Background
Author | Date | No. of items | Sample size | Sample | Analysis method | Summary of results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ryff, CD. | 1989 | 120 | 321 | Community volunteers; 3 age groups: young adults (mean age = 19.3 years, s.d. 1.6; midlife (49.9, 9.4) and older adults (75.0; 7.1). F = 60%. | Correlational analysis | Inter-factor correlations of a priori 6F model .32–.76; (highest: E with S = .76; S with P = .72; P with G = .72; P with E .66); internal consistency coefficients 0.86–0.93. |
Ryff, CD & Keyes, CL. | 1995 | 18 | 1,108 | Midlife in the United States (MIDUS). (Mean age = 45.6, 14.8); F = 59%. | LISREL 7.2 PRELIS WLS estimation continuous | Tested 6F model (BIC -167.6 df = 120), 6F with 2nd order (BIC -166.0, df = 129) and unidimensional model (-38.2, df = 135). Inter-factor correlations 0.30–0.85. (Highest E with S .85) |
Clark, PJ, Marshall VW, Ryff CD, Wheaton, B. | 2001 | 18 | 4,960 | Canadian Study of Health & Aging (mean age = 76) | EQS ML estimation (continuous) | Tested 1-6F models. Found low internal consistency & reliability for all models, some low factor loadings and a large number of cross-loadings. A priori 6F model (CFI = 0.77). Preferred solution – 6F model with 4 cross-loadings |
Kafka GJ & Kozma A. | 2002 | 120 | 277 | Canadian students (mean age = 21.3, 3.8) F = 67%. | Principal components analysis with varimax rotation. | Unrestricted model extracted 15 factors; a model restricted to 6F did not correspond to a-priori Ryff dimensions*. |
Van Dierendonck, D. | 2004 | 84 54 18 # | 233 420 | Dutch students (mean age = 22, 6); F = 67% Dutch professionals (mean age = 36, 8); F = 31%. | CFA – LISREL 8.5 ML estimation |
A-priori 6F with 2nd order returned lower AIC than other models (e.g. 1F, 2F negative and positive, 5F & 6F) but CFI unacceptably low = 0.65 (84-item), 0.73 (54-item); 0.88 (18-item). Factorial validity only acceptable for 18-item version, but internal consistency was below acceptable limits for 84, 54 & 18-item. |
54 | 420 | Dutch professionals (mean age = 36, 8); F = 31%. | ||||
Cheng, ST, Chan, AC. | 2005 | 24 | 1,259 | Chinese aged 18–86 (mean age 44.7, 16.6); F = 82%, volunteers at hospitals in Hong Kong | CFA – LISREL (8.52)/PRELIS with ML estimation. | 6F model (CFI = 0.93); 1F (CFI = 0.88) and 6F + 2nd order (CFI 0.92). Initial CFA on 18-item scale with poorer model fit and low internal consistency than their revised 24-item version. |
Springer, KW, Hauser, RM. | 2006 | 42 12 18 18 | 6,282 6,038 2,731 9,240 | Wisconsin Longitudinal Survey MIDUS (25–74 yrs) National Survey of Families and Households NSFH II | CFA – LISREL/PRELIS Estimator = WLS (Polychoric correlations) Adjustment for correlated negative method factor and adjacent questions | Tested a range of models (including 1F, 6F + 2nd order). 6F a-priori model with correlated negative method factor, correlated errors for adjacent questions and 3 error correlations had lowest BIC; although model fit criteria was poor. High inter-factor correlations for all dimensions (.72–.97) Highest E with S; P with S. |
18 | 2,731 | MIDUS (25–74 yrs) | ||||
18 | 9,240 | National Survey of Families and Households NSFH II | ||||
