Background
Invossa™ (TissueGene-C) is a cell and gene medicine for osteoarthritis [
1‐
3]. It is a mixture of primary human chondrocytes (hChonJ cells) and irradiated human chondrocytes modified to express TGF-β1 (hChonJb#7 cells) by the ratio of 3:1, and is administered into a knee joint of patients. The components of Invossa™, hChonJ and hChonJb#7 cells are allogeneic. The hChonJ cells were isolated from a cartilage of a 1-year-old female polydactyly donor and expanded in a monolayer culture. TGF-β1 cDNA was transferred to the hChonJ cells using retroviral vector to generate hChonJb#7 cells. Therefore, there has been a concern that these cells could induce immune responses when injected to patient’s joints. To address this question, the efficacy and safety of Invossa™ was evaluated in several animal models [
4‐
6]. Invossa™ showed efficacy in xenogeneic animals, and no adverse reaction related to Invossa™ was observed. Based on these data, clinical trials have been initiated. Up until now, Invossa™ has been administered more than 200 patients in several clinical trials, but no serious adverse events related to the cell components have been reported [
7‐
10]. However, no scientific evidence that Invossa™ does not induce immune response has been provided so far.
Clinical experiences over the last 30 years have shown that osteochondral allograft transplantation does not elicit immune response [
11,
12]. In addition, there are a volume of reports showing that transplanted allogeneic chondrocytes are not rejected. Transplanted osteochondral graft expresses donor MHC molecules, the primary target of the immune response to allogeneic tissues. Usually, transplanted tissue is rejected when the recipient T cells recognize donor tissue as non-self, and this process is mediated by MHC molecules present on the surface of donor cells. However, in osteochondral allografts, a host immune response against chondrocytes has not been reported. It is thought that the environmental characteristics of articular cartilage such as avascular and alymphatic extracellular matrix surrounding them plays a role. The extracelluar matrix can shield the MHC molecules from recognition by host cells; thereby protecting the chondrocytes from host immune responses [
13,
14]. The results are same with xenogeneic transplantation. When human neocartilage was transplanted into surgical defects created in the knee joint in genetically unrelated recipients, it was not rejected [
15,
16]. Human juvenile chondrocytes present in bioengineered neocartilage lack cell surface markers required for immune responses. They do not induce alloantigen specific proliferative immune responses in vitro, and they actively suppress the proliferation of activated T cells in a cell to cell contact-dependent manner. These results suggest that the immunosuppressive properties of chondrocytes may help immune evasion of allograft [
17].
As described previously, the hChonJ cells were derived from very young donor (1 year-old), therefore it is possible that hChonJ cells would share the immunosuppressive properties of human juvenile chondrocytes. However, hChonJ cells were cultured in monolayer and dedifferentiated, so we cannot be sure whether they preserve the properties of juvenile chondroctyes. In this study, we investigated the cell surface marker expression related to immune reaction and immunological properties of hChonJ cells, the live cell component of Invossa™.
Methods
Materials
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with high glucose, RPMI-1640, 1x antibiotic-antimycotic solution, and trypsin–EDTA solution were purchased from Gibco (CA, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Hyclone (UT, USA). Antibodies for FACS analysis, including Isotype IgG1, IgG2a, HLA-ABC (MHC class I), HLA-DR (MHC-class II), CD80 (B7-1), CD86 (B7-2), CD137L (4-1BBL), CD152 (CTLA-4), CD252 (OX40L), CD273 (PD-L2), CD274 (PD-L1), CD278 (ICOS), CD279 (PD-1) and B7H4 were purchased from BD Biosciences (CA, USA). Also, CD274 (PD-L1) and CD273 (PD-L2) antibodies were purchased from eBioscience (CA, USA). The detailed information of used antibodies was summarized in Table
1. Recombinant interferon (IFN)-γ was purchased from Peprotech (NJ, USA), isopropyl alcohol, mitomycin C and phytohemagglutinin were purchased from Sigma Chemical (MO, USA) and
3H-thymidine was purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (MO, USA). Other materials included SuperScript™III First-Strand Synthesis System and Trizol from Invitrogen (CA, USA), PCR reagents from TAKARA Bio (Shiga, Japan) and Ficoll-Paque PLUS from GE Healthcare (Sweden).
