Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | Correction

Correction to: Timing of pubertal stages and breast cancer risk: the Breakthrough Generations Study

verfasst von: Danielle H. Bodicoat, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Michael E. Jones, Emily McFadden, James Griffin, Alan Ashworth, Anthony J. Swerdlow

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research | Ausgabe 1/2020

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The original article can be found online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​bcr3613
Correction to: Breast Cancer Res
https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3613
As a consequence of responding to colleagues who asked about the publication of the original article [1], the authors have determined that the data published in Table 4 of the paper are incorrect. A number of moderate to strong correlations were identified in the corrected data that were not identified in the original manuscript.
The corrected table is shown below. These corrections affect the following sentences in the Discussion, but do not affect the remainder of the findings in the paper, or the summary of data in the Abstract.
The following sentences in the Discussion “Table 4 shows that the correlation between event timing was low in most instances. Interestingly, the duration between thelarche and menarche was not correlated with age at thelarche or age at menarche, but was highly correlated with age at regular periods, but not with age at menarche or age at regular periods. These high correlations suggest that these risk factors may be acting through the same pathway as each other or one may be a marker for the other” should be replaced by
“Table 4shows that the duration between thelarche and menarche was only modestly correlated (− 0.37 and 0.39) with age at thelarche or age at menarche, and was poorly correlated with age at regular periods (0.19). Strong (> 0.70) correlations were observed, however, for age at regular periods with respect to durations to this age from thelarche and menarche, for the duration between menarche and reaching adult height with age at reaching adult height, between the duration from menarche to regular periods and from thelarche to regular periods, and between ages at menarche and thelarche”
Table 4
Pearson’s correlations between timing pubertal variables
 
Age at thelarche
Age at menarche
Age at first regular periods
Age reached adult height
Years between thelarche and menarche
Years between thelarche and first regular periods
Years between menarche and first regular periods
Age at menarche
0.71
      
Age at regular periods
0.30
0.44
     
Age reached adult height
0.33
0.33
0.15
    
Years between thelarche and menarche
−0.37
0.39
0.19
0.02
   
Years between thelarche and first regular periods
−0.19
0.18
0.80
0.03
0.49
  
Years between menarche and first regular periods
−0.004
− 0.01
0.79
0.02
−0.007
0.87
 
Years between menarche and reaching adult height
−0.19
−0.38
− 0.17
0.75
− 0.25
−0.09
0.03
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Metadaten
Titel
Correction to: Timing of pubertal stages and breast cancer risk: the Breakthrough Generations Study
verfasst von
Danielle H. Bodicoat
Minouk J. Schoemaker
Michael E. Jones
Emily McFadden
James Griffin
Alan Ashworth
Anthony J. Swerdlow
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-1257-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Breast Cancer Research 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

02.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Eine adjuvante Radiotherapie nach radikaler Prostata-Op. bringt den Betroffenen wahrscheinlich keinen Vorteil. Im Gegenteil: Durch die Bestrahlung steigt offenbar das Risiko für Harn- und Stuhlinkontinenz.

ASS schützt nicht vor Brustkrebsrezidiven

02.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Nützt nichts und ist vielleicht sogar schädlich: In einer Phase-3-Studie konnten täglich 300 mg ASS keine Brustkrebsrezidive bei Frauen vermeiden, die ein hohes Risiko für eine Tumorrückkehr aufwiesen. Tendenziell traten unter ASS sogar häufiger Rezidive auf als unter Placebo.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.