Prevalence and novelty of PRPF31 mutations in French autosomal dominant rod-cone dystrophy patients and a review of published reports

Rod-cone dystrophies, also called retinitis pigmentosa (RP), are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of inherited retinal disorders usually primarily affecting rods with secondary cone degeneration [1‐4]. It represents a progressive disorder which often starts with night blindness and leads to visual field constriction, abnormal color vision and can eventually lead to loss of central vision and complete blindness. It is the most common inherited form of severe retinal degeneration, with a frequency of about 1 in 4000 births and more than 1 million individuals affected worldwide. The mode of inheritance can be X-linked (5-15%), autosomal dominant (30-40%) or autosomal recessive (50-60%). The remaining patients represent isolated cases for which the inheritance trait cannot be established [5].

To date, mutations in 20 different genes are associated with autosomal dominant RP (adRP) http://​www.​sph.​uth.​tmc.​edu/​Retnet/​. The majority of prevalence studies reveal rhodopsin (RHO) being the most frequently mutated gene in adRP [6]. PRPF31 was also proposed to represent a major gene underlying this disorder. It is located on chromosome 19q13.42, encompasses 14 exons and codes for a ubiquitously expressed pre-mRNA splicing factor [7]. According to published reports, PRPF31 mutation prevalence ranges from 1 to 8% in adRP cohorts from various geographical origins, with higher frequencies reported in the United States [8‐15].

To date over 40 mutations have been located in different parts of the gene. The mutation spectrum comprises missense, splicing, regulatory and nonsense mutations. In addition small or gross insertions, small insertion-deletions, and small or gross deletions were identified (http://​www.​sph.​uth.​tmc.​edu/​Retnet/​, http://​www.​retina-international.​org/​sci-news/​prp31mut.​htm) (Table 1).

The phenotype, age of onset and the severity of the disease in adRP patients varied with different PRPF31 mutations. In addition, in some families the same mutation was even associated with a range of phenotypic variations [15]. Furthermore, several studies revealed that incomplete penetrance is a common feature in families showing PRPF31 mutations with an asymptomatic mutation carrier having a carrier child, who fully manifests the disease [16‐18].

Our comprehensive study reported here aims to perform for the first time genotype-phenotype correlations in a French adRP cohort with PRPF31 mutations. All patients were recruited from the same clinical center, namely the Quinze-Vingts hospital in Paris. We will present the prevalence of PRPF31 mutations in this cohort and compare our findings with other studies.

Samples included in this study are part of a French cohort of adRP patients that were previously screened for RHO mutations and we noted 16.5% of cases with known or novel RHO mutations [6].

In the current study we report the identification of novel PRPF31 mutations in six of the 90 adRP index patients. In total two deletions, three duplications and a splice site mutation all over the gene were identified (Table 2). The respective deletions and duplications were predicted to lead to premature stop codons. The novel splice site mutation c.527 + 2T>C resides in the highly conserved donor site of exon 6, which is predicted to lead to skipping of exon 6. Co-segregation analysis revealed in all but one family incomplete penetrance (Table 2, Figure 1).

To detect large deletions in those patients (60 patients) where no mutations was detected by direct sequencing approaches, MLPA studies were performed. However, no additional deletion was found by this method.

Phenotypic characteristics of the 6 index patients are summarized in table 3 and 4. Four of them were females and two males with age ranging from 23 to 44 years with an average age of 34.5 years. Age at time of diagnosis ranged from 5 to 43 with an average of 19.5 years. Symptoms that led to the diagnosis were dominated by night blindness in all patients but one (CIC01171). Two patients also complained of visual field constrictions (CIC00034 and CIC01171). Refractive errors were variable. Central visual acuity was relatively preserved except in one patient (CIC00140), age 31, who had decreased central vision that just qualified her for legal blindness. Preserved central vision was well correlated with preserved responses to central hexagons in multifocal ERG. All patients showed visual field constriction with some peripheral perception, except for one patient (CIC00607), age 23, who had a relatively normal binocular visual field. This patient was the only one with detectable responses for both scotopic and photopic condition on ERG. Color vision was normal in 3 patients or showed tritan defect in one eye for one patient (CIC00607) and both eyes for patients CIC00140 and CIC03777 who also had low visual acuity. Anterior segment examination showed moderate posterior subcapsular cataract only in one patient (CIC00034), age 42. Fundus examination showed typical peripheral signs of RP with variable posterior pole involvements (Figure 2) including one patient with cystoid macular edema (CIC00607, Figure 2B), one patient with an area of parafoveal well-demarcated atrophy (CIC00034, Figure 2C), two patients with perifoveal atrophic changes (CIC01171, Figure 2D, CIC03777, Figure 2F) and one patient with foveal thinning (CIC00140, Figure 2E). This would suggest that central involvement is not uncommon in the course of the disorders and that central changes can occur as early as age 31 (patient CIC00140, Figure 2E). These cone dysfunction and macular changes can lead to further decrease in central vision and central cone survival should be the major target of future therapeutic intervention.