Table 1
Antibody clones and isotypes
HLA-ABC | G46-2.6 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
HLA-DR | G46-6 | Mouse IgG2a, kappa |
CD44 | 515 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD73 | AD2 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD80 | L307.4 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD86 | FUN-1 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD90 | 5E10 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD105 | SN6 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD137L (4-1BBL) | C65-485 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD151 | 14A2.H1 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD152 (CTLA-4) | BNI3 | Mouse IgG2a, kappa |
CD252 (OX40L) | ik-1 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD273 (PD-L2) | MIH18 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD274 (PD-L1) | MIH1 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD278 (ICOS) | DX29 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
CD279 (PD-1) | MIH4 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
Mouse IgG1, kappa isotype control | X40 | Mouse IgG1, kappa |
Mouse IgG2a, kappa isotype control | X39 | Mouse IgG2a, kappa |
Cell culture
hChonJ cells were cultured at Wuxi AppTec (Philadelphia, PA, USA) in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practices in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and antibiotic-antimycotic solution. As the positive control for MHC class I, II, CD80 and CD86 molecule, Raji cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and antibiotic-antimycotic solution. For IFN-γ treatment, hChonJ cells were incubated in the presence of 300 IU/mL of INF-γ for 96 h.
Flow cytometric analyses
The expression of immune-related cell surface markers was analyzed by flow cytometry using the FACSCanto™ II (BD Biosciences). Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with respective monoclonal antibody (mAb) or the isotype control for 30 min in the dark at 4 °C. Then, cells were washed and resuspended in PBS, and analyzed on the FACSCanto™ II using FACS DIVA software. The fluorescence intensity of each antibody was compared with that of the isotype control and represented as a histogram of measurements taken from each cell. These experiments were performed three times independently.
mRNA analyses of cell surface molecules and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)
The mRNA expression of cell surface molecules and IDO was assessed using a reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All primers were ordered from Macrogen (Seoul, Korea). The sequences of primers are shown in Table
2. Total RNA was extracted using TriZol according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized by using SuperScript™ III First-Strand Synthesis System. The procedures were as follows: 1 μg of total RNA, 1 μL of 50 μM oligo(dT) primer, and 1 μL of 10 mM dNTP mix adjusted to a total volume of 10 μL with DEPC-treated water. Mixtures were incubated for 5 min at 65 °C; then, 2 μL of 10x RT buffer, 4 μL of 25 mM MgCl
2, 2 μL of 0.1 M DTT, 1 μL of RNaseOUT™, and 1 μL of SuperScript™ III RT were added to each tube. The reaction was run in a BioRad thermocycler for 50 min at 50 °C and 5 min at 85 °C; then, PCR was performed using 2 μL of cDNA, 2 μL of 100 μM gene specific primers, 10x PCR buffer, 2.5 mM dNTP mix, 5 U/μL Taq polymerase adjusted to a total volume of 20 μL with distilled water. PCR conditions included initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. Amplification was finished with extension at 72 °C for 5 min. A housekeeping gene β-actin was used as an internal control.
HLA-ABC (MHC class I) | Sense, 5′-GATTCTCCCCAGACGCCGAG-3′ Antisense, 5′-CCTGGGCACTGTCACTGCTT-3′ | 1082 |
CD274 (PD-L1) |
Sense, 5′-CTACCCCAAGGCCGAAGTCA-3′
Antisense, 5′-CCCAGAATTACCAAGTGAGTCC-3′
|
258
|
CD273 (PD-L2) | Sense, 5′-ACCCTGGAATGCAACTTTGACACT-3′ Antisense, 5′-ACTTGGACTTGAGGTATGTGGAACGA-3′ | 167 |
CD80 | Sense, 5′-CATCACGGAGGGTCTTCTAC-3′ Antisense, 5′-AGGATCTTGGGAAACTGTTGT-3′ | 710 |
CD86 | Sense, 5′-TGCAAACTCTCAAAACCAAAG-3′ Antisense, 5′-AAAACACGCTGGGCTTCATCA-3′ | 815 |
IDO | Sense, 5′-AGGCAACCCCCAGCTATCAGAC-3′ Antisense, 5′-TCAGGGAGACCAGAGCTTTCACAC-3′ | 314 |
β-actin | Sense, 5′-GCTCGTCGTCGACAACGGCTC-3′ Antisense, 5′-CAAACATGATCTGGGTCATCTTCTC-3′ | 329 |
The expression of IDO mRNA was also assessed using a quantitative reverse transcripion-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). All primers were ordered from Macrogen and the sequences of primers are shown in Table
3. β-actin was used to normalize for IDO mRNA expression. cDNA was synthesized as described above for RT-PCR of IDO mRNA. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed with 2 μL of synthesized cDNA by using the SYBR premix EX taq (TAKARA Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The reactions were run on a Rotor-gene Q system (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in triplicate. PCR conditions included initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 58 °C for 15 s and extension at 72 °C for 20 s. The quantification data were analyzed with the Rotor Gene software to obtain relative IDO expression and PCR products were examined for the presence of by‑products using the melting curve analysis provided by the software.