Abbott, RA, Ploubdis, GB, Huppert, FA, Kuh, D, Wadsworth, MJ, Croudace, TJ. | 2006 | 42 | 1,179 | National Survey of Health & Development (UK) Women age 52. | CFA Mplus (3.1) rWLS estimator. Negative & positive method factors (uncorrelated) | Tested a range of models (including random allocation unidimensional, 6F + 2nd order). Method factors (orthogonal to the constructs and each other) for questions reflecting positive and negative item content improved model fit. Preferred model included a single 2nd order factor, loaded by 4 first-order factors (E,G,P,S), two method factors, and 2 distinct first-order factors (A,R) |
Methods
Sample
Measures
Psychological well-being
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Missing | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTONOMY
| % | % | % | % | % | % | % | |
A1+ | I am not afraid to voice my opinions even when they are in opposition to the opinions of most people | 4.0 | 11.5 | 10.7 | 19.9 |
34.8
| 16.7 | 2.7 |
A2+ | My decisions are not usually influenced by what everyone else is doing | 4.0 | 8.8 | 12.9 | 20.6 |
34.9
| 16.9 | 2.0 |
A4+ | I have confidence in my opinions even if they are contrary to the general consensus | 2.6 | 5.4 | 10.8 | 24.1 |
35.8
| 18.9 | 2.4 |
A6+ | Being happy with myself is more important than having others approve of me | 1.5 | 4.1 | 10.0 | 17.9 | 29.4 |
35.2
| 1.9 |
A3-
|
I tend to worry what other people think of me
|
19.8
|
15.0
|
9.6
|
29.4
|
14.3
|
10.1
|
1.8
|
A5-
|
I often change my mind about decisions if my friends and family disagree
|
12.1
|
20.3
|
19.4
|
28.1
|
13.8
|
3.5
|
2.9
|
A7-
|
It is difficult for me to voice my own opinions on controversial matters
|
23.6
|
21.3
|
15.1
|
18.7
|
11.8
|
6.8
|
2.7
|
ENVIRONMENTAL MASTERY
| ||||||||
E2+ | I am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily life | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 10.2 | 39.9 |
42.5
| 1.8 |
E4+ | I generally do a good job of taking care of my personal finances and affairs | 2.4 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 11.9 | 36.1 |
42.0
| 2.1 |
E5+ | I am good at juggling my time so that I can fit everything in that needs to be done | 2.9 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 14.9 |
35.1
| 32.0 | 2.1 |
E7+ | I have been able to build a home and a lifestyle for myself that is much to my liking | 2.7 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 16.3 | 33.5 |
37.2
| 2.1 |
E1-
|
I do not fit very well with the people and the community around me
|
53.6
|
23.4
|
6.9
|
6.7
|
4.8
|
2.5
|
2.1
|
E3-
|
I often feel overwhelmed by my responsibilities
|
28.0
|
21.4
|
15.0
|
19.0
|
9.8
|
4.7
|
2.1
|
E6-
|
I have difficulty arranging my life in a way that is satisfying to me
|
25.2
|
25.5
|
15.7
|
16.6
|
10.0
|
4.9
|
2.3
|
PERSONAL GROWTH
| ||||||||
G3+ | I think it is important to have new experiences that challenge how you think about the world | 2.2 | 4.3 | 8.4 | 24.3 |
29.7
|
29.5
| 1.6 |
G5+ | I have the sense that I have developed a lot as a person over time | 2.5 | 3.4 | 7.9 | 22.8 |
34.4
| 26.5 | 2.5 |
G1-
|
I am not interested in activities that will expand my horizons
|
41.9
|
24.7
|
11.9
|
10.3
|
6.8
|
2.0
|
2.4
|
G2-
|
I don't want to try new ways of doing things – my life is fine the way it is
|
15.2
|
26.5
|
20.4
|
11.9
|
15.6
|
8.5
|
1.9
|
G4-
|
When I think about it, I haven't really improved much as a person over the years
|
33.3
|
27.5
|
13.2
|
9.6
|
10.0
|
4.5
|
1.8
|
G6-
|
I do not enjoy being in new situations that require me to change my old familiar ways of doing things
|
16.2
|
19.5
|
16.8
|
23.3
|
12.9
|
8.6
|
2.6
|
G7-
|
There is a truth in the saying that you can't teach an old dog new tricks
|
23.9
|
21.1
|
16.0
|
16.1
|
11.9
|
8.6
|
2.5
|
POSITIVE RELATIONS WITH OTHERS
| ||||||||
