Background
Methods
Inclusion criteria
Search strategy
Study selection
Assessment of methodological quality
First author (year) | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Critical appraisal of qualitative studies included in the review | ||||||||||
Wakerman (2005) [37] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | N | Y | Y |
Gardner (2010) [28] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | N | N | U |
Barney (2004) [40] | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | N | Y |
Lloyd (2008) [31] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
Lloyd (2009) [30] | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
DiGiacomo (2010a) [26] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
Bailie (2004) [20] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | N | Y | U |
DiGiacomo (2010b) [27] | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
d’Abbs (2008) [24] | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y |
Thompson (2009) [35] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
Porter (2009) [39] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | N | Y | Y |
Ratima (1999) [38] | U | U | U | U | U | Y | N | Y | Y | Y |
Si (2006) [34] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | N | Y | U |
Battersby (2008) | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | N | Y | Y |
Barnett (2011) [21] | U | U | U | U | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Davidson (2008) [25] | U | U | U | U | U | Y | N | Y | U | Y |
Carey (2013) [23] | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Schierhout (2010) [33] | U | U | U | U | U | N | N | N | Y | U |
Kowanko (2012) [29] | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
% | 0.00 | 31.58 | 31.58 | 31.58 | 31.58 | 26.32 | 10.53 | 63.16 | 78.95 | 78.95 |
Critical appraisal of quantitative studies included in the review | ||||||||||
Si (2006) [34] | Y | Y | U | Y | N/A | Y | N | U | Y | |
Longstreet (2005) [32] | Y | U | N | U | N | Y | U | U | Y | |
Reilley (2010) [42] | Y | Y | Y | N | N/A | N/A | N/A | U | Y | |
Reilley (2009) [41] | U | Y | N | N | N/A | Y | N/A | U | Y | |
Tracey (2013) [36] | N | N | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
% | 60.00 | 60.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 80.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 80.00 |
Data collection
Data synthesis
Results
Results from qualitative studies
Five meta-aggregated synthesised findings and their categories |
---|
Finding: design attributes |
• Partnering with Indigenous communities and individuals is critical to inform the design of an intervention in order to ensure the successful implementation and sustainability of the intervention |
• Compatibility with systems and processes and adding value to existing services are qualities of a successful intervention |
• Multiple funding sources could increase the budget to resource additional initiatives but this also increases reporting requirements. Funding accountability is closely linked to evaluation, which is imperative to build into the design of the intervention |
• Local people employed as health workers are instruments for engaging patients |
• There is a need for strong organisational and clinical leadership to effect change in chronic disease care through an intervention |
• The context in which the intervention is implemented is critical in determining its success and sustainability. Context includes political will and the policy environment, the health service capacity for change and community acceptability |
• Planning for sufficient workforce resourcing at the design stage is essential so that staff have the time they need to manage chronic diseases |
• Willingness and capacity of existing staff to implement new ways of providing chronic disease care |
Finding: chronic disease workforce |
• Staff identify the need for cultural awareness training and that current training is not sufficient |
• Chronic disease training and development for the primary health care workforce needs to be relevant and feasible |
• Indigenous Health Workers are excluded from decision making and have limited support for carrying out their work |
• Health care staff need support for their own well-being and to help them provide better care |
• High turnover of staff in Indigenous health service provision precludes successful implementation of new initiatives |
• Dedicated chronic disease positions with transparent roles and responsibilities will help ensure staff time is spent on chronic disease management |
• There is a shortage of Aboriginal health workers in the primary health care workforce |
Finding: clinical care pathways |
• Lack of knowledge of available referral services prevents appropriate follow-up care |
• Seamless referral pathways with a dedicated referral coordinator are important to avoid having patients fall through the gaps and miss out on care |
• There are limitations in current clinical (electronic) support systems |
Finding: patient/provider partnerships |
• People with a chronic disease want to share responsibility for their care. They expect comprehensive information about their condition in lay language from service providers. Health care providers must allow patients to be a partner in their care. |
• A role of the provider should be to support and empower patients to share responsibility for their health and health care. |
• It is important that service providers can communicate in a culturally safe manner and relate to patients and the community |
• It is important that service providers understand the competing demands and priorities of patients |
Finding: access |
• The presence of Indigenous health workers and/or the provision of health care in Indigenous spaces create a friendly and relaxed atmosphere for patients |
• There are peer influences based on traditional or cultural understanding that can either enable or inhibit access to care |
• Clients need to be able to consistently access services (i.e. ongoing service availability) and experience continuity of care |
• Indigenous Health Workers provide cultural safety for patients |
• It is important to consider the role of the family when providing chronic disease care to Indigenous patients and when considering the patient’s ability to manage their chronic disease |
• The health care system is complex and requires an organised and coordinated approach to enable patients to navigate through it |
• Providing a culturally safe service is an enabling factor for Indigenous patients accessing chronic disease management and must include treating patients and their families with respect and consideration |
Results from quantitative studies
Quantitative findings |
---|
Design attributes |
• Increased bureaucratic process and existing health system regulations were perceived barriers to intervention implementation; community education and financial support were enablers. |
Chronic disease workforce |
• Identified barriers included high staff turnover, demanding workloads, lack of staff training, lack of clear roles of CD staff and a lack of stable relationships between staff; facilitators included employing IHW and involving staff from all levels in intervention design and planning. |
Clinical care pathways |
• Improving patient referral, coordination and follow-up care. |
Patient/provider partnerships |
• Maintaining confidentiality. |
Access |
• Provision of culturally secure services and culturally appropriate education materials, an increase in the volume of services, and provision of transport and accommodation for patients from rural and remote regions were recognised as patient-related facilitators. |
Discussion
Practice implications |
---|
Design attributes |
• Interventions should include a strategy for partnering with the community. This should include employment and training of local people to implement the intervention. |
• Interventions should, where possible, be designed to be compatible with existing systems or processes, and/or provide training and support for staff. The intervention should add value to the service, in the form of gained knowledge or improvement in existing processes. |
• Interventions must be adequately staffed to enable workers to complete their CD-specific tasks. Delegation of tasks and responsibilities of CD staff and the roles of all staff must be transparent to all workers. |
• A strategy for impact evaluation must be proposed in the intervention design phase. |
• A positive workplace culture should be fostered through strong leadership, with the presence of champions and change agents. |
Chronic disease workforce |
• Adequate and feasible training must be provided to staff to effectively implement the CD intervention. Cultural awareness training must be included. |
• Indigenous Health Workers must be recruited, trained, employed, and included in all stages of the intervention. |
• To mitigate high staff turnover in CD interventions, staff must be supported in their work. Reasonable workloads and adequate living conditions for remote staff should be considered. |
Clinical care pathways |
• A dedicated referral coordinator should be employed to bridge the gaps in referral processes. |
Patient/provider partnerships |
• Providers should receive guidance on how to communicate with their patients. Including patients in monitoring their progress and speaking with patients in lay language is important. |
Access |
• Indigenous health workers should be employed, and Indigenous people should be employed in other roles within PHC services. Where possible, services should be provided and delivered within culturally safe spaces. |