.CrossRefPubMed

Peng L, Ye L, Guo X, et al. Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2007;40(10):751–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01288.x.CrossRefPubMed

Prathima GS, Bhadrashetty D, Babu SB, Disha P. Microdentistry with lasers. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(9):134–7.PubMedPubMedCentral

Ranly DM. Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: new modalities for old rationales. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16(6):403–9.PubMed

Ren C, McGrath C, Yang Y. The effectiveness of low-level diode laser therapy on orthodontic pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(7):1881–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1743-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rivera N, Reyes E, Mazzaoui S, Moron A. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003;70(1):71–3.

Ruby JD, Cox CF, Mitchell SC, et al. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23(2):145–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01237.x.CrossRefPubMed

Saltzman B, Sigal M, Clokie C, et al. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol–zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15(6):437–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00670.x.CrossRefPubMed

Shabzendedar M, Mazhari F, Alami M, Talebi M. Sodium hypochlorite vs formocresol as pulpotomy medicaments in primary molars: 1-year follow-up. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35(4):329–32.PubMed

Shoji S, Nakamura M, Horiuchi H. Histopathological changes in dental pulps irradiated by CO₂ laser: a preliminary report on laser pulpotomy. J Endod. 1985;11(9):379–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(85)80024-8.CrossRefPubMed

Simancas-Pallares MA, Diaz-Caballero AJ, Luna-Ricardo LM. Mineral trioxide aggregate in primary teeth pulpotomy. A systematic literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(6):e942–6.CrossRefPubMed

Togaru H, Muppa R, Srinivas N, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of success of two commercially available pulpotomy agents in primary teeth: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(7):557–63.PubMed

Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Ratnaditya A, et al. Clinical evaluation of low level diode laser application for primary teeth pulpotomy. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):ZC67–70. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2016/13218.7140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Utsunomiya T. A histopathological study of the effects of low-power laser irradiation on wound healing of exposed dental pulp tissues in dogs, with special reference to lectins and collagens. J Endod. 1998;24(3):187–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(98)80181-7.CrossRefPubMed

Waterhouse PJ. Formocresol and alternative primary molar pulpotomy medicaments: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1995;11(4):157–62.CrossRefPubMed

Yadav P, Indushekar K, Saraf B, Sheoran N, Sardana D. Comparative evaluation of ferric sulfate, electrosurgical and diode laser on human primary molars pulpotomy: an “in-vivo” study. Laser Ther. 2014;23(1):41–7. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.14-OR-05.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yildiz E, Tosun G. Evaluation of formocresol, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulfate, and MTA primary molar pulpotomies. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(2):234–40. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.130616.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Clinical and radiographic outcomes of laser pulpotomy in vital primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von: H. Nematollahi
A. Sarraf Shirazi
M. Mehrabkhani
S. Sabbagh
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1818-6300
Elektronische ISSN: 1996-9805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0358-4

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of laser pulpotomy in vital primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract