Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2008

01.12.2008 | Breast Oncology

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Critical Assessment of 51 Procedures and Implications for Selection Criteria

verfasst von: Anna M. Voltura, MD, Theodore N. Tsangaris, MD, Gedge D. Rosson, MD, Lisa K. Jacobs, MD, Jaime I. Flores, MD, Navin K. Singh, MD, Pedram Argani, MD, Charles M. Balch, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 12/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Retrospective studies have shown that occult nipple–areolar complex (NAC) involvement in breast cancer is low, occurring in 6–10% of women undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). The cosmetic result and high patient satisfaction of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has prompted further evaluation of the oncologic safety of this procedure.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 36 self-selected patients who underwent 51 NSM procedures between 2002 and 2007. Criterion for patient selection was no clinical evidence of nipple–areolar tumor involvement. All patients had the base of the NAC evaluated for occult tumor by permanent histologic section assessment. We also evaluated tumor size, location, axillary node status, recurrence rate, and cosmetic result.

Results

Malignant NAC involvement was found in 2 of 34 NSM (5.9%) completed for cancer which prompted subsequent removal of the NAC. Of the 51 NSM, 17 were for prophylaxis, 10 for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 24 for invasive cancer. The average tumor size was 2.8 cm for invasive cancer and 2.5 cm for DCIS. Nine patients had positive axillary nodes. Overall, 94% of the tumors were located peripherally in the breast. After mean follow-up of 18 months, only two patients (5.9%) had local recurrence.

Conclusion

Using careful patient selection and careful pathological evaluation of the subareolar breast tissue at surgery, NSM can be an oncologically safe procedure in patients where this is important to their quality of life. A prospective study based on focused selection criteria and long-term follow-up is currently in progress.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowland JH, Desmond KA, et al. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 17:1422–9CrossRef Rowland JH, Desmond KA, et al. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 17:1422–9CrossRef
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilmoth MC. The after math of breast cancer: an altered sexual self. Cancer Nurs 2001; 24:278–86PubMedCrossRef Wilmoth MC. The after math of breast cancer: an altered sexual self. Cancer Nurs 2001; 24:278–86PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, et al. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56:462–70PubMedCrossRef Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, et al. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56:462–70PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jabor MA, Shayani P, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110:457–63PubMedCrossRef Jabor MA, Shayani P, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110:457–63PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5:620–6PubMedCrossRef Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5:620–6PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons RM, Fish SK, Gayle L, et al. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 1999:6:676–81PubMedCrossRef Simmons RM, Fish SK, Gayle L, et al. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 1999:6:676–81PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlson GW, Styblo TM, et al. Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:108–12PubMedCrossRef Carlson GW, Styblo TM, et al. Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:108–12PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho CM, Mak CKL, Lau Y, et al. Skin involvement in invasive breast carcinoma: safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:102–7PubMedCrossRef Ho CM, Mak CKL, Lau Y, et al. Skin involvement in invasive breast carcinoma: safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:102–7PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Laronga C, Kemp B, et al. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:609–13PubMedCrossRef Laronga C, Kemp B, et al. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:609–13PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Bauer M, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;312:665–73PubMed Fisher B, Bauer M, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;312:665–73PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Anderson S, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233–41PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233–41PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber B, Krause A, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nippl-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 2003;238:120–7PubMedCrossRef Gerber B, Krause A, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nippl-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 2003;238:120–7PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Crowe JP, Kim JA, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy, technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 2004;139:148–50PubMedCrossRef Crowe JP, Kim JA, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy, technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 2004;139:148–50PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Petit JY, Veronesi U, et al. When mastectomy becomes inevitable: the nipple-sparing approach. Breast 2005;14:527–31PubMedCrossRef Petit JY, Veronesi U, et al. When mastectomy becomes inevitable: the nipple-sparing approach. Breast 2005;14:527–31PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Caruso F, Ferrara M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. EJSO 2006;32:937–40PubMedCrossRef Caruso F, Ferrara M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. EJSO 2006;32:937–40PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. EJSO 2008;34(2):143–8PubMed Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. EJSO 2008;34(2):143–8PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy MJ, Abeloff MD. Management of locally recurrent breast cancer. Cancer 1993;71:2395–409PubMedCrossRef Kennedy MJ, Abeloff MD. Management of locally recurrent breast cancer. Cancer 1993;71:2395–409PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stolier AJ, Wang J. Terminal duct lobular units are scarce in the nipple: Implications for prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(2):438–42PubMedCrossRef Stolier AJ, Wang J. Terminal duct lobular units are scarce in the nipple: Implications for prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(2):438–42PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher E, Gregorio RM, Fisher B, et al. The pathology of invasive breast cancer. Cancer 1975;36:1–85PubMedCrossRef Fisher E, Gregorio RM, Fisher B, et al. The pathology of invasive breast cancer. Cancer 1975;36:1–85PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Taghian A, et al. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple: implications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg 2007;194(4):433–7PubMedCrossRef Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Taghian A, et al. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple: implications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg 2007;194(4):433–7PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert PA, Kolm P, Perry RR. Parameters that predict nipple involvement in breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:354–9PubMedCrossRef Lambert PA, Kolm P, Perry RR. Parameters that predict nipple involvement in breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:354–9PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen JA, Pallesen RM. Spread to the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg 1979;189(3):367–72PubMedCrossRef Andersen JA, Pallesen RM. Spread to the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg 1979;189(3):367–72PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagios MD, Gates EA, et al. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. Am J Surg 1979;138:135–42PubMedCrossRef Lagios MD, Gates EA, et al. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. Am J Surg 1979;138:135–42PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Santini D, Taffurelli M, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 1989;158:399–403PubMedCrossRef Santini D, Taffurelli M, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 1989;158:399–403PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Nipple–areola complex preservation, predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:240–4PubMedCrossRef Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Nipple–areola complex preservation, predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:240–4PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Critical Assessment of 51 Procedures and Implications for Selection Criteria
verfasst von
Anna M. Voltura, MD
Theodore N. Tsangaris, MD
Gedge D. Rosson, MD
Lisa K. Jacobs, MD
Jaime I. Flores, MD
Navin K. Singh, MD
Pedram Argani, MD
Charles M. Balch, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 12/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0102-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.