Due to the small number of index patients included in this study, it is difficult to draw general conclusions on phenotypic variability and phenotype/genotype correlation. However, our cohort still shows on one hand one patient with reduced but still detectable rod-cone responses and well preserved central vision (CIC00607) at age 23 and on the other hand one legally blind patient with undetectable ERG (CIC00140), at age 31, suggesting variable severity of the disorder. This variable severity of the disorder is in accordance with previous reports, which also mentioned the possible role of unknown modifier genes [15]. Further longitudinal studies are required to document retinal degeneration kinetics and especially macular involvement in order to prepare the patients for future treatment.

With the study presented here we report 6 novel mutations in a French cohort leading to variable severity of adRP. To our knowledge, this is the first report on PRPF31 mutation screening and prevalence in the French population and it further expands the mutation spectrum causing adRP. In total two deletions, three duplications and a splice site mutation were identified (Table 2). To date only few PRPF31 variations have been reported to be recurrent (Table 1). This holds also true for our study. Consistent with previous reports, we propose that these mutations also lead to loss of function of PRFP31 and thus to haploinsufficiency [19‐21]. In five of our families incomplete penetrance was observed. Only in one family (family 28) no asymptomatic mutation/or obligate carriers were reported. This was confirmed on three unaffected family members who did not reveal a mutation. However, due to the small size of the family, incomplete penetrance cannot be formally excluded for this mutation. To our knowledge, to date only one large Chinese family was reported with high penetrance [22], suggesting that most of the PRPF31 mutations are indeed associated with incomplete penetrance. Although the presumed mechanism to explain this phenomenon is allelic imbalance with over-expression of the wild-type allele, compensating for the non-functional allele in asymptomatic carriers [21, 23], the exact mechanism how this over-expression happens remains to be solved.

Patient data and mouse in vivo studies strongly suggest that the disease mechanism is caused by haploinsufficiency rather than dominant negative effect. A recent study in mice demonstrated that p.A216P mutation as well as deletion of Prpf31 exon 7 in mice lead to null alleles [24]. Mice heterozygous for these mutations did not reveal signs of retinal degeneration in histological, ERG and fundus examination, however in homozygous state they were embryonic lethal, demonstrating lack of function of the mutant Prpf31 alleles. In a number of studies a cytotoxic effect of PRPF31 mutations has been suggested [25, 26]. We believe that this toxicity plays a minor role in the development of the disease since asymptomatic mutation carriers do not develop retinal degeneration.

The study presented here reveals a prevalence of 6.7% in adRP cases due to PRPF31 mutations. This is higher than in another study from UK with 5% [15], in a study from India (4%), from Japan with 3% [12], from Spain with 1.7% [11] and from China with 1% [10]. A prevalence study by Sullivan and co-workers (2006) in 200 US families of presumably UK origin revealed 5.5% of cases with PRPF31 mutations. However, these numbers were corrected to 8% when MLPA studies revealed larger deletions, which were not detectable by direct sequencing approaches [14]. In contrast to these findings, our MLPA studies did not reveal any large deletions or duplications in this cohort. Therefore, we conclude that genomic rearrangements in the PRPF31 gene are not common in the French adRP cohort.

With the study presented here we report six novel mutations in a French cohort leading to variable severity of adRP in families with mainly incomplete penetrance. In 6.7% of this cohort PRPF31 mutations were detected, rendering this gene a major gene for adRP in France. Consistent with previous reports, we propose that mutations in PRPF31 are mainly not recurrent, lead to loss of function of PRFP31 and thus to haploinsufficiency.