R1+ | Most people see me as loving and affectionate | 1.6 | 2.5 | 5.3 | 15.1 |
43.0
| 29.9 | 2.6 |
R3+ | I enjoy personal and mutual conversations with family members or friends | 1.0 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 8.3 | 25.8 |
59.7
| 1.4 |
R6+ | People would describe me as a giving person, willing to share my time with others | 1.1 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 17.2 |
37.2
|
37.6
| 2.2 |
R7+ | I know that I can trust my friends and they know that they can trust me | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 8.7 | 28.9 |
55.8
| 2.1 |
R2-
|
I often feel lonely because I have few close friends with whom to share my concerns
|
42.8
|
18.6
|
9.6
|
13.5
|
7.1
|
7.1
|
1.3
|
R4-
|
I don't have many people who want to listen when I need to talk
|
36.4
|
25.0
|
11.2
|
12.2
|
9.3
|
4.1
|
1.7
|
R5-
|
It seems to me that most other people have more friends than I do
|
32.5
|
20.4
|
12.3
|
16.0
|
10.0
|
6.0
|
2.8
|
PURPOSE IN LIFE
| ||||||||
P5+ | I am an active person in carrying out the plans I set for myself | 1.8 | 2.9 | 7.6 | 24.3 |
35.0
| 26.1 | 2.3 |
P7+ | I enjoy making plans for the future and working to make them a reality | 2.4 | 4.3 | 11.5 | 22.2 |
30.6
| 25.7 | 3.2 |
P1-
|
I tend to focus on the present, because the future nearly always brings me problems
|
28.9
|
22.5
|
12.2
|
13.1
|
12.3
|
6.4
|
4.6
|
P2-
|
My daily activities often seem trivial and unimportant to me
|
34.7
|
23.0
|
10.5
|
15.3
|
9.4
|
5.2
|
2.0
|
P3-
|
I don't have a good sense of what it is I am trying to accomplish in life
|
27.9
|
22.7
|
11.8
|
17.4
|
11.5
|
5.5
|
3.1
|
P4-
|
I used to set goals for myself, but that now seems a waste of time
|
31.2
|
25.0
|
15.7
|
16.0
|
7.2
|
2.3
|
2.6
|
P6-
|
I sometime feel I have done all there is to do in life
|
50.7
|
20.9
|
10.8
|
7.6
|
4.4
|
3.5
|
2.1
|
SELF-ACCEPTANCE
| ||||||||
S2+ | I have made some mistakes in the past, but feel that all in all everything has worked out for the best | 4.5 | 4.9 | 8.3 | 17.5 |
33.0
| 29.2 | 2.5 |
S5+ | The past had its ups and downs, but in general I wouldn't want to change it | 6.9 | 6.5 | 10.7 | 14.8 |
30.3
| 28.0 | 2.7 |
S6+ | When I compare myself with friends and acquaintances, it makes me feel good about who I am | 4.0 | 6.0 | 12.2 | 23.3 |
30.3
| 21.2 | 3.0 |
S7+ | In general, I feel confident and positive about myself | 5.4 | 6.8 | 10.0 | 14.1 |
39.5
| 21.0 | 3.2 |
S1-
|
I feel that many of the people I know have got more out of life than I have
|
36.7
|
21.8
|
10.6
|
14.3
|
9.0
|
6.4
|
1.2
|
S3-
|
In many ways, I feel disappointed about my achievements in life
|
34.3
|
21.6
|
11.5
|
16.8
|
8.7
|
5.3
|
1.8
|
S4-
|
My attitude about myself is probably not as positive as most people feel about themselves
|
18.5
|
18.3
|
13.8
|
23.6
|
17.4
|
6.1
|
2.3
|
The General Health Questionnaire
Psychometric modelling
Method of factor analysis
Stages in analysis
Post-hoc modelling refinements
Construct validity of the PWB constructs with respect to subsequent mental health
Results
Model | 1st order factors | 2nd order | Method | Model | Chi Sq | Df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | WRMR | SSABIC | SSABIC +/- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A0 | 6 | No | Random | 4,263.8 | 199 | 0.608 | 0.852 | 0.132 | 3.220 | 159,889 | 0.0 | |
A1 | 1 | No | Uni-dimensional | 4,250.8 | 198 | 0.609 | 0.852 | 0.132 | 3.229 | 159,721 | -168 | |
A2 | 6 | No |
A priori
| 3,287.1 | 202 | 0.702 | 0.889 | 0.114 | 2.788 | 158,533 | -1,356 | |
