Background
Policy organisations and research use
Aims
Method
The scope of the review
Identifying relevant studies
Electronic databases
Manual searches
Selection of studies
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria | |
• English and Scandinavian language peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 1970 and July 2017 reporting or summarising empirical findings on organisational factors of research use relevant for public policy-making. • We included studies focusing on organisational factors positively related to evidence-based or evidence-informed decision-making in public policy. • We included studies applying the diffusion of innovation theory by Rogers [35] if we identified the link between the ‘innovation’ and research use or evidence-based or evidence-informed decision-making from the title and abstract. • We included reviews of empirical findings and theories if the review method was clearly described. | |
Exclusion criteria | |
• Books, book chapters, book reviews, editorials, opinion articles, debate/discussion articles and comments on articles. • We excluded papers on research use if they did not focus on public policy-making within the policy organisation, for instance, implementation of screening programmes in community clinics, unless we found the word ‘policy’ in the title or abstract, and if we were able to extract the factors of interest. • We excluded studies that did not include policy-makers as study population, e.g. surveys of researchers’ perception of barriers and facilitators on research use in policy-making. • Study protocols were excluded unless they included empirical results from pilot testing. • We excluded papers if they only reported organisational barriers of research use, unless we deemed that the authors clearly stated that, by reversing one or more of the barriers, the factors would become facilitators. • We excluded papers focusing on research use through networking activities between policy-makers and external stakeholders, such as researchers, unless we were able to identify factors within the policy organisation clearly presented in the results as one of the main drivers of research use such as research capacity, governmental coordination or policy-makers’ preferences. |
Charting and data extraction
Results
Characteristics of the included studies
Reviews
Empirical studies
Main approaches and theoretical foundations of the included studies
Organisational factors that facilitate research use
Thematic overview of the organisational factors/Policy level and population studied by number of studies | Local | State/regional | National/federal | International | Civil servants | Politicians | Service managers and clinical/field staff | Researchers | Other external actors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDIVIDUAL FACTORS | |||||||||
External knowledge exchange linkages | |||||||||
1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
5 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
Gender and age | |||||||||
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
Individual values, interests and beliefs | |||||||||
7. Having a left-leaning political orientation (1 review [29]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
5 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | |
13 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | |
10. Ownership of research results (1 review [51]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
Position, status and role in the organisation | |||||||||
5 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 2 | |||
5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | |
14. Having a type of specialisation (1 review [48]) | 1 | 1 | |||||||
8 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Research awareness and integration skills | |||||||||
4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
3 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 1 | |||||
19. Having a low educational level (1 empirical study [75]) | 1 | 1 | |||||||
7 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |||
8 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||
MANAGEMENT OF RESEARCH INTEGRATION | |||||||||
Performance management | |||||||||
7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |||
4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | ||||
18 | 12 | 16 | 1 | 26 | 6 | 6 | 8 | ||
5 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | ||||
Strategic commitment towards research use | |||||||||
7 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |||
8 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | |
14 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 6 | |
8 | 6 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |||
ORGANISATIONAL SYSTEM AND INFRASTRUCTURE FOR RESEARCH USE | |||||||||
Access to research | |||||||||
7 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |
4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
4 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
35. Technical support to access research findings (1 empirical study [39]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Inter-organisational communication and collaboration | |||||||||
9 | 8 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | |
2 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | ||||
Intra-organisational communication, learning networks and collaboration teams | |||||||||
2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||||
7 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |||
3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |||
Knowledge management systems and methods for internal research generation | |||||||||
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES AND RULES FOR POLICY-MAKING | |||||||||
Political environment | |||||||||
2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||
5 | 7 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |||
4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Implicit rules and preferences on how to make policy | |||||||||
3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | |||||
3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||
6 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||
ORGANISATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS | |||||||||
Function of the organisation | |||||||||
51. Being a healthcare organisation (1 empirical study [33]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
52. Being a statutory body that has to stand up to legal scrutiny (1 empirical study [61]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
53. Being an organisation with high functional differentiation (number of divisions or departments within the organisation) (1 empirical study [47]) | 1 | 1 | |||||||
54. Being an organisation whose primary task focuses on policy and programme development (1 review [48]) | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Size and complexity of the organisation | |||||||||
3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||||||
56. Being an organisation that provides a large number of distinct services (1 review [48]) | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Policy area | |||||||||
57. Working in a disease prevention policy area (1 empirical study [57]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
58. Working in a policy area where political conflicts are low (1 empirical study [57]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
59. Working in a policy area with a pathogenic focus (1 empirical study [57]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
60. Working in a technical policy area (1 empirical study [59]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
Level of policy-making | |||||||||
62. Being a national level organisation (1 empirical study [57]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
63. Being a provincial level organisation (1 empirical study [9]) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Location | |||||||||
64. Being in an urban area (1 review [48]) | 1 | 1 |