Background
The incidence of thyroid cancer is rapidly increasing in Korea and in several parts of the world. Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), mostly small papillary thyroid carcinomas which show excellent prognosis [
1‐
3], account for the majority of the increased incidence.
Although there are some controversies in the management of DTC (papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma), primary treatment typically consists of surgery, radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation/treatment, and TSH suppressive therapy with levo-thyroxine (T4). These treatment options are accompanied by various kinds of long-term complications such as voice change after thyroid surgery and xerostomia after high cumulative dose of RAI [
4].
Since most patients with DTC become free of disease after the initial treatment, the number of disease-free survivors of thyroid cancer continues to grow. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important factor in caring for long-term survivors of various types of cancer, and every cancer patient needs and deserves appropriate help from health care providers in order to improve their HRQOL [
5].
Despite the expectation of normal life expectancy for most disease-free survivors of DTC, there are concerns about their HRQOL. The results of many published reports however, have been inconsistent. Some studies that describe decreased HRQOL in patients with thyroid cancer have been limited by small sample size [
6‐
8], a lack of comparison with healthy control group [
6,
7,
9], or lack of information regarding specific details about thyroid cancer stage, type of thyroid surgery and radioiodine treatment [
9]. Hoftijzer
et al. reported a decreased HRQOL in 153 cured DTC patients compared with the general population, and the most important independent determinant for better HRQOL was the duration of cure [
10]. Contrarily, Peltrari
et al. found that the overall HRQOL of 341 patients with DTC (stage I, II), whose initial treatment was performed at least five years earlier, was comparable to that of the general population [
11]. These previous studies did not address the application of a comprehensive panel of quality of life and mental health instruments to a large population of thyroid cancer survivors of diverse stages by cancer-specific questionnaires.
The aim of this study was to compare the HRQOL for disease-free survivors of DTC with that of the general population using validated questionnaires, and to evaluate the important and manageable determinants, especially mental health instrument, of the HRQOL. We also wanted to see whether the different treatment modalities may affect HRQOL of disease-free survivors of DTC.
Discussion
Our data supports the hypothesis that disease-free survivors with DTC have decreased HRQOL, despite being clinically-free of disease. Important determinants of decreased HRQOL were the patients' subjective fatigue, anxiety, and depression. The modes of treatment (including type of surgery, frequency and cumulative dose of RAI, and level of TSH suppression) did not affect HRQOL in this study population.
Our high response rate of 78.6% resulted in 316 participants, making our study one of the largest to evaluate HRQOL in thyroid cancer patients to date. Furthermore, there were no differences in the demographic and clinico-pathologic characteristics between the participants and the non-participants. Data from a large, population-based, cross-sectional survey of 1,000 Koreans was used as a control in order to limit selection bias.
One limitation of our study was that even though the size of the study population was not small, our study subjects were homogenous in the method of treatment they underwent (total thyroidectomy, 89.9%; at least one dose of radioiodine administration, 92.1%; on T4 suppressive therapy, 97.5%). Also, selection bias may have been introduced due to the socioeconomic characteristics of our institution's geographic location, and the inherent limitation of a single-center study. More than half of the patients (58.2%) had earned at least a college degree, 93.2% of the patients classified themselves as economically middle-class or above, and 90.8% of the patients were women. Although we used general population for controls in the comparisons, we should be cautious in generalizing this study's results to all DTC patients. Further investigation with a larger number of cured DTC patients with more diverse demographic and clinico-pathologic profiles is needed. Furthermore, the relatively short period of follow-up after the determination of cured status (median 2.7 year) precludes any conclusions about the long-term outcomes in these patients, thus follow-up studies should be performed. The other limitation is that we used cancer specific questionnaire "EORTC QLQ-C30" in comparing the general QOL between disease-free survivor and general population. This might have caused some differences from previous reports and future study using questionnaire assessing HRQOL in general population is needed. Lastly, this study was cross-sectional design, which can limit the generalizability of our findings to similar groups of thyroid cancer survivors due to lack of validity of the data collection, lack of initial HRQOL, anxiety, depression and fatigue level and heterogeneous time since the initial thyroid cancer treatment.
We included the EORTC QLQ-C30 in the set of questionnaires in this study. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is one of the most commonly used questionnaires to evaluate HRQOL in various types of cancer. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been only one report regarding HRQOL using EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with DTC [
27], in which the number of participants was small (n = 62), and the disease status and treatment modalities used for the patients were not specified. In this study we used a group of patients who were all disease-free and included a much larger total number of patients (n = 316).
