Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2011

01.10.2011 | Colorectal Cancer

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Resection and Reconstruction with Colorectostomy. A Retrospective Study with Bootstrap Analysis

verfasst von: Rene Warschkow, MD, Thomas Steffen, MD, Jutta Thierbach, MD, Thomas Bruckner, PhD, Jochen Lange, MD, Ignazio Tarantino, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to apply modern statistical methods to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection in a retrospective cohort of patients who received a colorectostomy. Whereas a diverting stoma and tumor height are considered proven risk factors for anastomotic leakage, a lack of evidence about additional risk factors persists.

Methods

In a single-center study, 527 consecutive patients who received a colorectostomy after rectal cancer resection between 1991 and 2008 were retrospectively assessed. In addition to traditional uni- and multivariate regression, locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) regression and bootstrap analysis were applied to increase internal validity.

Results

Anastomotic leakage occurred in 70 patients (13.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 10.5–16.5%) and mortality was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.4–4.2%). Diverting stoma (odds ratio (OR), 0.4; 95% CI, 0.17–0.61) and tumor height (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.8–0.94) were proven to be protective. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.58–4.24) and intraoperative blood loss (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02–1.09) had a derogatory effect. Bootstrap analysis identified pre-existing vascular disease (95.5%), more advanced UICC stage III or IV tumors (95.7% or 91.5%, respectively), and intraoperative (96.1%) and postoperative (99.4%) blood substitution as harmful. Both intraoperative and postoperative blood substitution caused a dose-dependent increase in risk.

Conclusions

Applying statistical resampling methods identified intraoperative blood loss, blood substitution, vascular disease, and advanced UICC stage as risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Greater distances between the tumor and the anal verge and performance of a diverting stoma were associated with a decreased risk of anastomotic leakage.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nastro P, Beral D, Hartley J, Monson JR. Local excision of rectal cancer: review of literature. Dig Surg. 2005;22:6–15.PubMedCrossRef Nastro P, Beral D, Hartley J, Monson JR. Local excision of rectal cancer: review of literature. Dig Surg. 2005;22:6–15.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ptok H, et al. Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1548–54.PubMedCrossRef Ptok H, et al. Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1548–54.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kingham TP, Pachter HL. Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:269–78.PubMedCrossRef Kingham TP, Pachter HL. Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:269–78.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jestin P, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:715–21.PubMedCrossRef Jestin P, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:715–21.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:653–60.PubMedCrossRef Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:653–60.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vignali A, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:105–13.PubMed Vignali A, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:105–13.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW. Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1719–25.PubMedCrossRef Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW. Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1719–25.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Peeters KC, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211–6.PubMedCrossRef Peeters KC, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7:1–26.CrossRef Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7:1–26.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Boos DD. Introduction to the bootstrap world. Stat Sci. 2003;18:168–74.CrossRef Boos DD. Introduction to the bootstrap world. Stat Sci. 2003;18:168–74.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Andersen PK. Bootstrap investigation of the stability of a Cox regression model. Stat Med. 1989;8:771–83.PubMedCrossRef Altman DG, Andersen PK. Bootstrap investigation of the stability of a Cox regression model. Stat Med. 1989;8:771–83.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC, Tu JV. Bootstrap methods for developing predictive models. Am Stat. 2004;58:131–7.CrossRef Austin PC, Tu JV. Bootstrap methods for developing predictive models. Am Stat. 2004;58:131–7.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Locally-weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:596–610.CrossRef Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Locally-weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:596–610.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaheer S, et al. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1998;227:800–11.PubMedCrossRef Zaheer S, et al. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1998;227:800–11.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight CD, Griffen FD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery. 1980;88:710–4.PubMed Knight CD, Griffen FD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery. 1980;88:710–4.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat. 1998;52:119–26.CrossRef Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat. 1998;52:119–26.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311:485.PubMed Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311:485.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ulrich AB, Seiler C, Rahbari N, Weitz J, Buchler MW. Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:412–8.PubMedCrossRef Ulrich AB, Seiler C, Rahbari N, Weitz J, Buchler MW. Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:412–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:207–14.PubMedCrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:207–14.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunnarsson U, Karlbom U, Docker M, Raab Y, Pahlman L. Proctocolectomy and pelvic pouch—is a diverting stoma dangerous for the patient? Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:23–7.PubMedCrossRef Gunnarsson U, Karlbom U, Docker M, Raab Y, Pahlman L. Proctocolectomy and pelvic pouch—is a diverting stoma dangerous for the patient? Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:23–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Karliczek A, et al. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:569–76.PubMedCrossRef Karliczek A, et al. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:569–76.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Chu KW. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:260–8.PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Chu KW. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:260–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Valero G, et al. Neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy in rectal cancer does not increase postoperative complications. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;18:495–9.PubMedCrossRef Valero G, et al. Neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy in rectal cancer does not increase postoperative complications. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;18:495–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Buie WD, MacLean AR, Attard JA, Brasher PM, Chan AK. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation increases the risk of pelvic sepsis after radical excision of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1868–74.PubMedCrossRef Buie WD, MacLean AR, Attard JA, Brasher PM, Chan AK. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation increases the risk of pelvic sepsis after radical excision of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1868–74.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Folkesson J, Nilsson J, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U. The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:275–9.PubMedCrossRef Folkesson J, Nilsson J, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U. The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:275–9.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves A, et al. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg. 2002;26:499–502.PubMedCrossRef Alves A, et al. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg. 2002;26:499–502.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Camma C, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2000;284:1008–15.PubMedCrossRef Camma C, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2000;284:1008–15.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettersson D, et al. Interim analysis of the Stockholm III trial of preoperative radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:580–7.PubMedCrossRef Pettersson D, et al. Interim analysis of the Stockholm III trial of preoperative radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:580–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000;179:92–6.PubMedCrossRef Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000;179:92–6.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorensen LT, et al. Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 1999;86:927–31.PubMedCrossRef Sorensen LT, et al. Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 1999;86:927–31.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Miki C, et al. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion, the related cytokine response and long-term survival after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006;18:60–6. Miki C, et al. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion, the related cytokine response and long-term survival after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006;18:60–6.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:439–44.PubMedCrossRef Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:439–44.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Rullier E, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85:355–8.PubMedCrossRef Rullier E, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85:355–8.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Martel G, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy and anastomotic leak after tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1195–201.PubMedCrossRef Martel G, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy and anastomotic leak after tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1195–201.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Resection and Reconstruction with Colorectostomy. A Retrospective Study with Bootstrap Analysis
verfasst von
Rene Warschkow, MD
Thomas Steffen, MD
Jutta Thierbach, MD
Thomas Bruckner, PhD
Jochen Lange, MD
Ignazio Tarantino, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1696-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.