A3 | 6 | Yes | No |
A priori + 2
nd
order
| 3,332.7 | 202 | 0.698 | 0.888 | 0.115 | 2.846 | 158,621 | -1,268 |
B1 | 1 | P & N | Uni-dimensional | 3,284.4 | 254 | 0.707 | 0.914 | 0.101 | 2.307 | 157,535 | -2,354 | |
B2 | 6 | Negative |
A priori
| 2,842.1 | 247 | 0.749 | 0.924 | 0.094 | 2.243 | 157,080 | -2,809 | |
B3 | 6 | Positive |
A priori
| 2,714.1 | 248 | 0.769 | 0.928 | 0.092 | 2.192 | 157,007 | -2,882 | |
B4 | 6 | P & N |
A priori
| 2.395.6 | 257 | 0.793 | 0.940 | 0.084 | 1.950 | 156,574 | -3,315 | |
B5 | 6 | Yes | P & N |
A priori + 2
nd
order
| 2,460.6 | 255 | 0.787 | 0.937 | 0.086 | 2.010 | 156,467 | -3.422 |
Models A0-A3
Models B1-B5
Interpretation of factor loadings from selected models
Model A2
A priori six-factor | Model B4 Six-factor + two method factors | Model PH2 Modified 40-item with two method factors | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
A
|
b
| |
Autonomy
| ||||||
A1 + | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.53 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.50 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.52 |
A2 + | 0.98 (0.06) | 0.52 | 0.92 (0.07) | 0.46 | 0.94 (0.07) | 0.49 |
A3 - | 1.14 (0.07) | 0.61 | 1.13 (0.09) | 0.66 | 1.24 (0.09) | 0.64 |
A4 + | 1.29 (0.07) | 0.69 | 1.16 (0.07) | 0.58 | 1.16 (0.07) | 0.60 |
A5 - | 0.78 (0.06) | 0.42 | 0.85 (0.07) | 0.43 | 0.75 (0.07) | 0.39 |
A6 + | 0.92 (0.07) | 0.49 | 0.76 (0.07) | 0.38 | 0.72 (0.07) | 0.40 |
A7 - | 1.37 (0.07) | 0.73 | 1.56 (0.10) | 0.78 | 1.43 (0.09) | 0.74 |
Environmental mastery
| ||||||
E1 - | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.52 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.56 |
Moved to R
| |
E2 + | 1.25 (0.07) | 0.65 | 0.89 (0.07) | 0.50 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.52 |
E3 - | 1.06 (0.07) | 0.55 | 1.06 (0.07) | 0.59 | 1.12 (0.07) | 0.58 |
E4 + | 0.90 (0.07) | 0.47 | 0.55 (0.07) | 0.31 | 0.63 (0.06) | 0.33 |
E5 + | 1.01 (0.07) | 0.55 | 0.64 (0.06) | 0.36 | 0.72 (0.06) | 0.37 |
E6 - | 1.42 (0.08) | 0.74 | 1.44 (0.08) | 0.80 | 1.55 (0.09) | 0.81 |
E7 + | 1.44 (0.08) | 0.75 | 1.18 (0.07) | 0.66 | 1.33 (0.07) | 0.69 |
Personal growth
| ||||||
G1 - | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.49 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.45 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.36 |
G2 - | 0.65 (0.06) | 0.32 | 0.49 (0.07) | 0.22 |
Excluded
| |
G3 + | 1.04 (0.06) | 0.51 | 1.02 (0.08) | 0.46 |
Excluded
| |
G4 - | 1.62 (0.09) | 0.80 | 1.93 (0.14) | 0.87 | 2.36 (0.23) | 0.84 |
G5 + | 1.70 (0.10) | 0.83 | 1.52 (0.11) | 0.69 | 1.97 (0.20) | 0.71 |
G6 - | 1.15 (0.07) | 0.57 | 1.19 (0.09) | 0.54 | 1.26 (0.12) | 0.45 |
G7 - | 0.80 (0.07) | 0.40 | 0.75 (0.08) | 0.34 | 0.65 (0.10) | 0.23 |
Positive relations
| ||||||
R1 + | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.46 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.30 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.32 |
R2 - | 1.56 (0.11) | 0.72 | 2.49 (0.27) | 0.76 | 2.23 (0.23) | 0.73 |
R3 + | 1.38 (0.09) | 0.63 | 1.65 (0.17) | 0.50 | 1.57 (0.16) | 0.50 |
R4 - | 1.65 (0.10) | 0.75 | 2.63 (0.27) | 0.80 | 2.48 (0.24) | 0.79 |
R5 - | 1.64 (0.10) | 0.75 | 2.64 (0.27) | 0.80 | 2.51 (0.24) | 0.80 |
R6 + | 1.29 (0.08) | 0.59 | 1.34 (0.14) | 0.41 | 1.33 (0.13) | 0.42 |
R7 + | 1.31 (0.09) | 0.60 | 1.58 (0.17) | 0.48 | 1.55 (0.16) | 0.49 |
E1 - | 1.90 (0.20) | 0.60 | ||||
Purpose in life
| ||||||
