Background and rationale
Millennium development goals 4 and 5
Maternal and child survival in India
Current maternal and child health government programmes in India
Community-based interventions to improve newborn survival
Justification for this study
Design and methods
Study design
Aim
Objectives
Primary research question
Secondary research questions
Trial endpoints
Mortality | |
---|---|
Neonatal mortality rate | Number of Neonatal deaths per 1000 livebirths |
Stillbirth rate | Number of Stillbirths per 1000 births |
Early neonatal mortality rate | Number of early neonatal deaths (0-6 days) per 1000 livebirths |
Late neonatal mortality rate | Number of late neonatal deaths (7-28 days) per 1000 livebirths |
Maternal mortality ratio | Number of maternal deaths per 100 000 livebirths |
Pregnancy-related mortality ratio | Number of pregnancy-related deaths per 100 000 livebirths |
Perinatal mortality rate | Number of perinatal deaths per 1000 births |
Care-seeking practices
| |
4+ ANC visits | % of births for which mothers received 3+ ANC visits from a skilled provider (doctor, ANM, or other nurse) |
Care-seeking for a problem in pregnancy | % of births for which mother had a problem in pregnancy and sought care from a qualified provider |
Institutional delivery | % of births that took place at health facility (public or private) |
Birth preparedness | % of births for which mothers who made a plan for the delivery |
Skilled Birth Attendance | % of home births for which mothers delivered with a skilled birth attendant (doctor, ANM, or other nurse) |
Care-seeking for delivery complications | % of births in which complications were identified for which mother sought skilled care |
Maternal postnatal visit (qualified provider) | % of births for which mother received at least one postnatal check-up from skilled provider (doctor, ANM or other nurse) |
Infant postnatal visits (qualified provider) | % of births for which child received at least one postnatal check-up from skilled provider (doctor, ANM, other nurse or ASHA) |
Care-seeking for infant illness | % of births for which mothers sought care from qualified provider if infant had either fever, diarrhoea or cough in first 6 weeks |
Home care practices
| |
Clean delivery practices | For home births only: % of births for which attendant washed their hands with soap % of births for which attendant/mother had a sheet % of births for which attendant had new or boiled blade % of births for which attendant boiled thread % of births for which attendant washed their hands % of births for which attendant put nothing/antiseptic on cord |
Immediate and exclusive breastfeeding | % of liveborn infants breastfed within first hour % of liveborn infants exclusively breastfed for first six weeks |
Thermal care | % of liveborn infants wrapped within first hour after birth % of liveborn infants wiped within first hour after birth % of liveborn infants not bathed in first 24 hours after birth |
Skin-to-skin/kangaroo care | % of liveborn infants given kangaroo (skin to skin care) within the first hour after birth |
Interaction with other interventions
| |
Home visits & JSY | % mothers who received home visits on the 1st day of life % mothers who received home visits on 1st, 3rd and 7th day of life % mothers who had an institutional delivery assisted by the Janani Suraksha Yojana scheme |
Selection of clusters and unit of randomisation
District | Population* | ASHAs (n) | Villages (n) |
---|---|---|---|
Ranchi | 31,135 | 104 | 35 |
Godda | 29,097 | 42 | 41 |
Rayagada | 34,144 | 56 | 99 |
Mayurbhanj | 31,913 | 50 | 52 |
Khunti | 31,764 | 66 | 71 |
Total | 158,053 | 318 | 298 |
Setting
Target group and eligibility criteria
Randomisation and allocation
The interventions
Women's groups
ASHA TRAINING 1 | ||
---|---|---|
Phase I: Problems | Meeting 1 | Introduction to the project |
Meeting 2 | Identifying & prioritizing maternal problems in the community | |
Meeting 3 | Identifying & prioritizing neonatal problems in the community | |
ASHA TRAINING 2
| ||
Phase II:
Strategies | Meeting 4 | Thermal care for newborns (story on preventing winter deaths) |
Meeting 5 | Understanding causes and solutions for prioritized problems (story focusing on causes, effects and management) | |
Meeting 6 | Identifying and prioritising strategies for implementation | |
Meeting 7 | Choosing a method & preparing for sharing at the community meeting | |
Meeting 8 | Preparing for a community meeting | |
COMMUNITY MEETING 1 AND ASHA TRAINING 3
| ||
Phase III:
Implementation | Meeting 9 | Assigning responsibilities for the implementation of strategies |
Meeting 10 | Birth preparedness - Hygienic practices - Essential Newborn Care - Management of twins and low birth weight babies (demonstration) | |
Meeting 11 | Understanding & implementing home care strategies using picture cards | |
Meeting 12 | Understanding & implementing preventive strategies using picture cards | |
Meeting 13 | Understanding & implementing strategies for newborn emergency problems using picture cards | |
ASHA TRAINING 4
| ||
Meeting 14 | Accessing appropriate care (game) | |
Meeting 15 | Emergency preparedness for maternal and neonatal problems (role-play) | |
Meeting 16 | Preventing maternal deaths through campaigning against the first delay | |
Meeting 17 | Learning about strategies implemented by other groups | |
Meeting 18 | Preparation for community meeting | |
COMMUNITY MEETING 2
| ||
ASHA TRAINING 5
| ||
Phase IV:
| Meeting 19 | Phase-wise evaluation |
Evaluation | Meeting 20 | Evaluation of women's group activities |