Table 3
Quantitative real-time PCR primers
IDO | Sense, 5′- CTGGGCATCCAGCAGACT-3′ Antisense, 5′- TGAGCTGGTGGCATATATCTTCT-3′ |
β-actin | Sense, 5′- CAACCGCGAGAAGATGAC-3′ Antisense, 5′- GTCCATCACGATGCCAGT-3′ |
Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay
Immunogenicity of hChonJ cells was assessed using an MLR assay. In this MLR assay, we used hChonJ cells as the stimulator, and MHC-mismatched peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as the responder. Another MHC-mismatched PBMCs were used as the stimulator for a positive control of MLR assay. Human PBMCs were obtained by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque™ PLUS according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Stimulator cells (hChonJ cells and PBMCs obtained from MHC-mismatched donor) were treated with 40 μg/mL of mitomycin C (MMC) to prevent cell proliferation. 1 × 105 responder PBMCs were co-cultured with 1 × 105 cells of MMC treated stimulator PBMCs or various numbers of MMC treated hChonJ cells (1 × 103, 1 × 104 and 5 × 104 cells) in triplicate in round bottom 96-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). To confirm the mitogenic activity of responder PBMCs, the cells treated with 2 μg/mL of phytohemagglutinin (PHA) were also cultured. Cell culture for MLR assay was performed in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotic-antimycotic solution for 4 days at 37 °C. Eighteen hours before the end of culture, 0.5 μCi/well of 3H-thymidine was added to each well to measure the proliferation of responder PBMCs. Then, cells were harvested using an automated cell harvester (Tomtec, Hamden, CT), and thymidine incorporation was measured by Wallac MicroBeta-2 Scintillation Counter (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA).
Immune suppression assays
The immune suppressive activity of hChonJ cells was assessed using an allogeneic MLR assay. To evaluate their ability to inhibit the proliferation of responder cells, hChonJ cells (1 × 103, 1 × 104 and 5 × 104 cells/well) were added to an allogeneic MLR culture for 4 days. In addition, to evaluate whether the immune suppressive mechanism is caused by cell to cell interaction or soluble factors, assays were performed in two different culture conditions. First, hChonJ cells (1 × 103, 1 × 104 and 5 × 104 cells/well) were added to an allogeneic MLR culture with 20 μL of antibodies against PD-L1 and/or PD-L2 to mask co-inhibitory molecules expressed on hChonJ cells. Second, allogeneic MLR cultures were separated from hChonJ cells using transwell plate with a 0.2 μm pore membrane (Nunc, MA, USA). Cells were cultured for 4 days, and 0.5 μCi/well of 3H-thymidine was added to each well 18 h before the end of culture.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Sigma Plot (version 13.0) software. All data are presented as the mean ± SE. Statistically significant differences among study groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test was applied as a post hoc test if statistical significance was determined. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
Discussion
Invossa™ is an allogeneic cell and gene medicine for osteoarthritis, and injected to the arthritic knee joints. Articular cartilage is avascular and alymphatic, and it has a thick layer of extracellular matrix which can protect chondrocytes from immune cells. However, in osteoarthritic conditions, the immune-privileged nature of articular cartilage can be lost due to the damage to cartilage. Osteoarthritis has long been considered non-inflammatory arthropathy [
22]. However, the involvement of an inflammatory component, which is marked by symptoms such as joint pain and swelling, is now well recognized. The inflammatory response occurring in the synovial membrane of osteoarthritic patients exhibits features of a T cell immune response [
23]. It has been reported that CD3 positive T cells infiltrate in the synovium of osteoarthritic patients [
24] and T helper cells promote disease progression of osteoarthritis [
25]. Therefore, an antigen-driven immune response exists in osteoarthritic patients. T cells, with chronic inflammatory conditions, might be responsible for chondrocytes degeneration or hyaluronic acid degradation [
24].