P1 - | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.43 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.45 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.41 |
P2 - | 1.38 (0.09) | 0.59 | 1.42 (0.10) | 0.64 | 1.50 (0.11) | 0.62 |
P3 - | 1.53 (0.10) | 0.66 | 1.58 (0.10) | 0.71 | 1.69 (0.13) | 0.70 |
P4 - | 1.54 (0.10) | 0.66 | 1.56 (0.10) | 0.70 | 1.62 (0.12) | 0.67 |
P5 + | 1.61 (0.11) | 0.69 | 1.19 (0.09) | 0.53 | 1.32 (0.11) | 0.55 |
P6 - | 1.14 (0.09) | 0.49 | 1.09 (0.09) | 0.49 | 1.05 (0.10) | 0.44 |
P7 + | 1.52 (0.10) | 0.65 | 1.23 (0.09) | 0.55 | 1.36 (0.11) | 0.56 |
Self-acceptance
| ||||||
S1 - | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.76 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.80 | 1.00 (0.00) | 0.78 |
S2 + | 0.62 (0.03) | 0.47 | 0.46 (0.03) | 0.36 | 0.49 (0.04) | 0.38 |
S3 - | 1.05 (0.03) | 0.80 | 1.07 (0.03) | 0.85 | 1.09 (0.03) | 0.85 |
S4 - | 0.88 (0.03) | 0.67 | 0.87 (0.03) | 0.69 | 0.84 (0.03) | 0.69 |
S5 + | 0.79 (0.03) | 0.60 | 0.64 (0.03) | 0.51 | 0.68 (0.03) | 0.53 |
S6 + | 0.82 (0.03) | 0.62 | 0.65 (0.03) | 0.52 | 0.69 (0.03) | 0.55 |
S7 + | 0.96 (0.03) | 0.73 | 0.83 (0.03) | 0.66 | 0.86 (0.03) | 0.67 |
Upper diagonal = Model B4 - six-factor model with method factors
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimator = WLSMV
|
A
|
E
|
G
|
R
|
P
|
S
|
A – Autonomy |
0.57
|
0.57
|
0.38
|
0.54
|
0.66
| |
E – Environmental mastery | 0.62 |
0.53
|
0.67
|
0.84
|
0.87
| |
G – Personal growth | 0.62 | 0.61 |
0.53
|
0.79
|
0.67
| |
R – Positive relations | 0.42 | 0.70 | 0.60 |
0.69
|
0.66
| |
P – Purpose in life | 0.57 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 |
0.86
| |
S – Self-acceptance | 0.68 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.90 | |
Lower diagonal = Model A2: six-factor model excluding method factor | ||||||
Post Hoc Model (PH2)
|
A
|
E
|
G
|
R
|
P
|
S
|
A – Autonomy |
0.57
|
0.55
|
0.38
|
0.50
|
0.64
| |
E – Environmental mastery |
0.63
|
0.62
|
0.82
|
0.85
| ||
G – Personal growth |
0.65
|
0.82
|
0.78
| |||
R – Positive relations |
0.74
|
0.69
| ||||
P – Purpose in life |
0.88
| |||||
S – Self-acceptance | ||||||
Upper diagonal = Model PH2: six-factor modified 40-item model with method factors
|
A3 | B5 | PH3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
6F
|
6F + method
|
40 item
| ||
A
| Autonomy | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.61 |
E
| Environmental mastery | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.87 |
G
| Personal growth | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.83 |
R
| Positive relations | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
P
| Purpose in life | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
S
| Self-acceptance | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
A3
| Six-factor model (42-item) | |||
B5
| Six-factor with method factors (42-item) | |||
PH3
| Modified 40-item model with method factors |
Post-hoc models
Model | Factors | 2nd order | Method | Model | Chi Sq | Df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | WRMR | SSABIC | SSABIC +/- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH1 | 6 | No | Modified No method | 2,635.1 | 197 | 0.753 | 0.915 | 0.102 | 2.477 | 150,403 | 0.0 | |
PH2 | 6 | P&N | Modified with method | 1,678.5 | 252 | 0.856 | 0.961 | 0.069 | 1.613 | 148,661 | -1.742 | |
PH3 | 6 | Yes | P&N | Modified 2nd order | 1,738.5 | 249 | 0.849 | 0.959 | 0.071 | 1.677 | 148,691 | -1,711 |
PH4 | 6 | Yes | P&N | Modified 2nd order EGPS* | 1,732.5 | 251 | 0.850 | 0.959 | 0.071 | 1.662 | 148,691 | -1,712 |