Hoftijzer
et al. reported that 153 patients who had been cured of DTC had a decrease in QOL when compared to their healthy controls (n = 113) using multiple questionnaires (SF-36, MFI-20, HADS, SDQ). These decreases were seen in 13 of 16 surveyed areas [
10]. They reported that HRQOL may be restored to normal after 12-20 years of follow-up. In our study, even though the time elapsed since cure was relatively shorter (median 2.7 years; range 0.5-13.0) than that of Hoftijzer
et al' s study (median 6.3 years; range 0.3-41.8), the duration of cure when divided into two groups (<5 years and ≥5) did not influence any aspects of the HRQOL domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30. On the other hand, Pelttari
et al. used a 15D questionnaire for their study of 341 stage I or II DTC patients who were at least 5 years after cure [
11]. They concluded that these cured stage I or II DTC patients showed comparable HRQOL to that of the general Finnish population. In our study, we also incorporated patients with stage III DTC and showed a decreased HRQOL across all stages. Thus, our study corroborates the findings of Hoftijzer
et al, [
10] in showing a decreased HRQOL for cured DTC patients for at least 5-12 years during presumably one of the most active stages of these patients' lives, but deviates from the research of Pelttari
et al.
Tan
et al. described that ethnicity may play a role in HRQOL from a study conducted in 152 Singaporeans of diverse ethnicity [
22]. Tagay
et al. also reported that depression and anxiety in patients with DTC are highly correlated with QOL. The most important determinants for depression and anxiety in their study were social support and a sence of coherence; whereas TSH did not show a statistically significant association with depression or anxiety [
23]. In addition, it has been reported that patients with head and neck cancers who are more optimistic have a higher HRQOL [
28]. Hirsch
et al. reported that patients with thyroid cancer perceive their illness on a subjective and emotional basis, not on the objective severity of the DTC [
29]. So, the influence of different ethnic and cultural background on the perception of illness may have impacted the HRQOL of the cured DTC patients of our study and this may also explain some of the conflicting results in previously reported HRQOL studies. It is possible that in a predominantly ethnically homogeneous country such as South Korea, pervasive perceptions regarding the diagnosis of cancer may profoundly impact how an individual adjusts to DTC. In this regards, the attitude and emotional support by healthcare-provider and family would be of great importance on the HRQOL of long-term survivors of thyroid cancer.
In our study, as in previous studies, treatment modality did not affect HRQOL. The extent of surgery, as in the report by Shah
et al., did not impact HRQOL, therefore our findings support their statement that HRQOL should not be a factor in the decision of extent of surgery in DTC patients [
26] Likewise, we found no relationship between HRQOL and blood TSH level not only as a continuous variable, but also when grouped into suppressed (<0.5
), normal (0.5-4.5
) and increased (>4.5
) categories. A previous report by Eustatia-Rutten
et al. on a small number of patients who were cured of DTC (n = 24) with > 10 years subclinical hyperthyroidism also showed that HRQOL was preserved except for only minor stable impairment on somatic dysfunction. In their study, restoration of euthyroidism after subclinical hyperthyroidism did not result in consistent improvement of quality of life [
25]. In a similar vein, Giusti
et al. compared 61 DTC patients with a control group consisting of patients on T4 therapy for a non-toxic multi-nodular goiter and found a decreased HRQOL in the DTC patients that was not related to blood TSH levels [
7].
In our study, 89.9% of the patients underwent total thyroidectomy and 92% received RAI treatment at least once. The revised American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in 2009 for management of DTC management guidelines recommend near-total or total thyroidectomy without prophylactic central neck dissection, RAI ablation in selected patients, and maintenance of the TSH at or slightly below the lower limit of normal (0.1-0.5
) for PTC patients at low risk for recurrence [
4]. Considering that 93 DTC patients were stratified into the low risk for recurrence category in our study according to the revised ATA guideline, the issue of over-treatment according to older guidelines could be suggested. However, we found no significant differences in HRQOL according to treatment modalities even though the statistical power was weak because most of the patients underwent total thyroidectomy and RAI treatment. The impact of treatment modality needs further assessment with larger number of patients in the future.
We observed that the marital status, education, financial status had little impact on HRQOL. Multivariate analysis revealed that being employed status had a positive influence on role functioning. This reinforces the beneficial effects of the work on their lives or shows that these patients were less affected by the disease and thus still able to continue working.
Lastly, in a study from Germany, Tagay
et al. showed a decreased HRQOL and a high prevalence of anxiety in DTC patients on T4 suppression therapy, but the prevalence of depression was not increased [
23]. Similarly, we found significantly increased HADS-A scores in our subjects compared to that of the general population control. However, the HADS-D scores were significantly lower in the disease-free DTC patients than in the controls. One possible explanation is that TSH suppression in the patient group might be related to the lower HADS-D scores. Further study is required to investigate the relationship between TSH suppression, depression, and anxiety.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
JIL contributed the study design, data collection, statistical analysis, interpretation of data and draft of the paper and revision of the manuscript. SWK contributed to the study design, interpretation of data, draft of the paper and revision of the manuscript. SHK contributed to data analysis and interpretation of data. AHT contributed to the draft and revision of the manuscript. HKK, HWJ, KYH, JHK contributed to data collection and interpretation of data. KWK and JHC supervised execution of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.