In this study, we investigated the immunogenicity of dedifferentiated allogeneic chondrocytes (hChonJ cells) and found that hChonJ cells did not induce a T cell response, but rather could suppress an immune response. First, we tested the expression of cell surface molecules on hChonJ cells and observed that they expressed MHC class I, but did not express MHC class II and co-stimulatory molecules, CD80 and CD86 (Fig.
1a, b). Interestingly, hChonJ cells expressed co-inhibitory molecule PD-L2 (Fig.
1c, d). PD-L2 expression is known to be restricted to dendritic cells and macrophages, although PD-L1 is expressed on both hematopoietic cells and non-hematopoietic cells. PD-L2 expression in non-hematopoietic cells was reported in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) by flow cytometry [
26] and chondrocytes by RT-PCR [
17]. However, this is the first report that PD-L2 was constitutively expressed on human chondrocytes at the protein level. We observed that 20 – 30% of hChonJ cells expressed PD-L2 by flow cytometry. We also analyzed the expression of cell surface molecules on TGF-β 1 overexpressing chondrocytes, and observed that there was no difference in the expression pattern between hChonJ cells and TGF-β 1 overexpressing cells (data not shown).
In addition, when hChonJ cells were exposed to IFN-gamma, the expression of PD-L1 as well as that of PD-L2 was up-regulated (Fig.
2c). Both molecules were reported to be up-regulated mainly upon exposure to IFN-γ in monocytes, dendritic cells and cancer cells, however, it was not reported in chondrocytes at the protein level [
27‐
31]. These two co-inhibitory molecules, PD-L1 and PD-L2, can suppress activated T cells through binding with PD-1 and it is known that cancer cells use this strategy to evade host immune response. Our results indicate the possibility that hChonJ cells can suppress activated T cells via these co-inhibitory molecules.
We also tested the immunogenicity and immunosuppressive effect of hChonJ cells by using MLR assays. When hChonJ cells were co-cultured with allogeneic PBMCs, hChonJ cells did not stimulate alloantigen-specific T cell proliferation (Fig.
3a). In order to investigate whether hChonJ cells can suppress alloreactive T cells, we added hChonJ cells to allogeneic MLR culture. As shown in Fig.
3b, hChonJ cells significantly suppressed allogeneic T cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. We already knew that hChonJ cells express co-inhibitory molecules, PD-L1 and PD-L2, which can suppress the activated T cells. Here, we investigated whether the suppression of T cell proliferation by hChonJ cells is mediated by a cell to cell contact through PD-L1 and/or PD-L2. We used anti-PD-L1 and/or PD-L2 antibody to block its interaction with PD-1 on activated T cell. The blockade of PD-L1 and/or PD-L2 with specific antibody led to restoration of alloreactive T cell proliferation (Fig.
4a). When both anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-L2 antibody was present, T cells proliferation was significantly restored. However, these two antibodies did not affect the allogeneic MLR by MMC-treated stimulator PBMCs (data not shown). To investigate whether soluble factors secreted by hChonJ cells are also involved in suppression of T cell proliferation, we performed an MLR in flat-bottom, trans-well system. However, in this system, hChonJ cells did not exert their suppressive effects on MLR culture (Fig.
4b). Therefore, interactions of the PD-L1, PD-L2 and PD-1, which are delivered by direct contact between hChonJ cells and allogeneic T cells, are required to weaken T cell proliferation.
We further searched other molecules involved in T cell suppression by hChonJ cells, and found out that IDO might play a role in this phenomenon. IDO is one of the major immunosuppressive molecules that inhibit T-cell immune response against alloantigens [
32,
33]. It catabolizes tryptophan to kynurenine, resulting in localized depletion of tryptophan and inhibition of cell proliferation. The expression of IDO was reported in various cells. BM-MSCs can inhibit an allogeneic T cell response through the expression of IDO [
34]. Also, Adkisson and the colleagues suggested IDO expression as a mechanism of neocartilage implant survival [
17]. We found out that hChonJ cells also express IDO (Fig.
5). IDO expression might be involved in the immunosuppressive activity of hChonJ cells like the case of MSC or neocartilage. We did not evaluate the expression of other immunosuppressive molecules such as arginase or iNOS in ChonJ cells. This possibility should be clarified in further study.
In this report, we studied the immunogenicity of human chondrocytes obtained from one donor. The immunogenic properties observed in hChonJ cells may not be repeated in other chondrocytes obtained from other sources. This is the limit of our report, and we hope that our research will be the basis for further research.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.