ASHA selection, training and incentivisation
Additional interventions
Impact evaluation
Sample size
Surveillance
Data monitoring, masking and analysis plan
Stopping rules
Sub-analyses
Process evaluation
Methods
OBJECTIVE | INDICATORS & ISSUES | METHODS | DATA SOURCE |
---|---|---|---|
1. To describe the context in which the intervention was delivered
| |||
Information on terrain, infrastructure and health service provision | Discussions with facilitators, NGO and government staff Quantitative analysis of formats | Context notes and formats M&E data* Meeting reporting formats collated by co-facilitators HSS mapping format Process evaluation manager notes | |
Profile of intervention and control communities, cultural practices including health practices, livelihoods including seasonal occupation, and migration | Quantitative analysis Qualitative analysis of discussions with ASHAs and observation notes of project staff | M&E data (including baseline data) Context format Process evaluation manager notes | |
Profile of clusters (Population composition, number of ASHAs, population size and spread of ASHA catchment area, number of villages, hamlets and total population) | Quantitative analysis | M&E data Population Census, 2001 Context format | |
Objective 2: to describe the intervention in theory and in practice
| |||
Intervention plan | Trial protocol | ||
Profile of ASHAs category, n of training modules completed) Profile of co-facilitators Profile of cluster coordinators | Quantitative analysis | ASHA profile register Cluster coordinator reports ASHA profile register | |
ASHA and cluster coordinator recruitment process and training | Qualitative review of recruitment process of cluster coordinator and co-facilitators Qualitative summary of training reports | Interview schedules and process evaluation manager notes District-level training reports (6 × 5), training schedule, materials and games | |
ASHAs', cluster coordinators' and co-facilitators' perception of the intervention | Qualitative analysis | Discussion with ASHAs and cluster coordinators at the end of each intervention phase Discussions with co-facilitators by cluster coordinators at the end of the cycle | |
Meeting site | Quantitative compilation | Discussion with ASHAs and cluster coordinators at the end of each intervention phase | |
Group characteristics | Quantitative analysis | Group description format held by cluster coordinators (name, location, n of meetings, month/year of formation) | |
Meeting duration, attendance, member characteristics & group discontinuation | Quantitative analysis | Meeting reporting format Process evaluation manager notes of review meetings with cluster coordinators (for HR issues with ASHAs and co-facilitators) District-level HR register for cluster coordinators, ASHAs & co-facilitators M&E data | |
Identification and prioritization of problems | Quantitative analysis | Prioritised problem format (meeting specific) Women's group observation notes (5 groups followed from start to end of cycle) | |
Identification and prioritization of strategies | Quantitative analysis | Strategies format (meeting specific) M&E data | |
Village-level and cluster-level community meetings (ASHAs' and cluster coordinators' perception) | Qualitative summary | Discussion with ASHAs and cluster coordinators at the end of each intervention phase (1-4) Community meeting format (use for 1st and 2nd community meetings) | |
Support given to members for community meetings Methods for obtaining and using resources for the community meetings | Qualitative summary | Review meeting notes | |
Members' phase-wise evaluation of intervention | Quantitative analysis | Phase-wise evaluation chart | |
Group members' perception of the intervention and its impact | Qualitative analysis of 10 focus group discussions with group members (2 per district) | FGD transcripts | |
Objective 3: To identify factors that facilitate or prevent the delivery of this intervention by ASHAs and its implementation at scale
| |||
Enablers and barriers to ASHAs delivering the intervention | Qualitative analysis of 5 FGDs (1 per district) at the end of the PLA cycle and women's group case studies Qualitative summary | FGD transcripts and case study notes Reports of ASHAs, coordinators and cluster coordinator | |
HR lessons for scaling-up | Qualitative summary | Costing formats (Rajesh Sinha) Notes from review meetings with ASHAs and coordinators | |
Objective 4: To develop hypotheses about the mechanisms through which the intervention may have worked
| |||
Group discussion with Ekjut team members to review the process evaluation findings and generate a list of hypotheses about the intervention mechanisms | FGD transcripts Quantitative analyses Case studies notes Observation notes Facilitators' registers | ||
Objective 5: To compare the mechanisms linked to the success of the facilitator-led intervention with those of the ASHA-led intervention
| |||
Perception of group members regarding behaviour change among themselves and non-group members | 5 group discussions with group members | FGD transcripts Case studies | |
Population coverage of groups & coverage of pregnant women as compared with Ekjut trial intervention | Census data Register M&E | ||
Coordinators' and cluster coordinators' perceptions of intervention mechanisms | Discussion incorporating results of FGDs with group members to obtain coordinators' feedback | Discussion notes | |
Workload analysis of facilitators in ASHAs in JOHAR trial | Qualitative summary | Documents from review meetings with ASHAs |