Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2010

01.10.2010 | Breast Oncology

Margin Index: A New Method for Prediction of Residual Disease After Breast-Conserving Surgery

verfasst von: Julie A. Margenthaler, MD, Feng Gao, PhD, V. Suzanne Klimberg, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We hypothesized that the optimum margin after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) should depend on the original size of the tumor. We propose that “margin index”—a relationship of the margin obtained to the size of the tumor—is a better predictor of residual disease on reexcision than margin alone.

Methods

We identified 475 consecutive patients with Stage I-II breast cancer, with or without ductal carcinoma in situ, who were treated with BCT from 1998–2008 who also underwent reexcision for close margins. Margin index was calculated as follows: margin index = closest margin (mm)/tumor size (mm) × 100. A receiver operating curve was created using the derived margin index and the presence or absence of residual disease in the reexcision specimen. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at various margin indices to determine the optimum margin index.

Results

Of the 475 patients, 102 (21%) had residual disease in the reexcision specimen. The optimum margin index was >5; the risk of residual disease for a margin index >5 was only 3.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of a margin index cutoff of 5 was 85 and 73%, respectively. The overall c index for the receiver operating curve was 0.88. The margin index was the only factor predictive of residual disease in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Margin index is a reliable method for the prediction of residual disease after attempted BCT with close margins. This simple calculation may be helpful for identifying patients who require reexcision before radiation therapy and those who may be able to forego additional surgical interventions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobson J, Danforth D, Cowan K, et al. Ten-year results of the National Cancer Institute’s randomized trial of breast conservation versus mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.CrossRefPubMed Jacobson J, Danforth D, Cowan K, et al. Ten-year results of the National Cancer Institute’s randomized trial of breast conservation versus mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Dongen J, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.CrossRefPubMed Van Dongen J, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson JA, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life table analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992;11:19–26.PubMed Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson JA, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life table analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992;11:19–26.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, et al. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with fifteen years of follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1558–64.PubMed Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, et al. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with fifteen years of follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1558–64.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jobsen JJ, Van Der Palen J, Ong F, et al. The value of a positive margin for invasive carcinoma in breast-conservative treatment in relation to local recurrence is limited to young women only. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:724–31.PubMed Jobsen JJ, Van Der Palen J, Ong F, et al. The value of a positive margin for invasive carcinoma in breast-conservative treatment in relation to local recurrence is limited to young women only. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:724–31.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurtz J, Jacquiemier J, Amalric R, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers. Ann Surg. 1990;212:38–44.CrossRefPubMed Kurtz J, Jacquiemier J, Amalric R, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers. Ann Surg. 1990;212:38–44.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedwinek JM, Perez CA, Kramer S, et al. Irradiation as the primary management of stage I and II adenocarcinoma of the breast. Cancer Clin Trials. 1980;3:11–8.PubMed Bedwinek JM, Perez CA, Kramer S, et al. Irradiation as the primary management of stage I and II adenocarcinoma of the breast. Cancer Clin Trials. 1980;3:11–8.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–93.CrossRefPubMed Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–93.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–75.PubMed Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–75.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:1005–15.PubMed Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:1005–15.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DJ, et al. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:279–87.PubMed Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DJ, et al. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:279–87.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Touboul E, Buffat L, Belkacemi Y, et al. Local recurrences and distant metastases after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;43:25–38. Touboul E, Buffat L, Belkacemi Y, et al. Local recurrences and distant metastases after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;43:25–38.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81–5.CrossRefPubMed Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Magee B, Swindell R, Harris M, et al. Prognostic factors for breast recurrence after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: results from a randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 1996;39:223–7.CrossRefPubMed Magee B, Swindell R, Harris M, et al. Prognostic factors for breast recurrence after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: results from a randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 1996;39:223–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2005;241:629–39.CrossRefPubMed Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2005;241:629–39.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nixon AJ, Neuberg D, Hayes DF, et al. Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and the prognosis for patients with stage I and II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:888–94.PubMed Nixon AJ, Neuberg D, Hayes DF, et al. Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and the prognosis for patients with stage I and II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:888–94.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.CrossRefPubMed Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, et al. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188:399–402.CrossRefPubMed Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, et al. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188:399–402.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller AR, Brandao G, Prihoda TJ, et al. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:134–40.CrossRefPubMed Miller AR, Brandao G, Prihoda TJ, et al. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:134–40.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazouni C, Rouzier R, Balleyguier C, et al. Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:789–96.CrossRefPubMed Mazouni C, Rouzier R, Balleyguier C, et al. Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:789–96.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortunato L, Penteriani R, Farina M, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is an effective and preferable technique to localize non-palpable breast tumors. EJSO. 2008;34:1289–92.PubMed Fortunato L, Penteriani R, Farina M, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is an effective and preferable technique to localize non-palpable breast tumors. EJSO. 2008;34:1289–92.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson M, Henry-Tillman R, Margulies A, et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:148–56.CrossRefPubMed Thompson M, Henry-Tillman R, Margulies A, et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:148–56.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Malik HZ, George WD, Mallon EA, et al. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. EJSO. 1999;25:464–9.CrossRefPubMed Malik HZ, George WD, Mallon EA, et al. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. EJSO. 1999;25:464–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Janes SEJ, Stankhe M, Singh S, et al. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2006;15:326–30.CrossRefPubMed Janes SEJ, Stankhe M, Singh S, et al. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2006;15:326–30.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, et al. Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Path. 2008;21:39–45.CrossRef Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, et al. Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Path. 2008;21:39–45.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90.
Metadaten
Titel
Margin Index: A New Method for Prediction of Residual Disease After Breast-Conserving Surgery
verfasst von
Julie A. Margenthaler, MD
Feng Gao, PhD
V. Suzanne Klimberg, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1079-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.